ICCS 20 - Modelagem - Pedro
ICCS 20 - Modelagem - Pedro
ICCS 20 - Modelagem - Pedro
•ASTM D 1002.
• Eight tests for each kind of joint was performed.
Results
SLJ results:
3500
3000
2500
2000
CP A1.1
F ( N)
CP A1.2
1500 CP A1.3
CP A2.1
1000 CP A2.2
CP A2.4
500
0
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0
u (mm)
Results
Spot-welding results:
3500
3000
2500
2000
F (N)
1500 CP W2
CP W3
CP W4
1000
CP W7
CP W8
500 CP W9
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
u (mm)
Results
Hybrid Joints results:
3500
3000
2500
2000
F ( N)
1500
CP H1.1
1000 CP H1.2
CP H2.1
CP H2.2
500 CP H2.3
CP H2.4
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
u (mm)
Numerical Model
IF STEEL:
- Elastoplastic Model: Bilinear Kinematic
- Element: SOLID186 (3-D 20-Node Structural Solid)
ADHESIVE:
− Interface Model: Cohesive Zone Material
− Elements: TARGE170 and CONTA174 (contact/bonding elements)
Numerical Model – Mesh and boundary conditions
Numerical Results – Spot Welding Joint
Numerical Results – Spot Welding Joint
Numerical Results – Spot Welding Joint
3500
3000
2500
2000
F (N)
1500
3500
3000
2500
2000
F (N)
1500
• It was observed that the adhesive works like a electric barrier, for the
next steps, the use of metallic nanoparticles will be added to the
adhesive to improve electric conduction.
• The results shows that the model is capable of capturing the main
effects observed during the test .
Acknowledgments
References
[1] Costa, H. R. M.; Reis, J. M. L.; Souza, J. P. B.; Pacheco, P. M. C. L.;
Aguiar, R. A. A.; De Barros, S.; Composite Structures 133 (2015) 847-
852.
[2] Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Lu, F.; Carlson, B. E.; Sigler, D. R.;
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 1061–1072.
[3] Hou, Z.; Kim, I.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, C.; International Journal of
Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 1061–1072.
References
[4] Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Lu, F.; Carlson, B. E.; Sigler, D. R.;
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 101 (2016) 749–763.
[5] Eisazadeh, H.; Hamedi, M.; Halvaee, A.; Materials and Design 31
(2010) 149–157.