IJMS
IJMS
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The study proposes an approach allowing the favorable modification of the stresses field of a structure
Received 26 April 2013 subjected to a Hertzian contact. It is based on the study of a classic Hertzian contact in the presence of
Received in revised form subsurface circular defects. The idea is to limit the field of tangential stresses without large increasing of
27 August 2013
the global stress (Von Mises) of the system. The location of the defects is made according to the
Accepted 31 August 2013
mechanical parameters of the contact (Fn, has, z). The results of the numerical calculations (FEM) are
Available online 21 September 2013
compared with photoelastic measurements and highlight an excellent correlation. The location of the
Keywords: defect on the symmetry axis (x ¼ 0) is the dominating parameter for the tangential stress decreasing.
Hertzian contact & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subsurface treatment
Shearing stress decreasing
Photoelasticity
Numerical simulation
0020-7403/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.08.013
108 A.-C. Palade et al. / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 77 (2013) 107–112
Fig. 2. Comparison of the FEM results with Nowell and Hills solutions [2]. (a) Sub-surface stresses and (b) Normalized contact pressure distribution.
A.-C. Palade et al. / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 77 (2013) 107–112 109
line of equal value of (s1 s2) that is linked to the maximal Student law and a 95% confidence interval. The experimental
shearing stress with: τmax ¼(s1 s2)/2 where (s1 s2) is the values are detected from a depth of 0.5 mm.
difference between the principal stresses. The plan where the By keeping the previous operating conditions, we validated the
tangential stress is observed is perpendicular to the direction (z) of method by adding a hole with a diameter of 0.82 mm and located
the applied force, namely the polarization plan, and in the 2.5 mm under the surface, location point of τmax, when a load
direction (y) of propagation of the light (Fig. 3). Fn ¼714 N is applied (Fig. 5).
The holes from the polycarbonate samples were obtained by The distribution of the stress field between the numerical and
drilling. The size of these holes (Ø0.82 mm) is obtained with a experimental models is in a good agreement. Thus we assume that
Ø0.76 mm lubricated drill, operated at 0.081 cm s 1 feed rate and the numerical model, showing a good estimation of the shearing
475 tr min 1 rotation speed. These parameters were obtained after stress, allows estimating the distribution of the principal stresses.
an optimization process involving an experimental plan. The main The numerical calculation will thus allow predicting the distribu-
goal was to reduce the residual stress resulting from this process. tion of the shearing and Von Mises's stresses sVM in a pierced solid
or which presents a defect. Samples were mechanically drilled and
the absence of effect is verified by photoelasticity.
2.3. Methodology validation
Fig. 4. Sub-surface distribution of τmax within PC. Comparison of numerical, Fig. 6. Sub-surface distribution of τmax within PC at 714 N. Comparison FEM-
analytical and experimental approaches. experimental.
Fig. 7. Distribution of Von Mises stress (MPa) along x for Fn ¼714 N: (a) for z ¼0 mm; (b) for z¼ 2.5 mm.
30
3.3. Influence of the drilling diameter
20
The approach was completed by introducing an additional
factor: the diameter of drilling of the cylindrical hole. The results 10
are presented on Fig. 10 and are expressed according to normal-
ized parameters. On the y-axis, we have the ratio of Von Mises or 0
REF CASE 1 CASE 2 CASE 3 CASE 4
the shearing stress on the maximal contact pressure, Pmax. On the
x-axis, the ratio drilling diameter (ϕ)/half-width of contact (a) has Fig. 9. Distribution of τmax along z for Fn ¼714 N, z(τmax) ¼ 2.5 mm, a ¼3.122 mm.
A.-C. Palade et al. / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 77 (2013) 107–112 111
been chosen. The will is that from these curves, it is possible to a big importance for the control of Von Mises's stress. So, and
predict the behavior for various configurations of material. because we want to keep a general vision, we follow the perfor-
For ϕ/a o0.03, we have simultaneously an increase (between mance indicator versus the ratio surface of drilling/surface trans-
50 and 300%, depending on the considered case) of the normalized verse of the contact, where:
Von Mises's stress and a 60% decrease of the normalized tangential
stress. The transverse surface of the contact is defined as being the
For 0.03 oϕ/ao 0.1, Von Mises's stress continues to increase product 2za;
while the tangential stress remains constant. The interest of the The surface of the drilling is Nπϕ2⧸4, with N, the number of
drilling as regards the decrease of the tangential stress is elimi- drillings and ϕ, the diameter of the drillings.
nated by the overload of Von Mises's stress.
Beyond a ratio ϕ/a ¼0.1, Von Mises's stress and the tangential Fig. 11, below, shows that the case 2 allows a global decrease of
stress don't vary any more. The tangential stress undergoes a the stresses, only when the drilling surface is lower than 0.2% of
decrease of the order of 40% while Von Mises's stress increased the transverse surface of the contact.
by 300%.
4. Conclusion
3.4. Definition of the most favorable conditions
The decrease of the ecological footprint of the industrial
The study of the results shows that the case 2 is the one which processes brings the researcher to propose new solutions, envir-
leads to the lowest increase of Von Mises's stress. This case onment-friendly, to improve the properties of surface of mechan-
represents the best compromise between the biggest decrease of ical components. Our contribution consisted to show the interest
the tangential stress and the lowest increase of Von Mises's stress. of a subsurface treatment to strengthen the properties of a
Thus the product of the two stresses appears as a good perfor- component subjected to a Hertzian contact. In the case of a roll
mance indicator of the treatment, by accepting the fact that each plan contact, our works bring to light a good correlation between
of the components has the same importance in the result. The the experimental and numerical approach for the study of the
normalization of this indicator allows keeping a classic approach. stresses field. This good agreement is obtained as well in the
Thus it becomes: sVMτmax/P2max. classic Hertzian case as in the presence of circular defects under
The analysis also shows that the size of the drillings has low the surface of the contact. The normalized location of defects, in
influence on the results in terms of tangential stress, but presents the Hertzian sense, allows to define a space of study and allows
showing that the presence of a hole on the symmetry axis (x ¼0) is
the dominating factor when we aim at the decrease of the
tangential stress. On the other hand, the presence of holes
generates an increase of Von Mises's stress we have to take into
account not to plasticize the material. The optimization of this
approach allows to refine the strategy for the limitation of the
stresses field: realization of drillings in border of the contact zone
(case 2), with a drilling surface lower than 0.2% of the transverse
surface of the contact. As a result the performance indicator
(sVMτmax/P2max) shows a global decrease of the stresses level.
From a practical point of view, this imposes to realize cavities of
the order of 100 mm of diameter, by laser drilling for “transparent”
materials or by using the laser sintering technique for the other
materials.
Fig. 10. Normalized stresses's distribution (Von Mises and Tresca) versus the ratio Acknowledgement
ϕ/a.
Authors want to acknowledge the Grant accorded by the
uB-Filiale, subsidiary of Université de Bourgogne, which supports
this study.
References
[7] Frija M, Hassine T, Fathallah R, Bouraoui C, Dogui A. Finite element modelling [13] Kabo E, Ekberg A. Fatigue initiation in railway wheels – a numerical study of
of shot penning process: prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the the influence of defects. Wear 2002;253:26–34.
plastic deformations and the surface integrity. Materials Science and Engi- [14] Wang L, Wang Y, Sun XG, Pan ZY, He JQ, Li CG. Influence of pores on the
neering A 2006;426:173–80. surface microcompression mechanical response of thermal barrier coatings
[8] Dick T, Paulin C, Cailletaud G, Fouvry S. Experimental and numerical analysis fabricated by atmospheric plasma spray–finite element simulation. Applied
of local and global plastic behavior in fretting wear. Tribology International Surface Science 2011;257:2238–49.
2006;39:1036–44. [15] Poon B, Rittel D, Ravichandral G. An analysis nanoindentation in linearly
[9] Mohd Tobi AL, Ding J, Bandak G, Leen SB, Shipway PH. A study on the elastic solids. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2008;45:6018–33.
interaction between fretting wear and cyclic plasticity for Ti–6Al–4V. Wear [16] Liao Y, Zhou Y, Huang Y, Jiang L. Measuring elastic-plastic properties of thin
2009;267:270–82. films on elastic–plastic substrates by sharp indentation. Mechanics of Materi-
[10] Taraf M. Endommagement par fatigue de contact de roulement d’une roue als 2009;41:308–18.
ferroviaire: étude numérique par éléments finis [Thèse doctorale No.: [17] Bagherifard S, Ghelichi R, Guagliano M. A numerical model of severe shot
2008061S]. Metz: Université Paul Verlaine; 2008. penning (SSP) to predict the generation of a nanostructured surface layer of
[11] Kabo E. Material defects in rolling contact fatigue – influence of overloads and material. Surface and Coatings Technology 2010;204:4081–90.
defects clusters. International Journal of Fatigue 2002;24:887–94. [18] Ghita E., Marsavina L. Fotoelasticimetria. Metoda moderna in analiza experi-
[12] Kabo E, Ekberg A. Material defects in rolling contact fatigue of railway wheels - mentala a tensiunilor, Editura Eurostampa, Timisoara, 2002. pp. 63–67. ISBN
the influence of defect size. Wear 2005;258:1194–200. 973-8244-96-X.