HVDS Basic
HVDS Basic
HVDS Basic
EXISTING
LEVELS
4
4
6
8
22
INTERNATIONAL NORMS
MAX. TOLERABLE TARGET LEVEL
4.00
2.00
4.50
2.25
5.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
15.50
8.25
Phase-Neutral HVDS
Phase-Neutral HVDS
It is widely adopted in North America.
Under this system:
- the main line from substation is three-phase 4 wire (3 phases +
Neutral)
-- laterals are single-phase 2 wire line or two-phase 3-wire line or
three-phase 4-wire line depending upon the loads and feeding
arrangement.
Unique feature of the system lies in providing the neutral right
through the system, viz from substation to all nodes on the network.
Single-phase Loads: 11 KV single phase line (phase neutral) branch is
extended from main line and 1 No. 6350/230-0-230 V distribution
transformer is erected to feed single phase loads as shown in Part (A)
of Fig.
Phase-Neutral HVDS
Three-phase loads: Three alternative arrangements for feeding three
phase loads are described.
11 KV two-phase 3-wire branches are extended from the main line
and 2 Nos. of single-phase 6350/230-0-230 V distribution transformer
is connected, star on HV side and open delta on LV side to feed threephase loads, as shown in part (B) of Fig. Effective capacity of the
transformer bank is 86.6% of the total capacity of 2 transformers. Ie.
. if 2 No.s 10 kVA, transformers are used ,maximum 3 ph. load that
Can be fed is 17.32 kVA
11 KV three-phase, 4-wire line is extended and 3 Nos. 6350/230-0230 V single phase transformers are connected, star- delta to feed
three-phase loads as shown in Part (C)of Fig.
Existing 11 KV three-phase 4-wire line is extended and three-phase
Delta/Star distribution transformer is used as shown in part (D) of Fig.
will be affected.
n) In view of reduction in losses, additional loads can be fed
Advantages of S ph.HVDS
Capital cost is less as Transformer, surge arrestor requiring 1 No.
Instead of 3, protection system cost less in sph.HVDS
compared to 3 ph. system
Protection requirements are simpler
For cost effectiveness new villages with lesser load demand can be
electrified through S ph. HVDS, which can be converted in to 3
ph. HVDS once the load picks up
Thus if Existing LVD systems are converted in to HVD systems
taking due care of the System improvement aspects in respect of
33 and 11kV Systems, HVDS will prove to be a boon for
otherwise tottering Distribution networks.
CAPITAL COST
HIGHER INVESTMENT ON TRANSFORMATION EQUIPMENT
LARGER CAPACITY DUE TO LOW DICERSITY
HIGH COST/KVA DUE TO SMALL CAPACITY OF TR
LOWER
INVESTMENT ON LINES
OPERATING COST.
HIGHER TRANSFORMATION LOSSES DUE TO HIGHER NO.OF. DTrs
NO LOAD LOSSES PER KVA CAPACITY
LOWER LINE LOSSES DUE TO LOW CURRENTS HANDLED
QUALITY OF SUPPLY
BETTER VOLTAGE PROFILE
LOWER SYSTEM LOSSES
BETTER RELIABILITY
PREVENTS DIRECT TAPPING OF LINES
LOAD MANAGEMENT IS EASIER
SOLUTION
Reconfiguration
network
of
. Capacitive
compensation
Sectionalisation
of
distribution feeder .
primary
Provide
automatic
VACCUM/SF6
line
sectionalisation on the SPUR
lines which sense the voltage on
and off sequence generated by
circuit breaker at the substation
and isolate the faulty section
automatically.
Sphase motors
Indigenous manufacturing
capacity for high efficiency
and high power factor motors
developed.
Part-I of Strategy
The important problems likely to be encountered under this part are
investigated and appropriate solutions are presented.
Manufacture of small capacity single phase transformers which are
robust and fail proof.
Integration of new HVDS with existing LVDS.
Running of continuous neutral wire.
Discussion
HVDS is technically superior and provides ready solution to the
problems of distribution system.
Capital investment required for building new HVDS is 16.5% lower
than that of LVDS. The Peak Power loss and energy losses of HVDS
are 33% and 18% lower than that of LVDS respectively.
Capital investment required to restructure the existing network as
HVDS is marginally cheaper than restructuring the network as LVDS.
The peak power loss and energy losses of restructuring HVDS are
lower by 25% and 27% respectively compared to that of LVDS.
The peak power losses and energy losses reduction by restructuring as
HVDS are 80% and 66 % respectively.
Restructuring of existing distribution network as HVDS is highly
viable as the pay back period is about 18 months.
Conclusions
Phase neutral HVDS is identified as the best system among the
different HVDS schemes.
HVDS effectively tackles the problems faced by the utilities in the
existing LVDS.
The strategy proposed for implementation of HVDS and its
integration with the existing network is found to be technically
feasible and financially viable.
The cluster based algorithm proposed for restructuring the existing
LVDS as HVDS is an effective tool for large scale restructuring of the
existing network.
The restructuring of existing LVDS as HVDS is practically feasible
and financially viable.
CASE STUDY
H V D S SCHEMES
WARANGAL
NALAGONDA
1.Noofpumpsets
7000
3200
2. Year of sanction
1993-94
1997-98
Rs 8.0 cr
Rs 8.4 cr
3 years
3 years
5. Achivements
2500 nos
1100 nos
6. Financed by
OECF(Japan)
DFID( U K )
REASONS
FOR POOR
PROGRESS
SUGGESTIONS
To go for 3 HVDS by providing small capacity DTR ie 10 / 15 / 16 KVA
ADVANTAGE
1.Loss reduction is same in both cases
2.Pay back period is faster
3.Consumer involve is avoided
4.All benefits relating to s HVDS conversion ie
Better Voltage
Reduction in interruptions and Break do wns
Theft of energy controlled
Reduction in DTR failures
Loss reduction etc
SI No.
Item
LVDS
1.
Distribution Transformer
1.
2.
Line
3.
LT-3.6mm
HT(11kv)-2.6km & LT
AB cable-1km
( both are cases of
conversion from LT
Line)
4.
39Nos.
39Nos.
5.
Connected Load
179.5 HP
179.5 HP
6.
Crop pattern
No 100 KVA
11kv/415V
HVDS
11 NOS 15 kVA
11kV/415 V
distribution Trs
(a)
13 days
15 days
(b)
Input
4290 Units
5310 Units
(c)
Output
3490.4 Units
5019.8 Units
(d)
Loss of units
799.06 Units
290.8 Units
(e)
%Line losses
18.63%
5.47%
(f)
350V
420V
Pole locations
A) spans shall be limited by the tensile strength of the conductor,
wind pressure .
In a given length span shall be uniform with horizontal grade to the
extent possible
Not to be located along the edges or cuts
Cut points for a section, geneally not longer than 1,6 km (10 poles/
km for HT and 15 poles/ km for LT)
Right of way shall be identified and tree and vegetation clearance
shall be carried out
HTLine Erection
Pit marking and digging
Erection of poles and concreating
Providing of Stays with guy insulators
Mounting x arms, insulators
Paying out and Stringing the conductor
Sagging and tensioning the conductor
Providing earthing and gaurdings
Testing and commissioning
Pit- 1.2mtx o.6mt
poles to be erected with its longer axis in the direction of the line.
Planting depth for pole 1/6 th of the pole length
Each pole shall be raised on a base plate or RCC padding for better
load distribution on the ground below
For smooth sliding an inclined trench of a length of 15.2cm
Wx10.2cm L is made adjacent to the pit and a piece of MS channel
is placed on the other side in an inclined position so that pole can
smoothly slipped in to the pit
Using a Bipod and 3 ropes pole is erected and kept in vertical position
using manila ropes. Verticality checked with spirit level, earth filling
in the balance pit and ramming is done. In Swamp locations poles are
concreted up to pit level
Stay sets with 7/3.15 mm stay wire and turn buckle rod of 16mm dia
ae erected to prevent tilting of poles. Most commonly used is anchor
guy
.
Guy is used at angle locations, Dead ends, Tee offs, steep geadients
and where wind pressure is more than 50 kg/Sq.m Guy insulator kept
at a level of 3.5mts .Stay rod shall project 2mts. above ground level
(A type for LT line and C type for 11kV line)
At 35 to 40 inclined. After concreting and backfilling the balance 7
days are allowed for settling
X-arms and insulators are fixed
Conductor drum or conductor shall not get damaged while transport,
paying out.
Conductor is passed through Wooden or Aluminium rollers or snatch
block
Mid point joint through compression crimping o if helical fittings are
used manually
Constuction Practices
Metal supports Facto
Lattice type& compound type- not less than 1.5
Mechanically processed concrete pole- 2.0
Hand moulded concrete pole --------------- 2.5
Lattice & compound type -- not less than 1.5
( under broken wire condition)
Minimum factor of safety for Guard wire,
stay wireand bearer shall not be less than 2.5, based on
Ultimate strength of the wire
Minimum FS for a conductor shall be 2 based on its Ultimate
strength
TYPE
Voltage level
5.8
6.1 mts
5.5
5.8.mts
4.6
4.0
5.2
22kV
33kV
66kV
110kV
132kV
220kV
250V
11kV
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.75
2.75
3.05
3.05
4.58
4.58
22kV
33kV
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.44
2.75
2.75
3.05
3.05
4.58
4.58
66kV
110kV
2.44
2.75
2.44
2.75
2.44
2.75
2.75
2.75
3.05
3.05
4.58
4.58
132kV
220kV
3.05
4.58
3.05
4.58
3.05
4.58
3.05
4.58
3.05
4.58
4.58
4.58
The earthing lead from a LA shall not pass through any metallic pipe
but taken directly to an earth electrode in a separate earth pit
Guard wire shall be earthed at each point where its electrical
continuity is broken
Guard wire minimum breaking strength-635 kgs
To be galvanized if made of iron or steel
Guard shall have sufficient capacity not to melt or fuse till the live
wire in contact is removed
THANK YOU