final notes of ir
final notes of ir
o Class Struggle: Society is divided into classes based on their relationship to the
means of production (bourgeoisie vs. proletariat). International relations reflect these
dynamics globally.
o Global Capitalism: International relations are shaped by the global capitalist system,
which creates dependencies and perpetuates inequalities between developed (core)
and developing (periphery) countries.
3. Dependency Theory
o Originates from Marxist thought, arguing that underdeveloped countries are trapped
in a cycle of dependency due to exploitative economic relationships with developed
countries.
4. World-Systems Theory
o Developed by Immanuel Wallerstein, this theory categorizes the world into core,
semi-periphery, and periphery nations.
o Core countries dominate economic and political systems, while peripheral countries
are exploited for labor and resources. Semi-periphery nations act as a buffer zone.
o Challenges realism and liberalism for focusing solely on states and ignoring the
impact of global capitalism and class structures.
o Highlights how these theories often serve the interests of dominant capitalist states.
o Offers insights into issues like global inequality, labor exploitation, environmental
degradation, and the influence of multinational corporations.
o The Role of Ideas: Ideas, norms, and identities influence state behavior as much as, if
not more than, material power or capabilities.
o Mutual Constitution of Agent and Structure: States (agents) shape the international
system (structure), but the system also shapes states in return.
o Anarchy is What States Make of It: Alexander Wendt's famous assertion that anarchy
does not inherently lead to conflict; it depends on how states interpret and act within
the system.
o Identity and Interests: State identities (how they see themselves) influence their
interests and behaviors. For example, a "democratic" state may prioritize human
rights in its foreign policy.
o Norms and Institutions: Norms are shared expectations about appropriate behavior.
For example, the norm against using nuclear weapons shapes state behavior, even if
there is no binding enforcement mechanism.
o State Behavior: States act based on their identities, norms, and relationships with
other states. For instance, allies behave differently toward each other than toward
adversaries.
o Change in the International System: Constructivism explains how changes in ideas
and norms (e.g., the spread of democracy, human rights norms) can transform
international relations.
o End of the Cold War: Constructivists argue that the Cold War ended not just because
of material factors (e.g., economic decline of the USSR) but also due to changes in
ideas, such as Gorbachev’s policies of glasnost and perestroika.
o Human Rights Norms: The global adoption of human rights norms shows how ideas
can shape state policies and international law.
o Challenges realism for its focus on power and anarchy, and liberalism for its
overemphasis on institutions and material gains.
o Argues that these theories neglect the importance of ideas, norms, and identities in
shaping international relations.
o Accused of being too abstract and lacking predictive power compared to materialist
theories.
o Focus on norms and ideas may overlook the role of economic or military power in
certain cases.
o The flexibility of the theory can make it difficult to falsify or test empirically.
o Helps explain issues like the influence of global norms on human rights, climate
change cooperation, and the development of international institutions.
• Key Authors: Refer to scholars like Alexander Wendt and Nicholas Onuf.
• Use Examples: Highlight how constructivism explains phenomena like the EU’s emphasis on
shared identity or global responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Compare Theories: Explain how constructivism differs from realism and liberalism by focusing
on ideational factors over material ones.
• Key Terms: Be ready to define and discuss terms like "norms," "identity," "mutual
constitution," and "anarchy is what states make of it."
TOPIC 3: Post-structuralism
o Decentering the Subject: Questions the centrality of the state or other actors as fixed
entities, focusing instead on how identities and roles are constructed through
discourse.
o Discourse: Refers to the ways language and communication construct social reality.
