Dai 2021
Dai 2021
Keywords: The rate of corrosion due to the presence of carbon dioxide in a carbon steel pipe is an important
CO2 internal corrosion design consideration for gathering pipelines, particularly in the transportation of wet natural gas.
ASPEN HYSYS
To evaluate the corrosion rate in a gathering pipeline, in situ simulation study using HYSYS
Wet natural gas
program employed to predict CO2 corrosion in natural gas gathering pipelines system. The effects
Gathering pipelines
NORSOK Mÿ 506 Standard of operational conditions, inhibitors, pipe parameters and flow regime on the CO2 corrosion are
studied in this paper. Increasing operating pressure leads to increasing the pH and decreasing
the CO2 corrosion rate when the operating pressure over 10 MPa and the solution contents
0.85kmol/m3 iron carbonate. The CO2 corrosion rate does not always increase with temperature,
and which will reach a maximum value at 45 ÿC. A high gas velocity will lead to a high corrosion
rate. Less free water present in pipeline may lead to more serious corrosion than that of a large
amount of free water. The corrosion rate may be inhibited by liquid hydrocarbon and glycol, and
the glycol is not an economic inhibitor, especially when there is a large amount of free water in
pipeline. The large diameter and flat pipe are useful for decreasing CO2 corrosion rate. The shear
stress and corrosion rate will increase sharply when the slug flow forms in pipeline. Through
comparing the simulation data with field corrosion rate data, feasibility of this numerical simulation
method is proven.
1. Introduction
With the increasing demand for energy in the world, natural gas has been the fossil energy resource with the fastest growth recently. Natural
gas is a widely used clean fossil fuel which can reduce the greenhouse emissions. Some agencies have estimated that the consumption of
natural gas in the world will increase by 1.7% per year [1].
Because for economic reasons most of the pipes used in natural gas gathering industries were made from different types of carbon steel
instead of stainless steel, which has a lower corrosion resistance against CO2 corrosion. This class of material is susceptible to CO2 corrosion
in wet natural gas services. CO2 is a naturally existing compound in natural gas fields in quantities ranging from traces to about 50% presented
in produced water, oil, and gas processing. In the presence of water, CO2 dissolves to form carbonic acid which is corrosive causing different
forms of corrosion [2–3]. Approximately 60% of failures in the oilfield are caused by CO2 corrosion due to the inadequate prediction methods
and the low resistance of steels to this type of corrosion [4–5]. The cost for corrosion problem worldwide is estimated to be more than 3.3 trillion
dollars [6].
The mechanism of CO2 corrosion is complicated and is affected by various factors such as temperature, CO2 partial pressure, flow
* Corresponding author.
Email address: dai_min@126.com.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105265
Received 11 March 2020; Received in revised form January 19, 2021; Accepted 25 January 2021
Available online 2 February 2021
1350-6307/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Machine Translated by Google
rate, salt concentration, etc. [7–8]. From literature, it is evident that in the absence of protective scales, corrosion rate increases with increasing
CO2 partial pressure and in high values of pH, increasing the CO2 partial pressure enhances the protective scale precipitation which decreases
corrosion rate [9]. Furthermore, increasing temperature accelerates the CO2 corrosion rate in low pH, but in higher pH, as iron carbonate solubility
decreases, formation of protective scales decreases the corrosion rate [10–11]. In the absence of inhibitor and non-scaling conditions (pH < 6, T
< 60 ÿC), the increase in flow rate increases corrosion rate. On the other hand, in case of scaling condition (pH ÿ 6, T ÿ 60 ÿC) or presence of
inhibitor film, the effect of flow rate is insignificant [12]. Several correlations have been modified to estimate the corrosion rate for the internal flow
based on the main mentioned parameters. DeWaard et al. [13] developed semi empirical correlations to calculate CO2 corrosion rate based on
CO2 partial pressure with velocity up to 1 m/s at the surface of the pipelines. Jepson et al. [14] developed a fully empirical correlation to estimate
the corrosion rate in horizontal pipelines with multiphase slug flow. The model relates the corrosion rate with carbon dioxide partial pressure,
water cut, pressure gradient across the mixing zone, and temperature which modified later to include the effects of oil type and slug frequency.
Wang et al. [15] presented correlation covering different parameters such as reactions on the pipeline surface, water chemistry, and mass change
between pipeline surface and the bulk of fluid. Nesic et al. [16–17] developed a comprehensive correlation to predict corrosion rate into mild steel
pipelines includes the effects of hydrogen sulfide, water entrainment in multiphase flow, and corrosion inhibition by crude oil. Muhammad Hashim
Abbasa et al. [18] developed a neural network modeling of high pressure CO2 corrosion in pipeline steels to CO2 corrosion rate. In 2005,
Norwegian petroleum industry modified new correlation to predict the CO2 corrosion based on different parameters [19]. NORSOK Mÿ 506
Standard models applied which is widely accepted model to predict the CO2 corrosion rate developed with support from Norwegian Oil Industry
Association (OLF) and the Federation of Norwegian Manufacturing Industries (TBL) [20].
Although a large amount of works on the theoretical and experimental studies about CO2 corrosion in the most recent 20 years, the presence
of CO2 in a hydrocarbon pipeline can cause an undesirable deterioration of the pipe wall. This corrosion can cause serious flow problems that
may ultimately lead to a catastrophic failure of pipe. The rate of corrosion due to the presence of carbon dioxide in a carbon steel pipe is an
important design consideration for pipelines, particularly in the transportation of wet natural gas. The prediction of this corrosion rate is critical
when deciding if carbon steel was an acceptable material or if anti-corrosion measures such as the addition of inhibitor are required. To evaluate
the corrosion rate in a pipeline, in situ simulation study using HYSYS program employed to predict CO2 corrosion in wet natural gas gathering
pipelines system in this paper.
2. Process description
Gas wells are connected to network of gathering pipelines where these pipes gathering natural gas and send it out to the man gathering
pipeline for longer distance transport as shown by Fig. 1. The diameter of gathering pipelines is usually small, and which has a high operating
pressure. The gas gathering pipelines system works on principles of moving gas from gas well to natural gas process plant. In order to prevent
the gas gathering pipelines from being blocked by the hydrates formed in the transportation process, the produced gas must be heated or added
inhibitor. The produced gas from well is called wet gas which contained gas hydrocarbon, liquid hydrocarbon (gas condensate), water and some
other impurities such as CO2. Commonly, the operating pressure and temperature of gathering pipelines are under 20 MPa and 60 ÿC,
respectively. The primary material selection of gathering pipelines is mild steel, unless there is a large amount of chloride and hydrogen sulfide in
produced water. The CO2 corrosion considered as one of the common problems that facing gas gathering process which is known as sweet
corrosion.
Fig. 1. The schematic diagram for gas gathering pipelines system and process.
2
Machine Translated by Google
3. Simulation basis
The natural gas gathering process was simulated by the Aspen HYSYS V10.0 program which was a chemical process program widely
applied to mathematically simulate gas gathering and transportation processes. Aspen HYSYS offered different types of thermodynamic
property fluid packages to deal with hydrocarbon systems such as Peng-Robinson, SRK, Glycol, Acid Gas et al.. The Acid Gas fluid
package was recommended for hydrocarbons associated with CO2 due to its large binary interaction parameters . As shown in Fig. 2, the
calculation model selected the Pipe Segment which not only can calculate pipeline hydraulics but also offer CO2 corrosion analysis.
The Aspen HYSYS employed different models to estimate the CO2 corrosion such as NORSOK standard Mÿ 506, and de Waard Model
1991 and 1995. NORSOK Mÿ 506 was developed with the support of the Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF) and the Federation of
Norwegian Manufacturing Industries (TBL), and de Waard Model 1991 and 1995 was developed by de Waard and colleagues at Shell Oil.
The NORSOK Mÿ 506 correlation is developed as a purely empirical corrosion rate model, focused on most important parameters
(temperature, pH, CO2 partial pressure, and wall shear stress). The de Waard models are developed with more theoretical basis, the
temperature-dependency terms are based on a kinetic model, and experimental data was used to fit some of the constants. The NORSOK
Mÿ 506 is widely accepted, and works best when the conditions are tried to model are close to the conditions used to develop the
correlations. This model presents are recommended practice for calculation of corrosion rates in hydrocarbon production and process
systems where the corrosive agent is CO2. The NORSOK Mÿ 506 model is an empirical corrosion rate model for carbon steel in water
containing CO2 at different temperatures, pH, CO2 fugacity and wall shear stress. It is based on flow-loop experiments at temperatures
from 5 ÿC to 160 ÿC. A large amount of data at various temperatures, CO2 fugacity, pH and wall shear stresses are used to develop the
model. To calculate the pH, NORSOK Mÿ 506 model employs powerful Newton-Raphson iterative technique to find suspected root of the
very complex hydrogen ion cation concentration equation. In this simulation, NORSOK Mÿ 506 Standard model was applied. The general
equations for the corrosion rate [19] were given by:
ÿ
0.36
T = 15oC,CRt = Ktf ft(pH) (2)
CO2 ( S 19)0.146+0.0324logf CO2
0.62
20oC ÿ T ÿ 150oC,CRt = Ktf ft(pH) (3)
CO2 ( S 19)0.146+0.0324logf CO2
where CRt is the corrosion rate (mm/year). fCO2 is the fugacity of carbon dioxide, which is related to the CO2 partial pressure (bar). Kt is a
temperature-dependent corrosion rate constant. Table 1 of Reference [19] gives values for temperatures between 5 ÿC and 150 ÿC. ft(pH)
is the pH function, which is given in Table 2 of Reference [19]. The function has been evaluated for temperatures between 5 ÿC and 150
ÿC and for pH values between 3.5 and 6.5. S is the shear stress at the pipe wall (Pa), which is determined with the pipe flow correlation
used to calculate the pressure drop across the pipe, and which can be calculated by Eq. (4).
Fig. 2. Process flow scheme of the simulated gathering pipeline by Aspen HYSYS.
3
Machine Translated by Google
Table
1 Simulation basis and feed conditions.
Property Condition
Temperature 30 ~ 55 ÿC
Pressure 0.2 ~ 17 MPa
Iron carbonate 0.85kmol/m3
0.565 2,265 –
Propane i-
Butane 0.103 1,292 –
0.030 17,784 –
Heptane n-
Octane 0.000 16,471 –
0.000 5.725 –
n-C11
0.000 5.130 –
n-C12
0.000 4.012 –
n-C13
0.000 3.952 –
n-C14
0.000 2.738 –
n- C15
0.000 1.869 –
n- C16
0.000 1,577 –
n-C17
0.000 1.213 –
n-C18
0.000 0.930 –
n-C19
0.000 0.705 –
n-C20
0.000 0.515 –
n-C21
0.000 0.421 –
n -C22
0.000 0.333 –
n-C23
0.000 0.230 –
n-C24
0.000 0.184 –
n-C25
0.000 0.120 –
n-C26
0.000 0.091 –
n- C27
0.000 0.066 –
n-C28
0.000 0.052 –
n-C29
0.000 0.066 –
n-C30
1.500 0.000 –
CO2
H2O 0.061 0.000 100,000
N2 1.618 0.000 –
k
f = 0.001375 × [1 + (2000 D + 106[ÿmumD)
ÿm 0.33] (5)
where um is the mixed velocity of gas and liquid (m/s), ÿm is the mixed density of gas and liquid (kg/m3 ), ÿm is the mixed viscosity of gas and
liquid (Ns/m2 ), k is the pipe roughness (m), D is the pipe diameter (mm).
The pH of the solution can either be entered by a fixed valve or calculated using the method outlined in Reference [19]. The reported pH in
water analyzes is usually measured after depressurization and atmospheric exposure of the sample. Such pH gives no information about the in
situ pH which is a requisite for the corrosion rate evaluation. In order to calculate the corrosion rate accu-rately, the pH is chosen in situ calculating
by HYSYS. Using this calculation method, the initial bicarbonate concentration, the ionic strength, and whether or not the water is saturated with
iron carbonate should be specified.
The presence of inhibitor such as glycol in the fluid can reduce the corrosion rate by a factor given by:
where xgly is the weight fraction of glycol. If liquid hydrocarbon is present in the pipeline, the corrosion rate may be inhibited.
The operation conditions used in the simulation of gathering process and the wet natural gas compositions is shown in Table 1. The
parameters of gathering pipelines employed in the simulation are listed in Table 2.
4
Machine Translated by Google
Dai
Mr.
Table 2
Engineering
Failure
Analysis
(2021)
122
105265
Machine Translated by Google
Connecting with the current construction situation and the influence factors described above, the effects of operational conditions,
inhibitors, pipe parameters and flow regime on the CO2 corrosion are studied in this paper.
Fig. 3. The results of CO2 partial pressure, pH, shear stress, and corrosion rate for gathering pipeline at different operating pressure (Flat,
DN100.45 ÿC, Fgas = 5 m/s, Fcondensate = 0.0150 wt%, Fwater = 0.006 wt%).
6
Machine Translated by Google
was also shown previously both experimentally and computationally by Tanupabrungsun et al. [21] that pH had a strong influence on the
corrosion rate. Higher pH leads to a reduction of the corrosion rate, which may be an attractive way of managing CO2 corrosion.
The drawback of this way is that it can lead to excessive scaling and can be rarely used with formation water systems. Furthermore, the
CO2 corrosion rate starts increasing sharply to reach maximum valve, subsequently the corrosion rate decreases with increasing pipeline
length. The reason for this may be concluded that the CO2 partial pressure decreasing sharply in the latter part of pipeline leads to
decreasing of CO2 corrosion rate.
It is noteworthy that in the case of scale-free CO2 corrosion, an increase of CO2 partial pressure typically leads to an increase in the
corrosion rate [22–23]. The commonly accepted explanation is that with the increase of CO2 partial pressure, the concentration of
H2CO3 increases, which will lead to a low pH and accelerate the cathodic reaction, and ultimately the corrosion rate [24]. However, a
different result is observed when there is 0.85kmol/m3 iron carbonate in solution as shown in Fig. 3(b), and increasing of CO2 partial
pressure can have a beneficial effect on decreasing of corrosion rate. At a high pH, higher CO2 partial pressure leads to an increase in
bicarbonate and carbonate ion concentration and a higher supersaturation, which accelerates precipitation and scale formation [12,25].
To further study the pH and corrosion rate vary with CO2 partial pressure, the operating pressure is extended to a range from 0.2 MPa
to 17.0 MPa. The effect of extended operating pressure on the corrosion rate in the presence of iron carbonate is illustrated in Fig. 4.
The Fig. 4(a) shows the pH decreases initially and then increases with the increase of CO2 partial pressure, and the minimum pH
appears at the operating pressure of about 2.0 MPa. For the results as shown in Fig. 4(b), a phenomenon of the corrosion rate increases
initially and then decreases with the increase of CO2 partial pressure is observed, but the maximum corrosion rate appears at the
operating pressure of about 10.0 MPa, not at 2.0 MPa. May be the shear stress causes the maximum corrosion rate to move to high
operating pressure, because high operating pressure can enlarge shear stress, and which ultimately accelerates corrosion rate.
Fig. 4. The effects of extended operating pressure on pH and corrosion rate (Flat, DN100, 45 ÿC, Fgas = 5 m/s, Fcondensate = 0.0150 wt%, Fwater =
0.006 wt%).
7
Machine Translated by Google
stress, and corrosion rate for gathering pipeline at different operating temperatures are shown in Fig. 5. As shown in Fig. 5(a), the pH
increases with increasing of operating temperature, and the reason for this is increase of temperature will result in decrease of CO2
solubility, which will lead to a high pH. Fig. 5(b) shows that the shear stress also increases with the increasing of operating temperature,
especially at the 45 ~ 50 ÿC, the shear stress increases sharply. This indicates that the sensitivity of operating pressure for shear stress
is around 45 ~ 50 ÿC. Fig. 5(c) shows that CO2 corrosion starts increasing with increasing of operating temperature to reach maximum
corrosion rate of 2.35 mm/year at 45 ÿC, subsequently the corrosion rate decreases with temperature increases to at 55 ÿC.
For temperature below 45 ÿC, corrosion rate increases with temperature because the effect of shear stress plays a leading role. But for
temperature over 45 ÿC, the effect of pH increase will play a central role. Recent studies reported by literatures also found that at higher
pH, the precipitation kinetics would be accelerated by increasing temperature which aids the protective film formation, and which could
decrease the corrosion rate, the peak in the corrosion rate dependent on water chemistry and flow conditions [ 27–28]. Therefore, it can
conclude that the CO2 corrosion rate does not always increase with temperature, and which will reach a maximum value, and
subsequently decrease with temperature further increase.
Fig. 5. The results of pH, shear stress, and corrosion rate for gathering pipeline at different operating temperatures (Flat, DN100, 17 MPa, Fgas = 5 m/s,
Fcondensate = 0.0150 wt%, Fwater = 0.006 wt%).
8
Machine Translated by Google
Fig. 6. The results of CO2 partial pressure, pH, shear stress, and corrosion rate for gathering pipeline at different gas velocity (Flat, DN100, 45 ÿC, 17 MPa,
Fcondensate = 0.0150 wt%, Fwater = 0.006 wt%) .
corrosion rate.
Furthermore, higher flow velocity usually means high turbulence and effective mixing in the solution [29]. A large number of experimental
studies showed that increased turbulent flow accelerates the corrosion species both toward and away from the metal surface, and this
may result in an increase in the corrosion rate when the mass transfer was the rate controlling factor and no corrosion film was formed at
the metal surface [12]. Zhang [30] investigated the effect of various flow velocity on the corrosion rate of L360QS steel in H2S/CO2
environments with sulfur deposition and concluded that the corrosion rate increased by about 10 times when velocity increased from 3 to
7 m/s. In this paper, the results also indicate that high gas velocity in favor of high corrosion rate.
9
Machine Translated by Google
Fig. 7. The results of pH and corrosion rate for gathering pipeline at different water cut (Flat, DN100, 45 ÿC, 17 MPa, Fgas = 5 m/s, Fcondensate =
0.0150 wt%).
Fig. 8. The result of corrosion rate for gathering pipeline at different condensate cut (Flat, DN100, 45 ÿC, 17 MPa, Fgas = 5 m/s, Fwater = 0.006 wt%).
10
Machine Translated by Google
wettability effect and relates to a hydrodynamic condition where liquid hydrocarbon enters the water and prevents it from wetting the steel
surface (continuously or intermittently) [12]. The second effect is corrosion inhibition by certain components of the liquid hydrocarbon that
reaches the steel surface either by direct contact or by first partitioning into the water phase [12]. In order to study the effect of liquid
hydrocarbon on the corrosion rate, different condensate cut was simulated. As shown in Fig. 8, when the condensate cut below 0.015
wt%, the increasing of condensate cut can help decrease the corrosion rate. But it is worth noting that too much condensate cut may
increase corrosion instead, because the shear stress will increase obviously with a large number of condensate causes the liquid velocity
increase.
As discussed in above, the corrosion rate is related to shear stress. The pipe parameters usually have significant effect on the shear
stress of pipe at the same operating conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to study the pipe parameters such as diameter and elevation.
Fig. 9. The results of corrosion inhibition by glycol (Flat, DN100, 45 ÿC, 17 MPa, Fgas = 5 m/s, Fcondensate = 0.0150 wt%, Fwater = 0.006 wt%).
11
Machine Translated by Google
Fig. 10. The results of corrosion rate and shear stress for gathering pipeline at different pipe diameter (Flat, 45 ÿC, 17 MPa, Fgas = 5 m/s, Fcondensate =
0.0150 wt%, Fwater = 0.006 wt%).
One of the most complex problems is the effect of flow regime on CO2 corrosion since the pipelines carrying gas, condensate and
water are operating under three-phase flow conditions. The flow patterns can be found in wet natural gas gathering pipelines are
usually the slug and annular flow. In the liquid phase, water and condensate can flow separated or mixed with either phase being
continuous with the other flowing as a dispersed phase. Different flow patterns lead to a variety of steel surface wetting mechanisms
which greatly affect corrosion [12]. In the absence of protective scales multiphase flow can lead to very high fluctuating mass transfer
rates (particularly in slug flow) which, in turn, can affect corrosion. Associated with this are even larger fluctuations of the surface shear
stress which can lead to removal of protective scale and/or inhibitors. In order to study how the flow regime affects the corrosion rate,
a concave pipeline with ÿ 90 m elevation is simulated. The slug flow is observed when the condensate cut reaches 0.168 wt%, and
the flow pattern is always annular flow when the condensate cut below 0.168 wt%. Hence, the condensate cuts of 0.168 wt% and
0.167 wt% are used to simulate slug and annular flow respectively, and the number difference is very small, which can be ignored the
effect of liquid velocity difference on the shear stress. As shown in Fig. 12(a), the slug flow appears in the pipeline range from 2800 m
to 3600 m, and the max slug length is about 0.5 m. The Fig. 12(b) and Fig. 12(c) show that the shear stress and corrosion rate will
increase sharply when the slug appears, and because the slug forms as pulse, the increase of shear stress and corrosion should be a
region instead of an exact value. The reason for the increase of shear stress and corrosion rate can be attributed to the gas velocity
will increase sharply with the slug forms, and which will cause the shear stress increase. It can conclude that the slug flow will promote
the CO2 corrosion, and trying to avoid forming the slug flow in gathering pipeline is very necessary.
The corrosion rate simulated by HYSYS in this study was validated with the field data from a natural gas gathering pipeline located
in Tarim oilfield, Xinjiang, China. The operating conditions of the natural gas gathering pipeline are as follows: operating pressure 15.5
12
Machine Translated by Google
Fig. 11. The result of corrosion rate and shear stress for gathering pipeline at different pipe elevation (DN100, 45 ÿC, 17 MPa, Fgas = 5 m/s, Fcondensate
= 0.0150 wt%, Fwater = 0.006 wt%).
~ 16.1 MPa, operating temperature 30 ~ 45ÿ, inlet gas velocity 2.8 ~ 4.2 m/s, condensate cut 0.012 wt%, water cut 0.005 wt%, and CO2 in natural gas is 0.89 mol.%.
The natural gas gathering pipeline parameters are as follow: outside diameter 219 mm, wall thickness 18 mm, mild steel material, 12560 m length, and 67 m elevation
difference. The coating material and thickness are urethane foam and 40 mm, respectively. The field corrosion rate data was obtained by ultrasonic inspection for the
natural gas gathering pipeline through an intelligent pig during annual maintenance. As the operating conditions were changing with the time, hence, maximum
corrosion and minimum corrosion cases were simulated in this work. The simulation validation with field corrosion rate data is shown in Fig. 13.
The corrosion rate simulated by HYSYS is higher than the field corrosion rate data from 0 m to 1500 m along the pipeline, and the simulated results are in good
agreement with the field corrosion rate data after 1500 m along the pipeline. It should be noted that the corrosion variations trend along the pipeline simulated by
HYSYS is consistent with the field corrosion rate data, and this indicates that the HYSYS is provided an accurate tool for determining the corrosion rate of CO2 for the
natural gas gathering pipeline.
5. Conclusion
Extensive simulation study has been performed on the CO2 corrosion rate into wet natural gas gathering system. In situ parametric study stated to check the
effects of different factors on the CO2 corrosion rate and based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
Presence of CO2 and water as in natural gas that can cause corrosion in the gathering pipelines with high pressure depends on the operational conditions.
Increasing operating pressure leads to increasing the pH and decreasing the CO2 corrosion rate when the operating pressure over 10 MPa and the solution contents
0.85kmol/m3 iron carbonate. The CO2 corrosion rate does not always increase with temperature, and which will reach a maximum value at 45 ÿC, and subsequently
decrease with temperature further increase. At high gas
13
Machine Translated by Google
Fig. 12. The simulation results for effects of multiphase flow on corrosion rate and shear stress (Concave, DN100, 45 ÿC, 17 MPa, Fgas = 5 m/s,
Fcondensate = 0.167/0.168 wt%, Fwater = 0.006 wt% ).
Fig. 13. Simulation validation with field corrosion rate data (Maximum corrosion case: 45ÿ, 16.1 MPa, Fgas = 4.2 m/s; Minimum corrosion case: 30ÿ, 15.5
MPa, Fgas = 2.8 m/s).
velocity will lead to a high corrosion rate. To avoid the CO2 corrosion, the best way is separating the free water from the wet natural gas before it gets into the gathering
pipelines, and less free water present in pipeline may lead to more serious corrosion than that of a large amount of free water.
14
Machine Translated by Google
References
[1] T. Hea, IA Karimia, Ju Yonglin, Review on the design and optimization of natural gas liquefaction processes for onshore and off shore applications, Chem. Eng.
Res. Des. 132 (2018) 89–114.
[2] Y. Hua, Xu Shusheng, Y. Wang, W. Taleb, J. Sun, L. Zhang, R. Barker, A. Neville, The formation of FeCO3 and Fe3O4 on carbon steel and their protective
capabilities against CO2 corrosion at elevated temperature and pressure, Corros. Sci. 157 (2019) 392–405.
[3] M. Javidi, S. Bekhrad, Failure analysis of a wet gas pipeline due to localized CO2 corrosion, Eng. Fail. Anal. 89 (2018) 46–56.
´
[4] DA Lopez, T. P´erez, SN Simison, The influence of microstructure and chemical composition of carbon and low alloy steels in CO2 corrosion – A state of art
appraisal, Material and Design 24 (2003) 561–575.
[5] M. Wang, A. Lawal, P. Stephenson, J. Sidders, C. Ramshaw, Postcombustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: a state–of–the–art review, Chem. Eng. Res.
Des. 89 (2011) (2011) 1609–1624.
[6] M. Asadian, M. Sabzi, SH Mousavi Anijdan, The effect of temperature, CO2, H2S gases and the resulting iron carbonate and iron sulfide compounds on the sour corrosion
behavior of ASTM A–106 steel for pipeline transportation, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 171(2019) 184–193.
[7] FF Eliyan, A. Alfantazi, Re–examining the influence of chloride ions on electrochemical CO2 corrosion of pipeline steels–corrosion of the heat affected zones
(HAZs) of API–X100 steel, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 3 (2015) 1044–1052.
[8] R. Elgaddafi, A. Naidu, R. Ahmed, S. Shah, S. Hassani, SO Osisanya, A. Saasen, Modeling and experimental study of CO2 corrosion on carbon steel at elevated pressure and
temperature, J. Nat. Gas Sci Eng 27 (2015) 1620–1629.
[9] Srdjan Neÿsi´c, Kun–Lin John Lee, Vukan Ruzic, A mechanistic model of iron carbonate film growth and the effect on CO2 corrosion of mild steel. CORROSION,
NACE International, Houston/TX, 2002(Paper No. 237).
[10] G. Schmitt, M. Horstemeier, Fundamental aspects of CO2 metal loss corrosion–part II: influence of different parameters on CO2 corrosion mechanisms, CORROSION,
NACE International, Houston/TX, 2006 (Paper No. 112).
[11] H. Mansoori, D. Young, B. Brown, S. Nesic, M. Singer, Effect of CaCO3-saturated solution on CO2 corrosion of mild steel explored in a system with controlled
water chemistry and well-defined mass transfer conditions, Corros. Sci. 158 (2019), 108078.
[12] S. Neÿsi´c, Key issues related to modeling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines–a review, Corros. Sci. 49 (2007) 4308–4338.
[13] C. de Waard, U. Lotz, DE Milliams, Predictive Model for CO2 Corrosion Engineering in Wet Natural Gas Pipelines, CORROSION, NACE International, Houston/
TX, (Paper No. 19).
[14] William P. Jepson, Samir Bhongale, Madan Gopal, Model for sweet corrosion in horizontal multiphase slug flow, CORROSION, NACE International, Houston/
TX, 1996 (Paper No. 11).
[15] H. Wang, J.–Y. Cai, WP Jepson, CO2 corrosion modeling and prediction of horizontal slug flow, CORROSION, NACE International, Houston/TX, 2002 (Paper
No. 238).
[16] S. Neÿsi´c, Effects of multiphase flow on internal CO2 corrosion of mild steel pipelines, Energy Fuels 26 (2012) 4098–4111.
[17] Srdjan Neÿsi´c, Jiyong Cai, Kun–Lin John Lee, A multiphase flow and internal corrosion prediction model for mild steel pipelines, Corrosion, NACE International, Houston/TX,
2005 (Paper No. 556).
[18] Muhammad Hashim Abbasa, Rosemary Normana, Alasdair Charles, Neural network modeling of high pressure CO2 corrosion in pipeline steels, Process Safety
and Environmental Protection, 119 (2018) 36–45.
[19] NORSOK, NORSOK standard M–506, CO2 corrosion prediction model, Strandveien (2005).
[20] Ammar Ali Abd, Samah Zaki Naji, Atheer Saad Hashim, Failure analysis of carbon dioxide corrosion through wet natural gas gathering pipelines, Engineering
Failure Analysis, 105 (2019) 638–646.
[21] T. Tanupabrungsun, B. Brown, S. Neÿsi´c, Effect of pH on CO2 corrosion of mild steel at elevated temperatures, CORROSION, NACE International, Houston/TX
(2013). Paper No. 48.
[22] Y. Zhang, X. Pang, Qu Shaopeng, X. Lib, K. Gao, Discussion of the CO2corrosionmechanism between low partial pressure and supercritical conditions, Corros.
Sci. 59 (2012) 186–197.
[23] EE Okoroa, AM Kurah, SE Sanni, A. Dosunmu, EB Ekeinde, Flow line corrosion failure as a function of operating temperature and CO2 partial pressure using
real time field data, Eng. Fail. Anal. 102 (2019) 160–169.
[24] C. Plennevaux, N. Ferrando, J. Kittel, M. Fr´egon`ese, B. Normand, T. Cassagne, F. Ropital, M. Bonis, pH prediction in concentrated aqueous solutions under high
pressure of acid gases and high temperature, Corros. Sci. 73 (2013) 143–149.
[25] P. Sui, J. Sun, et al., Effect of temperature and pressure on corrosion behavior of X65 carbon steel in water–saturated CO2 transport environments mixed with
H2S, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 73 (2018) 60–69.
[26] M. Asadian, M. Sabzi, SH Mousavi Anijdan, The effect of temperature, CO2, H2S gases and the resulting iron carbonate and iron sulfide compounds on the sour corrosion
behavior of ASTM A–106 steel for pipeline transportation, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 171 (2019) 184–193.
[27] Yoon–Seok Choi, Fernando Farelas, Srdjan Neÿsi´c, Alvaro Augusto O. Magalhaes, ˜ Cynthia de Azevedo Andrade, Corrosion behavior of deep water oil production tubing
material under supercritical CO2 environment: part 1–effect of pressure and temperature, CORROSION, NACE International, Houston/TX, 2013, (Paper No. 80).
[28] J. Armando Garnica-Rodriguez, Genesca, Juan Mendoza-Flores, Ruben Duran-Romero, Electrochemical evaluation of aminotriazole corrosion inhibitor under
flow conditions, J. Appl. Electrochem. 39 (2009) 1809–1819.
[29] Sobhan Hatami, Alireza Ghaderi-Ardakani, Mohammad Niknejad-Khomami, Farzan Karimi-Malekabadi, Mohammad R. Rasaei, Amir H. Mohammadi, On the
prediction of CO2 corrosion in petroleum industry, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids 117 (2016) 108–112.
[30] Naiyan Zhang, Dezhi Zeng, Zhi Zhang, Wentao Zhao, Guangju Yao, Effect of flow velocity on pipeline steel corrosion behavior in H2S/CO2 environment with Sulfur deposition,
Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol. 53 (2018) 370–377.
15