U
U
UNIT-L
un thuse TV
The
,
Y.V amd z
( X - -*)bewa
T.VA aleo a Y.V Te onet, z &,,X
C l zd the Sampiwa
A dht, s4 the possi bu merms
the S uwwptes n o on a Le
af al Passi bu S tatstie 1
Val ues
Caled the s amph dist, cr pvobabl ty
Samph'ng that Statis trc
2
pes
Same
(1 AM a +he Sampka d
mean he ves4e popu) trem
a h
whi ch Sompl eRe ake
Ls to
AM c Somplin dt cqual
(u
+e Vm.e aw
pppu .D
has a.
dist s eam
Sbamdas d Error
te S cuwmpi hy dist, e
RYOY. SE
as
St otistic
o detes i ne wihtn ouich
6ancd tudeful
to ke
the pasaMmetesg VaMuec nt 2 p e cted
styumeut teat wg a
Ve pothes
Ex, SE( = /R
sF C =
2
O M E - T C o n t t m u a h o n a
SIGNIFICANCE
(Basic Concen
4. TEST OF
Where vx) v
=
f....
(x,)
n
n
2
no
t...... t
+
n
2
n n
The S.E. of the mean is
The standard errors of the some of the well known
statis.
for large samples are
given below, where is the
n
sample size, o
the population variance and P is the population proportion and
Q 1-P. ni and n2 represent the sizes of two independent random
samplesrespectively.
SILNo Statistie Standard Error
Sample mean x
ngle hypothes is
p Two different hypothesis. So that of one hypothesis is aceepted
the other is rejected and vice versa
Null Hypothesis:
hy pothesis ofno difierence is called nuil hypethesis ard
usuaiy denoted by Hll hypothesis is the hyprothesis whieh
sted for
s te possible rjection
under the that it is assumption trie
Prof R.A. Fisher It is very usefui tool in test of sigificance
for example If we want to find out whether the special classes (for
The eitings f
Anown as leti 1ailed alternative respectively.
enables to decide
ilernative hypothesis is very important since it us
test
riment,
In a statistical hypothesis testing experiment, a Type | a 1Ype error
error
committed by rejecting the hypothesis
hypothesis when
null
null
when it is true. On
On the
other aT ne
Oner hand, a Type II error is comm ted by not rejectin
rejectin,
(accepting) the null hypothesis when it is falsc
If we write,
aP(Type I error)
P (rejecting Ho| Ho is true)
ll error) P (Not rejecting Ho | Ho false) iS
Y p e =
n
practice, type I error amounts to rejecting a lot wnen it is gOod|
and type Il error may be regarded as accepting the lot when it is
bad. Thus we find ourselves in the situation which is described in
the following table.
Accept Ho Reject Ho
Ho is true Correct decision TypeI Error
Hois false Type ll error Correct decision
5.1 Large samples (n> 30): 8
The tests of significance used for problems of large
different from those used in case of small samples as
sampk
are
th
assumptions used in both cases are different. The followins
assumptions are made for problems dealing with large samples
(i) Almost all the
sampling distributions follow noma
asymptotically.
(11) The sample values close to t
are approximately close
population values.
The following tests are discussed in large sample tests.
) Test of
(ii) Test
significance
of
for
proportion
significance for difference between
proportions
(ii) Test of significance for mean
two means.
(iv) Test of significance for difference between
Calculation of statistic:
Under Ho the test statistic is
Z=P-P
PQ
n
Expected value:
P-P N (0. 1)
PQ
N n
=
1.96 for a =
0.05 (1.645)
=
2.58 for a =
0.01 (2.33)
Inference:
(i) If the computed value of Zo s Zwe
accept the null
hypothesis and conclude that the sample is drawn from the
population with proportion of success Po
(I) f Z> Z we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that
the sample has not been taken from the
population whose
population proportion of success is Po.
PxampleIn 1
a random of 400 persons from a large
sample
4are females.Can it be said that males and females population
3 are in the
in the
population? Use 1% level of significance
Solution:
We are given
n 400 and
sample =
120
x =
No. of female in the
120
the sample =
P-P
PQ
0.300-0.375
0.375 x0.625
400
0.075 0.075 3.125
V0.000586 0.024
Expected value:
n=400
in the sample =
30
= No. of defectives in the sample
defectives
p propo.1on of
= 0.075
n 400
Null hypothesis:
P=0.05
The claim of the company is tenable Ho:
Alternative Hypothesis:
H P 0.05 (Right tailed Altenative)
Level ofsignificance: 5%
Calculation ofstatistic
Lnder Ho. the test statistic is Jale)
P
Z
PO
0 . 0 5 . 9 5 a uras\dek
0.075-0.050
means 4s/ non
400
0.025 2.27
0.0001187
1A
Expected value:
P
Z N(O,1)
PQ
V n
= 1.645 (Single tailed) oru valu
9 f sqle taled
Inference:
Since the calculated Za
So
> Z. we reject our mull hypothesis
5% level of significance and we conclude that the company's claim
is not tenable.
Test Procedure
Set up the null and alternative hypotheses:
Ho: Pi =P2 = P (say)
H:P P2 (P>P2or P <P;)
Level of significance:
Let a = 0.05 or 0.01
Calculation of statistic:
Under Ho the test statistic is
Example 3:
In a referendum submitted to the 'student body' at a
university, 850 men and 550 women voted. 530 of the men and 310
ofthe women voted 'yes. Does this indicate a significant
diterence of the opinion on the matter between men and women
students?
Solution:
We are given
n850 n2 550 X 30 X2310
530 310
0.62 P2 0.56
850 550
PtX 530+3100 = 0.60
n+n, 1400
0-40 (1-) -
(1-o.b
Null hy pothesis:
A: P P2 ie the data does not indicate
a significant
diflerence of
he
opinion
students.
and women
on the matter between
nmen
native Hypothesis:
. P#P2 (Two
lailed Alternative)
evel of significance
et a 005
13
Calculation of statistic:
statistic is
test
Under Ho. the
PP:
Po n:
0.62-0.556
P
Inference
Since Z, >Z we reject our null hypothesis at 5% level of
500 1000
500
I500 3
Null bypothesis:
:P P There is no signilicant difference betwcen the two
population proportions
Alternative Hypothesis:
PP(left tailed Alternativc)
Levelofsignificanee: let a- 0.05
Caleulation of statistic:
nder Ho. the test statistie is
PP
3500 1000
Fxpected value:
N0,) o5
hypothesis
at 5% level.of
Inference: null
> Ze we reject the difference betweeen
Since Zo significant
there is a
significance
and say that
proportions
the two population
Example 5: to 200 people. On the
examination
was given
A civil service the upper 30% and
divided into
basis of their total
scores, they were
40 of the upper groun
70%. On a certain question On the basis of this
the remaining
answered correctly.
and 80 of the lower group for discriminating the
likely to be useful
question, is this question
tested?
ability of the type being
Solution:
We are given
30x 200 70x 200 =
140
ni 60 100
100
X2 8 0
X 40
40 80
-
P2
PI 3 140 7
40+80
n, +n 60+140
120 6
200 10
=1-P=1
6 10
Null hypothesis:
Ho: P- P; (say) The particular the
abilities of two groups. question does not discriminate
Alternative Hypothesis:
H: P P2 (two tailed
Level of significance: Alternative)
Let a = 0.05
Calculation of statistics
Under Ho, the test statistic is
S.4Test of significance for mean: 6
Let X, (i 1,2...n) be a random sample of size n from a
POpulation with variance o, then the sample mean x is given by
-(X1tX2t....Xn)
E(x)=
V(x) =
V[-(x1t x2 t..Xn)
17
I(V(xi)+V(x)+...V(xn)
na2=
no
n
S.E(X)=-Vn
Test Procedure:
Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
Ho:u =Ho
Level of significance:
Let a = 0.05 or 0.01
Calculation of statistie:
Under Ho. the test statistic is
x-E(x) =
S.E(x) o/n
Expected value:
N0,1)
G/Vn
=
1.96 for a =
0.05 (1.645)
or
j =
Ho
Example 6:
The lifetime of 100 fluorescent
mean
by a
company is computed to be 1570 light bulbs produced
deviation of 120 hours. hours with a standard
If u is the mean
produced by the lifetime of all the bulbs
company, test the
hypothesis u=1600 hours against
132
1
the alternative hypothesis 1600 hours using a 5% level of
significance.
Solution:
We are given
x = 1570 hrs
1600hrs s=120 hrs n=100
Null hypothesis:
Ho: 1600.ie There is no significant difference between the
sample mean and population mean.
Alternative Hypothesis:
Hi: H 1600 (two tailed Alternative)
Level of significance:
Let a = 0.05
Calculation of statistics
Under Ho, the test statistic is
Sn
1570-1600
120
V100
30x 10
120
2.5
Expected value:
Z = N(O,1)
Solution:
=28; n-50; s=3.5
We are given x = 30;
Null hypothesis:
28. i.e The company's claim that the petrol consumption of
Ho:
new car is 28km per litre on the average is acceptable.
Alternative Hypothesis:
H: 28 (Left tailed Alternative)
Level of significance:
Let a = 0.05
Calculation of statistic:
Under Ho the test statistics iss
s/n
30-28
3.5
50
2x V50
3.5
4.04
Expected value:
N(O,1) at a = 0.005
= 1.645
Inference: 20 V1eluc.
Since the caleulated Zo
Ze we reject fhe nuil hypothesis
>
at
5% level of significance and conclude
that the company's claim is
not acceptable.
5.5 Test of
significance for difference between two means:
Test procedure
Set up the null and
alternative hypothesis
Level of significance:
Let a%
Calculation of statistic:
Under Ho the test statistic is
X2
If o =
o: =
o* (ie) If the
samples have been drawn from
the population with common S.D o then under Ho : Hi =
42
XI X2
Zo=
Expected value:
XI-N2 -N(0,1)
Inference:
S.E(X-Xx:)
)
IfZ s Z, we accept the Ho (ii) If Z,> Z, we reject the lHo
Example 8:
test of the breaking strengths of two different types of cables
Conducted using samples of ni = n2 = 100 pieces of each type
of cable.
21
Cable II
Cable
, 1905
,-1925
230
o 40
provide suflicient evidence to indicate
Do the data
of the two cables?
difference between the mean breaking strengths
Use 0.01 level of significance.
Solution:
We are given
=1925 X=1905 40 2 30
Null hypothesis
Ho:H= 42 .ie There is no significant difference between the
breaking strengths of the two cables.
H:4 H2 (Two tailed alternative)
Level of significance:
Let a = 0.01 or 1%
Calculation of statistie:
Under Ho the test statistic is
Zo XI-X2
n n
1925-1905
40 30 T
4
Expected value:
90 100|
N (0,1) 2.58
-
O,
n,
Inference: 22
Since Zo Z we reject the Ho Hence the formulated null
ie there
hypothesisis wrong
breaking strengths of two cables.
is a significant difference in the
Example 9:
The means of two large samples of 1000 and 2000 items are
67.5 cms and 68.0cms respectively. Can the samples be regarded as
drawn
5%
from
level
the population
of signiticance.
with standard deviation 2.5 cms. Test at
Solution:
We are given
n = 1000; n> = 2000
67.5 cms: , =68.0 cms G= 2.5 cms
Null hypothesis
Ho: = 2 (i.e.,) the sanmple have been drawn from the same
population.
Alternative Hypothesis:
H: 2 (Two tailed alternative)
Level of significance:
a 5%
Calculation of statistic:
Under He the test statistic is
67.5-68.0
2. 000 2000
0.5x 20
2.53/5
5.1
Expected value: 23
XI X2
Z N(0.1) = 1.96
1
n n2
Inference:
Since Zo > Z we
and conclude that the reject the Ho at 5% level of significance
population. samples have not come from the
same