Volvo Trucks: Entry and Penetration in The US Market
Volvo Trucks: Entry and Penetration in The US Market
Volvo Trucks: Entry and Penetration in The US Market
Group 4
Bharath R.
Srilekha B.
Neha S.
Abinash K.
Ankita P.
Harsh N.
Agenda
Introduction to Volvo
World of Heavy Truck Industry
Products
Customers and Markets
Manufacturing
Competitors
Volvo Truck Group
History in the US Market
Case Analysis
Car business
sold to Ford.
Diversified Volvo becomes
industrial group, Conglomerate
a manufacturer
with products strategy
for transport
spanning from reversed-
solutions
trucks to marine refocused on
and jet engines vehicles and
heavy
equipment
Heavy Trucks
American European
Length of tractor not included Length of tractor included in
in truck length truck length
Lower maximum allowed Higher maximum allowed
weights weights
Unsynchronised gearboxes Synchronised gearboxes
Customers
Leasing
• Deregulation led to customers becoming • Leasing companies less prevalent
increasingly cost and quality conscious
• Leasing companies emerged, later
becoming full service maintenance
companies
Buyers
• Large purchasers dominated buying • Large fleet operators less common
• Buyers favored US built products and • Truckers tended to own and drive their
customization vehicle
• Engine manufacturing involves plants with annual output of over 40,000 units which is not
uncommon
• In the US, most manufacturers were assemblers and made their own cabs, by using
components from outside supplier
• Buyers would typically specify a combination of drive-train components, especially the
engine
Assemblers Drive-train mfg Diesel Engines Gearboxes Rear Axles
Paccar
• Highly profitable pure assembler concentrated on
the premium segment
• Several alliances and acquisitions over the years
Mack • 2001, agreement with Cumin Engines for supply of
Engines to Paccar USA and the DAF subsidiary
• Reputation for durability, innovative firm and
industry leader Navistar
• Built first motorized passenger bus with cab-
over design in 1905, first heavy-duty truck and • Undergone major restructuring in trucks, retained
first US heavy-duty diesel-engine truck strong position in engines
• First to use power brakes and air suspended • Focussed on NAFTA region
cabs on heavy duty truck • Plant in Mexico
• From 1979 to 1990 SOGC sold Mack shares to • Manufactured commercial trucks, school buses and
RVI diesel engines for International brand
Competitors in Europe
Competitors Origin % of Major Acquisition Strength Weakness
Worldwide
production
Daimler- Germany 28% Freightliner (US) in One of the Not sold in North
Benz 1980 technological leaders America
Ford Trucks (US) in
1997
Renault(RVI) France 11% Mack (US) in 1980 Innovative and Even after acquiring
Industry leader, sold Mack they were
all over Europe, managed separately
Middle East and
Africa
Scania Sweden 8% None Differentiated by its However it was
advanced successful in Far East
technology, brand and South America,
image and having but very less
highest profit margin presence in US
Most of the Asian heavy truck market captured by Japanese manufacturer such as
Hino, Nissan Diesel and Mitsubishi
Hino is leading manufacturer and mostly targeting the Asian market with some
presence in Europe and US
Company
81,000 medium and heavy trucks
• Held 14.9% of European market
and 10.6% of North American
market
Products
• Standardized parts reduced cost
• Suppliers reduced from 1600 to 400
• No. of components reduced from
41,000 to 25,000
Manufacturing
Brazil and United States
• Drive-train components producing
plants in Sweden and Brazil
Volvo Trucks
Volvo Introduced a
introduced the new VN model,
Volvo Truck ‘slash’ on Volvo the 770
entered the US White truck
market using fronts
existing car
dealership Volvo acquired
Freightliner GM’s heavy
acquired by truck business
Daimler-Benz
• WMC was one of the oldest and best • Volvo White Truck Corporation formed
•
Company
Company
known US truck manufacturers Sought to establish close dealer and
• Market share had sunk to 8.6% in 1974 customer relations
• Consolidation measures to improve • Decided to move into the premium end
earnings were futile of the market
Products
• Standardized parts reduced inventory improvements
• Autocar line with a model for off-road • Integral sleeper introduced
transport • White/Autocar nameplates preserved
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
• Modern assembly plants in Utah and • Signs of the old White company
Virginia removed
• Cab production in need of upgrade • Utah assemble plant closed
• Other locations in Detroit, Cleveland, • All assembly moved to Virginia
Chicago
In 1987, Volvo White had only managed an 8-9% overall market share,
comparable to that of WMC in 1981
1998 Industry demand rebounded, margins stayed low for all players
2000 How to increase market share and profitability?
Volvo Trucks: Entry and Penetration in the
12-07-2018 15
US Market
Case Analysis
Sales
• EU cab-over trucks, EU and US components
conventional trucks • Modular concept with
• FH series based on modular standardized components 1996 1998 2000
concept introduced • Adopted by American
assemblers and leading
Production
manufacturers
• Reduced costs of product
development and logistics
• More responsive
Are the
capabilities If deployed in
Localising forces a foreign
• Differences in desirable developed in Are the
the home market, would
features capabilities
market these
• Distribution model transferable
relevant to capabilities be
differences
consumers appropriable?
• Regulatory differences
Capabilities Capabilities Capabilities are
include across industry transferable
Globalising forces
manufacturing are not different
• Conversion of European
and American engine and assembling enough to
technology heavy trucks develop a RAT Model
• Industry consolidation Relevant in profitable
global markets market position
Situation Situation
• Pricing restrictions abolished • 15% decline in industry volume in 1995-
• Dramatic fall in profitability due to influx 96
of competition • Volvo performed even worse with a 38%
• Leasing companies emerged, which drop in sales and unprecedented loss
threatened the existing business model
• The Profitable Growth Paradox: Most growth investment will at first reduce the
profitability, cost reduction efforts to boost the bottom line usually have a negative
impact on future growth
• As of 2000, due to the cyclical nature of the industry, the market growth rate is low,
and is expected to rise in the next couple of years
Global Transnational
International Multidomestic
Local Responsiveness
• No cost benefits from the integration • Industry trend towards closer co-
• Full integration is not the industry operation between OEMs and engine
norm suppliers
Challenges
• Develop ties with external suppliers • Engine value was 25% of the total
and dealers truck and high after-sale service and
spare parts revenue
1996 Volvo