Design of Chemical Reactors: Required Reading: Chapter 22 (Reactors) of Turton Et Al. (2018)
Design of Chemical Reactors: Required Reading: Chapter 22 (Reactors) of Turton Et Al. (2018)
Design of Chemical Reactors: Required Reading: Chapter 22 (Reactors) of Turton Et Al. (2018)
REACTORS
2H2 + CO = CH3OH
- 2H2 - CO + CH3OH = 0
nj = [-2, -1, 1]
Conversion, Yield, and Selectivity
• Conversion: Amount of reactant reacted / Amount of reactant fed
• Limiting reagent: Reagent whose initial amount limits the amount of
product that would be formed if the reaction went to completion.
• Theoretical yield: Amount of product that would be formed if the reaction
went to completion (i.e., if all the limiting reagent was consumed).
• Percent yield = 100 x (Actual yield / Theoretical yield)
• Selectivity (1) = Amount of reagent reacting to give the desired product /
Total amount of reagent reacting
• Selectivity (2) = Amount of reagent reacting to give the desired product /
Amount of reagent reacting to give undesired products
Example
The stoichiometric reaction of 1-propanol with phosphorus trichloride to produce 1-
chloropropane is as follows:
3 CH3CH2CH2OH + PCl3 3 CH3CH2CH2Cl + H3PO3
1-propanol 1-chloropropane phosphoric acid
SOLUTION
a. One mole of PCl3 is consumed per 3 moles of 1-chloropropane produced. Hence,
1.5/3 = 0.5 moles of PCl3 reacted. The conversion of PCl3 is 0.5/1 = 0.5 or 50%
b. 1-propanol is the limiting reagent because its amount is less than would be
required to react with all the PCl3.
c. If the reaction went to completion, all the 1-propanol would react. The theoretical
yield is therefore 2 moles of 1-chloropropane.
d. The actual yield is 1.5 moles of 1-chloropropane. Therefore, the percent yield is
100 x (1.5/2) = 75%.
Example
Consider a reactor where the following two reactions take place:
b. The theoretical yield of NO2 is calculated by assuming that all of the initial N2O5
reacts by Reaction A and Reaction B does not occur because this would produce the
maximum amount of NO2. Hence, the theoretical yield is 4 moles of NO 2.
c. Since only 2.5 moles of NO2 were produced, the percent yield of NO2 is
100x(2.5/4) = 62.5%.
d. The amount of N2O5 reacted to form 2.5 moles NO2 by Reaction A is 2.5/2 = 1.25
mole. From a) we know that the total amount of N2O5 reacted is 1.75 moles. Hence
the selectivity (1) toward NO2 is 1.25/1.75 = 0.714 (71.4%).
Tutorial
Endothermic
Exothermic
ln K
1/T
Calculation of the Equilibrium Constant in
Hysys
• Fixed Keq: The equilibrium constant Keq is considered to be fixed, and is
thus independent of temperature.
• Gibbs Free Energy: The equilibrium constant is determined from the Ideal
Gas Gibbs Free Energy Coefficients in the Hysys library.
• Ln(Keq) Equation:
• Keq vs T table: The user provides values for temperature and equilibrium
constants in the K Table. Hysys estimates the equilibrium constant from
the pairs of data provided by the user and will interpolate when necessary.
Hysys will calculate the constants in the Ln(Keq) equation with the table
data.
Equilibrium of Gas-Phase Reactions
(Review)
• Consider a single reaction with all reactants and products in the
gas phase.
• The mole fractions of all species (, ) at reaction equilibrium are
given by:
Equilibrium Reactor
Homogeneous Reaction Kinetics
Consider the stoichiometric reaction:
Elementary steps:
H2 <-> 2H• (fast => reaches equilibrium very quickly)
Example:
For toluene hydrodealkylation
forward backward
Tutorial
where
k : reaction rate constant
Ki : adsorption constant
k and Ki are catalyst specific and must be obtained by fitting reaction data.
The denominator includes the concentrations of reactants that are strongly
adsorbed on the catalyst.
Rate Models in Hysys –
Heterogeneous Kinetic Reaction
𝑘 ∏ 𝐶𝑖 − 𝑘 ′ ∏ 𝐶𝑖
′
𝛼𝑖 𝛼𝑖
𝑖 𝑖
− 𝑟 𝑗=
[ ]
𝛼 𝑛
1+ ∑ 𝐾 ∏ 𝐶𝑖
𝑗, 𝑖
𝑗
𝑗 𝑖
Tutorial
In general:
• Chemical change
– Slow chemical change of the catalyst causes reduction in its activity.
Solid-Fluid Reactor Types (1)
Solid-Fluid Reactor Types (2)
• Fixed-bed reactors
– Used for heterogenous catalysis
– Approach plug flow
– Ease of catalyst access for maintenance and regeneration
– High pressure drops
– Not suitable if high rates of heat transfer are required because of difficulty controlling
the temperature (heat loads vary through the bed) => hot spots
• Fluidized-bed reactors
– Gas flows at a rate sufficient to fluidize suspended solid particles.
– Performance is intermediate between well-mixed and plug-flow models due to ease of
backflow in the gas.
– Suitable for high rates of heat transfer and temperature uniformity
– Operating difficulties due to flow and suspension issues
• Moving-bed reactors
– Can process particles that are too large to be handled in fluidized-bed reactors.
– Favorable when catalyst requires frequent regeneration because of ease to
continuously remove and add catalyst particles (as in a refinery catalytic cracking unit
where coke deposits on catalyst particles).
Solid-Fluid Reactor Types (3)
Solid-Fluid Reactor Types (4)
• Slurry (stirred-tank) reactors
– Simple
– Good mass transport via mixing if fluid is not too viscous
– Good heat transfer via external jackets, internal coils, or external heat exchanger
in flow loop.
– Good access to catalyst
– Equipment degradation due to impingement of catalyst particles on impellers,
nozzles, and pipes
– Not good for high pressures
– Unfavorable when byproduct forms via series reactions (wide distribution of
residence times)
– Not desirable when reactants or products are very hazardous due to large
material inventory
• Multitubular reactors
– Catalyst filled tubes with heat conducting fluid flowing outside the tubes.
– Good thermal control and uniform residence time distribution
– Good for high pressures
– Unfavorable for multiphase reactions because of difficulty achieving good
mixing between phases
– Catalyst inaccessibility
Solid-Fluid Reactor Types (5)
• Shallow- or thin-bed reactors
– Suitable for fast reactions or where large heats of reaction are involved.
– Good access to catalyst for reactivation or maintenance
This will require increasing the number of tubes or the tube diameter to keep the
same reactor volume => increased area for flow => lower fluid velocity, which
reduces pressure gradient.
Toutj Tbulkj
Modeling Heat Transfer in PFR (Cont’d)
• Heat-transfer fluid (cooling or heating utility) flows co-current outside
the tubes.
• The largest temperature driving force, and therefore heat transfer rate,
occurs near the reactor inlet where reaction rates are the largest.
• Only set the inlet T and P of the utility fluid. Hysys will calculate the
outlet T and P.
• Hysys calculates the temperature profile of the process stream and
utility fluid => improved estimation of reaction rates throughout the
reactor => more precise reactor sizing
• Knowing the temperature profiles allows:
– Avoiding hot spots
– precisely estimate temperature driving forces => precise estimate of utility fluid flow
rate
Heat Transfer Page in Hysys (Formula
Option)
Shell-side HT coefficient
Utility fluid flow, heat
capacity and inlet temp
information
Tube-side HT coefficient
Heat Transfer Parameters
Shell-Side
Heat Transfer Parameters
Tube-Side
Estimating Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Shell-side heat transfer coefficients depend on the utility
fluid:
– For a boiling utility fluid, 1100 W/m2-K (200 Btu/h.ft2.oF) is
reasonable.
– For molten salts, literature values vary between 700 W/m2-K and
16,000 W/m2-K.
(1)
Peters, P.E. et al., Heat Transfer in Packed-Tube Reactors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 226-233.
Estimating Tube-Side Heat Transfer
Coefficients
• For catalyst particles having shapes of spheres, cylinders and rings(1):
Where:
inner wall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2-K)
: particle diameter (m)
: fluid thermal conductivity (W/m-K)
: fluid density (kg/m3)
: fluid velocity (m/s)
: fluid viscosity (Pa.s)
: fluid heat capacity (J/kg-K)
(1)
Peters, P.E. et al., Heat Transfer in Packed-Tube Reactors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 226-233.
Estimating Tube-Side Heat Transfer
Coefficients More Precisely
• For catalyst particles having shapes of spheres(1):
where:
: tube inner diameter (m)
(1)
Peters, P.E. et al., Heat Transfer in Packed-Tube Reactors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 226-233.
Simulating Cooling or Heating by Vaporization or Condensation
of Utility Fluid at Constant Temperature
• Only a non-boiling utility fluid is permitted in Hysys.
• Simulate boiling at constant temperature by using a fictional utility liquid
having an arbitrarily high heat capacity and flow rate so that its
temperature changes very little when flowing through the reactor.
• If the actual utility fluid will be vaporizing water for cooling or
condensing steam for heating, select an inlet temperature on the
Design/Heat Transfer page corresponding to one of the standard steam
pressure values, ~150oC for LPS, ~190 oC for MPS, or ~253 oC for HPS.
• Divide the reactor duty by the latent heat of vaporization of the actual
utility fluid (e.g., saturated boiler feed water) to get its actual flow rate.
Tutorial
CSTR Reactor