The document discusses experimental and quasi-experimental research designs. It defines true experimental designs as having three criteria: the researcher manipulates the independent variable, there is an experimental and comparison group, and subjects are randomly assigned. Quasi-experimental designs are similar but lack random assignment. Several quasi-experimental designs are described, including nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest and posttest-only designs. Examples are provided to illustrate how these designs are used in nursing research.
The document discusses experimental and quasi-experimental research designs. It defines true experimental designs as having three criteria: the researcher manipulates the independent variable, there is an experimental and comparison group, and subjects are randomly assigned. Quasi-experimental designs are similar but lack random assignment. Several quasi-experimental designs are described, including nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest and posttest-only designs. Examples are provided to illustrate how these designs are used in nursing research.
The document discusses experimental and quasi-experimental research designs. It defines true experimental designs as having three criteria: the researcher manipulates the independent variable, there is an experimental and comparison group, and subjects are randomly assigned. Quasi-experimental designs are similar but lack random assignment. Several quasi-experimental designs are described, including nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest and posttest-only designs. Examples are provided to illustrate how these designs are used in nursing research.
The document discusses experimental and quasi-experimental research designs. It defines true experimental designs as having three criteria: the researcher manipulates the independent variable, there is an experimental and comparison group, and subjects are randomly assigned. Quasi-experimental designs are similar but lack random assignment. Several quasi-experimental designs are described, including nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest and posttest-only designs. Examples are provided to illustrate how these designs are used in nursing research.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21
Faculty of Nursing Research Methods – Lec.
(6) .Postgraduate Student – MSc
Experimental Design
Asst. Prof. Dr. Ali Abdulzahra Mahdi
Ph.D. - Physiology Study Design In an experiment, researchers are active agents, not passive observers. Scientists study phenomena in a laboratory and controlling the conditions under which they occurred. The procedures developed by physical scientists were adopted by biologists during the 19th century, resulting in many achievements in physiology and medicine. The 20th century has witnessed the use of experimental methods by researchers interested in human behavior. True Experimental Designs
A true experimental design has three criteria:
1. The researcher manipulates the experimental variable(s). 2. At least one experimental and one comparison group are included in the study. 3. Subjects are randomly assigned to either the experimental or the comparison group. Causality
Researchers usually design quasi-experimental
and experimental studies to examine causality or the effect of an intervention (independent variable) on a selected outcome (dependent variable), using a design that controls extraneous variables . Bias
The term bias means a slant or deviation from
the true or expected. Quasi-experimental and experimental designs were developed to reduce the possibility and effects of bias . Many factors related to research can be
biased; these include attitudes of the
researcher , environment of the study, method of the sampling, measurement methods, data collection process, and Control Group
The term control group refers to a group of
subjects whose performance on a dependent variable is used to evaluate the performance of the experimental group or treatment group (the group that receives the intervention) on the same dependent variable . after-only design or posttest-only design
One data collection point after the (after-only)
intervention; not appropriate for measuring change Example posttest-only design
Milne (2000) used a posttest-only design to
study the effect of an educational intervention relating to urinary incontinence on the subsequent help-seeking behavior of older adults. One group received individualized instruction and written information, and the other received written information alone. Two months later, Milne determined how many subjects in each group sought professional help for urinary incontinence. Before—after design or Pretest—posttest design
Data collection both before (before–after) and
after the intervention; appropriate for measuring change; can determine differences between groups (experimental) and change within groups (quasi- experimental) Example .pretest—posttest design
Sandgren, McCaul, King, O’Donnell, and Foreman
(2000) conducted an experiment to test the effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral telephone therapy intervention for patients with breast cancer. Women in the study were randomly assigned to the intervention or to a control group. Measures of the dependent variables (e.g., psychological distress, coping, and quality of life) were measured at baseline and at follow-up, and changes over time were determined. Solomon four-group Data collection before and after subjects the intervention for one experimental and one control group, but after only for a second experimental and control group, to assess pretest effects Solomon four-group Swanson (1999) used a Solomon four-group design in her study of the effects of a caring- based counseling intervention on the emotional wellbeing of women who had had a miscarriage. Swanson adopted this design because of a concern that “the potential existed that participating in a longitudinal control group with early focused attention on loss might, in itself, serve as a form of recognition, support, and validation” (p. 290). ??Why Experimental research is considered the most powerful quantitative method because of the rigorous control of variables . Experimental studies usually are conducted in
highly controlled settings, such as laboratories or
research units in clinical agencies . Quasi-Experimental Designs Quasi means “like,” and so quasi- experimental designs are like experimental ones, but not equivalent to them . Quasi-experiments are not as powerful as
experiments in establishing causal
connections between interventions and outcomes . Quasi-Experimental Designs Most studies with quasi-experimental designs have samples that were not assigned randomly and there is less control of the study intervention, extraneous variables, and setting . nonequivalent control group pretest - posttest design It is identical experimental design except that subjects have not been randomly assigned to experimental and comparison groups . nonequivalent control group pretest - posttest design Example of a nonequivalent control group pretest - posttest design Johnson, Budz, Mackay, and Miller (1999) evaluated the effect of a nurse-delivered smoking cessation intervention on smoking status and smoking self efficacy among patients hospitalized with cardiac disease. Experimental subjects were admitted to one cardiac unit, and comparison subjects were admitted to another. The researchers preferred this approach to randomization within units because information sharing among patients in the same unit could have contaminated treatment conditions. Nonequivalent control group posttest design This design is used in situations in which a pretest is not possible. For example, if the researcher is examining differences in the amount of pain a subject feels during a painful procedure, and a nursing intervention is used to reduce pain for subjects in the experimental group, it might not be possible (or meaningful) to pretest the amount of pain before the procedure . Discussion In the real world, it may be difficult, if not impossible, to conduct true experiments