GROUP 1

HIRARC
SEWERAGE & MANHOLE SERVICE

START
 MEMBERS

INTAN MAG HASIF

 MEMBERS

YEK SEERU HASSAN

Abstract, Introduction,
Objective
By MAG
 ABSTRACT

Hazard identification , Risk Once the hazard has been

Assessment and Control or HIRARC also help to
identified , risk involved
HIRARC System is a risk will be estimated and identify all the factors

assessment tool which will categorized . If the that may cause harm to
estimated risk falls in a employees and other .
assist users in identifying
category , which is higher
hazard and estimating risk
then the low risk category
involved in each identified
, then possible control
hazard measures will be
recommended
INTRODUCTION

➔ Provide A Systematic And Objective Approach

To Assess The Hazard And The Associated Risk
That Will Provide An Objective Measure Of An
Identified Hazard
➔ Provided Method To Control The Risk
➔ Plan Introduce And Monitor The Preventive
Measure To Ensure The Risk Is Controllable
➔ Distinguish Between Danger And Risk
➔ Risk = Possibility Or Probability Of The Hazard
Resulting In Harm Or Destruction To The
People, Property Or The Environment.

Risk = Likelihood X Severity

 OBJECTIVE

The purpose or objective of this report is to :

1. Identify the health and safety hazard affecting employees and

the employer at Infineon Melaka Tower
2. Carry out the risk analysis that could arise from the hazard
identified in Infineon Melaka Tower
3. Recommend recommendations for action appropriate health and
safety be taken
Methodology
By SEERKAMBAN
METHODS OF IDENTIFYING HAZARDS
• Methods of identifying hazards include review of documents
and publications, inspection and observation at the
workplace, measurement of the atmosphere monitoring the
environment or medical surveillance of workers and hazard
analysis.

PRE-ASSESSMENT –CLASSIFYING WORK ACTIVITIES

• Before hazard identification is done, a pre-assessment of the
hazard is done by gathering information on the facilities,
processes, and activities of the organization like the area map
and site plan of the facilities, process flow-charts, inventory of
materials like raw materials, chemicals, wastes, products, sub-
products, toxicology and other health and safety data,
monitoring data, geographical areas within and /or outside the
premises, stages in a production process or in the provision of
a service, defined the tasks like driving and window cleaning,
identify the working groups and land use for previous property
use and future use.
METHODS OF IDENTIFYING HAZARDS
DOCUMENT REVIEW
• In documentation review, reports of INSPECTION AND OBSERVATION
accidents, accident investigation and audits • Types of inspections include statutory
are reviewed as well as information from inspection, periodic inspection, formal and
publications such as acts, regulations and informal inspection.
codes of practice, statistics, handbooks, and
Chemical Safety Data Sheet (CSDS) are
referenced to aid in identifying the hazards.

MEASUREMENT
• Types of monitoring are area and personal monitoring include the monitoring of noise, heat, radiation, air contaminants
and chemicals.
• Biological monitoring is a regular measuring activity where selected validated indicators of the uptake of toxic substances
in the human body are determined to prevent health impairment. This form of monitoring could require examination for
example, blood, urine, saliva, and expired air. Biological monitoring is commonly featured in the health or medical
surveillance of persons exposed to hazardous environments especially complying to legal requirements such as USECHH
Regulations 2000. Health surveillance is warranted if substance is used in the workplace is hazardous, evidence or reason
to suspect injury and atmospheric monitoring insufficient.
 • Methods that are used in hazard analysis
are Job Safety Analysis (JSA), Hazards and
Operability Studies (HAZOP) and Fault
Tree Analysis.

HAZARD
ANALYSIS
 JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS (JSA)
•JSA is a job described in less than 10 steps
and an action verb used to describe a job. JSA
also lists things that can go wrong.
•The term JSA includes the formulation of
safe work procedures using written
instructions for workers. It may still require
other risk controls and supervisor and
workers should assist each other. Ideally all
jobs should have a JSA.
 HAZARDS AND OPERABILITY
FAULT TREE ANALYSIS
STUDIES (HAZOP)

•HAZOP is used to identify and evaluate •The Fault Tree Analysis is used to analyze
safety hazards in a work process such as a how and why incidents could occur by using
complex system and identify operability graphic techniques by tracing branches of
problems. It involves creating a new events. It is also used to calculate the
design or process, multidisciplinary probability of an end event.
brainstorming, as a “What If”
questionnaire method and focuses on fire,
explosion and toxic release.
 RISK ASSESSMENT

• Risk assessment is the process of evaluating the risks to safety and health arising from
hazards at work. Risk assessment results are documented and used for risk control in
OSH management and future reference and review.
• Risk assessment is carried out before operations, during operations and after
operations.
 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPAL OF
RISK ASSESSMENT RISK MANAGEMENT - AS LOW
AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE
QUALITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS (ALARP)
• Qualitative risk analysis will in
general be more abstract. It centers • ALARP is the level to which
TECHNIQUES OF RISK around distinguishing dangers to hazard ought to be
ASSESSMENT quantify both the probability of a controlled. We probably
• There are 4 techniques particular danger occasion won't have the option to
in risk assessment happening during the undertaking wipe out all danger, however
which are qualitative life cycle and the effect it will have it should be controlled,
risk assessment, semi- on the general timetable would it be particularly with regards to
quantitative risk a good idea for it hit . wellbeing and security.
assessment and
quantitative risk • The goal is to determine severity in
assessment. terms of harm to health, damages
to property and to environment or
the combination of the above.

SEMI QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT

• Semi-quantitative risk assessment will in
general be more abstract. It centers around QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT
distinguishing dangers to quantify both the • Quantitative risk assessment is a formal and methodical danger
probability of a particular danger occasion investigation way to deal with measuring the dangers related with the
happening during the undertaking life cycle activity of a designing cycle. This assessment is a fundamental device to
and the effect it will have on the general help the comprehension of openness of hazard to representatives, the
timetable would it be a good idea for it hit. climate, organization resources and its notoriety.
 • Risk management is a measure taken to
nullify or eliminate health and safety hazards
as much as possible so that the hazards do
not pose a risk to workers who enter the

RISK
workplace and have to operate equipment
frequently.
• However, in most cases, the cause of the

CONTROL danger cannot be ruled out, so it is difficult

to rule out the hazards that exist in the work
environment. Therefore, risk should be
minimized as much as possible by developing
and implementing appropriate control
measures.
RISK CONTROL

HIERARCHY OF CONTROL

The control hierarchy lists several types of control methods

with different effective levels.

There are basically three levels of effectiveness. Most

effective, fairly effective, and least effective. In general, the
closer the control method is to the hazard, the more effective
it is.
 SUBSTITUTION
RISK CONTROL • Replacing
something that
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)
• Personal protective equipment or PPE includes
produces a hazard gloves, uniform, respirators, hard hats, safety
which is like glasses, high-visibility clothing, and safety footwear.
ELIMINATION PPE is the least effective means of controlling
• Eliminating the elimination with
something that hazards because of the high potential for damage to
hazard or by render PPE ineffective.
does not produce
physically
a hazard.
removing it is the
most effective
hazard control.

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS
• Administrative controls are changes to the
way people work.
• Administrative controls do not remove
ENGINEERING CONTROLS hazards, but limit or prevent people's
• These do not eliminate hazards but rather exposure to the hazards, such as
isolate people from hazards. Capital costs of completing road construction at night when
engineered controls tend to be higher than fewer people are driving
less effective controls in the hierarchy,
however they may reduce future costs.
Analysis &
Discussion
By INTAN, HASIF
 COMPANY

MEGAH HOLDING SDN. BHD

. . . . . .
 ANALYSIS & DISCUSSION
ACTIVITIES: Prepare
ACTIVITIES: Apply permit ACTIVITIES: Display
material mobilization- signage and barricade work
to work - daily task dicussion
unloading of material and area-erecting barricade and
|
equipment display signage
HAZARD :Wrong type of
| |
permit use, improper
HAZARD : Ergonomic HAZARD : Tripping hazard
guidance
hazard, pinching hazard |
|
| EFFECT: Physical injury -
EFFECT: Misunderstanding
EFFECT: Physical injury - bodily injured
work order, wrong work
bodily injury |
method
| LIKELIHOOD: 1
|
LIKELIHOOD: 2 |
LIKELIHOOD: 2
| SEVERITY: 1
|
SEVERITY: 1 |
SEVERITY: 1
| RISK: 1 x 1 = 1
|
RISK: 2 x 1 = 2
RISK: 2 x1 = 2
 ANALYSIS & DISCUSSION
ACTIVITIES: Planning and
ACTIVITIES: Erection of ACTIVITIES: Bricklaying
preparation for excavation- and plastering work
formwork and reinforcement
mobilization of excavator to |
work
site HAZARD : Ergonomics
|
| hazard-repetitive movement,
HAZARD : Fall of person
HAZARD : Struck by awkward pose
from improper access or
moving or swing machinery |
ladder
| EFFECT: Occupational
|
EFFECT: Physical injury - disease - musculoskeletal
EFFECT: Physical injury -
bodily injury , property disorder, low back pain
bodily injury
damage |
|
| LIKELIHOOD: 2
LIKELIHOOD: 2
LIKELIHOOD: 5 |
|
| SEVERITY: 3
SEVERITY: 4
SEVERITY: 4 |
|
| RISK: 3 X 2 = 6
RISK: 2 x 4 = 8
RISK: 5 x 4 = 20
 ANALYSIS
ACTIVITIES: Conduct
& DISCUSSION
ACTIVITIES: Conduct
excavation works - begin excavation works - continue the ACTIVITIES: uncompleted
digging at the making point digging until the whole manhole work
| excavation pit is complete |
HAZARD :Miscommunication | HAZARD :Left opening of
, Hit underground utilities HAZARD :Soil of excavation pit manhole pit for continue
| collapse, Accidental fall of excavation work
EFFECT: Pysical injury - equipment, Worker fall down |
bodily injury, property damage | EFFECT: Worker fell down
(underground utilities) EFFECT:Pysical injury - bodily |
| injured LIKELIHOOD: 3
LIKELIHOOD: 4 | |
| LIKELIHOOD: 4 SEVERITY: 5
SEVERITY: 5 | |
| SEVERITY: 4 RISK: 3 x 5 = 15
RISK: 4 x 5 = 20 |
RISK: 4 x 4 = 16
 ANALYSIS & DISCUSSION ACTIVITIES: Walking inside manhole
ACTIVITIES: Lifting or ACTIVITIES: Concreting |
hoisting of material works - Body HAZARD :By breathing them in,By
| | skin contact through cuts, scratches, or
HAZARD :Fall object while HAZARD :Body contact penetrating wounds. Certain organisme
lifting with concrete chemical can enter the body through the surfaces
| | of the eyes, nose and mouth
|
EFFECT: Pysical injury - EFFECT: Skin allergic EFFECT: Weil’s disease, a flu-like
bodily injured ,Damage to x
| illness with persistent and severe
property LIKELIHOOD: 2 headache, transmitted by rat urine.
| | Damage to liver, kidneys and blood may
LIKELIHOOD: 2 SEVERITY: 3 occur and the condition can be fata
|
| |
LIKELIHOOD: 2
SEVERITY: 5 RISK: 2 x 3 = 6 |
| SEVERITY: 4
RISK: 2 x 5 = 10 |
RISK: 2 x 4 = 8
Recommendation
By YEK, HASSAN
RECOMMENDATION

High Risk Hazard

: Struck by moving or swing machinery in the process of planning and
preparation for excavation.
RECOMMENDATION : Segregate between vehicle route and workers walk area.

High Risk Hazard : Soil of excavation pit collapse when conduct excavation work.
RECOMMENDATION : Keep the soil 1 meter away from the edge.

High Risk Hazard : Workers fell down when there is uncompleted manhole work.
RECOMMENDATION : Barricade the area of uncompleted manhole work.
RECOMMENDATION
Medium Risk Hazard : Workers fall from improper access or ladder when doing erection of formwork
& reinforcement work.
RECOMMENDATION : Use aluminium ladder and tight into fixed anchor point to prevent slip.

Medium Risk Hazard : Vibration hazard when using vibration poker while doing concreting work.
RECOMMENDATION : Use rope to control vibration nozzle.

Medium Risk Hazard : Expose to cement dust or silica from sand when doing bricklaying & plastering work.
RECOMMENDATION : Wear Personel Protective equipment(PPE) like alkali-resistant gloves,
waterproof boots and respiratory protective equipment.

Medium Risk Hazard : Object fall during lifting operation.

RECOMMENDATION : Make sure the machine are always in good condition.

Medium Risk Hazard : Body contact with concrete chemical when doing concretion works.
RECOMMENDATION : Use rubber hand gloves and proper clothing when handling concrete.

Medium Risk Hazard : Certain organisme enter the body through the surfaces of the eyes, nose and mouth.
RECOMMENDATION : Wear Personel Protective Equipment like waterproof gloves, footwear, eye and respiratory protection.
 CONCLUSION

Based on this
Any risk that occurs So the first step for
case study , the
in the workplace protecting workers
highest risk
needs to be against occupational
level in this
observed , identified , diseases and
experiment is 15
monitored and maintaning a safe
to 20
reduced. workplace is defining
and analyzing hazard
THANK
YOU