For example, how terms like "terrorism" or "rogue states" are used shapes
perceptions and policy decisions.
o Challenges realism and liberalism for their assumptions about fixed categories like
states, power, and anarchy.
o Argues that these theories legitimize existing power structures by presenting them as
natural or inevitable.
o Rejects positivism, the idea that IR can be studied scientifically in the same way as
natural sciences.
o Identity Construction: Highlights how state and individual identities are not fixed but
constantly constructed and reconstructed through discourse.
o Global War on Terror: Analyzed as a narrative that legitimizes specific policies and
actions while marginalizing alternative perspectives.
o Humanitarian Intervention: Explored as a discourse that often frames Western
nations as saviors and non-Western nations as victims needing intervention.
6. Critiques of Post-Structuralism
o Overly Abstract: Accused of being too theoretical and disconnected from practical
policy issues.
o Complex Language: Its reliance on dense and technical language can make it
inaccessible.
o Offers insights into how language and narratives shape global politics.
o Helps deconstruct dominant narratives to reveal hidden power dynamics and biases.
o Provides tools for critically examining issues like climate change discourse, migration
narratives, and the portrayal of global crises.
• Key Scholars: Mention figures like Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Richard Ashley.
• Use Examples: Highlight cases like the "clash of civilizations" narrative or the framing of
refugees in international discourse.
• Critique Positivism: Discuss how post-structuralism challenges the scientific approach to IR,
emphasizing subjectivity instead.
TOPIC 4: Pos-colonialism
o Power and Identity: Focuses on how power relations constructed during colonial
times persist in the form of cultural hegemony, economic dependency, and political
control.
o Challenges realism and liberalism for ignoring the historical and ongoing impacts of
colonialism.
o Argues that these theories universalize Western experiences and values while
neglecting the diverse realities of the Global South.
o Subaltern Studies: Inspired by the works of Antonio Gramsci and Gayatri Spivak, this
examines the perspectives of marginalized groups who have been excluded from
dominant narratives. Spivak’s famous question, “Can the subaltern speak?” addresses
whether oppressed voices can truly be heard within global systems.
o Orientalism: Edward Said's concept that Western portrayals of the "East" (Orient)
reinforce stereotypes and justify domination. For instance, the depiction of the
Middle East as inherently violent or irrational.
o Hybridity and Resistance: Explores how colonized peoples combine indigenous and
colonial cultures to create new identities, often resisting domination through cultural
practices.
o Global Institutions: Critiques institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and WTO for
perpetuating inequalities rooted in colonial structures.
o Cultural Imperialism: Examines how Western norms and values dominate global
culture, undermining local traditions and identities.
o Decolonization Movements: The struggles for independence in Africa, Asia, and Latin
America highlight the long-term impact of colonial rule.
o Global Inequality: The persistent wealth gap between the Global North and South
reflects colonial exploitation's legacy.
o Climate Justice: Post-colonialists argue that countries most responsible for climate
change (industrialized nations) often impose the heaviest burdens on vulnerable,
formerly colonized nations.
6. Critiques of Post-Colonialism
o Lack of Practical Solutions: Focuses heavily on critique without offering clear policy
alternatives for addressing global inequalities.
o Internal Diversity: Post-colonialism often generalizes the Global South, neglecting the
unique experiences of individual nations and groups.
7. Relevance of Post-Colonialism Today
o Highlights the need for inclusive approaches in global governance that account for
diverse perspectives.
• Key Scholars: Refer to Edward Said, Gayatri Spivak, Homi Bhabha, and Frantz Fanon.
• Use Examples: Mention the economic dependency of African nations, the portrayal of the
Middle East in Western media, or the role of the Global South in climate negotiations.
• Key Terms: Be prepared to define and discuss "orientalism," "subaltern," "hybridity," and
"cultural imperialism."
TOPİC 5: Feminism
o Intersectionality: Acknowledges how race, class, ethnicity, and other factors intersect
with gender to shape individuals' experiences in global politics.
o Security Defined Narrowly: Feminists argue that security should include human
security, focusing on issues like poverty, sexual violence, and health, rather than just
military strength.
o Women's Roles in Conflict and Peace: Highlights the impact of war on women, such
as gender-based violence, and their roles as peacebuilders and negotiators.
4. Feminism in Practice
o UNSCR 1325: The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women,
Peace, and Security emphasizes the importance of women's participation in conflict
resolution and peace processes.
o Sexual Violence in Conflict: Feminists have drawn attention to the use of sexual
violence as a weapon of war and the need for accountability.
o Global Inequalities: Focuses on how international policies, such as those of the IMF
and World Bank, disproportionately affect women in developing countries.
5. Types of Feminism in IR
6. Critiques of Feminism in IR
o Engagement with Power: Some argue that feminism lacks practical strategies for
addressing power dynamics in global politics.
• Use Examples: Highlight cases like the impact of war on women in Afghanistan or the role of
women in peacebuilding in Liberia.
• Key Terms: Be ready to discuss "patriarchy," "gendered division of labor," "human security,"
and "intersectionality."
• Contrast with Traditional Theories: Emphasize how feminism broadens the scope of IR by
focusing on people and social issues rather than just states and power.
o Moral Considerations in IR: International ethics examines how moral values and
principles influence the behavior of states, organizations, and individuals in the global
arena.
o Realism:
▪ Ethics play a limited role; national interest and power are prioritized.
o Liberalism:
▪ Advocates for universal values like democracy, human rights, and the rule of
law.
o Constructivism:
▪ Ethical norms and values are socially constructed and can change over time.
o Utilitarianism:
o Deontological Ethics:
▪ Jus post bellum (justice after war) – e.g., fair treatment of defeated
parties.
o Humanitarian Intervention:
o Human Rights:
o Global Inequality:
▪ Ethical questions about wealth distribution, development aid, and debt relief.
o Environmental Ethics:
o Nuclear Ethics:
o International Criminal Court (ICC): Pursuing accountability for war crimes and crimes
against humanity.
o Power Dynamics: Ethical norms often reflect the interests of powerful states,
marginalizing the Global South.
o Addresses contemporary issues like global health, migration, and cyber warfare.
• Key Scholars: Mention Michael Walzer, John Rawls, and Hedley Bull.
• Use Examples: Highlight cases like the Iraq War (2003), Syrian refugee crisis, or climate
change negotiations.
• Key Terms: Be ready to discuss "just war theory," "humanitarian intervention," "responsibility
to protect (R2P)," and "global justice."
o War: Organized and sustained conflict between political entities, typically states or
groups.
o Types of War:
▪ Proxy Wars: Indirect conflicts where states support opposing sides (e.g., Cold
War-era conflicts).
o Realism:
o Liberalism:
o Constructivism:
3. Causes of War
o System-Level Causes:
o State-Level Causes:
o Individual-Level Causes:
o Global Power Dynamics: War shapes and reshapes the balance of power, alliances,
and international order.
o Security Dilemma: When one state’s efforts to increase security make others feel less
secure, leading to arms races or conflict.
o Just War Theory: Evaluates the morality of war based on its causes (jus ad bellum)
and conduct (jus in bello).
o War Economy: Some conflicts are perpetuated by economic interests, such as control
over resources (e.g., oil or minerals).
o Collective security and peacekeeping missions play critical roles in conflict zones.
o World Wars: Shaped modern international relations and institutions like the UN.
o Cold War: A period of proxy wars and ideological conflict between the US and USSR.
o Post-9/11 Wars: The global War on Terror, including interventions in Afghanistan and
Iraq.
o Hybrid Warfare: Combining conventional military tactics with cyber, economic, and
informational tools.
• Key Scholars: Mention Carl von Clausewitz, Kenneth Waltz, and Michael Doyle.
• Use Examples: Reference major wars like WWI, WWII, or contemporary conflicts such as
Ukraine-Russia.
• Key Terms: Be ready to discuss "security dilemma," "just war theory," "balance of power,"
and "hybrid warfare."
• Compare Theories: Highlight how realism, liberalism, and constructivism explain the causes
and consequences of war differently.