22ge003 - Basics of Electrical Engineering Unit 3 Induced Electric Field Due To Changing Magnetic Field 3.1 EMF Due To Change in Magnetic Field
22ge003 - Basics of Electrical Engineering Unit 3 Induced Electric Field Due To Changing Magnetic Field 3.1 EMF Due To Change in Magnetic Field
UNIT 3
INDUCED ELECTRIC FIELD DUE TO CHANGING MAGNETIC
FIELD
3.1 EMF due to change in Magnetic field
To see how an emf can be induced by a changing magnetic field, let us consider a loop of
wire connected to a galvanometer, as illustrated in Figure 1. When a magnet is moved toward the
loop, the galvanometer needle deflects in one direction, arbitrarily shown to the right in Figure 1a.
When the magnet is moved away from the loop, the needle deflects in the opposite direction, as
shown in Figure 1c. When the magnet is held stationary relative to the loop (Fig.1b), no deflection
is observed. Finally, if the magnet is held stationary and the loop is moved either toward or away
from it, the needle deflects. From these observations, we conclude that the loop “knows” that the
magnet is moving relative to it because it experiences a change in magnetic field. Thus, it seems
that a relationship exists between current and changing magnetic field.
Figure 1 (a) When a magnet is moved toward a loop of wire connected to a galvanometer, the galvanometer
deflects as shown, indicating that a current is induced in the loop. (b) When the magnet is held stationary,
there is no induced current in the loop, even when the magnet is inside the loop. (c) When the magnet is
moved away from the loop, the galvanometer deflects in the opposite direction, indicating that the induced
current is opposite that shown in part (a). Changing the direction of the magnet’s motion changes the
direction of the current induced by that motion.
Figure 2 Faraday’s experiment. When the switch in the primary circuit is closed, the galvanometer in the
secondary circuit deflects momentarily. The emf induced in the secondary circuit is caused by the changing
magnetic field through the secondary coil.
The key to under standing what happens in this experiment is to first note that when the
switch is closed, the current in the primary circuit produces a magnetic field in the region of the
circuit, and it is this magnetic field that penetrates the secondary circuit. Furthermore, when the
switch is closed, the magnetic field produced by the current in the primary circuit changes from
zero to some value over some finite time, and it is this changing field that induces a current in the
secondary circuit.
the emf induced in a circuit is directly proportional to the time rate of change of the magnetic
flux through the circuit.
where ∮ represents the line integral around the circuit. Faraday’s law can be written in terms of
the induced electric field as
There is an important distinction between the electric field induced by a changing magnetic field
and the electrostatic field produced by a fixed charge distribution. Specifically, the induced electric
field is nonconservative because it does net work in moving a charge over a closed path, whereas
the electrostatic field is conservative and does no net work over a closed path. Hence, electric
potential can be associated with the electrostatic field, but not with the induced field. The following
equations represent the distinction between the two types of electric field:
Example:
What is the induced electric field in the circular coil shown in figure below at at the three
times indicated? t1=0, t2=5.0×10−2s , and t3=1.0 s. A magnetic field B⃗ is directed outward
perpendicular to the plane of a circular coil of radius r = 0.50 m. The field is cylindrically
symmetrical with respect to the center of the coil, and its magnitude decays exponentially
according to B = (1.5T)e(5.0s−1)t , where B is in teslas and t is in seconds.
Solution
The induced electric field in the coil is constant in magnitude over the cylindrical surface,
similar to how Ampere’s law problems with cylinders are solved. Since E⃗ is tangent to the coil,
The direction of ϵ is counterclockwise, and E⃗ circulates in the same direction around the coil.
The values of E are
Thus, the magnetic flux through a circular path whose radius r is greater than R, the
solenoid radius, is
The induced field E⃗ is tangent to this path, and because of the cylindrical symmetry of
the system, its magnitude is constant on the path. Hence, we have
b. For a path of radius r inside the solenoid, so
c. The magnetic field points into the page as shown in part (b) and is decreasing. If either of
the circular paths were occupied by conducting rings, the currents induced in them would
circulate as shown, in conformity with Lenz’s law. The induced electric field must be so
directed as well.
3.4 Significance
In part (b), note that |E⃗ | increases with r inside and decreases as 1/r outside the solenoid,
as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 : The electric field vs. distance r. When r < R , the electric field rises
linearly, whereas when r > R , the electric field falls of proportional to 1/r.
Discussion Questions:
1. Why is it that induced electric fields due to changing magnetic flux are more readily
observable than the induced magnetic fields due to changing electric fields?
The magnitude of the magnetic field due to displacement current is too small to be easily
observable. This effect can of course be increased by increasing the displacement current.
On the other hand, the effect of induced electric field due to changing magnetic flux can
be increased simply by taking more and more number of turns in the coil. The induced
emf’s in different turns of the same coil add up in series.
2. A coil consists of 200 turns of wire having a total resistance of 2.0 (. Each turn is a square
of side 18 cm, and a uniform magnetic field directed perpendicular to the plane of the coil
is turned on. If the field changes linearly from 0 to 0.50 T in 0.80 s, what is the magnitude
of the induced emf in the coil while the field is changing?