Mandik Chapter 1

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Human Mind, Science and

Psychology

Chapter 1: Meet Your Mind


Outline

Aspects of the mind (mental states and their properties)

Philosophical problems concerning the mind


Thought and experience

Sensory experiences: colours and shapes, noises, smells, texture


and temperature
Emotional experiences: anxiety, fear

Thoughts: beliefs, judgments, doubts

Can these two groups comprise all mental states? (mental


images and emotions)
Conscious and unconscious states

Not all mental states are conscious


Freud's unconscious desires
Unconscious planning in playing the piano

Most perception is conscious


Qualia

Subjective aspects of conscious experiences that cannot be


verbally described: “what it feels like” to have pain

It is impossible to describe what red is like to someone who is


congenitally blind

Inverted spectrum: Is it possible that experiences of red/blue are


inverted in different  people?
Sensory perception

The source of all knowledge according to empiricism

What is the difference between perceiving a cat and thinking of


a cat? Causal interaction with an existing object 
Emotion

Thinking that there is a dog in the room vs. being happy that
there is a dog in the room

Emotions are usually positive or negative, unlike thoughts.


But this is not enough to characterize all emotions (anger vs.
fear)
Imagery

Imagining D (rotated counterclockwise) on top of J

Non-visual mental imagery as well

Images are similar to sensory experiences in one way and similar


to thoughts in another way.
Will and action

What happens to us (perception and experience) vs. what we do


(action).

Will causes actions but not perceptions. Perception is not


voluntary; actions sometimes are.
Self

Personal identity: What distinguishes you from other persons or


objects? What makes you still you when your body, your
memories, your worldview gradually change over the years?

One answer is the self.

David Hume and the Buddhists deny that selves exist: just
experiences; no separate experiencer
Propositional attitudes

Beliefs and desires are propositional attitudes; experiences are


not

Proposition: a declarative sentence

Attitudes: believing, wondering, doubting, desiring, fearing,


intending

“Believing that it will rain tomorrow”


“Fearing that you will fail the exam”
The mind-body problem

Physical states and properties (mass, in space, movement,


chemical constituents; being green) vs. mental states and
properties (thought; being painful)

What is the real difference between the physical and the mental?
(If any)

What kind of a relation can there be between physical and mental


states? (two-way causal?)

If minds are also physical, how can that be possible given that
they look so different?
The mind-body problem

Descartes' substance dualism: Thinking thing vs. thing that takes


up space (res cogitans vs. res extensa)

If so, how is interaction possible? They seem to interact both at


perception and action.

Causal interaction usually requires being at the same place. But


minds are not located in space. So there is a problem.

Also, how come your mind affects your body but not my body?
The mind-body problem

To avoid the problem of interaction, an alternative is monism:


everything is mental or everything is physical (future chapters)

Perhaps the mind is just the brain; if so, brain-body interaction


becomes possible.

The problem for physicalism is the existence of qualia. There


are no qualia in the brain (no blue thing in the brain when we
experience “blueness”)

This may lead to property dualism.


The problem of perception

In accurate perception, we interact with an object and are aware


of the object. In dreaming, hallucinating or misperceiving, you
are not aware of an object but the idea of an object. But from the
inside, the experience of accurate perception and misperception is
the same.

Because of this similarity, some philosophers say that in both


cases what we are aware of is the idea of the object. But if this is
true, the external world becomes unreachable to us and irrelevant
to perception.
The problem of other minds

Mental states are private: Only I can have direct access to my


mental states. If so, how can I know other people have mental
states?

Perhaps by observing their behaviour. But a very good actor who


acts as if in pain can deceive us.

The relation between mental states and behaviour is contingent


(no necessary connection). One solution is behaviourism.
The problem of artificial intelligence

Can computers and robots have minds? Can a machine think?

Functionalists say yes: Minds are some sort of machine. An


artificial machine that works like the mind can think.

If so, what is the difference between thinking and non-thinking


machines?
The problem of consciousness

Perhaps a machine can think. But can it be conscious, have qualia


and sensory experiences? Can a machine feel pain?

Consciousness seems different from thinking. Consciousness in


physical systems seems more difficult to imagine.
The problem of intentionality

What sort of relation is there between a thinker and the things


thought about?

Perhaps a causal relation: The things causally influence the


thinker's thoughts.

I can think about things that don't exist (e.g., unicorns), so the
relation is puzzling.
The problem of free will

We think we make free decisions and are morally responsible for


our decisions and actions.

But scientists think that everything (including human decisions


and actions) is predetermined given the laws of nature and past
events

If so, can we still be free? Is there room for free will in the
modern scientific worldview? Can determinism and free will be
reconciled?
The problem of personal identity

How much change is required when one thing becomes another


thing? Changing a chair part by part. Persons also change cell by
cell. What maintains personal identity?

What happens to a person after death? If there is life after death,


what kind of life is it? Bodily or merely spiritual?

A functionalist rejects substance dualism but can still accept life


after death: Your mind can still run on a new hardware.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy