Sanger Sequencing: A Brief Introduction & Explanation

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Sanger

Sequencing
A Brief Introduction &
Explanation
DNA
 Blueprint of life
 Chemical building blocks= Nucleotides
 Nucleotides

i. Phosphate
ii. Sugar
iii. Nitrogen Base (A, T, G, C)
 Sequence of base=biological
instruction.
Structure
History of Sequencing
 Watson & Crick identified DNA double-helix
structure.
 Walter Fieserr= RNA sequencing of
Bacteriophage MS2
 Maxam & Gilbert developed chemical
degradation method
 Sanger developed di-deoxy chain termination
method
 Automation in DNA sequencing by Applied
Biosystems
Maxam-Gilbert Method

 Denature DNA to
get ssDNA

 32
P as 5’ phosphate

 Cleavage using
chemicals

 Electrophoresis

 Radiography
Why Obsolete?
 Time Consuming

 Quite Problematic (Too many steps)

 200-300 bases of DNA every few days

 Working with radioactive material

 More complicated than Sanger


Sanger Sequencing
 Usingthird form of a Ribose Sugar
(Dideoxyribose)

 Ribose has OH group on 2’ and 3’ carbon

 Deoxyribose has O removed from 2’


carbon.

 Dideoxyribose has O removed from 2’ and


3’carbons.
 ddNTPs are labeled with fluorescent dyes
 Fragments readable through laser light in capillary
gels
Conclusion
 15-20% of DNA molecules need to contain the mutation to
be reliably detected by Sanger. (Rohlin et al., 2009)

 Sanger is being replaced by NGS (Mu et al., 2016)

 NGS technologies have lowered the cost and effort of DNA


sequencing

 NGS employs massively parallel sequencing of millions of


DNA fragment simultaneously

 However, Sanger is the gold standard for short fragments


(Totomoch et al., 2017) & NGS is the future
References
Rohlin, A., Wernersson, J., Engwall, Y., Wiklund, L., Björk, J., & Nordling,
M. (2009). Parallel sequencing used in detection of mosaic mutations:
Comparison with four diagnostic DNA screening techniques. Human
Mutation, 30(6), 1012-1020. doi:10.1002/humu.20980

Mu, W., Lu, H., Chen, J., Li, S., & Elliott, A. M. (2016). Sanger
Confirmation Is Required to Achieve Optimal Sensitivity and Specificity
in Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Testing. The Journal of Molecular
Diagnostics, 18(6), 923-932. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.07.006

Totomoch-Serra, A., Marquez, M. F., & Cervantes-Barragán, D. E.


(2017). Sanger sequencing as a first-line approach for molecular
diagnosis of Andersen-Tawil syndrome. F1000Research, 6, 1016.
doi:10.12688/f1000research.11610.1

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy