Pillar Design: Presented by Abhishek Vaidya 117MN0676

PILLAR DESIGN
PRESENTED BY
ABHISHEK VAIDYA
117MN0676.
CONTENT
 INTRODUCTION.
 BASIC PRINCIPLES OF PILLAR DESIGN.
 DGMS GUIDELINE FOR PILLAR DESIGN.
 PILLAR STRENGTH FORMULAS.
 FACTOR OF SAFETY.
 SIZE OF PILLARS.
 LABORATORY TECHNIQUES.
INTRODUCTION
 COAL PILLARS ARE TO BE LEFT IN MINE TO
SUPPORT THE OVERBURDEN .
 IT ALSO SERVES VARIOUS PURPOSES LIKE –
PROTECTION OF GATE, SURFACE SUBSIDENCE
CONTROL AND PROTECTION OF MINE SHAFTS.
 USUALLY PILLARS ARE IN SQUARE OR
RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE.
Basic principles of pillar
design
 Tributary Area Concept: According to this concept, a pillar
takes the weight of overlying rock up to a distance of half the
opening width surrounding it. In the figure, Wo and Wp are widths
of the opening and pillar respectively, while Lp is the length of
the pillar. For square pillars, WP=LP.
The load on the pillar,
Where γ is the weight of the rock per unit volume, and h is the depth of
mining. The stress on the pillar σ is:-
TRIBUTARY AREA CONCEPT HAS FOLLOWING
LIMITATIONS.
 Tributary estimates are valid only if the geometry of

pillars is highly regular and it is repeat itself over a
relative distance.
 Tributary is only applicable for support pillars under
static load. It cannot estimate the abuntment load on a
chain pillar.
 Tributary load is to conservative for longwall mining. It
overestimates the pillar loads , because tributary load
assumes the load is uniformly distributed over the
pillars, which is not the case.
 Pressure Arch Theory -According to this theory, when
an opening is made, the stresses shift outward on both
sides of pillar, leaving a de-stressed zone, in the shape
of an arch, around the pillar. The exact shape and size of
the arch depends on the stress levels, age and
shape/size of opening, and strata properties. Subsidence
occurs when the arch reaches the surface.
A disadvantage of this theory is that due to a lack of a
quantitative estimate of the pressure arch profile, it is
difficult to design .
DGMS GUIDELINE FOR PILLAR
DIMENSION
Pillar Strength Formulas
 CMRI Formula.
 Obert-Duvall/Wang Formula.
 Holland - Gaddy Formula.
 Holland Formula.
(1)- CMRI Formula: CMRI developed a formula for pillar strength taking into
account the pillar w/h ratio, the uniaxial compressive strength of the pillar,
the height of seam and depth of cover.
S = Pillar strength (MPa) .

σc= Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) (MPa) .
h = Working height or seam height (in m) .
H = Depth of cover (in m) .
w = Pillar width (in m).
(2): Obert-Duvall/Wang Formula -It was derived from laboratory tests
on hard rock and elasticity considerations the same relationship as did
Bunting in 1911. Greenwald et al. (1939) mention that this form of an
expression for pillar strength was proposed in 1900 for anthracite after
laboratory tests made for the Scranton Engineers Club. This formula is given
as
Where σp is pillar strength, σ1 is uniaxial compressive strength of a cubical

specimen (w/h = 1), and w and h are pillar dimensions. this equation is valid
for w/h ratios of 0.25 to 4.0.
(3): Holland - Gaddy Formula -
Where, k is the Gaddy factor, w and h are pillar dimensions in in., and σp is
pillar strength in psi. Holland specified a safety factor between 1.8 and 2.2
for the design of coal pillars, with a recommended value of 2.0. The width-
to height ratio, for which the Holland formula is valid, ranges from 2 to 8.
(4): Holland Formula –

Where σ1 is the strength of cubical pillars (w = h = 1). In effect, it can be
interpreted as the strength at the critical size of coal specimens and is to be
determined. The recommended factor of safety is 2.0.
Factor of Safety
 Factor of Safety
Where, σp = Strength of pillar .
Sp = Stress of pillar.
1. The seam is subjected only to vertical pressure, which is constant over the
mined area. However, stress transfer occurs where stiff abutments exist
in underground workings. Thus this vertical pressure may be relieved
partially.
2. Each pillar supports the column of rock over an area that is the sum of the
cross-sectional area of the pillar plus a portion of the room area, the
latter being equally shared by all neighbouring pillars. However, this is
certainly not valid if the area of development is small since the pillars in
the centre of the excavation are under more stress than the pillars near
the sides. It is usually only accepted as valid if the mined-out area is
greater than the depth below surface.
3. It is assumed that the load is uniformly distributed over the cross-sectional
area of the pillar.
Size of pillars
 Strength of the coal: Seams with weak coal require large
pillars. Effect of atmosphere and escape of gas also
influence the size of pillars.
 Geological Considerations: In the vicinity of faults, large
pillars are required. Dip and presence of water also
influences the decision as to the size of pillars.
 Time dependant strain: With time the strain goes on
increasing, the load remaining constant and if the size
of the pillar is not sufficiently large, then it may fail
under the time dependant strain, although initially it
might be stable.
Laboratory Techniques
The tests used for the analysis are Uniaxial compressive
strength testing and Triaxial testing.
Uniaxial compressive testing:-
This is the most common test to characterise any sample.
Samples were prepared after coring, cutting and polishing. The
sample length used for testing was 148 mm and the diameter of
the sample taken was 54.24 mm. The load at which the sample
failed was noted. The failure profile was analysed.
Triaxial testing
Triaxial testing was carried out to determine the behaviour of
sample under confined pressure. The first, second and failure
peak loads were noted for varying confined pressures. The
cohesion and angle of internal friction was then analysed after
incorporating the peak loads and the confined pressure. The
sample length used for triaxial testing was 103.2 mm and the
sample diameter used for the test was 53.28 mm.
REFRENCES
 Singh, R.D., ―Principles And Practices OF Modern Coal Mining.
 Deshmukh, D.J., ―Elements Of Mining Technology.
 T.N. Singh.
 www.slideshare.net.
 Madden B.J., ―Reassessment of coal pillar design ‖ , J. S. Afr.
Inst. Min. Metal, vol. Jan 1991, pp 27-37  Sheorey P.R.,
Barat D., Mukherjee K.P., Prasad R.K., Das M.N.
 Banerjee G., Das K.K., ―Application of the Yield Pillar
Technique for Successful Depillaring Under Stiff Strata. ‖ Int. J.
Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Vol. 32, No. 7, 1995, pp.
699708.
 Sheorey P. R. Pillar strength considering in situ stresses.
Workshop on Coal Pillar Mechanics and Design, pp. 122-127.
Santa Fe, USBM IC 9315 (1992).
THANK YOU

Pillar Design: Presented by Abhishek Vaidya 117MN0676

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pillar Design: Presented by Abhishek Vaidya 117MN0676

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pillar Design: Presented by Abhishek Vaidya 117MN0676

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PILLAR DESIGN

The load on the pillar,

 Tributary estimates are valid only if the geometry of

S = Pillar strength (MPa) .

Where σp is pillar strength, σ1 is uniaxial compressive strength of a cubical

(3): Holland - Gaddy Formula -

(4): Holland Formula –

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.