EAPP Q2 M1
EAPP Q2 M1
EAPP Q2 M1
11
Quarter 2 Module 1: Gathers Manifestoes and
Analyze – s the Arguments Used by the
Writer/s
a presentation by E.P.S
General Direction: Read each item carefully. Write the chosen letter on a
separate sheet of paper.
A. Multiple Choice
Direction: Choose the letter of the best answer.
1. This refers to a published declaration of the intentions, motives, or
views of the issuer, be it an individual, group, political party or government
a. Law b. Texts c. Manifesto d. Arguments
Directions: Complete
the information needed
in the table by filling in
the description of the
graphic visual aids
listed below. Write your
answer in a separate
sheet of paper.
6
8
Manifesto. This refers to a published declaration of the
intentions, motives, or views of the issuer, be it an individual,
group, political party or government.
Argumentative writing. A kind of writing where the students
establish a position in a given topic and then use evidence to
persuade the audience to see things from their point of view. To
write a great argumentatively, the students first have to
investigate several sides of the argument, which allows them to
make an educated stance. Then, they have to collect evidence,
including facts, statistics, and claims from experts in the topic’s
field.
Argument. In academic writing, this is usually a main idea,
often called a “claim” or “thesis statement,” backed up with
evidence that supports the idea.
9
Analyzing an Issue and Developing an
Argument
Once your topic is selected, you should do
some research on the subject matter. While
you may already have an opinion on your
topic and an idea about which side of the
argument you want to take, you need to
ensure that your position is well supported.
Listing the pro(FAVOR) and
con(AGAINST) sides of the topic will help you
examine your ability to support your
counterclaims, along with a list of supporting
evidence for both sides.
10
Techniques for Analyzing Arguments in Manifestoes
a) Identify the Main Claim or Proposition
•Start by finding the central thesis or proposition the manifesto is
making (e.g., support for climate action, gender equality,
economic reform). This will help guide the analysis by focusing on
the writer’s key point.
b) Break Down the Structure of the Argument
•Premises: Identify the supporting reasons or premises used to
justify the main claim. These are the facts, evidence, or beliefs
the writer uses to build their case.
•Conclusion: Analyze how these premises lead to a conclusion.
Does the logic flow well? Are there gaps in reasoning?
•Assumptions: Uncover any underlying assumptions or beliefs
that may not be explicitly stated. For example, an argument for
universal basic income may assume that automation will lead to
widespread job loss, even if this isn't clearly articulated.
c) Evaluate the Evidence Used
•Types of Evidence: Analyze the types of evidence used, such as
statistical data, expert opinions, historical examples, or moral
arguments.
•Credibility: Consider the credibility and relevance of the
evidence. Is the evidence recent, reliable, and from a trustworthy
source? Are there any biases in the data presented?
d) Examine the Use of Rhetorical Techniques
•Ethos (Credibility): How does the writer establish their authority
or credibility? Do they rely on their expertise, reputation, or
alignment with the values of the audience?
•Pathos (Emotion): Does the manifesto appeal to the emotions of
the readers? Analyze how the writer invokes fear, hope, pride, or
empathy to persuade the audience.
•Logos (Logic): How strong is the logical structure of the
argument? Does the writer use clear, reasoned, and fact-based
e) Identify Counterarguments
•Look for sections where the writer addresses potential objections or
counterarguments. Do they adequately respond to criticism? Are the
counterarguments well considered, or are they dismissed without serious
engagement?
f) Analyze the Ideological Framework
•Political or Ideological Positioning: Identify the ideological basis of the
manifesto. Is it aligned with a particular political ideology (e.g., socialism,
conservatism, environmentalism)? How does this influence the arguments
presented?
•Values: What values does the writer appeal to? For example, freedom,
equality, tradition, innovation, security, or justice.
g) Check for Logical Fallacies
•Be on the lookout for logical fallacies such as:
• Straw Man: Misrepresenting the opposing view to make it easier to
attack.
• Ad Hominem: Attacking the person rather than the argument.
• False Dichotomy: Presenting only two options when there are more.
• Slippery Slope: Arguing that a small step will inevitably lead to
h) Contextualize the Manifesto
•Understand the historical, social, or political context in which the
manifesto was written. This helps in analyzing why certain
arguments were made at that particular time. For example, a
manifesto for labor rights during an economic recession may focus
on job security due to rising unemployment.
i) Compare with Other Manifestoes
•After gathering multiple manifestoes on the same topic, compare
and contrast the arguments. Look for similarities, differences, and
how each writer responds to the issue based on their perspective,
values, and goals.
j) Consider the Audience
•Analyze who the intended audience is. Manifestoes aimed at
political elites may use different language and evidence compared
to those written for grassroots movements or general public
leadership. The arguments may shift based on who the writer is
Activity 8 I STAND ON MY ARGUMENT :
Direction: Write your argument on an issue and support it by gathering
manifestoes and analyzing the arguments used by the writers.
Choose ONLY ONE from the following possible topics:
1. Climate Change and Environmental Policies
Issue: Should governments enforce stricter
regulations on corporations to reduce carbon
emissions?
2. Universal Basic Income (UBI)
Issue: Should governments implement Universal
Basic Income to reduce poverty?
3. Gender Equality in the Workplace
Issue: Should businesses be required to meet
gender quotas in leadership positions?
4. Free Higher Education
Issue: Should higher education be free for all
citizens?
5. Surveillance and Privacy in the Digital Age
Issue: Should governments have the right to
The global COVID-19 pandemic, which began in late 2019, has
profoundly affected public health, economies, and societies. This
manifesto seeks to explore whether the pandemic is legitimate or not,
the potential benefits (pros), and the detrimental effects (cons) that
have emerged from this global crisis.
Argument for Legitimacy:
1.Scientific Consensus
2. Global Impact and Response
3. Economic Disruptions
Counter-Argument: Skepticism
4.Misinformation and Conspiracies
5. Overreaction Claims
Section II: Pros of the COVID-19 Pandemic
6.Acceleration of Medical Advancements
7. Environmental Benefits
8. Digital Transformation
THANK YOU
MIRJAM NILSSON
mirjam@contoso.com
www.contoso.com