Cottle Taylor Case Analysis
Cottle Taylor Case Analysis
Cottle Taylor Case Analysis
TAYLOR
”Expanding the Oral
Care Group in India”
1.
S Y N D I C AT E :
E R RY N M . PA R A M Y T H A 29115016
2. P U S P A D I VA N U R A Q M A R I N A 2 9 1 1 5 0 4 2
3. IRENE ANGELINA 29115075
4. NADIA ASTRID 29115202
AGENDA
Introduction of Cottle-Taylor
Cottle’s Strategy
Problems
Answer
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION COTTLE-TAYLOR
2009
2004
46% Market
Revenue: Share of
$11.5 billion
Toothbrush in
India
Sales grow:
1815 8% annually Operations in
Based in Net Income: 200 countries
Philadelphia as 12% worldwide
hand soap Earning per
manufactures shares:
14%
COTTLE-TAYLOR IN INDIA
Personal
• Focus only on oral care Care
• Wide distribution network with 4,50,000 retail
outlets
• Outlets included small shops, road side vendors,
medium & large stores and even supermarkets Product
• 46% Market share of toothbrush sold in india s
• Hinda-daltan and sarindia – main competitors
Oral Home
Care Care
INDIAN PEOPLE CONDITION
Brushing Incidence
In India
Replacement Incidence
8.6
7%
23% 9%
22%
39%
1 Time/Week 2 Times/Week
91.4 3 Times/Week 1 Time/Day
2 Times/Day
COTTLE'S STRATEGY IN INDIA
Television Newspaper
Billboards & Outdoor Display Radio
COTTLE’S STRATEGY - MESSAGES TO BE DELIVERED
• LANG’S VIEW (VP of Marketing for • PATEL’S VIEW (Director of Oral Care
Greater Asia & Africa) Marketing)
Currently, only below 50% of rural consumers had the desire to adopt
modern approach to oral care. Because based on the data, above 50%
didn’t not use a toothbrush to clean teeth.
ANSWER: 3
The consumer buying power has been increase especially for the semi urban and urban
area. With disposable income above $5.000/year it is possible to upgrade into the more
sophisticated products.
ANSWER: 4 ( PRODUCT MIXED )
Based on the product mixed from product category, Langs has higher revenue than Patel
MARKETING PLAN – 2010
PROJECTION
MARKETING PLAN – 2010
PROJECTION
Better to choose Patel 2010, because the profit is higher than Lang 2010. It because Lang decide to
increase the marketing budget into 12%.
ANSWER: 5
• No, a 3% increase in Ad dollars would not definitively lead to higher revenues
and profitability in this situation.
• Increasing the amount of advertising dollars injected into a campaign does not
necessarily have a direct correlation on revenues and profit.
• Essentially, increasing the amount spent on advertising could increase consumer
awareness and volume, but it is plausible that consumers who do not have a lot of
money may not be influenced by advertisements. In India, 80% of citizens live on
less than $2 per day, which is a big obstacle for Cottle. Many Indians may not
have access to view the advertisements, and a 3% increase may just be a waste of
funding in the end. Finding an effective and feasible insight into how Indians
purchase oral care products should be priority #1 and custom tailoring a message
to each consumer group
CONCLUSION
• Brinda Patel’s plan must be approved as it based on local research,
not on success of other country with distinctive culture. As long as
50% of rural population didn’t use toothbrush Cottle’s messages
should concentrate on persuading consumers to brush for the first
time.
• Great majority of Indians are price-sensitive, and 80% Indians live
less than on $2, that means that Cottle’s should focused on the
product lines that consumers will most likely buy.