Chapter II Micro
Chapter II Micro
df ( L, K ) df ( L, K ) f ( L, K )
f ( L, K ) MPL APL
dL2 dL L ,
L L2 L L L
df ( L, K ) f ( L, K )
because MPL and APL
dL L
Thus,
When , Slope of is positive ( rises).
When , Slope of is zero ( is at its maximum).
When, Slope of APL is negative ( falls).
From fig 3.4,
At , , and thus is at its maximum.
Below , , and thus, rises.
After , , and thus falls.
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
(LDMR)
is a short run law of production.
It states that as the use of an input increases in equal
increments (with other inputs being fixed), a point will
eventually be reached at which the resulting additions to
output decreases.
When the labor input is small (and capital is fixed), extra labor
adds considerably to output, often because workers get the
chance to specialize in one or few tasks.
Eventually, however, the LDMR operates: when the number
of workers increases further, some workers will inevitably
become ineffective and the MPL falls (this happens when the
number of workers exceeds L1 in Fig 3.4).
NOTE: the LDMR operates (MP of successive units of labor
decreases) not because highly qualified laborers are hired first and
the least qualified last.
Diminishing marginal returns results from limitations on the use
of other fixed inputs (e.g. machinery), not from decline in
worker quality.
The LDMR applies to a given production technology (when the
level of technology is fixed).
Over time, however, technological improvements in the
production process may allow the entire total product curve shift
upward, so that more output can be produced with the same input.
Efficient Region of Production in the
short-run
We are not yet in a position to determine the specific number of the
variable input (labor) that the firm should employ.
because this depends on several other factors than the productivity
of labor such as the price of labor, the structure of input and
output markets, the demand for output, etc.
However, it is possible to determine ranges over which the
variable input (labor) should be employed.
Figure 3.5: Production Stages
The three stages of production are characterized by the
slope and shape of the total product curve.
The first stage is characterized by an increasingly
positive slope,
The second stage by a decreasingly positive slope, and
The third stage by a negative slope.
Because the slope of the total product curve is marginal
product, these three stages are also seen with marginal
product.
In Stage I, marginal product is positive and
increasing.
In Stage II, marginal product is positive, but
decreasing (law of diminishing marginal returns).
And in Stage III, marginal product is negative.
Economic Production
These three distinct stages of short-run production are not
equally important.
Stage I, increasing marginal returns, is a great place to
visit, but most firms move through it quickly.
• Because each variable input is increasingly more
productive, firms employ as many as they can, as quickly as
they can.
Stage II, with decreasing but positive marginal returns,
provides a range of production that is suitable to most firm.
Stage III, negative marginal returns, is not particularly
attractive to firms.
• Production is less than it would be in Stage II, but the cost
of production is greater due to the employment of the
variable input.
Although marginal product declines, additional
employment of the variable input does add to total
production.
Even though production cost rises with additional
employment, there are benefits to be gained from extra
production.
The trick is to balance the extra cost with the extra
production.
As a matter of fact, because Stage II tends to be the
choice of firms for short-run production, it is often
referred to as the "economic region."
Firms quickly move from Stage I to Stage II, and do all
they can to avoid moving into Stage III.
Firms can comfortably, and profitably, produce forever
and ever in Stage II.
3.3. Long Run Production
Remember that long run is a period of time (planning
horizon) which is sufficient for the firm to change the
quantity of all inputs.
To simplify, assume that the firm uses two inputs (labor and
capital) and both are variable.
The firm can now produce its output in a variety of ways by
combining different amounts of labor and capital.
With variable factors, a firm can usually produce a given level
of output by using a great deal of labor and very little
capital or a great deal of capital and very little labor or
moderate amount of both.
In this section, we will see how a firm can choose among
combinations of labor and capital that generate the same
output. To do so, we make the use of isoquant.
So it is necessary to first see what is meant by isoquants and
their properties.
ISOQUANTS
• An isoquant is a curve that shows all possible efficient
combinations of inputs that can yield equal level of output.
• If both labor and capital are variable inputs, the production
function will have the following form.
Figure 3.9. Isoquants can never be thick. Points A and B are on the same isoquant.
But point A denotes higher amount of capital and the same amount of labor as point
B. Hence point A denotes inefficient combination of inputs and thus it lies out of the
isoquant. The isoquant should be thin if point A is to be excluded from the isoquant.
Special Shape of Isoquants
i) Linear Isoquants
Isoquants would be linear when labor and capital are
perfect substitutes for each other.
In this case the slope of an isoquant is constant.
As a result, the same output can be produced with
only capital or only labor or an infinite combination
of both.
Figure 3.10. Libear isoquants:
Capital and Labour can perfectly
substitute each other so that the
same output (q=100) can be
produced by using either 1oK or 8K
and 12L or 15L or an infinite
combination of both inputs
ii) Input output isoquant(Leontief isoquant)
This assumes strict-complementarities or zero
substitutability of factors of production(Impossible to make
any substitution among inputs).
Each level of Q requires a specific combination of L and K.
That is additional Q cannot be obtained unless more capital
and labor are added in specific proportions.
iii) Kinked isoquants
This assumes limited substitution between inputs; inputs
can substitute each other only at some points.
Thus, the isoquant is kinked and there are only a few
alternative combinations of inputs to produce .
These isoquants are also called linear programming
isoquants or activity analysis isoquants.
iv) Smooth, convex isoquants
This shape of isoquant assumes continuous
substitution of capital and labor over a certain
range, beyond which factors cannot substitute each
other.
Basically, kinked isoquants are more realistic for there
is often limited (not infinite) method of producing a
given level of output.
However, traditional economic theory mostly adopted
the continuous isoquants because they are
mathematically simple to handle by the simple rule
of calculus, and they are approximation of the more
realistic isoquants(the kidded isoquants).
From now we use the smooth and convex isoquants to
analyze the long run production.
Figure 3.13 the smooth and convex isoquant : This type of isoquant is the
limiting case of the kinked isoquant when the number kink is infinite. The slope of
the iso quant decrease as we move from the top (left) to the right (bottom) along the
isoquant. This indicates that the amount by which the quantity of one input
(capital)can be reduced when one extra unit of another inputs(labor)is used ( so
that output remains constant) decreases as more of the latter input (labor)is used.
Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution
(MRTS)
MRTS is the slope of an isoquant.
The slope of an isoquantindicates how the quantity of one
input can be traded off against the quantity of the other,
while output is held constant.
The MRTS shows the amount by which the quantity of
one input can be reduced when one extra unit of another
input is used, so that output remains constant.
MRTS of labor for capital, denoted as shows the amount
by which the input of capital can be reduced when one
extra unit of labor is used, so that output remains constant.
decreases as the firm continues to substitute labor for
capital (or as more of labor is used).
In fig.3.13 to increase the amount of labor from 1 to 2, the
firm reduces 4 units of capital (K=4), to increase labor
from 2 to 3, the firm reduce 2 unit of capital (K=2), and
so on.
Hence, the firm reduces lower and lower number of capital
for the successive one unit of labor.
The reason is that when the number of capital is large and
that of labor is low, the productivity of capital is relatively
lower and that of labor is higher (due to the low of
diminishing marginal returns).
Thus, at this point relatively large amount of capital is
required to replace one unit of labor (or one unit of labor
can replace relatively large amount of capital).
As the employment of labor increases and that of
capital decreases (as we move down ward along
the isoquant in the direction of increasing L), quite
the reverse will happen.
That is, productivity of capital increases and
that of labor decreases.
The fact that the slope of an isoquant is decreasing
makes an isoquant convex to the origin.
(the slope of isoquant) can also be given by the ratio of
marginal products of factors.
That is,
; and
Thus, the firm should use 60 units of labor and 30 units of
capital to maximize its production (output).
The maximum output can be found by substituting 60 and 30
for L and K in the production process, and is 6.71 units.
The S.O.C also need to be satisfied.
slope of , and
slope of
Example 2: given , birr, birr and birr find L*, K*, and Q*.
-Find the quantity of L and K at optimum combination
- Maximum output
Case_2: Cost Minimization
In this case, consider an entrepreneur (a firm) who wants
to produce a given output (for example a bridge or a
building or x tones of a commodity) with minimum cost
outlay.
That is, we have a single isoquant which denotes the
desired level of output, but there are a set of isocost lines
which denotes the different cost outlays.
Higher isocost lines denote higher production costs.
The production costs of a desired level of output will
therefore be minimized when the isoquant line is
tangent to the lowest possible isocost line (see Figure
3.18).
At the point of tangency, the slope of the isoquant and
isocost lines are identical i.e.
The second ordered condition(S.O.C) is for the isoquant to
be convex i.e. the slope of the isoquant should be negative.
The S.O.C(the convexity of isoquant) would be insured when:
slope of
slope of and,
Example: Suppose a certain contractor wants to maximize profit
from building one bridge. The contractor uses both labor and
capital, and efficient combinations of Labor and capital that are
sufficient to make a bridge is given by the function
𝟎 .𝟓 𝟎.𝟓
𝟏=𝟎 .𝟐𝟓 𝑳 𝑲
If the prices of labor (w) and capital (r) are $5 and $10
respectively, find the least cost combination of L and K, and the
minimum cost.
Solution: The contractor wants to build one bridge. Thus, the
constraint equation can be written as
The
At equilibrium condition ;
Substituting equation (1) in to the constraint
, ;
Therefore, the efficient combinations(least cost
combination) of L and K are and , respectively.
The least cost will be