Chapter Two (2)
Chapter Two (2)
Chapter objectives
After successful completion of this chapter, you will be able to:
Define production and production function
Differentiate between fixed and variable inputs
Describe short run total product, average product and marginal product
Compare and contrast the three stages of production in the short run
Explain the difference between accounting cost and economic cost
Describe total cost, average cost and marginal cost functions
Explain the relationship between short run production and short run cost
functions
Theory of Production
Fixed inputs are those inputs whose quantity cannot readily be changed when
cannot plant additional machinery overnight and respond to the increased demand.
Buildings, land and machineries are examples of fixed inputs because their
Variable inputs are those inputs whose quantity can be altered almost
instantaneously in response to desired changes in output.
That is, their quantities can easily be diminished when the market demand for
the product decreases and vice versa.
The best example of variable input is unskilled labour.
Consider a firm that uses two inputs: capital (fixed input) and labour (variable
input).
Given the assumptions of short run production, the firm can increase output
only by increasing the amount of labour it uses.
Hence, its production function can be given by: Q = f (L)
Production with one variable input (while the others are fixed) is obviously a
short run phenomenon because there is no fixed input in the long run.
Assumption of short run production analysis
In order to simplify the analysis of short run production, the classical
economist assumed the following:
1. Perfect divisibility of inputs and outputs
This assumption implies that factor inputs and outputs are so divisible that
one can hire, for example a fraction of labor, a fraction of manager and we can
produce a fraction of output, such as a fraction of automobile.
Production in the short run: Production with one variable input
Total product (TP): it is the total amount of output that can be produced by
efficiently utilizing specific combinations of the variable input and fixed input.
Increasing the variable input (while some other inputs are fixed) can increase
the total product only up to a certain point.
For instance, the change in total output resulting from employing additional
worker (holding other inputs constant) is the marginal product of labour
(MPL).
In other words, MPL measures the slope of the total product curve at a given
point.
In the short run, the marginal product of the variable input first increases,
reaches its maximum and then decreases to the extent of being negative.
4.1.3 Total, average, and marginal product…
Average Product (AP): Average product of an input is the level of output that
each unit of input produces, on the average. It tells us the mean contribution of
each variable input to the total product.
Mathematically, it is the ratio of total output to the number of the variable
input.
The average product of labour (APL), for instance, is given by:
4.2. Production Function…cont’d
The table below illustrates the short run production function
Unit of K Unit of L TP AP MP
4 0 0 ̶ ̶
4 1 10 10 10
4 2 30 15 20
4 3 60 20 30
4 4 80 20 20
4 5 95 19 15
4 6 108 18 13
4 7 112 16 4
4 8 112 14 0
4 9 108 12 -4
4 10 100 10 -8
January 22, 2025 Microeconomics Lecture Note
4.1.3 Total, average, and marginal product…
4.1.3 Total, average, and marginal product…
b) At what level of labour does the total output of cut-flower reach the maximum?
Stage I: This stage of production covers the range of variable input levels over
which the average product (APL) continues to increase.
It goes from the origin to the point where the APL is maximum, which is the
equality of MPL and APL (up to L2 level of labour employment in figure 4.1).
This stage is not an efficient region of production though the MP of variable input
is positive.
The reason is that the variable input (the number of workers) is too small to
efficiently run the fixed input so that the fixed input is under-utilized (not
efficiently utilized).
4.1.5 Stages of production….
Stage II: It ranges from the point where APL is at its maximum (MPL=APL) to
the point where MPL is zero (from L2 to L3 in figure 4.1).
Here, as the labour input increases by one unit, output still increases but at a
decreasing rate. Due to this, the second stage of production is termed as the stage
of diminishing marginal returns.
The reason for decreasing average and marginal products is due to the scarcity
of the fixed factor.
Hence, the efficient region of production is where the marginal product of the
variable input is declining but positive.
4.1.5 Stages of production….
Stage III: In this stage, an increase in the variable input is accompanied by
decline in the total product.
This stage is also known as the stage of negative marginal returns to the
variable input.
The cause of negative marginal returns is the fact that the volume of the variable
inputs is quite excessive relative to the fixed input; the fixed input is over-
utilized.
Obviously, a rational firm should not operate in stage III because additional
units of variable input are contributing negatively to the total product (MP of the
variable input is negative). In figure 4.1,
The laws of production
• The laws of production describe the technically possible ways
of increasing the level of production. This can be in various
ways.
• Output can be increased by changing all factors of production
which is possible in the long run. This is called the law of
returns to scale.
• On the other hand output can be increased by changing only
the variable input while keeping the fixed inputs constant,
which is possible in the short run.
• The MP of the variable factor will decline eventually as more
and more quantities of this factor are combined with the other
constant factors.
Law of variable proportion or Law of Diminishing
Returns
• This law states that, if more and more of a variable input is applied
to a fixed input, the total output may initially increase at an
increasing rate, but beyond a certain level of output it increases at
a diminishing rate.
• In other words, if some factors are held constant and more and
more units of a variable factor are combined with the fixed factor,
the marginal product of the variable factor eventually declines.
• What we can understand is that as the use of a variable input
(labor) increases with other inputs (capital) fixed, the resulting
addition to output will eventually decreases.
• This is shown by a downward sloping MPL curve after its maximum
point (at L1).
• This principle is known as the law of variable proportion or the law
Long run Production: Production with two variable inputs
The short-run production function in which the firm uses one variable input
(labor) and one fixed input (capital).
Now we turn to the long run analysis of production. Remember that long run is
a period of time (planning horizon) which is sufficient for the firm to change the
quantity of all inputs.
For the sake of simplicity, assume that the firm uses two inputs (labor and
capital) and both are variable.
Laws of Returns to Scale: Long-Run Production
Analysis
• The Laws of Returns to Scale describe how output responds
to proportional changes in all inputs in the long run when
all factors of production are variable.
• Unlike the short run, where one or more inputs are fixed,
the long run provides firms the flexibility to scale up or
down their operations.
• In the long run, firms analyze the relationship between
input changes and resulting output changes. This
relationship is categorized into three phases:
Increasing Returns to Scale (IRS)
Constant Returns to Scale (CRS)
Decreasing Returns to Scale (DRS)
1. Increasing Returns to Scale (IRS)
When all inputs are increased by a certain proportion, the output
increases by a greater proportion.
• Example: Doubling both labor and capital leads to more than
double the output.
• Reasons for IRS:
• Division of Labor: Specialization increases productivity.
• Economies of Scale: Cost advantages from large-scale
production.
• Indivisibility of Inputs: Some inputs (e.g., machinery) work
more efficiently when fully utilized.
The production function can be expressed as: Q=f(aL,aK)
• If f(aL,aK)>a. f(L,K): Increasing Returns to Scale
2. Constant Returns to Scale (CRS)
When all inputs are increased by a certain proportion, output
increases by the same proportion.
• Example: Doubling both labor and capital leads to exactly
double the output.
Characteristics:
• CRS indicates that the firm operates at an optimal scale.
• It reflects a balanced and efficient use of resources without
significant gains or losses in productivity.
The production function can be expressed as: Q=f(aL,aK)
• If f(aL,aK)=a. f(L,K): Constant Returns to Scale
3. Decreasing Returns to Scale
(DRS)
• When all inputs are increased by a certain proportion, output
increases by a smaller proportion.
• Example: Doubling both labor and capital leads to less than
double the output.
• Reasons for DRS:
• Managerial Inefficiencies: Coordination becomes challenging
in large-scale operations.
• Overutilization of Resources: Inputs may become less
effective as scale increases.
• Diseconomies of Scale: Rising costs due to operational
complexity.
• The production function can be expressed as: Q=f(aL,aK)
• If f(aL,aK)<a. f(L,K): Decreasing Returns to Scale
Long run Production: Production with two variable inputs
The firm can now produce its output in a variety of ways by combining different
amounts of labor and capital.
With both factors variable, a firm can usually produce a given level of output by
using a great deal of labor and very little capital or a great deal of capital and
very little labor or moderate amount of both.
In this section, we will see how a firm can choose among combinations of labor
and capital that generate the same output.
To do so, we make the use of isoquant.
Isoquants
An isoquant is a curve that shows all possible efficient combinations of inputs
that can yield equal level of output. If both labor and capital are variable inputs,
the production function will have the following form.
Q = f (L, K)
Given this production function, the equation of an isoquant, where output is
held constant at q is
q = f (L, K)
Thus, isoquants show the flexibility that firms have when making production
decision: they can usually obtain a particular output (q) by substituting one input
for the other.
Isoquant maps
2. The further an isoquant lays away from the origin, the greater the level of
output it denotes.
Higher isoquants (isoquants further from the origin) denote higher combination of
inputs. The more inputs used, more outputs should be obtained if the firm is
producing efficiently. Thus efficiency requires that higher isoquants must denote
higher level of output.
3. Isoquants do not cross each other. This is because such intersections are
inconsistent with the definition of isoquants. Consider the following figure.
Properties of Isoquants
Isoquants can have different shapes (curvature) depending on the degree to which
factor inputs can substitute each other.
1-Linear isoquants
Isoquants would be linear when labor and capital are perfect substitutes for each
other. In this case the slope of an iso quant is constant. As a result, the same output
can be produced with only capital or only labor or an infinite combination of both.
Graphically,
Shape of Isoquants
Linear isoquant
K MPL
MRTS L , K
L MPK
Equilibrium of the firm: Choice of optimal
combination of factors of production
• A firm is said to be in equilibrium when it employs those
levels of inputs that will maximize its profit.
• This means the goal of the firm is profit maximization
(maximizing the difference between revenue and cost).
• Thus the problem facing the firm is that of constrained profit
maximization.
• To determine the economically efficient input combination,
the following simplifying assumptions hold true:
Assumptions
Isocost line
Maximization of output subject to cost
constraint
• Suppose a firm having a fixed cost out lay (money budget)
which is shown by its iso-cost line.
• Here, the firm is in equilibrium when it produces the
maximum possible output, given the cost outlay and prices
of input.
• The equilibrium point (economically efficient combination) is
graphically defined by the tangency of the firm’s iso-cost line
(showing the budget constraint) with the highest possible
isoquant.
• At this point, the slope of the
Mathematical derivation of the equilibrium
condition
• A rational producer seeks the maximization of its output,
given total cost outlay and the prices of factors.
• The problem can be stated as:
• Maximize X = f (L,K)..........................Objective function
• Subject to C = wL + rK..........................Constraint function
• This is a constrained optimization which can be solved by
using the lagrangian method.
• The steps are:
Numerical Example
• Solving equation (1) and (2) would give us the optimal
combination of L and K.
L=2K
5L+ 10K= 600
L=60 units and K=30 units.
Thus, the firm should use 60 units of labor and 30 units
of capital to maximize its production (output). (Check
the second order condition).
The maximum output can be found by substituting 60
and 30 for L and K in the production process.
Factor intensity
• A process of production can be labor intensive or capital intensive or neutral process.
• A process of production is called labor intensive if it uses many labors and relatively
few capitals.
• If it uses many capitals and relatively few labor it is called capital intensive technology.
• On the other hand, if the process uses equal proportion of both it is called neutral
technology.
• The factor intensity of any process is measured by the slope of the line through the
origin representing the particular process.
• Thus, the factor intensity is the capital-labor ratio.
• The higher the capital-labor ratio is the higher the capital intensity but the lower the
capital-labor ratio is the higher labor intensity of the process.