Primer v7.0 Manual
Primer v7.0 Manual
7 1
Co-Authors:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword 3
I-A. Rationale 4
I-B. Vision-Mission-Goals 5
I-C. Advantages of Implementing the SPS 5
II. Program Nomenclature and Recognitions 6
III. Application Process for Program Recognition by the Region 8
IV-A. Checklist of Requirements for the Application of Schools 9
Implementing SPS (Elementary)
IV-B. Checklist of Requirements for the Application of Schools 12
Implementing SPS (JHS)
V. Learners’ Admission & Selection Policy 16
VI. Policy on Retention & Transfer 29
VII. Grading System & Assessment 29
VIII. Subject Offering & Loading 30
IX. Governance & Manpower 34
X. Laboratories & Classrooms for SPS 36
XI. Establishment of School Scientific Review Committee 47
XII. Annual Reporting (Monitoring & Evaluation) 48
XIII. Effectivity & Revision 51
XV. References 52
Signatures of the Author and Co-Authors 53
Photo of the Author and Co-Authors 54
Appendices 55
Foreword
The excerpt from the poem “A Life of Service” is an echo that gave strength to
concretize this PRIMER: The Regional Harmonized Curriculum and Guidelines in the
Implementation of the Special Program in Science (SPS).
PRIMER is a Region VII initiative to harmonize all the DepEd issuances and provide
clear instructions to streamline the practices, implementation and provide recognition to
schools implementing the program.
The PRIMER serves as regional guide while waiting for the DepEd Central Office to
produce the complete guidelines. In case there is an issuance of the National Implementing
Guidelines for the Special Program in Science, all directives of PRIMER shall be voided
following the national mandate and only parts of this PRIMER where there are no clear
provisions from the Central Office shall be enforced.
Kindly refer to PRIMER Version 5.0 as the latest version of the guidelines.
We invite you to make use of what we call the fruit of our labor!
I-A. Rationale
Most of the Special Program in Science guidelines were crafted during the
implementation of the Revised Basic Education Curriculum (RBEC) in 2002. The
significant curricular reform from RBEC into the Enhanced Basic Education Curriculum or
K to 12, made some of the provisions in the S&T-related guidelines that are no longer aligned
vis-a-vis policies and guidelines for Kto12 Basic Education in 2014.
While the reforms for Special Program in Science (SSES & STE) implementing schools
are still a work in progress in the Department of Education Central Office, DepEd-CO
directed all implementers to observe status quo in the operation of the Special Program in
Science. As a result, Schools Division Offices (SDOs), having no certain and guiding
reference, implemented SP-Science in differing instructions and directions. Issues regarding
the learner’s mobility, curriculum, assessments, applications and admissions are usually
raised from the school level to the SDOs and Regional Office (RO) since schools are seriously
challenged in implementing immediate actions to resolve these concerns. Moreover, the
regional office has the list of (10 STE & 10 SSES) as pilot schools implementing the Special
Program in Science in 2010 and 2011 and year after year there are more schools offering
the program without the knowledge or the recognition from the regional office. Region VII
sees the need to streamline the implementation of the Special Program in Science to perform
its prime duties to regulate all programs; recognize the established programs; implement
policies; monitor and evaluate programs; and provide technical assistance to the SDOs.
With these, the Curriculum and Learning Management Division (CLMD) together
with the Curriculum Implementation Division (CID) of the different Schools Division Offices
(SDO) have identified applicable guidelines from the SPS policies; streamlined them against
the recent issuances; compiled the coherent Regional Memoranda; conducted field visits
and interviews with the implementing schools; scheduled harmonization meetings, and
round table discussions with the Education Program Supervisors in Science.
The contextualization is limited only to parts where schools, SDOs and the RO are
required to implement and where no clear instructions and provisions are provided.
Contextualization is also evident in the harmonization of the curricular offering and various
monitoring and evaluation tools. The RO added other parameters for Monitoring and
Evaluation (M&E) aside from the minimum requirements promulgated by the national
issuances.
Generally, this PRIMER aims to provide the needed guidance to all school -
implementers of the Special Program in Science in Region VII and those schools who are
interested in opening the program.
Vision –The Special Program in Science envisions in developing learners who will
become STEM advocates, leaders, and champions.
Goal – The program aims to provide learners with an enriched Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - oriented curriculum integrated with research,
technology and design that will enable them to develop technical and entrepreneurial skills
and prepare them in the pursuit of higher education and/or world of work in the areas of
STEM.
The schools implementing the Special Program in Science (SPS) that are duly
recognized by the region shall be:
1. given priority to receive the Special Education Fund (SEF) from the Local
Government Unit (LGU),
2. included in the Regional Inventory (List of SPS Implementers) to be endorsed to the
Central Office as recognized implementer of the SPS,
3. given priority for possible funding of the program coming from the DepEd Central
Office,
4. given priority for funding, grants, scholarships, donations, and trainings, from any
donors, coming from government, non-government, and private organizations, as
well as foundations, and
5. included in the advocacy of the SDO and RO in all conventions and conferences to
promote SPS advocacy and establish linkages to potential sponsors and donors.
To align the nomenclature of the existing Special Interest Programs including Special
Program in Journalism (SPJ), Special Program in the Arts (SPA), Special Program in Foreign
Language (SPFL), Special Program in Sports (SPS); the Region VII will adapt the program
name Special Program in Science (SPS) with four (4) categories:
It should be made clear that the schools and SDOs implementing the Special Program
in Science (SPS) should be screened, evaluated, recognized, and monitored by Region VII.
This means that all existing schools implementing the SPS can submit an application and
the required documents to the Regional Office for appropriate evaluation, validation and
then recognition, except the Regional Science High School (Ramon Teves Pastor Memorial
Science High School) which is recognized in the National level by virtue of DepEd Order No.
49, s. 2003. Only schools with regional recognition should operate the SPS Program and all
other potential applicants shall be given a compliance period of three to five years to
complete the SPS Program requirements. All other schools implementing a special science
curriculum, but not compliant to the SPS standards, shall be called “Science Class” (SC)
and shall be managed by the SDO. For schools who intend to offer the SPS can start
establishing the Science Class for at least three years and may submit for SPS recognition
after all requirements are compiled as assessed by the school-SDO-RO following the
application process flow.
It should also be emphasized that SPS is a school curricular program along with
other special interest programs and not a school title or name. Hence, changing the school’s
name is not necessary. While granting recognition is a one-time process, the implementing
schools will be subject to a yearly monitoring and evaluation.
Exemption
The Regional Science High School in DepEd Region VII, the Ramon Teves Pastor
Memorial Science High School in Daro Dumaguete City, was established through DO
No. 69, s. 1993. This school will be exempted from re-applying for recognition but shall
comply for the annual monitoring and evaluation using SPS Form 1.1. and SPS Form 4.0.
Step 2. The SDO shall convene its Division Review and Evaluation
Committee (DREC) composed of 2 EPS from the CID (Science & Math)
and 1 SGOD to assess/re-assess the readiness and compliance of the
school to offer the SPS. The DREC shall utilize Form 1.0 or 1.1 SPS
Checklist of Requirements.
Step 3.B If the School is non-compliant, Step 3.A. If the School is compliant, the
the SDO shall provide technical assistance Is the
SDO shall endorse the application,
and require the school to comply all the school
documents, and compliance report to RO
compliant?
lacking requirements and then go back to VII.
Step 2.
____ No. of Complied Items _____No. of Non-Complied Items _____No. of items on-hold
Action:
______ Advice for Compliance _____ for recommendation to Receive the Recognition
______________________________________________________ _________________
SDO DREC/RO RIT Date
35. storage room/area for the wet and dry materials for Resources,
science experiments Tools, and
36. computer laboratory with at least 25 sets of laptop or Equipment
desktop and 2 printers that are regularly utilized as
evidenced in the Requisition Form
37. an existing software/internet/STARBOOK kiosk
38. robotics kit & sensors
X. Awards, Recognitions & Research
The school…
39. received awards and recognition in science fair, Portfolio of
robotics, research and science related contests in both awards per year
DepEd and/or Non-DepEd organized competitions. Portfolio of
(Division, Region, National, & International) awards per year
40. received Awards and recognitions for teachers, school (every year
heads and the school should have at
least 5 awards)
41. produced research of any type e.g., action research,
Copy of the
basic research (written and conducted by teachers or
research
school heads) at least once in a year
Summary of Findings:
____ No. of Complied Items _____No. of Non-Complied Items _____No. of items on-hold
Action:
______ Advice for Compliance _____ for recommendation to Receive the Recognition
______________________________________ _________________
SDO DREC/RO RIT Date
A. Admission Process
Admission is open to incoming Grade 1 and Grade 7 learners.
• For Grade 1, the learner should have a rating of C (Consistent) in Language, Literacy
and Communication; Mathematics; and Understanding the Physical and Natural
Environment.
• For Grade 7, the learner should have a grade of at least 87 in Science, Math, and
English and at least 85 in other subjects from first to third quarters (computed as
average) as modified cut-off grade per DO 8, s. 2015 Item 5.
Step 3. Conduct of The SDO Science Supervisor shall manage EPS Science
Admission Test the conduct of the reading test in SPS
Elementary / LSS and Mental Ability Test in SPSC
SPS Secondary / RSHS / LSS.
Step 5. Signing of Program Applicants who passed the screening process SPSC
Support Form (PSF) shall be admitted to the SPS. Signing of PSF
shall follow.
The form shall be provided by the school.
Refer to SPS Form 3.1
1. The test admission shall be part of the orientation with the learners and parents
applying for the SPS.
Phrasing Reads with good Reads with a Reads in two or Reads word- X2
phrasing, mixture of three by-word in a
adhering to run-ons, mid- word phrases, monotone
punctuation, sentence not voice.
stress, and pauses for adhering to
intonation. breath, and punctuation,
some stress, and
choppiness. intonation.
There
is reasonable
stress and
intonation.
Total Score
Total Score
5. The Multiple Intelligence (MI) Test shall be scheduled, preferably for another
Saturday.
a. MI test shall be administered one-on-one with the applicant. This can be
done simultaneously.
b. The MI test shall be a showcase of any talent (monologue, playing instrument,
singing, dancing, drawing, magic, recitation, experiment, impersonation,
solving puzzles, etc.)
c. The applicant shall bring his/her own material for the demonstration.
d. The showcase of MI shall not be more than 5 minutes.
e. The rating should be based on SPS Form 2.3 MI Rubric.
Total Score
1. The test admission shall be part of the orientation with the learners and parents
applying for the SPS.
3. The battery of tests shall begin with Mental Ability Test (30%)
a. The SDO EPS Science shall be provided with an IQ Test Reference Booklet by
the Regional Office through the EPS Science.
b. The test booklet shall be the source of the 50 IQ test questions which can be
answered in printed or electronic means.
c. The test should be administered for 60 minutes only.
d. The exam shall be administered on two Saturdays by batches.
4. The next part of the Test will be Panel Interview (Communication Skills Test-
30%).
c. The learners are required to bring their own laptop, tablets, or paper.
d. The school can also provide the materials.
e. The learners are given 30 minutes to think and ideate a possible solution.
f. The Project solution should be composed of the following parts:
I. Title of the project
II. Features of the project
III. Materials and cost
IV. Methodology (diagram)
V. Functionality (how it works and solves the problem)
VI. Beneficiaries
g. After 30 minutes the learners shall present the project in slide deck
Presentation for 10 minutes.
h. The panel shall be composed of two members (1 science teacher and 1
research teacher) to evaluate the project.
i. Question and answer shall follow in 5 minutes.
j. The score shall be based on SPS Form 2.4 Project Pitching Rubric.
Total Score
a. All application folders and results shall be kept and treated with utmost
confidentiality pursuant to RA 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012.
b. Test papers shall be organized and kept for three years and can be disposed
thereafter in consonance with applicable record disposal guidelines.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Last Name , First Name Middle Name
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Home Adress
I ______________________________________________of_____________________________ ,
(Last Name, First Name, M.I) (Address)
______________________________________________________________________________.
b. I shall always behave and exhibit good behavior and will comply with all rules
and regulations as prescribed by the school.
I/We, _____________________________________________________________________________,
(Last Name, First Name, M.I) (Last Name, First Name, M.I)
a. I/We shall assume all civil liabilities that my/our child/ward incurs against the
school during his/her stay in the program.
b. I/We shall disclose to the school any condition that may affect the academic
performance and well-being of the learner.
c. I/We shall hold the school free from any type of liability in case of injury or death
of the learner arising from activities or endeavors not sanctioned by the school.
d. I/We shall help in the holistic development of my/our child/ward.
e. I/We shall regularly attend parent-teacher meetings/conferences to discuss the
learner’s academic and behavioral standing as well as other school activities and
concerns.
__________________________________________ _________________
Signature over Printed Name of the Learner Date
_________________________________________________ _________________
Signature over Printed Name of Parent/s/Guardian Date
Name: ________________________________________________
2x2 Colored ID Picture
Address: _________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
For student to remain in the program, he or she should obtain a final rating of 87%
in Science, Mathematics, and English and 85% in the rest of the subjects including
elective as a modified rating cut-off per DO No. 8, s. 2015 item # 5. Failure to meet
the grade requirements shall put the learner under probation for one (1) school year
or can be a cause of transfer to the regular class (DO No. 41 s. 2005) as recommended
by the adviser and validated by the school head. Learners or parents expressing the
intention to withdraw from the program shall sign a waiver (DO No.57 s. 2011).
B. Transfer
1. Regional recognized schools implementing the Special Program in Science in both
Elementary and Junior High School shall only accept transferee learners coming
from other recognized schools implementing the SPS (DO No. 55, s. 2010; DO No.
41 s. 2004) except RSHS to transfer laterally, that is, from one RSHS to another
(DO No. 41 s. 2005).
2. Transfer from a regular high school to SPS shall not be allowed in any curricular
year. Transfer from any SPS school shall be allowed, provided the learner has no
grade below 85% in any of the subjects (DO No. 55, s. 2010).
3. In cases where schools implementing the SPS felt the need in admitting potential
and promising learners in Grades 1 and 7 coming from accredited and reputable
international and private schools; higher education institutions including state
universities and colleges shall be consulted and seek approval from the Schools
Division Superintendent through the Division Science Supervisor in writing. List
and supporting documents of applicants together with an endorsement signed by
the School Head and its corresponding screening results should be submitted to
the Schools Division Office. However, the placement of the recommended learners
shall be subjected to the availability of slots intended for the SPS.
C. Commencement Exercises
The learners who are graduates of the Special Program in Science must have their
own commencement exercises separate from the regular sections. These graduates
should be celebrated with utmost pride and distinction. A sash or “sablay” containing
the name of the program “Special Program in Science” should be worn. Honor
graduates in the program should likewise have a separate mention in the invitation
or souvenir program.
The core subjects offered in the 2010 Secondary Education Curriculum shall be
enhanced by the additional subjects identified in the Revised Curriculum of the Engineering
and Science Education Program (ESEP) of the S & T- Oriented High Schools (DO No. 41, s.
2004).
The subject offerings and time allotment stipulated in DO 41 s. 2004 shall be strictly
followed. However, supplementary subjects may be offered as deemed necessary, but the
suggested curriculum offerings should not be minimized to be able to offer other courses
(DO No. 55, s. 2010).
DO No. 46, s. 2012 (Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of SCP at the Secondary
Level), item 4 states “Being career pathways, the Special Curricular Programs take the place
of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) of the core curriculum. All the other subjects
of the core curriculum shall be adopted, including the time allocation as stipulated in DepEd
Order No. 31, s. 2012. The add-ons to the core curriculum shall be the advanced subjects
of the Special Programs. Likewise, the schools have the option to further enrich the
curriculum, provided that the requirements of the core curriculum and the special
curricular programs have been met.
Hence, DepEd Region VII will adopt a uniform scheme of the subject offering and time
allotment.
A. SPS in Elementary
Note 2: ICT and Design Thinking/Science Investigatory Project are Elective subjects that will
take the place of TLE subject per DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019 on Policy Guidelines on the K to 12
Basic Education Program, item 69 p. 88.
Note 3: Teaching Time for Enhanced Science should be longer than the other subjects. If the
mandate is 45 minutes per subject, then Enhanced Science will be 60 minutes. If the regular
subject takes 60 minutes, then the Enhanced Science is 90 minutes.
A. SPS in JHS
Subjects G7 G8 G9 G10
min/day min/day min/day min/day
Enhanced Math 60 60 60 60
Enhanced Science 60/90 60/90 60/90 60/90
Creative Technology 60 60 60 60
(3 x a week)
Science Research 60 60 60 60
(3 x a week)
Note 1: Class Schedules are from Monday-Thursday only, while Friday will be devoted to Catch-Up
Friday (DM 001 s. 2024)
Note 2: Creative Technology and Science Research are Elective subjects that will take the
place of TLE subject per DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019 on Policy Guidelines on the K to 12 Basic
Education Program, item 69 p. 88.
Note 3: Those who are implementing a Foreign Language subject have the option to continue the
practice with a 2-hour-per-week session. This shall be regarded as optional Elective and not an
enrolment in the Special Program in a Foreign Language.
Note 3: Teaching Time for Enhanced Science should be longer than the other subjects. If the
mandate is 45 minutes per subject, then Enhanced Science will be 60 minutes. If the regular
subject takes 60 minutes, then the Enhanced Science is 90 minutes.
5 -- Status Quo Status Quo Status Quo Status Quo Harmonized Harmonized
Curriculum Curriculum
6 -- Status Quo Status Quo Status Quo Status Quo Status Quo Harmonized
Curriculum
By 2028-2029 all SPS Elementary shall have completed the harmonized the
curriculum. For SPS JHS, all grade levels shall have completed the harmonized curriculum
by SY 2026-2027.
DO No. 69, s. 1993 Teachers in science schools should have qualifications higher than
the requirement for ordinary schools. Newly hired teachers should be superior graduates
of teacher education institutions or should have scored well in the PBET or LET.
Teachers with graduate or post graduate degree or at least 15 units will be preferred.
DO No. 55, s. 2010 states that teachers to be assigned in SPS should have the
qualifications: Honor graduates of CHED-recognized teacher education institutions,
preferably, DOST scholars; and passed the PBET or LET.
Teaching Loads
In assigning teaching loads, the SPS Coordinator shall consider the following:
Enhanced Math in BSED Math or BS Math or Statistics with relevant master’s degree units
JHS
DO No. 69, s. 1993 the school should be headed by a principal and teachers whose
qualifications are higher than the requirement for ordinary schools. A school implementing
the Program shall be administered by the school head/principal and supported by the
program coordinator. It should also have specialized teachers who shall execute the
prescribed curriculum for the SPS. Likewise, it has support personnel that shall provide
ancillary services to the learners.
1. Principal/School Head
a. The principal/school head in a school offering the SPS must have the relevant
educational background and training as well as a firm commitment to the Program. The
school head must recognize the value of STEM education for learners who are
mathematically and/or scientifically inclined. The school head in SPS JHS must be a
Science/Math or TLE major.
b. The principal/school head shall have overall responsibility for the
administrative management and instructional leadership of the SPS in the school. Specific
responsibility:
• ensure the easy and immediate implementation of policies to each of the
learning areas.
• spearhead the LAC sessions in their respective departments every month
geared towards the effective and efficient implementation of SPS.
• attend relevant training in the implementation of SPS.
• conduct Instructional Supervision through regular monitoring and evaluation
of the quality of instruction of the teachers.
• coordinate with the school head opportunities for STEM education teachers
and students’ development.
• submit school year report to the SDO & RO.
• lead in the conduct of screening of applicants to the school.
• lead effectively in the decision-making process for continuous improvement of
the curriculum, instruction, and learning outcomes.
• facilitate effective community and stakeholder’s participation in the
continuous improvement of the Program.
• create a positive sphere of influence among fellow mentors and stakeholders
to serve as a model by being champion of the Program in the School Governing
Council.
• orient the incoming school heads as to the SPS implementation in case
reshuffling happens.
c. Assignment of school heads shall have preference to those with specialization
in the STEM fields.
2. Program Coordinator
a. SPS implementing schools should have a Program Coordinator with a
bachelor’s degree and specialization in science, mathematics, or other related fields and
have at least 3 years of teaching experience handling Science or Math subjects.
b. The program coordinator has the following responsibility:
For JHS
• Measuring Equipment
Analytical Balances
Thermometers
Rulers
Measuring cups
Measuring spoons
Volumetric flask
Distilling flask
Calorimeter
pH meter
• Apparatus
Electrolysis apparatus
Sterilizing oven
Conductivity apparatus
• Heating Equipment:
Bunsen burners
Heating mantles
Melting point apparatus
Hot plates
• Glassware:
Test tubes
Funnels
Bottles and jars with tight-fitting lids
Burettes
Pipettes and droppers
Graduated cylinders
Beakers
Flasks
Mortar and pestles
Evaporating dishes
Spot plates
Stirring rods
Physics:
1. Measuring equipment
Meter Scale
Vernier Caliper
Screw Gauge
Protractor
Stopwatch
Spring Balance
Spherometer
Triple beam balance
Speedometer
Sextant
2. Optical equipment
Lenses
Concave
Convex
Prism
Mirror
Flat mirror
Concave mirror
Convex mirror
Optical Bench
Glass slab
3. Electrical equipment
Rheostats
Multimeter
Voltmeter
Ammeter
Decade Box
Galvanometer
Ballistic Galvanometer
Wein’s bridge
Anderson Bridge
Maxwell Bridge
Battery eliminator
Daniel cell
Meter bridge
Leclanché cell
Ohm’s law apparatus
Bread Board
Thyratron Valve
Transistors
Diodes
4. Semiconductor Devices
Thyristor
Diode
Photodiode
Zener Diode
Light Emitting Diode (LED)
Triode
Transistor
Capacitor
Resistor
5. Gravity-related apparatus
Pendulum
Kater’s Pendulum
Parallelogram apparatus
8. Magnetic equipment
Compass
Bar magnets
Iron fillings
Mathematics
• Chalkboard compass
• Protractor
• Graphing board
• Scientific calculator
• Geoboard
• Stopwatch
• Solid geometrical bodies
• Area and Volume explanatory model
Library/ Research Must be catalogued:
Room • Textbooks
• Reference books
• Encyclopedia
• Dictionary
• Almanac
• Atlas
• Maps/charts
• Tables and chairs
• Lights
• Ventilation
• Research output
• 3 laptops for research with Wi-Fi
• STARBOOKS kiosk (online) optional
ICT Laboratory/ Elem & JHS
Creative Tech Room
• Maximum of 40 sets of laptop or desktop (8 GB RAM)
• Camera and headset
• 2 printers set with photocopier/scanner.
• Microsoft Office package
Robotics:
• Microcontroller board/IC
• Power supply for MCU
• Sensors (temperature, light, sound, humidity, gas,
motion, etc.)
• Motors (DC motor (1-12v); Nema 17 stepper motor,
small servo motor, motor driver
• Breadboard
• Relay modules
• Buttons/switch
• RGB
• Seven segment LED
• Assorted 3 mm LEDs.
• LCD 2x16
Software:
• Photoshop
• Illustrator
• For JHS (inkscape, corel, sketchup (3D cad))
_____________________________ __________________________
Project Supervisor/Teacher Checked by Lab In-charge.
(Name & Signature) (Name and Signature)
DECLARATION:
I/We borrowed the above stated item(s) belonging to the Science Laboratory. I
understand that all the items will be used for teaching-learning activities, research
and competition purposes only.
teacher/laboratory in-charge.
1. This form must be completed and submitted to the laboratory in charge at least one
day in advance, incomplete form will not be entertained.
2. All equipment & items to be borrowed are subject to availability and vacancy.
3. Prior approval from project supervisor/teacher is needed to obtain the item(s) above.
4. The laboratory in charge has the right to request the borrower to return the loaned
item(s) at any time.
5. The borrower/s (learner/teacher) may be responsible for replacing the item(s) if it
is damaged,lost or stolen due to recklessness or negligence.
6. An incident report should be made if the borrowed item/s is/are broken, lost or
damaged.
7. The equipment/apparatus should not be taken out of premises unless authorization
from the Property Custodian and the Principal is obtained.
Names of Learners:
Date:
Subject:
Title of the Experiment:
Scoring Scale
4- Expectations Exceeded 19-20 –Exceptional
3- Expectations Met 16-18- Satisfactory
2- Basic Standards Somewhat Met 12-15 –Needs Improvement
1-Below the Minimum Standards 01-11- Inadequate
Instruction. Put Checkmark on appropriate rating 4 3 2 1
Experimental Hypothesis
Based upon the purpose of the experiment, the
hypothesized relationship between variables and predicted results is
clear and reasonable.
Experimental Designs + Materials
Experiment conveys a thorough analysis of the problem and has been
conducted thoughtfully. All materials and setup employed are
accurately described. All images, graphic elements, diagrams, charts,
drawings, etc., are clear and pertinent.
Data Collection + Procedures
Data has been collected and recorded accurately and conveyed in an
orderly manner to accurately reflect results. Clear steps are listed to
define all procedures.
Analysis
Thoughtful analysis discusses the relationship between variables.
Trends and patterns are logically analyzed. Predictions are made
regarding varying outcomes because of alterations to the experiment.
Scientific Results + Conclusions
The solution to the problem is explained with convincing clarity. Sources
are cited appropriately. Conclusion explains whether the hypothesis
was supported by the findings. Possible sources of error are detailed, if
applicable. Clearly expresses what was learned from the experiment.
Column Total
Total Score
1) Learner/s’ Details
Learner/s Name Contact
Grade Level
Section:
2) Description of Incident
Date of Incident Time
Lab Room No. and
Name
Subject Teacher
Item Specifics
Description of Incident
(Describe the incident
in detail) provide
additional sheet if
necessary.
Appropriate Action _____ For School Report/Inventory Only _____For Replacement
Fill-in this data only if the replacement is charge to learners/teachers after incident
report has been made and considered, otherwise, this data is not necessary.
Total
I/We
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________have
fully read, understand and agree to abide for the “Replacement Charges - Breakage, Damage
or Loss of Laboratory Item” in which the school holds the right to take necessary action.
____________________________________________________________________
4) Declaration by the Parents
I/We
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ fully
understand that our children are responsible for replacing the damage or loss of the
borrowed science tools, equipment or learning resources under the care of the school based
on the breakage and incident report. Hence, by extension we are taking the responsibility to
provide financial support or/and make effort in the replacement in compliance to the lost or
damaged item/s.
____________________________________________________________________________________
1. Chairman – could be the SPS Coordinator or the Research Teacher who evaluates
the correctness and coherence of the information declared in the research proposal
or output vis-a-vis RSTF/NSTF/INTEL-ISEF forms and guidelines. Preferably, the
chairman has experience in SIP contest.
2. Vice Chairman – could be a math teacher or laboratory-in-charge who evaluates the
over-all rigor of research and aids data analytics.
3. Ethics Reviewer – could be a science teacher who checks the integrity of the research
processes, claims, copyrights, data anonymity and confidentiality.
4. Plagiarism Checker – could be the ICT teacher or the LR Coordinator who evaluates
the originality of the paper using any online plagiarism checker.
5. Technical Expert – could be the English teacher who checks all syntaxes, grammars,
structures, and bibliography/references using any online language checker and
formatting tool.
Total
2.
3.
4.
Part V. Teacher Development Actual Number of Count
1. LAC Session conducted in Q1
2. LAC Session conducted in Q2
3. LAC Session conducted in Q3
4. LAC Session conducted in Q4
5. School INSET conducted in a school
year
6. Teachers sent to division training in a
school year
7. Teachers sent to regional training in a
school year
8. Teachers sent to national training in
a school year
9. Teachers sent to international
training in a school year
10. Academic Profile of the teachers Bachelor’s degree Master’s Degree
9.1 Physics
9.2 Biology
9.3 Chemistry
9.4 ICT
Call for revisions to revise specific parts of this manual can be cast in either
parliamentary or pseudo-parliamentary motions. During official meetings with EPSs in
Science, a motion to revise specific parts in the manual can be raised. Pseudo-parliamentary
invitation to revise parts can be cast through text motions which will be laid by the Regional
Science Coordinator into poll voting. Either way, when a motion to revise a specific part
reaches more than 50% of the votes, a notice for special meeting for revision shall be made
through a Regional Memorandum.
Depending on the context and degree of revisions, the Regional Office may invite
proper personalities like school heads, departments heads, and /or teachers of the SP-
Science implementers. Once the revisions are carried out, the identity marking in the lower-
right corner of the cover page containing the version number and the released date shall be
updated.
In case the Central Office shall issue the National Implementing Guidelines for
the Special Program in Science, all directives of this manual will be voided following
the national mandate and only parts of this harmonized curriculum and guidelines
where there are no clear provisions from the Central Office shall be enforced.
XIV. References
Assessment
DO No. 08, s. of 2015 “Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K-12 Basic
Education Program.
DO No. 31, s. 2022 “Interim Guidelines for Assessment and Grading in Light of the Basic
Education Learning Continuity Plan.”
“The most valuable resource that all of us have is each other. Without
collaboration, our growth is only limited to our own perspectives.”
– R.J. Meehan