Performance Analysis of Conventional Diversity Combining Schemes in Rayleigh Fading Channel
Performance Analysis of Conventional Diversity Combining Schemes in Rayleigh Fading Channel
Performance Analysis of Conventional Diversity Combining Schemes in Rayleigh Fading Channel
= +
=
The received SNR is
2
0 1 1
max{ , ,...., }
b
M
O
A E
N
I = = I I I
The CDF of I is
1
0
( ) ( )
M
i
i
P P
I I
=
=
[
The bi t-error rate probabili ty
Fig 5: BER Vs
0
/
b
E N for select ion diversity
Volume 2, Issue 6, June 2012 www.ijarcsse.com
2012, IJARCSSE All Rights Reserved Page | 199
ii. Maxi mal Rati o Combi ning
Both branches are weighted by their respective
instantaneous voltage-to-noise ratios.The branches are
then co-phased prior to summing in order to insure that all
branches are added in phase for maximum diversity gain.
The summed signals are then used as the received signal
and connected to the demodulator.
The advantage is that improvements can be achieved with
this configuration even when both branches are
completely correlated. The disadvantage of maximal ratio
is that it is complicated and requires accurate estimates of
the instantaneous signal level and average noise power to
achieve optimum performance with this combining
scheme. Maximal ratio combining will always perform
better than either selection diversity or equal gain
combining because it is an optimum combiner. The
informat ion on all channels is used with this technique to
get a more reliable received signal.
Fig 6: Block diagram of maximal ratio combining diversity scheme.
The combined output is given by:
1
0
( ) ( )
M
i i
i
y t wr t
=
=
The received SNR is
1
2
1
0
0
M
i b M
i
i
i
o
A E
N
=
=
I = = I
The bit-error rate probability
0
0
( / ) 1
0 0
1
( ) ( )
2
1 1
( )
2 ( 1)
b
e
E N N
N
b
P erfc p d
erfc e d
N
=
= I
!(E / N )
}
}
iii. Equal Gai n Combi ning
It is same as that of maximal ratio combining except that
of equal gains. In this scheme the gains of the branches
are all set to a single value and are not changed. Both the
branch signals are multiplied by the same branch gain (G)
and the resulting signals are co-phased and summed. The
resultant output signal is connected to the demodulator.
Fig 7: BER Vs
0
/
b
E N for Maximal Rat io Combining.
Fig 8: Block diagram of equal gain combining diversity scheme
The combined output is given by:
1 0 0
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
i i
M M M
j j
i i i
i i i
y t e r t A s t e z t
u u
= = =
= = +
The received SNR is
2
1
0
0
M
b
i
i
E
A
MN
=
| |
I =
|
\ .
It can be observed from the figure 10 the value of bit error
rate is lesser for Maximal Ratio Combining diversity
technique as compare to Equal Gain Combining and
Selection diversity technique and BER value for Equal
Gain Combining is more than the Selection diversity
technique.
Volume 2, Issue 6, June 2012 www.ijarcsse.com
2012, IJARCSSE All Rights Reserved Page | 200
Fig 9: BER Vs
0
/
b
E N
for Equal Gain Combining. Fig 10: BER Comparison
iv. Conclusion
For the receiver diversity we have different diversity
technique, out of which we used three techniques-
selection diversity, maximal ratio combining and equal
gain combining for our work. BPSK modulat ion
technique and Rayleigh fading is used for checking the
performance of these techniques. We observed that when
we calculated the value of SNR with different no. of
antenna for these three techniques, maximal ratio
combining diversity technique gives the best result as
compare to the equal gain combining and selection
diversity. For the calculation the bit error rate with respect
to the
0
/
b
E N
then again maximal ratio combining have
lesser value as compare to the equal gain combining and
selection diversity. So, we can say that the performance of
the maximal rat io combining is better as compare to the
equal gain combining and selection diversity
References
[1] Fangming He, Hong Man and Wei Wang, Maximal
Ratio Diversity Combining Enhanced Security, IEEE
Communicat ions Letters, Vol-15, Issue: 5 , pp-509 511,
May 2011.
[2] Rizvi, Yilmaz, Janssen, Weber and louin,
Performance of Equal Gain Combining with Quantized
Phases in Rayleigh Fading Channels, IEEE Transactions
on Communications, Vol-59 , Issue: 1 , pp-13 18,
January 2011.
[3] Moradi, Refai, LoPrest and Atiquzzaman, Selection
diversity for wireless optical communications with non-
coherent detection without CSI, IEEE GLOBECOM
Workshops (GC Wkshps) ,pp. 1010 1014, Dec. 2010.
[4] Rim Haddad and Ridha Bouallgue BER
Performance Evaluation of Two Types of Antenna Array-
Based Receivers In A Mult ipath Channel, International
Journal of Computer Net works & Communicat ions
(IJCNC) Vol.2, No.6, November 2010.
[5] Wei Liu , Sellathurai, M. ,Chaojing Tang and Jibo We
, Achieving space and time diversity by using lattice
constellation based joint Alamouti coding, IEEE
Communicat ions Letters, Vol. 14 , Issue: 1 ,pp-33 35,
January 2010.
[6] Hossain and Mondal, Effectiveness of selection and
maximal ratio combining diversity techniques on a DS-
CDMA wireless communication system impaired by
fading, 12th International Conference on Computers and
Information Technology, 2009. ICCIT '09, pp-115 120,
Dec. 2009.
[7] Yunfei Chen ,Beaulieu, N, and Rajwani ,
Performances of EGC and MRC diversity for UWB
PAPM systems in IEEE channel models, IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol- 8 , Issue:
11 , pp- 5411 - 5415 , November 2009.
[8] Wireless Communications Principles and Practice, Dr.
Rappaport.
[9] Wireless Communication Technologies, lecture notes,
Spring 2005, Dr. Narayan Mandayam, Rutgers
University.