Glass ionomer cements have improved over generations with faster setting times, reduced sensitivity to moisture, and better adhesion to tooth structures. However, their strength is still weaker than resin composites. Newer variations include resin-modified glass ionomers to improve aesthetics and strength, and compomers which aim to combine properties of glass ionomers and composites. Experimental variations include fiber-reinforced, bioactive glass, and nanobioceramic-modified glass ionomers to further enhance properties.
Glass ionomer cements have improved over generations with faster setting times, reduced sensitivity to moisture, and better adhesion to tooth structures. However, their strength is still weaker than resin composites. Newer variations include resin-modified glass ionomers to improve aesthetics and strength, and compomers which aim to combine properties of glass ionomers and composites. Experimental variations include fiber-reinforced, bioactive glass, and nanobioceramic-modified glass ionomers to further enhance properties.
Glass ionomer cements have improved over generations with faster setting times, reduced sensitivity to moisture, and better adhesion to tooth structures. However, their strength is still weaker than resin composites. Newer variations include resin-modified glass ionomers to improve aesthetics and strength, and compomers which aim to combine properties of glass ionomers and composites. Experimental variations include fiber-reinforced, bioactive glass, and nanobioceramic-modified glass ionomers to further enhance properties.
Glass ionomer cements have improved over generations with faster setting times, reduced sensitivity to moisture, and better adhesion to tooth structures. However, their strength is still weaker than resin composites. Newer variations include resin-modified glass ionomers to improve aesthetics and strength, and compomers which aim to combine properties of glass ionomers and composites. Experimental variations include fiber-reinforced, bioactive glass, and nanobioceramic-modified glass ionomers to further enhance properties.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19
RECENT ADVANCES IN:
GLASS IONOMER CEMENT
The early conventional glass-ionomer materials were technique- _ • sensitive, slow setting, opaque when set and sensitive to both desiccation and hydration during setting. This led to premature surface deterioration. Most of these problems have (more or less) been solved in newer generations of glass-ionomer cement. Setting has been accelerated and hydration problems have been reduced. However, unlike composites, their use in stressed situations is still questionable. The most common indication of the newer, heavily filled, reduced particle size glass-ionomer cements is in non-stress bearing build-ups, root caries, tunnel restorations and long term .provisional restorations in primary and adult dentitions The cement is formed as a result of poly-acidic attack of the outer • shell of fluoride containing soluble aluminum-glasses. Dissimilar to resin- based composites that have no chemical reactivity after setting, glass ionomer cements remain reactive for a prolonged time. Also quite the opposite to resin-based composites, bond formation of glass ionomer cements to mineralized tissue is no problem. Although the bond strength reaches only 25% of that can be obtained with resinbased bonding systems, the bond is reliable and far more degeneration resistant than the resin systems, where the hybrid layer can break up with time 6 . Glass-ionomer cements do not require extra provisions for consistent retention or adhesion, as they adhere directly to, even humid, dental hard tissues As filling material, glass-ionomer cement mimics tooth colour not as • good as composites do and show faster surface loss by wear, but since it is less technique demanding it may serve in many ways more successfully than resin-based composites. Dependant on tradition, in some countries (e.g. Australia, UK) full glass-ionomer Class III restorations are generally accepted, while the material is merely used as only dentine replacement in sandwich restorations. For the time being resin-based composites possesses superior surface .characteristics The resin-modification of glass-ionomer cements, introduced to obtain • command set glassionomer cements, did not contribute to higher wear resistance 9 . Resin modified glass-ionomer cements are materials in which a hydrophilic polymerizing resin is added to the glass-ionomer matrix. The admixed resin improves initial aesthetics and tensile strength and fracture toughness. Also desiccation and hydration problems are reduced. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements set partly through an acidbase reaction and a polymerization of the resin component of the matrix. The resin component can be lightcured. Another portion of the setting process involves the typical acidbase process between the filler and the poly-acid matrix. The latter reaction does not progress as complete as is the case with traditional glass-ionomers. The hydrophilic .character of the resin component also contributes to osmotic swelling Another step in merging the characteristics of resin-based composites • with those of traditional glass-ionomer cements was the introduction of the poly-acrylic acid modified composite resins, also called compomers. Compomers were intended as to optimally combine the properties of glass-ionomers and resin-based composites. If regarded as a more or less temporary restorative, compomers can replace resin-based composite in anterior proximal restorations and have become in many countries the material of first choice in paediatric dentistry. In almost all other applications, traditional composites and glass-ionomer cements are preferred because of greater strength and wear resistance and better dimensional stability. As a matter of fact, a disadvantage of compomers is that ease of handling was obtained at the cost the established specific properties of hybrid resin-based composites and a proper glass-ionomer .reaction Within the framework of mixing resins with inorganic materials, it • has to be realized that conventional glass-ionomer is a pure inorganic material and thus is predisposed to acid erosion. Figure 2 shows how decreasing pH affects wear significantly. This acid susceptibility is less present for the resin-modified glass-ionomers. Note that wear as such for the resinmodified types is considerably faster than for conventional ones. Figure 3 shows how conventional glassionomers .seriously can erode when used interdentally in risk patients Also excessive consumption of soft drinks might put conventional • glassionomer restorations at risk For direct restorative dentistry, the slow setting of conventional glassionomer cements is felt as an inconvenience. Apart from the nuisance of waiting for finishing the restoration, a drawback of the slow setting is that the water content of the freshly placed cement can easily be altered either by dehydration or water .uptake from the saliva The loosely bound water may have a negative effect on initial solidity of glass-ionomer, but is at the same time responsible for positive characteristics such as curing shrinkage relieve and continuing chemistry throughout the bulk material, which reinforces the material and facilitates fluoride release. A, yet not fully customary technique, by which the cements’ hardening is substantially accelerated with ultrasonic or heat treatment may solve many problems related to the slow setting of glassionomers 10 . Figure 4 shows that accelerated hardening prevents the glass-ionomer for dye penetration. Mechanical properties are also significantly enhanced by .heat or ultra-sound treatment : ADVANCED GIC TYPES Condensable / Self Hardening GIC – _1 • These are basically, purely chemically activated RMGIC with no light activation at all.Developed mainly for luting purposes, they contain monomers and chemical initiatiors such a the benzoyl peroxide and tamines to allow self polymerization.It is used mainly in paediatric dentistry for cementation of stainless steel crowns,space maintainers, bands and brackets Advantages over conventional GIC‟sare Packable + Condensable, Easy placement , Non sticky, Rapid finishing can be carried out, Improved wear resistance and Solubility in oral fluids is very low The Bioactive Glass _2 • This idea was developed by Hench and co in 1973. It takes into account the fact that on acid dissolution of glass, there is formation of a layer rich in Ca and PO4 around the glass, such a glass can form intimate bioactive bonds with bone cells and get fully integrated with the bone. It is being used experimentally asBone cement, Retrograde filling material, For perforation repair, Augmentation of alveolar ridges in edentulous ridges , implant cementation, Infra- bony pocket correction Fiber Reinforced GIC _3 • Incorporation of alumina fibres into the glass powder to improve upon its flexural strength.This technology called the Polymeric Rigid Inorganic Matrix Material It involves incorporation of a continuous network / scaffold of alumina and SiO2 ceramic fibres It has increased depth of cure, reduced polymerization shrinkage improved wear resistance and increase in flexural strength. 4_Giomer Giomer utilizes the hybridization of GIC and composite by using a unique technology called the prereacted glass ionomertechnology.Thefluoroaluminosilicate glass is reacted with polyalkenoic acid to yield a stable phase of GIC this pre reacted glass is then mixed with the resin.Depending on the amount of glass which is reacted, the PRG technology can be 2 types: F- PRG = reaction of Full / entire glass S- PRG = Surface of glass Eg: Beautiful, Reactmer Amalgomers_5 • These are restoratives which are glass ionomer based but with the strength of amalgam. They also provide Frelease, natural adhesion to tooth structure, good compatibility and prevent shrinkage, creep, corrosion or thermal conductivity problems associated with other filling materials.They have been found to have exceptional wear characteristics, along with other advantages of GIC 6_Hainomers These are newer bioactive materials developed by incorporating hydroxyapatite within glass ionomerpowder.These are mainly being used as bone cements in oral maxillofacial surgery and may a future role as retrograde filling material. They have a role in bonding directly to bone and affect its growth and development 7_Chlorhexidine impregnated GIC It is developed to increase the anticariogenic action of GIC.Still under experimental stage. Experiments conducted on cariogenic organisms Proline Containing Glass Ionomer Cement _8 • It is an amino acid-containing GIC had better surface hardness properties than commercial Fuji IX GIC. This formulation of fast-set glass ionomer showed increased water sorption without adversely affecting the amount of fluoride release.Considering its biocompatibility, this material shows promise not only as a dental restorative material but also as a bone cement with low cytotoxicity 9_CPP – ACP Containing GIC Here casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate incorporated into a glass-ionomer cement. Incorporation of 1.56% w/w CPP-ACP into the GIC significantly increased microtensile bond strength (33%) and compressive strength (23%) and significantly enhanced the release of .calcium, phosphate, and fluoride ions at neutral and acidic pH Zirconia Containing GIC _10 • Zirconia containing GIC – A potential substitute for miracle mix.Thediametral tensile strength of zirconia containing GIC significantly Greater than that of Miracle mix due to better interfacial bonding Between the particles and matrix. 11_NANO Bioceramic Modified GIC Nano hydroxyapaptite / fluorapatite particles added to FUJI II GC, The glass ionomer cements containing nanobioceramics are promising restorative dental materials with both improved mechanical properties and improved bond strength to dentin.Nanohydroxyapatite/fluoroapatite added cements exhibited higher compressive strength (177–179 MPa), higher diametral tensile strength (19–20 MPa) andhigher biaxial flexural strength (26–28 MPa) as compared with the control group (160 MPa in CS, 14 MPa .in DTS and 18 MPa in biaxial flexural strength) Calcium Aluminate GIC _12 • A hybrid product with a composition between that of calcium aluminate and GIC, designed for luting fixed prosthesis.The calcium aluminate component is made by sintering a mixture of high-purity Al2O3 and CaO (approximately 1 : 1 molar ratio) to create monocalciumaluminate.The main ingredients in the powder of this hybrid cementare calcium aluminate, polyacrylic acid, tartaric acid,strontium-fluoro-alumino-glass, and strontium fluoride. The liquid component contains 99.6% water and 0.4% additivesfor controlling setting.The calcium aluminate contributesto a basic pH during curing, reduction in microleakage,excellent biocompatibility, .and long-term stability andstrength Thank you Presentation made by : Rana Sayed Farghaly Bassma Hassan Abdelaleem