0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views

Presentación Louis Mattar Testing - SPE

The document discusses analytical versus numerical solutions for well test equations. Analytical solutions provide exact solutions but can only handle simple reservoir models with homogeneous properties and regular boundaries. Numerical simulations can handle more complex reservoirs but require discretizing the reservoir into gridblocks, which introduces many degrees of freedom. It is often difficult to know the reservoir complexity in advance. The document argues that analytical models are better for understanding flow behavior and inverse problem solutions during well test analysis and that numerical models should only be used when reservoir complexities are well understood.

Uploaded by

ADWINDT
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views

Presentación Louis Mattar Testing - SPE

The document discusses analytical versus numerical solutions for well test equations. Analytical solutions provide exact solutions but can only handle simple reservoir models with homogeneous properties and regular boundaries. Numerical simulations can handle more complex reservoirs but require discretizing the reservoir into gridblocks, which introduces many degrees of freedom. It is often difficult to know the reservoir complexity in advance. The document argues that analytical models are better for understanding flow behavior and inverse problem solutions during well test analysis and that numerical models should only be used when reservoir complexities are well understood.

Uploaded by

ADWINDT
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 44

CIPC 2003

Louis Mattar
Fekete Associates Inc Analytical Solutions in Well Testing

Well Test Equation

P P 1 P + 2 = 2 y t x
2 2

Solutions Analytical Semi-Analytical

Numerical - Finite Difference Numerical - Finite Element Boundary Element? Analytical Element?

Issues
Complexity of Model / Solution Inverse Problem Diffusity

Issue Complexity

Definitions Analytical Models solve the problem directly (transforms, substitutions, calculus) Solution is continuous across domain.

Definitions Numerical Simulation is the process of dividing the reservoir into discrete blocks, having different reservoir properties, in order to deal with complex reservoir problems.

Well Test Equations


Analytical Vs Numerical

P P 1 P + 2 = 2 t y x
2 2

1 n+ 1 i,j

2P +P x

1 n+ i,j 2

1 n+ 1 i+,j

P +

1 n+ 1 i,j

2P +P y

1 n+ i,j 2

1 n+ 1 i+,j

1 P P = t

1 n+ i,j

n i,j

Numerical Vs Analytical

Analytical : -Whole reservoir -Single phase -Exact -Homogeneous * -Regular Boundaries**

Irregular Shapes

Irregular Boundaries

Modified Analytical ElementsA k1 k3

k2

Rubiks Cube (Integral Transforms)

Advantages of Analytical Solutions Better Understanding Cause and effect Physics of the process Groups that control response kh/q or k/c

Numerical

Numerical - Discretize Reservoir


(1+ Million Cells)

- Complex Reservoir - Heterogeneous - Computationally intensive - Multiphase**

Complexity? or Simplicity?

Occam's Razor If you have two theories which both explain the observed facts then you should use the simplest until more evidence comes along

Numerical Simulation may be justified when reservoir complexities are known. But how often, or how well, do we know these reservoir complexities, in advance? Often these reservoir complexities are only discovered through testing

Issue Inverse Problem

Inverse Problem

Well test interpretation is essentially an Inverse problem, and in general, is better suited to Analytical Solutions

Direct problem versus Inverse problem


Direct Problem: 2 + 3 = ? Answer : 5 Inverse Problem: The Answer is 5. What are the two numbers ?

Characteristics of Inverse Problems


non-unique solutions

K2 K1

2-Boundaries or Composite?

A good looking history match is not a good enough answer.

x x x x x

The selected MODEL must be appropriate


Numerical models are too complex-too many Degrees of

Freedom
Reservoir Complexities are often unknown a priory Cannot see forest for trees

Analytical models allow us to focus on the main issues Create a conceptual analysis.
Pattern recognition Judgement Consistency checks

Much better than numerical simulator

Issue Diffusivity

Diffusive Nature of PTA 7 8 2 5 9 3 6

9 2 4 7 1 2 1 8 9 8 5 4 4 7 6 3 6 1 5 3

Diffusive Nature of PTA Homogeneous

5.2

The question is, how much information is contained about the spatial distribution of permeability in the well-testing response in a heterogeneous formation?
Average permeability in a region Not Permeability at a fixed radius

Sageev and Horne (SPEFE 1988, 428 437)

It is possible to have a hole in the reservoir

as large as half the distance


between a production well and an observation well, without

any discernible difference


being evident in interference test

Obs

Hole

Well

Linking Analytical & Numerical Obtain Analytical Solution Use geostatistical model to Generate Permeability Field Populate Numerical Simulator
Example
Naturally Fractured Reservoir Determine Fractal Parameters Generate Permeability Field

Modeling can mean 2 things: a) Model recognition from a set of data - Well Testing b) using a model to forecast future performance - Numerical

Conclusions:

K eep I t S imple S tupid

Einstein Everything should be made as simple as possible,


but not simpler

Mathematics:
Great Servant
(Analytical)

Terrible Master
(Numerical)

I would rather be vaguely right


(Analytical)

than precisely wrong


(Numerical)

Justification for Numerical


Detailed Geological Description of complex reservoir geometry available in advance Multi-phase fluid flow, where gas is not fluid of interest Water cut matching

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy