LRMDS Coordinators Orientation

ADM Module
Quality
Assurance
Standards
Neolita S. Sarabia – EdD
EPSvr - LRMDS
TOR : The Learning Resource
Evaluators (LREs) shall
1. Evaluate and check the assigned modules for conceptual,
factual, procedural, pedagogical, computational, and
grammatical errors, violations on social content, and other
types of errors.
2. Write specific comments, findings, and suggested revisions on

the margin of the pages of with inadequacies or errors in
content.
1. Accomplish the prescribed evaluation tool and prepare the

Summary of Findings Report that shall guide the development
team in implementing the recommended revisions.
4. Submit the evaluated ADM materials with marginal
comments and the duly accomplished summary report on a
staggered basis until all assigned LRS have been evaluated.
5. Discuss with the development team, if needed, to clarify

comments and recommendations made in your content
review.
6. Review the revised and finalized DDLRs to ensure that

corrections/ suggested revisions were sufficiently and correctly
implemented
4. Submit the evaluated ADM materials with marginal
comments and the duly accomplished summary report on a
staggered basis until all assigned LRS have been evaluated.
5. Discuss with the development team, if needed, to clarify

comments and recommendations made in your content
review.
6. Review the revised and finalized DDLRs to ensure that

corrections/ suggested revisions were sufficiently and correctly
implemented
The HOW
 Evaluate the assigned modules one at a time. Read
each module page by page to identify possible
errors using the following criterion items found in the
Content Evaluation tool (Annex 1) as your guide and
in writing your marginal comments:
WHAT TO LOOK INTO
A. Intellectual Property Compliance

Check the LRs for:
 Copyright violations
 Proper and accurate citations for

copyrighted texts and visuals
WHAT TO LOOK INTO
B. Learning Competencies
 Check the alignment of the content of the

LRs with the targeted DepEd Learning
Competencies intended for the learning
area and grade level.

WHAT TO LOOK INTO
• C. Instructional Design and Organization
 Content of the LR should:
 Contribute to the achievement of specific learning objectives
 Be arranged and organized logically to facilitate

achievement of learning objectives
 Be suitable to the target learner’s level of development,

needs, and experience

WHAT TO LOOK INTO
 Reinforce, enrich, and /or lead to the mastery of the targeted
learning competencies
 Use devices that facilitate progressions from lesson to lesson
 Allow for review, comparison, and /or integration with

previous lessons

WHAT TO LOOK INTO
 Provide motivational strategies/activities
 Use various teaching and learning strategies to meet

individual differences/ learning styles
 Promote the development of higher cognitive thinking

skills and 21st century learning skills
 Enhance the development of desirable values and traits

WHAT TO LOOK INTO
• D. Instructional Quality
Check the LRs for:
 Conceptual errors
 Factual errors
 Procedural errors
 Pedagogical errors
 Computational errors
 Grammatical errors
 Violations on Social Content
 Other types of errors
WHAT TO LOOK INTO
• E. Assessment
 Check LRs for assessment that:
 Helps teacher evaluates learner’s progress
 Is aligned with the specific learning
objectives
 Facilitates self-checks
 Are varied
WHAT TO LOOK INTO
F. Readability
LRs should have:
Words and sentences that are within
the level of the target learners
Paragraphs and sentences that are
structured to the level of the target
learners
Smooth flow of ideas within a lesson
and from one lesson to lesson
•
WHAT TO LOOK INTO
F. Readability
LRs should have:
Good use of transition devices
Lessons, Instructions, exercises,
questions, and activities that are clear to
the learners
•
Write comments on salient points based
on the criteria while examining the
module. Highlight the part of the page
that needs to be improved/revised or
where the error is found. Specify
comments, findings, and
recommendations beside the highlighted
portion to guide the development team in
revising the modules.
Use the Summary of Findings
template in Annex 2 to identify the
specific parts that need to be corrected
/ revised by indicating specific pages
and line numbers.
Avoid using vague words and
nonspecific/generalized comments in your
marginal comments (e.g., some words are
not appropriate; many of the examples are
not aligned with the content; the sentence is
not clear; the verb is grammatically incorrect)
After evaluating the module, go over your
marginal comments to validate/confirm
that the findings and recommendations
are consistent and thorough and to
check that none is missed out.
Ensure that all comments and
recommendations indicated in the
modules are included in the
Summary of Findings report. Notes
on the specific pages of the
modules must adequately support
comments written in the Summary
of Findings report.
Provide an overall assessment on
the content quality based on the
comments and findings noted in
the ADM modules. Encode the
Summary of Findings report of the
overall findings and recommend if
the module requires minor or
major revisions.
After individual evaluation of each
LR, immediately submit each ADM
module with marginal comments
and the duly accomplished
summary report on a staggered
basis until all assigned modules
have been evaluated.
If deemed necessary, discuss your
report with the development team/s
or focal persons to clarify findings
and agree on the revisions and
improvements to be made in the
modules evaluated.
Thank you!


LRMDS Coordinators Orientation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LRMDS Coordinators Orientation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LRMDS Coordinators Orientation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ADM Module

2. Write specific comments, findings, and suggested revisions on

1. Accomplish the prescribed evaluation tool and prepare the

5. Discuss with the development team, if needed, to clarify

6. Review the revised and finalized DDLRs to ensure that

5. Discuss with the development team, if needed, to clarify

6. Review the revised and finalized DDLRs to ensure that

A. Intellectual Property Compliance

 Proper and accurate citations for

 Check the alignment of the content of the

 Be arranged and organized logically to facilitate

 Be suitable to the target learner’s level of development,

 Use devices that facilitate progressions from lesson to lesson

 Allow for review, comparison, and /or integration with

 Use various teaching and learning strategies to meet

 Promote the development of higher cognitive thinking

 Enhance the development of desirable values and traits

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.