Assessment August 24 2019
Assessment August 24 2019
Assessment August 24 2019
8am – 12nn
Work with
others Ask questions
Interactive
A. Overview of Assessment
(Definition, Nature and K-12
assessment)
C. Table of Specification
D. Rules in constructing the
different test types :
Multiple Choice. Matching Type,
True or False, Fill in the Blank,
Essay
H. Authentic Assessment
of
assessment for learning
as
1
What
nature of
2 assessment
is being
described?
3
Nature of Assessment
3. Assessment of learning
• assessment that is
accompanied by a number,
letter grade, or description
based on a standard
(summative)
Using traditional
assessments
Using alternative
assessments
traditional alternative
Alternative
assessment tools
K-12: How are learners assessed in the
classroom?
Components of Summative Assessment
1. Allows learners to
1.Ensures that students show what they
are able to express know and are able
learned skills and to do in diverse
concepts in written ways
form. Written Performance 2. Learners may
2.May include essays, Work Tasks create or innovate
written report, long products or do
quizzes and other performance-based
written output tasks
Quarterly
Assessment
3
Sample Report Card
Grades 1 to 10
4
Sample Report Card
Grades 11 to 12
4
Sample Report Card
Grades 11 to 12
4
Retrieved from:
http://www.kurwongbs
s.qld.edu.au/thinking/
Bloom/blooms.htm
Original Terms New Terms
(Bloom) (Anderson)
• Evaluation •Creating
• Synthesis •Evaluating
• Analysis •Analysing
• Application •Applying
• Comprehension •Understanding
• Knowledge •Remembering
(Based on Pohl, 2000, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 8)
Higher-level thinking skills for
everyone
Can the student create a new product
CREATING or point of view?
Can the student justify a stand or
EVALUATING
position?
Can the student distinguish between the
ANALYZING
different parts?
Learning Competencies
These refer to the knowledge,
Content Standards
understanding, skills and
attitudes that learners
1.These cover a
Performance Standards need to demonstrate in
specified
1.These describe the abilities every lesson and/or
scope of sequential and skills that learners are expected to learning activity.
topics demonstrate in relation to the content
within each strand, standards and integration of 21st-century skills.
domain, theme 2.They answer the following questions:
or component. i. What can learners do with they know?
2. They answer the ii. How well must learners do their work?
question “What iii. How well do learners use their learning or
should learners understanding in different situations?
know?” iv. How do learners apply their learning or
understanding in real-life contexts?
v. What tools and measures should the
learners
use DEPARTMENT
to demonstrate what they know?
OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Table of
Specification
TOS
Table of Specification
(TOS)
TOS is a test map/blue print.
TOS is a guide in constructing the test.
TOS Prototype
LEVEL OBJECTIVE ITEM NO %
NUMBERS .
Essay
Total 23 60
Fill in the table to make
a TOS for 80 items
Topic #of hours #of items Type of
Exam/ Item
Number
True or False
A 1
Alternate Response
B 8 Matching Type
Essay
Total
Fill in the table to make a
TOS for 80 items (answer)
Topic #of hours #of items Type of
Exam/ Item
Number
True or False
A 1 3.3 = 3
Alternate Response
B 8 26.6= 27 Matching Type
Essay
Total 24 80
Reminders in
giving directions:
Clear
Essay
Fill in the blank Matching Type
10min
10 min
Working Break
Answer numbers
26-55
20 min
ANALYZING THE
TEST
“Postmortem is just as
necessary in
classroom assessment
as it is in medicine.”
Lewis Aiken
Item Analysis
• It is the technique to help
teachers determine the
quality of a test item.
Formula:
DF = number of students who are able to answer the item correctly
total number of students
Level of difficulty of an item
Range of Difficulty Index Interpretation
0.41-0.60 Average/Moderately
Difficult
0.61-0.80 Easy
0.41-0.60 Average/Moderately
Difficult
0.61-0.80 Easy
UPPER 0 12 3 1 5
GROUP
LOWER 0 8 7 0 6
GROUP
2. Discrimination Index (DI)
It is the power of the item to discriminate
the students between those who scored
high and those who scored low in the
over all test.
In other words, it is the power of the item
to discriminate the students who
do not know the
know the lesson
lesson
Formula:
Index of Discrimination (DI) = DU -____DL
Nu
where
DU – number of students in the upper
25% who responded correctly
DL – number of students in the lower
25% who responded correctly
UPPER 0 12 3 1 5
GROUP
LOWER 0 8 7 0 6
GROUP
2. Discrimination Index (DI)
Positive DI happens when more students in the
upper group got the item correctly.
OPTIONS A B* C D E
UPPER 0 12 3 1 5
GROUP
LOWER 0 8 7 0 6
GROUP
A class is composed of 50 students. 27% was
used to get the number of the upper group and
the lower group.
ITEM 10 A B C D*
UPPER 1 2 2 9
GROUP
LOWER 2 2 5 5
GROUP
1.Compute the index of difficulty
2.What is the difficulty level?
3.Indicate the discrimination index.
ITEM 10 A B C D*
UPPER 1 2 2 9
GROUP
LOWER 2 2 5 5
GROUP
4. Which group got more correct answer?
5. Which option is the most effective?
6. Which of the options is/are ineffective?
7. Does item 10 has positive discrimination?
8. What can you say about options A and C? Are
they effective distracters ? How about option B?
What will you do with option B?
SUMMARY MEASURE
VARIATION LOCATION
CENTRAL TENDENCY
(RELATIVE STANDING)
MEAN RANGE
QUANTILES OR Z-SCORE
FRACTILES
MEDIAN VARIANCE
MODE QUARTILES
STANDARD
DEVIATION
MIDRANGE DECILES
COEFFICIENT OF
VARIATION
PERCENTLES
Example: Team A - Heights of five marathon players in inches
Mean = 65”
SD = 0”
65 “ 65 “ 65 “ 65 “ 65 “
Example: Team B - Heights of five marathon players in inches
Mean = 65”
SD = 4.0”
62 “ 67 “ 66 “ 70 “ 60 “
A z-score or a standard score is the number of
standard deviations that a given value (x) is
above or below the mean
Sample Population
xx x
z z
s
In what subject did Glenn perform well
in relation to the mean and standard
deviation of the class?
Subject Glenn’s Mean Standard
Score Deviation
English 89 92 5
Math 95 98 6
PE 93 88 4
RELIABILITY
Value of r interpretation
0.80 – 1.00 High reliability
0.40 – 0.79 Fair reliability
0.39 and below Low reliability
METHODS OF DETERMINING TEST RELIABILITY
1.Test-retest Method
- one test
-administered twice
-same group of students
Pearson’s R is used
3. Split-half method
- A single test divided into two equivalent halves
-administered once
-one group of students
True If a test is
or reliable then it is
false also valid.
WHICH FIGURE ILLUSTRATES THE MOST
VALID AND RELIABLE EXAM?
AUTHENTIC
ASSESSMENT
1. AA starts with clear and definite criteria of
performance made known to students. RUBRIC
I am the way
The truth
And the life
No one comes to the Father except thru me.
WRITING RUBRIC
Criter Factor Level of Level of Level of
ion Performance Performance Performance
Satisfactory – Developing – Unsatisfactor
6-10 5-6 y – 1-5
Easily Somewhat Not
Cont Thesis Identifiable and Identifiable or Identifiable
ent Statem Clearly Stated Ambiguous Thesis and
ent Thesis; Thesis and Point of View
Establishes a Point of View
Point of View
Develo Focuses on and Diverges from Fails to Focus
pment Fulfills the Focus and on and
Thesis Development Develop