Judicial System in Ancient India

JUDICIAL SYSTEMS IN
ANCIENT INDIA
Judicial institutions
No clear reference to the existence of judicial
organization in the Vedic period.
Village elders acted as judges and punishment
was awarded according to the nature of the
offence, in accordance with local usages and
customs.
The king was
the fountainhead of law, and
dispensed with justice.
The growing and settled order of society made

it impossible for the king carry out all function
of judiciary
The administration of justice was entrusted to
the hands of the experts
Kings court was reserved for appeals and severe
crimes against the state, the rest of the
litigations being entrusted to various other
courts
Judges
A group of six member of the Sabha also
acted as judges in Vedic society
Kautilya advises the king to establish a

court with a bench of three magistrates
for every ten villages, with higher courts
in the district and provinces
Manu also suggested a bench composed of the
Pradvivaka and three other judges.

According to Sudrakas Mruchchakatika judges
consisted of
Adhikarnika (chief justice)

Sresthin (a wealthy merchant)
Kayastha (a representative of the particular
folder)
Highest court kings court
Types of courts
In the Vedic times, the Sabha, which assumed
the character of National judicature, exercised
judicial functions as well
The meeting of the assembly for justice may
have been more frequent than for general
discussion and decision
A standing committee(6 members) of the Sabha
might have permitted these functions
The thieves and criminal were dragged before

the Sabha, and the most influential men had
to
submit
to
the
decision
of
their
peer
assembled here.
The Dharmasutras evidence to the continuance
of the judicial character of the Sabha even to
later times
Kautilya mentions two types of courts

*Civil court (Dharmasteya)
*dealt with disputes involving
*Contracts
*inheritance
*labour
*marriages
*dowry
*deposits
*benefit
Criminal court: Kantakasodhana
1.Protection
of artisans and merchants
2.detecting
criminals by means of spies
3.Arresting
the suspicious or real culprits
4.Post-mortem
5.Discipline
in various state departments
6.Punishment
7.Capital
examinations
for mutilation
punishment
8.Miscellaneous
offences
Kantakasodhana
was in the nature of the
doctrine of police power
To
remove all such impediments which
were injuries to the peaceful enjoyment

of rights of the people.
To
root out all such anti-social elements
which acted against the established social

order.
There
was no provision for the arrest of the
persons three days after a crime had been

committed.
The
aged,
the
diseased,
the
mad,
those
suffering from hunger, those who confessed

their guilt, physically unfit, and the pregnant
women
were
persecution
generally
exempted
from
Courts of the Guilds

*The guilds had their own rules and regulation
called the srenidharma
*The Guild had judicial rights over its
jurisdiction.
*The guilds were not allowed to exercise their
powers like autocrats because ultimately they
were responsible to the state.
Village courts
Village panchayats: grama vruddgas
Chief of the village advised by six councilors
Court Procedures
Plaintiff
A
plaintiff
first
filed
plaint
before
the
registration officer (Lekhaka) with sufficient

information.
When the judge found that matter was legally

acceptable, he delivered a sealed order to the
defendant.
Suits between teacher and student, husband

and wife and master and servant should not be
entrained
(Manu) In case of more than one complaint at
the same time, preference must be given on
the basis of the varna of the plaintiff
(Katyayana) Priority should be given to a plait
where the injury was greater or cause more
important requiring immediate attention.
Defendant
*The
legally maintainable plaint was read and
recorded in the presence of the defendant
*Then
the defendant was asked by the judge to
file his reply as early as possible
*Defendant
had to give immediate reply in
urgent and important cases.
*Adjournment
or more.
ranged from one day to one year
*Katyayana
to
avoid
does not favour adjournment,

complication
and
normal
of
course of judicial procedure.
*The
defendants reply was require to
meet the points raised in the plaint

without deviating from truth and without
any confusion
The ordinary procedure in trails was by

evidence, while in extraordinary cases recourse
was taken to divine evidence.
There are instances of circumstantial evidence,
particularly in the absence of human evidence,
being considered in the trial of cases
The trial involved the examination of documents,
possession and evidence tendered by the
witness were discussed meticulously
The trial:
The trail of the case began with the
submission of the reply, in writing, by
the defendant.
Depending on the decision of the judge
they should submit their proofs.
According to smiti writers at least three

witnesses before the king and Brahmans
Justice given according to law and in
consonance
with
the
accepted
social
norms and every point in the case was

subjected to close scrutiny
Mode of proof divided into two classes
Human: documents, possession and witness

(sakshi)
Divine: divine proof consisted of ordeals
Ordeals were restored to only when ordinary

method of proof was not possible

Judicial System in Ancient India

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Judicial System in Ancient India

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Judicial System in Ancient India

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JUDICIAL SYSTEMS IN

the fountainhead of law, and

dispensed with justice.

The growing and settled order of society made

Kautilya advises the king to establish a

Manu also suggested a bench composed of the

Pradvivaka and three other judges.

Adhikarnika (chief justice)

The thieves and criminal were dragged before

Kautilya mentions two types of courts

Criminal court: Kantakasodhana

of artisans and merchants

criminals by means of spies

the suspicious or real culprits

in various state departments

was in the nature of the

doctrine of police power

remove all such impediments which

were injuries to the peaceful enjoyment

root out all such anti-social elements

which acted against the established social

was no provision for the arrest of the

persons three days after a crime had been

suffering from hunger, those who confessed

Courts of the Guilds

registration officer (Lekhaka) with sufficient

When the judge found that matter was legally

Suits between teacher and student, husband

legally maintainable plaint was read and

recorded in the presence of the defendant

the defendant was asked by the judge to

file his reply as early as possible

had to give immediate reply in

urgent and important cases.

ranged from one day to one year

does not favour adjournment,

course of judicial procedure.

defendants reply was require to

meet the points raised in the plaint

The ordinary procedure in trails was by

According to smiti writers at least three

norms and every point in the case was

Mode of proof divided into two classes

Human: documents, possession and witness

Divine: divine proof consisted of ordeals

Ordeals were restored to only when ordinary

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.