0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views3 pages

Report Assignment Quality Control

A quality control inspector at Coca-Cola analyzed twenty-five samples of bottle volumes, calculating an average volume of 15.95 ounces. Using a standard deviation of 0.14 ounces, control limits were established at 16.16 ounces for the upper control limit (UCL) and 15.74 ounces for the lower control limit (LCL). These limits are based on three standard deviations from the average volume.

Uploaded by

g493524
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views3 pages

Report Assignment Quality Control

A quality control inspector at Coca-Cola analyzed twenty-five samples of bottle volumes, calculating an average volume of 15.95 ounces. Using a standard deviation of 0.14 ounces, control limits were established at 16.16 ounces for the upper control limit (UCL) and 15.74 ounces for the lower control limit (LCL). These limits are based on three standard deviations from the average volume.

Uploaded by

g493524
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

TASK 2

A quality control inspector at the Coca-Cola soft drink company has taken twenty-five samples
with four observations each of the volume of bottles filled. The data and the computed means are
shown in the table. If the standard deviation of the bottling operation is 0.14 ounces, use this
information to develop control limits of three standard deviations for the bottling operation.

Sample Bottle volume in ounces Average, Range, R


number 𝑥
1 2 3 4

1 15.85 16.02 15.83 15.93 15.91 0.19

2 16.12 16.00 15.85 16.01 15.99 0.27

3 16.00 15.91 15.94 15.83 15.92 0.17

4 16.20 15.85 15.74 15.93 15.93 0.46

5 15.74 15.86 16.21 16.10 15.98 0.47

6 15.94 16.01 16.14 16.03 16.03 0.20

7 15.75 16.21 16.01 15.86 15.96 0.46

8 15.82 15.94 16.02 15.94 15.93 0.20

9 16.04 15.98 15.83 15.98 15.96 0.21

10 15.64 15.86 15.94 15.89 15.83 0.30

11 16.11 16.00 16.01 15.82 15.99 0.29

12 15.72 15.85 16.12 16.15 15.96 0.43

13 15.85 15.76 15.74 15.98 15.83 0.24

14 15.73 15.84 15.96 16.10 15.91 0.37

15 16.20 16.01 16.10 15.89 16.05 0.31

16 16.12 16.08 15.83 15.94 15.99 0.29

17 16.01 15.93 15.81 15.68 15.86 0.33

18 15.78 16.04 16.11 16.12 16.01 0.34


19 15.84 15.92 16.05 16.12 15.98 0.28

20 15.92 16.09 16.12 15.93 16.02 0.20

21 16.11 16.02 16.00 15.88 16.00 0.23

22 15.98 15.82 15.89 15.89 15.90 0.16

23 16.05 15.73 15.73 15.93 15.86 0.32

24 16.01 16.01 15.89 15.86 15.94 0.15

25 16.08 15.78 15.92 15.98 15.94 0.30

Total 398.75 7.17

Solution:

The centerline of the control data is the average of the samples:

398.75
X̄ =
25

X̄ = 15.95

The control limits are:

UCL = X̄ + zσ
𝑥

= 15.95 + 3 ( )
0.14
4
= 16.16

LCL = X̄ − zσ
𝑥

= 15.95 − 3 ( )
0.14
4
= 15.74

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy