Scribd
Upload
1K views

Eapp (The Structure - Language of Critique)

This document discusses critiques in academic writing. It states that critiques should present a balanced perspective and be grounded in observations, not just opinions. It provides tips for developing critiques, such as making them accessible to readers and relating them to broader contexts. Finally, it recommends that critiques be organized into three parts: introducing the topic, summarizing the concept, and providing the author's recommendations.

Uploaded by

BrenNan Channel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views

Eapp (The Structure - Language of Critique)

This document discusses critiques in academic writing. It states that critiques should present a balanced perspective and be grounded in observations, not just opinions. It provides tips for developing critiques, such as making them accessible to readers and relating them to broader contexts. Finally, it recommends that critiques be organized into three parts: introducing the topic, summarizing the concept, and providing the author's recommendations.

Uploaded by

BrenNan Channel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

The Structure and

Language of Critique
CRITIQUES

Critiques are an important rhetorical


pattern in academic writing as they
present a balanced view of things.
CRITIQUES

These are based not only on


personal perspective but should be
grounded on actual observations.
TIPS IN DEVELOPING YOUR CRITIQUES:

1. The critique should be


accessible to the audience.
TIPS IN DEVELOPING YOUR CRITIQUES:

2. Relating your critique to greater


realities will also help as you
ground your critique on the wider
scheme of things.
CRITIQUE SHOULD BE ORGANIZED IN
THE FOLLOWING MANNER:

1. The first part should provide


readers a sense of ideas
you want to tackle.
CRITIQUE SHOULD BE ORGANIZED IN
THE FOLLOWING MANNER:

2. The next part should provide a


summary of the concept.
EXAMPLE: (Illustrating Strengths)
With his attitude, Michael should be
awarded a Conduct Award.

Since Michael was responsible, come to


school early, helpful, and good, he should
be awarded a Conduct Award.
CRITIQUE SHOULD BE ORGANIZED IN
THE FOLLOWING MANNER:

3. The final section of the critique


should include the
final recommendations
of the author.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy