hce
hce
unforeseen events)
the Force stopping
-
:
6) ESTOPPEL/ APPARENT AUTHORITY = There is an exception to the general
= Article 1431 od the Civil Code: rule. This provides excuses for errors
Through estoppel, an admission or committed if it yields for the best
representation is rendered conclusive interest of the patient.
upon the person making it, and cannot
be denied or disapproved as the 12) TOTALITY
person relying thereon. = All decisions in medical ethics must
A representation
person is relying
7) GOOD SAMARITAN
cannot be
thereon
denied , it is conclusive as another
prioritize the good of the entire person,
including physical,
- psychological and
-0
= Offers legal Protection to the spiritual.
-
people who give “reasonable
assistance” to those who are, or whom 13) THE GOLDEN RULE
they believe to be injured, ill, in peril, = Simply treating others on how you
or otherwise incapacitated. want to be treated.
= A maxim of many religions and
cultures.
14) DUE PROCESS 2) NEGLIGENCE: “THE NURSE LORENZA
= Legal matters shall be resolved SOMERA CASE”
according to established rules and = Issue: Whether or not, Nurse Lorenza-
principles, and that individuals shall be Some ra is liable for negligence?
treated fairly. = Ruling: YES!!
= Nobody shall be deprived of his/her
own life, liberty and property without 3) NEGLIGENCE: NOEL CASUMPANG,
being heard and protected under the RUBY SANGA-MIRANDA and SAN JUAN
bounds of the law. DE DIOS HOSPITAL, petitioners, vs.
= Due proves applies to civil, NELSON CORTEJO, respondent, (G.R. No.
administrative and criminal matters. 171127)
= Issue: Whether or not, Dr. Noel
JURISPRUDENCE IN HEALTHCARE PROFESSION Casumpang is liable for negligence?
RULING = Held: YES!!
=closely related to “HOLDING”. This is
what the court orders to happen to the 4) RES IPSA LOQUITOR: CARLOS
parties as a result of their holding. This BORROMEO, petitioner, vs. FAMILY CARE
is also the court’s decision on the matter HOSPITAL, INC and RAMON S. INSO,
presented in lawsuit. MD, respondents (G.R. No. 191018)
= Issue: Whether or
HELD not, Dr. Ramon S. Inso ●No! is liable for
= in the context of a legal judgment or negligence?
pronouncement means “decided” or = Held: NO!!
“ruled”.
5) BREACH OF DUTY AND
1) THE PRACTICE IF MEDICINE IN THE CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF
PHILIPPINES: PHILIPPINE MEDICAL PATIENTS: FE CAYAO-LASAM,
ASSOCIATION, petitioner, vs. BOARD OF petitioner, vs. SPOUSES CLARO and
MEDICAL EXAMINERS and JOSE MA. EDITHA RAMOLETE, respondents, (G.R.
TORRES, respondents, (G.R. No. L-25135) No. 159132)
= Issue: Whether or not, Jose Ma. Torres = Issue: Whether or not, Dr. Fe Cayao-
is entitled to practice medicine without Lasam is liable for negligence due to
taking the medical licensure exam? breach of professional duties?
= Held: NO!! = Held: NO!!