Item Analysis AND Validation

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

ITEM ANALYSIS

AND
VALIDATION
(a) item difficulty
(b) discrimination
index
The difficulty of an item or
item difficulty is defined as
Item the number of students who
are able to answer the item
difficulty correctly divided by the
total number of students.
 One problem with this type of difficulty index is that it
may not actually indicate that the item is difficult ( or
easy). A student who does not know the subject matter
will naturally be unable to answer the item correctly
even if the question is easy. How do we decide on the
basis of this index whether the item is too difficult or too
easy?
 The following arbitrary rule is often used in the
literature

Range of Difficulty Index Interpretation Action


0-0.25 Difficult Revise or Discard
0.26 0.75 Right difficulty Retain
0.76- above Easy Revise or Discard
 Difficult items tend to discriminate between those who
know and those who do not know the answer.
Conversely, easy items cannot discriminate between
these two groups of students. We are therefore
interested in deriving a measure that will tell us
whether an item can discriminate between these two
groups of students. Such a measure is called an index of
discrimination.
 An easy way to derive such a measure is to measure
how difficult an item is with respect to those in the
upper 25% of the class and how difficult it is with
respect to those in the lower 25% of the class. If the
upper 25% of the class found the item easy yet the
lower 25% found it difficult, then the item can
discriminate properly between these two groups.
Thus:
 Index of discrimination = DU – DL
 Theoretically, the index of discrimination
can range rom -I.0 (when DU = 0 and DL =
1) to 1.0 (when DU = 1and DL = 0). When
the index of discrimination is equal to -1,
then is means that all of the lower 25% of
the students got the correct answer while
all of the upper 25% got the wrong
answer. In a sense, such an index
discriminates correctly between two
groups but the item itself is highly
questionable.
 On the other hand, if the index of discrimination is 1.0,
then this means that all of the lower 25% failed to get
the correct answer while all of the upper 25% got the
correct answer. This is a perfectly discriminating item
and is the ideal item that should be included in the test.
From these discussions, let us agree to discard or revise
all items that have negative discrimination index for
although they discriminate correctly between the upper
and lower 25% of the class, the content of the item itself
may be highly dubious.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy