0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views30 pages

ECE 476 Renewable Energy Systems: Lecture 2: Power Industry History, Review of Phasors

- Phasor analysis simplifies analysis of AC systems by representing sinusoidal voltages and currents as phasors rotating at constant frequency. - Phasors allow representation of circuit elements like resistors, inductors, and capacitors using simple algebraic equations rather than differential equations. - Complex power S represents total power as the sum of real power P (average power consumed) and reactive power Q (power flowing back and forth between source and load each cycle).

Uploaded by

ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views30 pages

ECE 476 Renewable Energy Systems: Lecture 2: Power Industry History, Review of Phasors

- Phasor analysis simplifies analysis of AC systems by representing sinusoidal voltages and currents as phasors rotating at constant frequency. - Phasors allow representation of circuit elements like resistors, inductors, and capacitors using simple algebraic equations rather than differential equations. - Complex power S represents total power as the sum of real power P (average power consumed) and reactive power Q (power flowing back and forth between source and load each cycle).

Uploaded by

ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

ECE 476

Renewable Energy Systems


Lecture 2: Power Industry History,
Review of Phasors

Prof. Tom Overbye


Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
overbye@illinois.edu
Announcements
• Please read Chapters 1 and 2
• HW 1 is 2.7, 16, 24, 33, 47; due Thursday 9/1
• Do the regular problems (not multiple choice)
• HW 1 will be turned in (for other homework we may
have an in-class quiz)
• For Problem 2.33 you need to use the PowerWorld
Software. You can download the software and cases at
the below link; get Version 19 (August 11, 2016)
www.powerworld.com/gloveroverbyesarma
History, cont’d – 1990’s & 2000’s

• Major opening of industry to competition occurred as


a result of National Energy Policy Act of 1992
• This act mandated that utilities provide
“nondiscriminatory” access to the high voltage
transmission
• Goal was to set up true competition in generation
• Result over the last few years has been a dramatic
restructuring of electric utility industry (for better or
worse!)
• Energy Bill 2005 repealed PUHCA; modified PURPA

3
Electricity Prices, 1960-2010

Sources: EIA, Annual Energy Review, 2010, Figure 8.10; 2015, Fig 9
4
Utility Restructuring

• Driven by significant regional variations in electric


rates
• Goal of competition is to reduce rates through the
introduction of competition
• Eventual goal is to allow consumers to choose their
electricity supplier

5
State Variation in Electric Rates

6
The Goal: Customer Choice

7
The Result for California in 2000/1

OFF

OFF

8
The California-Enron Effect

WA
MT ND VT ME
MN
OR NH
ID SD WI NY MA
WY MI RI

IA PA CT
NV NE NJ
IN OH DE
UT IL W MD
DC
CO VA VA
CA KS MO KY
AZ TN NC
OK
NM AR SC
MS AL GA
TX
LA
AK
FL
HI

electricity delayed suspended


no activity
restructuring restructuring restructuring
Source : http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/chg_str/regmap.html
9
The Rise of Natural Gas

Source: US EIA, 2011


10
August 14th, 2003 Blackout

11
My Favorite Blackout Hoax Photo
My Favorite 8/14/2003 Blackout
Cartoon!

13
The Smart Grid
• The term “Smart Grid” dates officially to the 2007
“Energy Independence and Security Act”, Title 13
(“Smart Grid”)
• Use of digital information and control techniques
• Dynamic grid optimization with cyber-security
• Deployment of distributed resources including
• Customer participation and smart appliances
• Integration of storage including PHEVs
• Development of interoperability standards

14
Smart Grid Perceptions (Some of
Us Like the Term “Smarter”)

15
Renewable Portfolio Standards
(September 2012)

Source: http://www.dsireusa.org/
16
In the News: First US Offshore
Wind is Complete
• US wind has grown rapidly, but none has been offshore
• First offshore wind, Block Island Wind Farm, is now
complete and should be generating in October 2016
– It has five 6 MW GE
direct drive wind
turbines (30 MW total)
– Located three miles
southeast of Block Island,
Rhode Island
– Connected to grid by
underwater 34.5 kV
three-phase cables
Image source: New York Times, Aug 22, 2016
North America Electric Load and
Generation
Power System Modeling and Time
Frames
• Much of class covers power system models. An
important quote to keep in mind is
– “Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful.
However, the approximate nature of the model must always
be borne in mind.” G.E.P. Box, N.R. Draper, Empirical
Model-Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley, 1987, p. 424.
• Power systems covers
many different time
frames, with essentially
no models valid for
all of them
Image: Sauer, P.W., M. A. Pai, Power System Dynamics and Stability, Stripes Publishing, 2007
19
Review of Phasors

Goal of phasor analysis is to simplify the analysis of


constant frequency ac systems

v(t) = Vmax cos(wt + qv)


i(t) = Imax cos(wt + qI)

Root Mean Square (RMS) voltage of sinusoid

1T 2 Vmax

T0
v(t ) dt 
2

20
Phasor Representation

Euler's Identity: e j  cos  j sin 

Phasor notation is developed by rewriting


using Euler's identity
v(t )  2 V cos( t  V )
v(t )  2 V Re e j (t V ) 
(Note: V is the RMS voltage)

21
Phasor Representation, cont’d
The RMS, cosine-referenced voltage phasor is:
V  V e jV  V V
v(t )  Re 2 Ve j t e jV
V  V cosV  j V sin V
I  I cos I  j I sin  I
(Note: Some texts use “boldface” type for
complex numbers, or “bars on the top”)

22
Advantages of Phasor Analysis
Device Time Analysis Phasor
Resistor v(t )  Ri (t ) V  RI
di (t )
Inductor v (t )  L V  j LI
dt
1t 1
Capacitor 
C0
i (t ) dt  v (0) V 
j C
I

Z = Impedance  R  jX  Z 
R = Resistance
X = Reactance (Note: Z is a
2 2 X complex number but
Z = R X  =arctan( )
R not a phasor)

23
RL Circuit Example

V (t )  2 100cos( t  30)
f  60Hz
R  4 X  L  3
Z  42  32  5   36.9
V 10030
I  
Z 536.9
 20  6.9 Amps
i(t)  20 2 cos( t  6.9)

24
Complex Power
Power
p (t )  v(t ) i (t )
v(t) = Vmax cos( t  V )
i (t) = I max cos( t   I )
1
cos cos   [cos(   )  cos(   )]
2
1
p (t )  Vmax I max [cos(V   I ) 
2
cos(2 t  V   I )]

25
Complex Power, cont’d
Average Power
1
p (t )  Vmax I max [cos(V   I )  cos(2t  V   I )]
2
T
1
Pavg 
T0 p (t )dt

1
 Vmax I max cos(V   I )
2
 V I cos(V   I )

Power Factor Angle =  =V   I

26
Complex Power

S  V I  cos(V   I )  j sin(V   I ) 
 P  jQ (Note: S is a complex number but not a phasor)

 V I*
P = Real Power (W, kW, MW)
Q = Reactive Power (var, kvar, Mvar)
S = Complex power (VA, kVA, MVA)
Power Factor (pf) = cos
If current leads voltage then pf is leading
If current lags voltage then pf is lagging
27
Complex Power, cont’d
Relationships between real, reactive and complex power
P  S cos 

Q  S sin    S 1  pf 2

Example: A load draws 100 kW with a leading pf of 0.85.


What are  (power factor angle), Q and S ?
  -cos 1 0.85  31.8
100kW
S   117.6 kVA
0.85
Q  117.6sin(31.8)  62.0 kVar
28
Conservation of Power
• At every node (bus) in the system
– Sum of real power into node must equal zero
– Sum of reactive power into node must equal zero
• This is a direct consequence of Kirchhoff’s current
law, which states that the total current into each
node must equal zero.
– Conservation of power follows since S = VI*

29
Conversation of Power Example

Earlier we found
I = 20-6.9 amps

S  V I *  10030  206.9  200036.9 VA


  36.9 pf = 0.8 lagging
SR  VR I *  4  20  6.9 206.9
2
PR  1600W  I R (Q R  0)
SL  VL I *  3 j  20  6.9 206.9
2
Q L  1200 var  I X (PL  0)
30

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy