Employee Testing and Selection
Employee Testing and Selection
Selection
Ashwini Naik
Background
• Achieving person - job fit
• Matching knowledge, Skills, abilities and other competencies (KSACs)
required for performing the job with applicants KSACs
values of
1. Test retest =
the x-
variable in a
sample
mean of
= the values
of the x-
variable
values of
the y-
= variable in a
sample
mean of
the values
= of the y-
variable
2. Parallel forms reliability
• Parallel forms reliability example
• A set of questions is formulated to measure understanding of the topic recruitment in a
group of respondents. The questions are randomly divided into two sets test A and test
B, and the respondents are randomly divided made two groups.
• Both groups take both tests: group A takes test A first, and group B takes test B first. The
results of the two tests are compared, and the results are almost identical, indicating
high parallel forms reliability.
4. Inter-rater reliability
Ways to demonstrate test validity
1. Criterion validity: Showing scored on the test (predictor)are related
to job performance (criterion)
Those who do well in test perform well in job and vice versa
2. Content Validity: Contains fair sample of tasks and skills actually
needed for the job in question
3. Construct Validity: Demonstrates that a selection procedure
measures a construct (abstract idea such as moral or honesty) and
that the construct is important for the job performance
Steps in Test Validation
1. Analyse the Job
• Based on description and specification, specifying human traits and skills
required for job performance (predictors)
• Eg: Dexterity and patience for assemblers job
• Important to define success on the job (quantity, quality and personnel such
as absenteeism and length of service)
2. Chose the test
• Based on experience, previous research and best guesses
• Test battery: measure an array of possibility predictirs by chosing several tests
and combining them
Steps in Test Validation
3. Administer the test
• Current employees
• Compare with current performance
• Disadvantage
• Current employees do not represent new applicant
• Already trained
• Predictive Validation: Administer the test before hiring but hire only using
existing selection techniques and not result of new test. Compare the test
score after the hired employees have performed the job and validate
Steps in Test Validation
4. Relate scores and criteria
• Determine statistical relationship between
• Scores on the test
• Job analysis
• Expectancy chart: graph showing relationship between test scores and job performance
for a group of people
5. Cross Validate and revalidate
• Repeat steps 3 and 4
• Avoid bais
Difference
Reliability Validity
Conscientiousne Emotional
ss stability/
Neuroticism
Openness to
Agreeableness
experience
• Extraversion: tendency to be sociable, assertive, active, and to
experience positive effects such as energy and zeal.
• Neuroticism: tendency to exhibit poor emotional adjustment and
experience negative effects such as anxiety, insecurity and hostility
• Openness to experience: disposition to be imaginative,
nonconforming, unconventional and autonomous
• Agreeableness: tendency to be trusting, complaint, caring and gentle
• Conscientiousness: Achievement and dependability
• Projective personality test: Ambiguous stimuli and person reacts
• Self reported:
• Applicants fill out the forms and results are analysed
• Interest Inventory: Personal development and selection device that
compares the person’s current interest with those of others now in
various occupations to determine preferred occupation for individuals
• Achievement test: School tests (Job knowledge in various areas)
• Talent Analytics: Using statistical techniques to let employers search
through their employee data to identify pattern and corelation that
shows what type of people or process succeed or fail
• Machine learning: self educating software
• Artificial intelligence
Work Samples and Simulation
Measuring Work Performance
Directly
Current Supervisors
Written References
Background
Employer Legal Issues:
Guidelines
Investigations and Privacy
Reference Checks
Supervisor
Reluctance
Making Background Checks More Useful
1. Include on the application form a statement for applicants to sign
explicitly authorizing a background check.
2. Use telephone references if possible.
3. Be persistent in obtaining information.
4. Compare the submitted résumé to the application.
5. Ask open-ended questions to elicit more information from
references.
6. Use references provided by the candidate as a source for other
references.
Using Preemployment Information Services
Acquisition and Use of Background Information
Benefits of Applicant
Tracking Systems