Sensory Profile: Submitted By-Amandeep Kaur M.O.T-Neuro, Sem 3 ENROLLMENT NO - A138141620004 Guided by - Ruby Ma'Am

SENSORY PROFILE
SUBMITTED BY- AMANDEEP KAUR

M.O.T-NEURO, SEM 3
ENROLLMENT NO- A138141620004
GUIDED BY- RUBY MA’AM.
WHAT IS SENSORY RPOFILE?
The Sensory Profile provides a standard method to measure a client’s
sensory processing abilities & to examine the effect of sensory processing
on functional performance in the daily life of the client.
In other words-
It helps us understand the client’s sensory processing patterns in everyday
situations & profile the sensory system's effect on functional performance
for diagnostic & intervention planning.
 It is a standardized tool to help evaluate a child's sensory processing patterns
in the context of home, school & community-based activities.
 Developed by- Winnie Dunn, PhD, OTR, FAOTA
 Year- 1999.
 Since original 1999 Publication 5 separate assessments:
1. Sensory Profile (1999)
2. Infant Toddler Sensory Profile (2002)
3. Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (2002)
4. Sensory Profile School Companion (2006)
5. Sensory Profile Supplement (2006)
 Now 2 assessments:
1. Sensory Profile 2 (2014)
2. Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (2006)
SENSORY PROFILE
SENSORY PROFILE
SHORT COMINGS OF SENSORY
PROFILE
 Went up to only 10 years of age.
 People gave feedback that they needed a tool for children with
developmental delays or for children in middle school.
 Has five manuals.
 Cannot be scored online.
 The original Sensory Profile will be available until there are no more.
There is no validity problem.
 Infant & Toddler form was not separated.
SENSORY PROFILE 2
 Age Range: Birth – 14:11
 Administration Options: Paper-and-pencil or online through Q-
global.
 Completed by: Caregiver or teacher.
 Scoring Options: Manual Scoring or Q-global.
SENSORY PROFILE 2-
FORMS
 Infant Sensory Profile 2: Birth-6 months - Spanish available
 Toddler Sensory Profile 2: 7-35 months - Spanish available
 Child Sensory Profile 2: 3-14 years - Spanish available
 Short Sensory Profile 2: 3-14 years - Spanish available
 School Companion Sensory Profile 2: 3-14 years
 Sensory profile 2 is a Family of assessments that helps to-
 Evaluate sensory processing in children &
 Identify the effect of sensory processing on functional participation in a
child’s:
• Home
• School &
• community.
 It is a set of judgment-based caregiver or teacher questionnaires.

 Information collected helps formulate hypotheses.
 Parents and/or teachers (with regular contact with the child) complete the
questionnaire.
 Patterns of responses indicate the child’s sensory processing patterns.
APPROPRIATE USES OF
SENSORY PROFILE 2
 Contribute to determining eligibility for services.

 Data provides information for intervention planning within a
multi-tiered model of support.
 Data provides a vehicle for discussion.
 Data are combined with other data (ex. Siblings)
 NOT designed to document progress.
SENSORY PROFILE 2- WHAT’S
NEW?
 Infant, Toddler, Child, Short, and School Companion combined in one kit, with
one manual.
 Updated content.
 Shorter administration time (reduced number of items except Toddler Form) –
 Infant: 36 -> 25
 Child: 125 -> 86
 School: 62 -> 44
 Short: 38 -> 34
 Greater consistency between forms.
 Infant and Toddler record forms now on two separate forms.
SENSORY PROFILE 2- WHAT’S
NEW?
 Ability to score online via Q-global.
 Ability to compare responses across caregivers with new multi-rater report in
Q-global.
 Percentile rank added for an additional level of analysis.
 Expanded upper age range to 14:11 on Child, School Companion & Short
Forms.
 No longer separate score sheets: Score summary included on questionnaire.
 Questions were carefully reviewed to improve readability (remove double
negatives).
 Increased validity and reliability studies.
 Weighting on questions: “Almost Always” = 5 instead of 1
COMBINATION OF SENSORY
EVENTS
1. Sensory System Scores –
 General
 Auditory
 Visual
 Touch
 Movement
 Body Position
 Oral
2. Behavioral Scores –
 Behavioral
 Conduct
 Social
 Emotional
 Attentional
3. Sensory Pattern Scores –

 Seeking/Seeker, Avoiding/Avoider,
 Sensitivity/Sensor,
 Registration/Bystander
4. School Factor Scores (School Companion only) –
 Supports
 Awareness
 Tolerance
 Availability
SENSORY SENSITIVITY
 Passive response to a low threshold.
 Easily respond to sensory stimuli.
 Notice things other people don’t notice
 Highly aware of their surroundings.
 Distractible.
SENSATION AVOIDING
 Actively counteract a low threshold.
 Intentional withdrawal or blocking of sensation.
 Use of rituals and routines.
 Overwhelmed by sensoryrich environments.
 Good at creating structured and supportive environments
LOW REGISTRATION
 Passive response with a high threshold.
 Miss available sensory input.
 Spacey, clumsy.
 Under-responsive or slow to respond.
 Can focus in distracting environments.
 Flexible, comfortable in wide range of environments.
SENSATION SEEKING
 Behavioral response to counteract a high threshold.
 Enjoys sensory rich environments.
 Creates sensation.
 Easily bored.
 Trouble tolerating low stimulus environments.
ADMINISTRATION/SCORING
TIME
 Paper and web-based Administration –
• Infant Sensory Profile 2: 5 to 10 minutes.
• Toddler Sensory Profile 2: 10 to 15 minutes.
• Child Sensory Profile 2: 15 to 20 minutes.
• Short Sensory Profile 2: 5 to 10 minutes.
• School Companion (SP2): 15 minutes.
 Scoring –
• Manual Scoring: Approx. 15 minutes.
• Web-based administration and scoring: 0 minutes.
 Enhanced Assessment and Planning Report –
• Adds approx. 15 to 30 minutes to completion time.
SENSORY PROFILE 2- Q-GLOBAL
SCORING.
1. Reporting Options in Q-global: –
• Score Report.
• Item Analysis Report.
• Assessment & Planning Report-Helps determine next-steps based on results.
• Multi-rater Report
2. Administration Options in Q-global: –

• Ability to administer on-screen in the office, or remotely by sending a link
by email through Q-global
NORMATIVE INFORMATION
 2012-2013 – Stratified sample.
 1791 - Total children.
 337 - Children rated on both child and school forms.
 774 children with disabilities.
 Approx. 10% of sample - children with disabilities.
 Data collected both digitally and paper/pencil.
RELIABILITY
 Test-Retest Reliability:
“Consistency of a measure from one time to another”
• – Caregiver = .83 - .97
• – School = .66 - .93
 Inter-Rater Reliability:
“Degree to which different raters give consistent estimates of the same
phenomenon”
• – Caregiver: Mostly in .70s and .80s
• –Teacher: Mostly in .70s, .80s and .90s
VALIDITY
 Previous Sensory Profiles.
 BASC-2 PRS and SP2 Child/Short forms.
 BASC-2 TRS and SP2 School form.
 SSIS parent and SP2 Child form.
 SSIS teacher and SP2 School form.
 Vineland-II and SP2 Infant/Toddler/Child forms.
 School Function Assessment and SP2 School form.
CLINICAL COMPARISON GROUPS
Discrimination for clinical groups was key for development.
 Infant and Toddler forms:
• Developmental Delays.
 Child and School Companion forms:
• Autism
• ADHD
• Dual diagnosis of ADHD/ASD
• LD
• Giftedness
• Intellectual Disabilities
• Down Syndrome
• English as additional language
ARTICLE DISCUSSION:
1. ‘AN OVERVIEW & CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE SENSORY
PROFILE - SECOND EDITION’
-LISA LICCIARDI, TED BROWN.
BACKGROUND-
The Sensory Profile-2 (SP-2) is the recently revised set of scales that provide
information about a child's responses to different types of sensory stimuli.
AIM-
To examine the methodological quality and psychometric properties of the SP-2
using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement
Instruments (COSMIN) and Quality Criteria for Health Status Questionnaires
(QCHSQ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS-
The methodological quality and psychometric properties for each of the SP-2
scales were examined by two assessors using the COSMIN and QCHSQ.
RESULTS-
The COSMIN revealed that the SP-2 demonstrated strengths in patient-related
outcome measure design and internal consistency.
However, hypothesis testing, cross-cultural validity and structural validity
(construct validity) were notable shortcomings.
The QCHSQ indicated the SP-2 has merits in its content validity and construct
validity.
CONCLUSION-
Informed assessment selection is fundamental for evidence-based and
quality occupational therapy practice provision. Overall, the SP-2 is
considered to have adequate psychometric properties.
SIGNIFICANCE-
The review and critique of the SP-2 adds to the body of knowledge about the
revised instrument and provides an objective perspective about its strengths
and weaknesses.
2. ‘TEST–RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE SENSORY PROFILE
CAREGIVER QUESTIONNAIRE.’
- ALISHA OHL; CHERYL BUTLER; CHRISTINA CARNEY.
OBJECTIVE-
To examine the test–retest reliability & internal consistency of the Sensory
Profile Caregiver Questionnaire (SP).
METHOD-
55 primary caregivers of children 36–72 mo old participated in the study.
Participants completed the SP on two separate occasions 7–14 days apart.
Participant data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)
and Cronbach’s α coefficients.
RESULTS-
Test–retest reliability was good enough.
Internal consistency was high.
CONCLUSION-
This study suggests the SP has acceptable test–retest reliability and internal
consistency and supports the use of quadrant scores over factor and section scores
to analyze children’s sensory processing patterns.
THANKYOU.

Sensory Profile: Submitted By-Amandeep Kaur M.O.T-Neuro, Sem 3 ENROLLMENT NO - A138141620004 Guided by - Ruby Ma'Am

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sensory Profile: Submitted By-Amandeep Kaur M.O.T-Neuro, Sem 3 ENROLLMENT NO - A138141620004 Guided by - Ruby Ma'Am

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sensory Profile: Submitted By-Amandeep Kaur M.O.T-Neuro, Sem 3 ENROLLMENT NO - A138141620004 Guided by - Ruby Ma'Am

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the Sensory Profile?

What are the different forms of the Sensory Profile 2?

SENSORY PROFILE

SUBMITTED BY- AMANDEEP KAUR

 It is a set of judgment-based caregiver or teacher questionnaires.

 Contribute to determining eligibility for services.

3. Sensory Pattern Scores –

2. Administration Options in Q-global: –

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.