Intro 2 MD Simulation

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Molecular Dynamics simulations

Bert de Groot
Max Planck institute for biophysical chemistry
Göttingen, Germany
Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Schrödinger equation

Born-Oppenheimer approximation

Nucleic motion described classically

Empirical force field


Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Interatomic interactions
Molecular dynamics-(MD) simulations of Biopolymers
d2
• Motions of nuclei are described classically, ( ∗ ) ma 2 Rα = −∇α Eel ( R1 ,..., RN ), α = 1,..., N .
dt
• Potential function Eel describes the electronic influence on motions of the nuclei and is
approximated empirically  „classical MD“:

E el ≈ ∑
Bindungen
E ibond + ∑E
Bindungs −
angle
j + ∑E
Dihedral −
dihe
k + ∑ ( EαCoul
,β + Eα ,β + Eα ,β ) + ...,
. rep . vdW

i winkel j winkel k

Covalent bonds Non-bonded interactions

Eibond
approximated

exact
=
KBT { R=
ν0 |R|
„Force-
Field“
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Molecule: (classical) N-particle system

d2  
Newtonian equations of motion: mi 2 ri = Fi ( r )
dt

Fi (r ) = −∇ iV (r )
 
with r = ( r1 ,..., rN )
Integrate numerically via the „leapfrog“ scheme:

with
Δt ≈ 1fs!

(equivalent to the Verlet algorithm)


BPTI: Molecular Dynamics (300K)
Computational task:
Solve the Newtonian equations of motion:
Non-bonded interactions

Lennard-Jones potential Coulomb potential


Use of constraints to
increase the integration step

The „SHAKE“ algorithm


Δt = 1fs --> 2 fs
Molecular dynamics is very expensive ...
Example: F1-ATPase in water (183 674 atoms), 1 nanosecond:
106 integration steps
8.4 * 1011 flop per step [n(n-1)/2 interactions]

total: 8.4 * 1017 flop


on a 100 Mflop/s workstation: ca 250 years

...but performance has been improved by use of:


multiple time stepping ca. 25 years
+ structure adapted multipole methods ca. 6 years
+ FAMUSAMM ca. 2 years
+ parallel computers ca. 55 days
Limits of MD-Simulations

• classical description:

chemical reactions not described


poor description of H-atoms (proton-transfer)
poor description of low-T (quantum) effects
simplified electrostatic model
simplified force field

• only small systems accessible (104 ... 106 atoms)

• only short time spans accessible (ps ... μs)


MD-Experiments with Argon Gas
Role of environment - solvent
explicit
or
implicit?

box
or
droplet?
Surface (tension) effects?
periodic boundary conditions
and the minimum image convention
Proteins jump between many, hierarchically ordered
„conformational substates“

H. Frauenfelder et al., Science 229 (1985) 337


Reversible Folding Dynamics of a β-Peptide

X. Daura, B. Jaun, D. Seebach, W.F. van Gunsteren, A.E. Mark, J. Mol. Biol. 280 (1998) 925
MD Simulations

• external coupling:

temperature (potential truncation, integration errors)


pressure (density equilibration)
system translation/rotation

• analysis

energies (individual terms, pressure, temperature)


coordinates (numerical analysis, visual inspection!)
 mechanisms

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy