The Code of Kalantiaw
The Code of Kalantiaw
Instructor’s note: Below is an article taken from Esquiremag.ph. It talks about the imaginary
Code of Kalantiaw, a set of laws supposedly promulgated in the 15th century by a native datu of
the same name. I am sharing this with you for academic purposes only. Make sure you read
this before our next meeting. Thank you. I encourage you to read further on this story;
particularly, try to read more about how William Henry Scott managed to debunk this whole
thing.
xxx
What Is the Code of Kalantiaw, the Pre-Colonial Penal Code That Was Later Found
to Be a Hoax?
Philippine textbooks used to present it as a historical fact. The Order of Kalantiaw also used to
be a state honor before it was deleted from the Honors Code in 2003.
During ancient times, law codes served as the written statement of laws in a society.
Compilations of said laws and customs have been around since as far back as 2400 BC,
archiving local, provincial, and sometimes national ideas of justice throughout history. These
were attempts at creating some form of legal unity among people. These were syntheses of
political and philosophical concepts, and were used as benchmarks in how we thought about
social order during each period.
In the retelling of pre-colonial Philippines, there was a time when The Code of Rajah Kalantiaw
was once considered a highly revered document in our political thought and patrimony. It was a
pre-Hispanic Philippine penal code that was well-regarded as an essential legal document of
our people. So much so that it was published in textbooks and was written about for decades.
There was even a state honor dedicated to its lore. But, as it turns out, the legend was much
stronger than the truth.
The code was supposedly a legal code written by Datu Bondahara Kalantiaw in 1433, and was
discovered in 1614. Kalantiaw was said to have been a chief on the island of Negros, whose
writings were immortalized in the epic of Maragtas. Mentions of the code would appear in
Philippine history textbooks, too.
Article I
Ye shall not kill, neither shall ye steal nor shall ye hurt the aged, lest ye incur the danger of
death. All those who this order shall infringe shall be tied to a stone and drowned in a river or in
boiling water.
Article II
Ye shall punctually meet your debt with your headman. He who fulfils not, for the first time shall
be lashed a hundredfold, and If the obligation is great, his hand shall be dipped threefold in
boiling water. On conviction, he shall be flogged to death.
Article III
Obey ye: no one shall have wives that are too young, nor shall they be more than what he can
take care of, nor spend much luxury. He who fulfils not, obeys not, shall be condemned to swim
three hours and, for the second time, shall be scourged with spines to death.
Article IV
Observe and obey ye: Let not the peace of the graves be disturbed; due respect must be
accorded them on passing by caves and trees where they are. He who observes not shall die by
bites of ants or shall be flogged with spines till death.
Article V
Obey ye: Exchange in food must be carried out faithfully. He who complies not shall be lashed
for an hour. He who repeats the act shall, for a day be exposed to the ants.
Article VI
Ye shall revere respectable places, trees of known value, and other sites. He shall pay a
month's work, in gold or money, whoever fails to do this; and if twice committed, he shall be
declared a slave.
The Order of Kalantiaw medal, bestowed upon judges and legal luminaries
in the 20th century.
Article VII
They shall die who kill trees of venerable aspect; who at night shoot with arrows the aged men
and the women; he who enters the house of the headman without permission; he who kills a fish
or shark or striped crocodile.
Article VIII
They shall be slaves for a given time who steal away the women of the headmen; he who
possesses dogs that bite the headmen; he who burns another man's sown field.
Article IX
They shall be slaves for a given time, who sing in their night errands, kill manual birds, tear
documents belonging to the headmen; who are evil-minded liars; who play with the dead.
Article X
It shall be the obligation of every mother to show her daughter secretly the things that are
lascivious, and prepare them for womanhood; men shall not be cruel to their wives, nor should
they punish them when they catch them in the act of adultery. He who disobeys shall be torn to
pieces and thrown to the caymans.
Article XI
They shall be burned, who by force or cunning have mocked at and eluded punishment, or who
have killed two young boys, or shall try to steal the women of the old men (agurangs).
Article XII
They shall be drowned, all slaves who assault their superiors or their lords and masters; all
those who abuse their luxury; those who kill their anitos by breaking them or throwing them
away.
Article XIII
They shall be exposed to the ants for half a day, who kill a black cat during the new moon or
steal things belonging to the headmen.
Article XIV
They shall be slaves for life, who having beautiful daughters shall deny them to the sons of the
headman, or shall hide them in bad faith.
Article XV
Concerning their beliefs and superstitions: they shall be scourged, who eat bad meat of
respected insects or herbs that are supposed to be good; who hurt or kill the young manual bird
and the white monkey.
Article XVI
Their fingers shall be cut off, who break wooden or clay idols in their olangangs and places of
oblation; he who breaks Tagalan's daggers for hog killing, or breaks drinking vases.
Article XVII
They shall be killed, who profane places where sacred objects of their diwatas or headmen are
buried. He who gives way to the call of nature at such places shall be burned.
Article XVIII
Those who do not cause these rules to be observed, if they are headmen, shall be stoned and
crushed to death, and if they are old men, shall be placed in rivers to be eaten by sharks and
crocodiles. End of the code
Historian Jose E. Marco wrote about it in his historical fiction Las Antiguas Leyendes de la Isla
de Negros (The Ancient Legends of the Island of Negros) in 1913, as well. There, Marco
credited a priest named Jose Maria Pavon as his source.
Fellow historian Josue Soncuya, likewise, wrote about the Code of Kalantiaw in his book
Historia Prehispana de Filipinas (Prehispanic History of the Philippines) four years later. He
would make one correction though. The author moved the location of the code's origins from
Negros to Panay because, as he asserted, it was much more likely that the code had something
to do with the Binirayan festival, which is celebrated in Antique.
In 1971, the Order of Kalantiaw, based on the document, was even a state honor that was
established by former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. It would be conferred to retiring Supreme
Court justices and the like. More than 200 individuals would be given the distinction throughout
its records.
Marcos Sr. issued Presidential Decree 105 back in 1973, which was written for the protection of
established national shrines as sacred or hallowed places. Among these were the birthplace of
Dr. Jose Rizal in Calamba, Laguna; Fort Santiago, for obvious reasons; the Aguinaldo Mansion
in Kawit, Cavite; and yes, the Code of Kalantiaw.
Its existence would continue to be presented as a historical fact throughout the latter half of the
20th century. The code was embraced by Filipinos, especially from the Panay region. A
Kalantiaw Shrine and Museum was established in Batan, as well. Datu Bondahara Kalantiaw
would also be honored as the first Philippine lawmaker.
In 1956, the Philippine Historical Committee, had even made a bronze marker for the Batan
area, reading:
In the 1960s, historians and pundits had already started questioning the validity of the
document. In spite of its wide acceptance and publishing, the code was eventually contended by
historian William Henry Scott, who called it fraudulent in his Prehispanic Source Materials for the
Study of Philippine History back in 1968.
Marco, one of the pioneering historians who put forth the idea of the Code of Kalantiaw, was
later found to have many of his works rife with historical error, consistences, and downright
fabrications. One of them was the Code of Lakantiaw, which had no historical basis upon further
investigation. Another historian, the late great Teodoro Agoncillo disputed the document during
his time, as well.
Unfortunately, the Code of Lakantiaw would be deemed a historical fabrication. In the early
2000s, then-President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo dropped the Order of Kalantiaw from the
Honors Code of the Philippines, which sought "to create an order of precedence of honors
conferred and for other purposes.”
With finality, the National Historical Institute (now the National Historical Commission of the
Philippines) officially confirmed that the Code of Kalantiaw was a hoax in 2004. NHI Resolution
No. 12 declared the Code of Kalantiaw invalid. With it, these were the subsequent
pronouncements: