GM Layered Audits

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

LAYERED AUDITS

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 1
LAYERED AUDITS
PURPOSE:
To provide a system to:
- verify compliance to the documented process
- instill discipline
- improve communication
- improve overall quality
SCOPE:
• Assembly Area
• Manufacturing Operations
• Shipping/Receiving
• Repair/Rework Area
• All Operations and other support functions

RESPONSIBILITY:
• Single Ownership
- Plant Manager
• Supported By
- Quality Manager
© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.
006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 2
REQUIREMENTS:

• Layered Audits shall be conducted for manufacturing and


assembly of high risk items at a minimum of once per shift.

• Frequency of Layered Audits based on production volume or level of


risk
associated with process.

• Layered Audits supplement ongoing control plan and job instruction


checks.

• A check list of high risk items to be verified during Layered Audits


shall be established.

• Elements should be considered in developing the check list. (Example)

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 3
(Example)
Elements

 Utilization of manufacturing assists (as applicable)


 Gages functioning and calibration confirmation
 Stacking / packing techniques
 Build / manufacturing techniques
 Visual aids presence and content
 Process parameter setting
 Job instructions
 Correct product identification
 Process steps adhered to
 Required inspections completed
 Torque monitoring (if applicable)
 Product dimensions or visual inspection
 Documentation / record completion
 Quality Gates (as applicable)
 Customer feedback

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 4
REQUIREMENTS (continued):

• Layered Audits results shall be recorded.

• Non-conformities shall be addressed immediately

• Reaction plan(s) for non-conformities detected during Layered


Audits shall be documented and available for use.

• Corrective actions shall be documented.

• Results shall be summarized and reviewed by the


manufacturing site leadership.

• Layered Audit documentation shall be compiled in the


Lessons Learned (key strategy) database.

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 5
REQUIREMENTS (continued):

• Customer used features shall be identified, listed and checked in


the manufacturing process with emphasis on:

- Supplier pass through features


- Mounting (holes, taps, etc.)
- Electrical connections/connectors
- Mounting surfaces
- Clearances
- Missing/wrong brackets
- Incorrect parts
- Others as identified by customer

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 6
REQUIREMENTS (continued):

• The following is an example of a Layered Audit with three levels


of management involved in the process:
- The manufacturing supervisor shall verify (daily) all quality
documentation is completed by operators.
- The manufacturing area manager shall verify (weekly) that
supervisor verification is being completed.
- Site leadership shall conduct layered audits at a
frequency defined locally.

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 7
QUALITY ELEMENT: LAYERED AUDIT

Example
REACTION (Special Cause Prevention (Common Cause) GMPT model
PFMEA
CUSTOMER CONCERNS RPN REDUCTION
External- PRR’s, etc TEAMS
Cross Functional
Internal Shainin
AUDIT THE PROCESS

8 STEP Corrective P. -Formal Line item document


Action CONTROL PLANS --Items Checked daily
F. -- Is the system working?
-12:15p.m. Report outs What’s critical to
-Fast Response M. the process?
E. AUDIT % COMPLIANCE
A. JOB INSTRUCTIONS -Data Collection
-Participation
-Standardized Work -Responsiveness
-Integrity

RESULTS
-Quality Improved
-Quality Stabilized

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 8
LAYERED AUDIT MATRIX (Example)

O P E R A T IO N S M A N A G E R

CO PRO RATE M ANAG ER


SHIFT DAILY WEEKLY M ONTHLY QUARTERLY

E X E C U T IV E M A N A G E R
PLANT M ANAG ER
Q .A . IN S P E C T O R

Q .A . M A N A G E R
TEAM LEADER

S U P E R V IS O R
O PERATO R

P R E S ID E N T

TBD
PART / PRODUCT
Err or Pr oofing V e rification
Fir s t Pie ce Ins pe ction
Las t Pie ce Ins pe ction
Standard Work Ins tr uction Pre s e nt
Ope r ator Training Tr ack ing She e t
Safe ty Is s ue s

PROCESS
Se t-up
SPC Com pliance
Tooling Appr oval (Sign-off)
Quality Gate Data

SYSTEM
Pre ve ntative M aintainance
Calibr ation
Lot Trace ability
Hous e k e e ping

V OICE OF THE CUSTOM ER


6-Pane l Pos te d
Action Plans Update d & on-tim e
PR/R's Pos te d
Cus tom e r De live r y Pe r form ance
C.A.R.E.

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 9
(Example)

PART NAME:
PART NUMBER: SHIFT:
CUSTOMER :
DEPARTMENT: WEEK ENDING:

Wednesday

Thursday

Saturday
Tuesday
Monday

Friday
Op 10 Broach
Is runout (column #2) within spec (20 lights)
Has perpendicularity been gaged (402-3537)? Spec is 20 lines
Is there any broach tear? (Check one part from each broach)

Op 20 Olofssons
Is the ID on size (columns #2 & 3)?
Is the ID run out within specifications?
Is the ID taper (between columns 2 & 3) within specification?

Op 30 Hones
Has the ID-Micro been checked and the Micro Log completed?

* Entire Department
Are operators verification sheets completed daily by all shifts?
Are the tagging procedures being followed?
Are any Temporary Alert Notices posted that have expired?

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 10
(Example)
PART NAME:
PART NUMBER: SHIFT:
CUSTOMER:
DEPARTMENT: WEEK ENDING:

Wednesday

Thursday

Saturday
Tuesday
Monday

Friday
Op A Assembly
Are the builders checking rotation & marking parts (touch point)?
Have the 8-hole sprags been inspected for presence of 8-holes
and identified with orange marker?
Are bar code labels attached to shipping container in correct
location?
Are shipping containers checked for actual count?

Machining Operations Total Non-Conforming Items

Assembly Total Non-Conforming Items

LIST ANY QUALITY OR MANUFACTURING CONCERNS ON ALL OPERATIONS.

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 11
(Example)

DEPARTMENT LAYERED AUDIT RESULTS

ITEMS NOT IN COMPLIANCE

ITEM NUMBER OF OCCURANCES

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 12
(Example)

DEPT.____________ LAYERED AUDITS RESULTS

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
% IN COMPLIANCE:
# OF ITEMS ON ASSESSMENT:
# OF ASSESSMENTS
TOTAL # OF ITEMS ASSESSED:
# OF ITEMS IN COMPLIANCE:

© 1998 General Motors Corporation. All rights reserved.


006/02/20 QSB WORKSHOP REV. 11 (02/18/03) 13

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy