Dastin Brass: Cost Activity Analysis
Dastin Brass: Cost Activity Analysis
Dastin Brass: Cost Activity Analysis
1. Use the Overhead Cost Activity Analysis in Exhibit 5 and other data on manufacturing costs to estimate product costs for values, pumps, and flow controllers.
Activity Analyze
Material Costs Valves Pumps Flow Controllers
16 7500 120,000
20 12500 250,000
22 4000 88,000
Labor Costs
Production Runs/Month Setup Labor (Hours/Production Run) Run Labor (Hrs/Unit) Run Labor Cost/ Month Setup Costs/Unit
Valves
Pumps
Flow Controllers
1 8 0.25
0.25Hrs*7500Unit*16$ 8Hrs*1Run*16$
5 8 0.5
0.50Hrs*12500Unit*16$ 8Hrs*5Runs*16$
10 12 0.4
0.40Hrs*4000Unit*16$ 12Hrs*10Runs*16$
128 $ 30,000 $
640 $ 100,000 $
1920 $ 25,600 $
Flow Controllers
0.20 4000 0.2*4000*25$
93,750$
156,250$
20,000$
Manufacturing Overheads
Receiving Materials Handling Engineering Packing and Shipping Maintenance
Valves
600 6,000 20,000 1,800 10,500
Pumps
3,800 38,000 30,000 13,800 17,400
Flow Controllers
15,600 156,000 50,000 43,800 2,100
Total
20,000 200,000 100,000 59,400 30,000
Sum
Exhibits 2 & 5
38,900
103,000
267,500
410,000
Total Costs
Material Costs/Month Setup Costs in 1month
Valves
Pumps
Flow Controllers
120,000 128
250,000 640
88,000 1,920
30,000
93,750 38,900 282,778 37.7
100,000
156,250 103,000 609,890 48.8
25,600
20,000 267,500 403,020 100.75
2.Compare the estimated costs you calculate to existing standard costs (Exhibit 3) and the revised unit costs (Exhibit 4). What causes the different product costing methods to produce such different results?
Total Costs
Valves
Pumps
Flow Controllers
37.56 49 37.7
Here we have over valued pumps in traditional method and flow controllers seems to be under valued. because the traditional method allocates overhead as a part of direct labor. so, flow controllers appear cheaper than they are because the overhead they create gets applied across the other two products (valves and pumps). Activity analysis reflects this providing pumps a lower unit cost because overhead that should have been allocated to flow controllers was not being allocated to pumps under this method. In the revised method, we have, valves appear over valued, pumps appear overvalued, and flow controllers appear very, very undervalued. Comparing with activity analysis. Because the revised method applies overhead rate based on material related overhead. We think controllers dont use that much more material than pumps, but they do use much more labor, this is not reflected in the revised standard unit costs Therefore, flow controllers appear much less expensive because overhead produced with the labor going into making flow controllers was being allocated to pumps and valves.
3. What are the strategic implications of your analysis? Could the production process for flow controllers be changed in such a way to allow Destin Brass Products to reduce the unit cost of flow controllers? How would the change in the lot size for flow controller production affect unit costs? Has Destin Brass Products adopted the most profitable distribution system in the flow controller market? What actions would you recommend to managers at Destin Brass Products Company?
Implications of ABC analysis indicate that the current production process for flow controllers might be changed to reduce the unit cost of flow controllers. If Destin Brass could reduce the production runs of flow controllers to a single run per month, They will success to reduce the standard unit cost.
4. Assume that interest in a new basis for cost accounting at Destin Brass Products remains high. In the following month, quantities produced and sold, activities, and costs were all at standard. How much higher or lower would the net income reported under the activitytransactionbased system be than the net income that will be reported under the present, more traditional system? Why? If the interest goes higher on the new cost accounting, the net income reported should not have any different under the each costing analyze systems. Because revenues minus all costs gives net income. SO each accounting system will not change revenues and the total costs. Our method is a mechanism for allocating the costs across the various product lines. So, the net income will be remains constant.
The End