Application-and-Example-Non-isentropic-flow
Application-and-Example-Non-isentropic-flow
In fluid dynamics, non-isentropic flow refers to situations where entropy is not conserved along a
streamline, typically due to the presence of heat transfer, viscous dissipation, or shock waves.
Although ideal fluids are typically assumed to be inviscid and adiabatic (i.e., isentropic), the concept
of non-isentropic flow can still be meaningfully applied in an idealized context to analyze key flow
behaviors where entropy changes occur. The following are some significant applications of non-
isentropic flow of ideal fluids in engineering and physics:
In propulsion systems such as jet and rocket engines, flow through the nozzle is often subject to
external heating or cooling, violating the isentropic assumption. Similarly, in steam turbines, the
working fluid may experience heat loss or gain in blade passages, resulting in entropy changes. These
conditions require a non-isentropic treatment, even when ideal fluid models are used to simplify the
calculations.
When air flows around high-speed aircraft or through supersonic wind tunnels, shock waves form
and cause abrupt increases in pressure and temperature, along with a rise in entropy. These shock-
induced changes are inherently non-isentropic, and are analyzed using the Rankine-Hugoniot
relations, which are derived under the ideal gas assumption but account for entropy change across
the shock front.
The combustion process introduces significant heat and chemical energy into the flow, dramatically
increasing entropy. This occurs in gas turbine combustors, ramjet and scramjet inlets, and rocket
nozzles, where idealized flow models are used in preliminary design and performance prediction
despite the presence of irreversible thermodynamic effects.
spacecraft encounter hypersonic flow conditions where shock waves and intense aerodynamic
heating dominate the flow field. The flow around the re-entering body undergoes strong entropy
increases due to shock compression and heat transfer. While real-gas effects and viscous dissipation
are significant, ideal fluid models with non-isentropic corrections are still used in early design stages
or for simplified analysis.
Heat Exchangers with Flow Acceleration
in thermodynamic cycle analysis involving Brayton or Rankine cycles, ideal gas flows experience
entropy change during heat exchange processes. Additionally, models such as Rayleigh flow (heat
addition in a constant-area duct) and Fanno flow (adiabatic flow with friction) provide theoretical
frameworks for analyzing non-isentropic behavior in ducts, despite the use of ideal fluid
assumptions.
1. Air (k=1.4) enters [section (1)] an insulated, constant cross-sectional area duct with the
following properties:
T0= 518.67 °R
T1=514.55 °R
P1=14.3 psia
For Fanno flow, determine corresponding values of fluid temperature and entropy change
for various values of downstream pressures and plot the related Fanno line.
Solution:
( ρV )2 T 2
T+ =T 0=Constant
2 C p P2 Eqn (1)
2
R
And Equation:
T P
s−s 1=C p ln −Rln Eqn (2)
T1 P1
We need values of the ideal gas constant and the specific heat at constant pressure to use in Eqs. 1
and 2.
Calculating Cp:
Rk
C p= Eqn (3)
k−1
[53.3 (ft −lb)/(lbm−° R)](1.4)
CP=
1.4−1
C p=187(ft−lb)/(lbm−° R)
From the equation:
ρ1
ρ 1 V 1= Ma1 √ RT 1 k Eqn (4)
RT 1
But:
T 1 514.55 ° F
= =0.992
T 0 518.67 ° R
From equation:
1/ 2
T0
Ma 1=( −1)/[(k−1)/2]}
T1
Or
M a1 = (
√ 1
0.992
−1)/0.2=0.2
Thus, with:
T+¿¿
T =518.67 ° R
Thus, since 1 lb=32.2 lbm⋅ft/s2, we obtain:
−5 2
6.5 x 10 T +T −518.67+0
T =502.3 ° R
From Eq. (2), we obtain
s−s 1+
[ lbm ⋅° R ]
187 ( ft ⋅lb )
ln (
502.3 ° R
514.55 ° R
)
550
500
450
T, °R
400
350
300
30 35 40 45 50 55 60
s-s1, (ft-lb)/(lbm-°R)
Solution:
Eqn (1)
( ρV )2 RT
P+ =constant
P
And equation:
Eqn (2)
T P
s−s 1=C p ln −Rln
T1 P1
Calculating Cp:
Rk
C p= Eqn (3)
k−1
[53.3 (ft −lb)/(lbm−° R)](1.4)
CP=
1.4−1
C p=187(ft−lb)/(lbm−° R)
Also, from the previous example, ρ V = 16.7 lbm/(ft2°s). For the given inlet
[section (1)] condition, we get:
R T 1 [ 53.3 ( ft ⋅lb ) ∕ ( l bm⋅° R ) ] ( 514.55 R )
= =13.3 f t 3 /lbm
P1 2
1 psi a(144.∈. / f t )
2
( ρv )2 RT
[ ]
2
16.7 lbm
P+ =14.3 Psⅈa + 2
(13.3 f t 3 /lbm)
P f t ⋅s
2
14.3 psia+3720 lbm /(ft ⋅ s )=constant
Or, since 1 lbm/(ft⋅s2) = [(1/32.2)(lb⋅s2/ft)]/(ft⋅s2) = (1/32.2)lb/ft2
( ρv )2 RT
P+ =14.3 Psⅈa +[(93720/32.2)lb / f t 2 ](1 f t 2 /144∈.2)
P
¿ 15.10 psia=constant
With the downstream pressure of P=13.5 psia, we can obtain the downstream
temperature by using Eq. 3 with the fact that:
[ ]
2
lbm ft ⋅ lb
16.7 2 [53.3 ]
( ρV )2 R f t ⋅s lbm ⋅° R
= 2 2
P (144∈. / f t )13.5 psia
2 2
¿ 7.65[lbm/(ft ⋅s )]/° R [1 lb /(32.2 lbm⋅ ft / s )]
2 2 2
¿ 0.238(lb/ f t )/° R(1 f t /144∈. )
−3 2
¿ 1.65 x 10 (lb/¿ . )/° R
Hence, from Eqn. (3)
−3 2
13.5 psia+[1.65 x 10 (lb / ¿ . )/° R]
P=15.10 psia
Or
T =969 ° R
From Eq. (2) with the downstream pressure P=13.5 psia and temperature
T=969°R we get:
969 ° R
s−s 1=[187(ft ⋅lb)/(lbm⋅° R)]ln ( )
514.55 ° R
s−s 1=121(ft ⋅lb)/(lbm ⋅° R)
REFERENCES