Shortcut: WD:AN

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikidata
(Redirected from Wikidata:Deletion review)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nakba item

[edit]

@Nicoljaus is edit-warring in Nakba (Q3266633) for his biased changes presenting Nakba as a ‘narrative’ and not as a thing that actually happened and refuses to follow the standard bold-revert-discuss cycle. The page needs to be reverted to the state pre-their edits. stjn[ru] 12:31, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not as a thing that actually happened - As I said twice, there are two elements on Wikidata, 1948 Palestinian exodus (Q13220089) and Nakba (Q3266633). I just don't understand the complaints. Nicoljaus (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I said twice, your ideological motivations shouldn’t be the reason to make Wikidata worse. English Wikipedia, for example, explicitly describes Nakba as the ethnic cleansing campaign, not as a ‘narrative’ as you are trying to present it. The fact that there is a separate item for flight and expulsion of Palestinians that you also heavily edited to make more biased does not mean that the item for Nakba should distort historical truth and the way it is described in majority of sources. For god’s sake, you put catastrophe in quotes in Russian description. It does not get more biased than that.
Hopefully Wikidata administrators do not refuse to do anything about your edit warring behaviour. stjn[ru] 18:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
your ideological motivations shouldn’t be the reason to make Wikidata worse - what a brilliant words. Yes, the English Wikipedia has become notorious: How Wikipedia’s Pro-Hamas Editors Hijacked the Israel-Palestine Narrative. But this has nothing to do with the reorganization of elements in Wikidata, I still don't understand what you want. No one removed the mention of "ethnic cleansing": [1]. And the fact that "Nakba" is also a narrative hasn't been cleaned out even from the English Wikipedia yet: "The Palestinian national narrative views the Nakba as a collective trauma that defines their national identity and political aspirations". And you continue the edit war: [2]. Not good. Nicoljaus (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First, you can take your conspiracy theories about English Wikipedia somewhere else. Second, you are misrepresenting what you actually did. It is not ‘reorganisation’ to suggest that instead of an ethnic cleansing, Nakba is just ‘a narrative of ethnic cleansing’. It is just genocide denial. If you do not want to get banned in Wikidata as well as English and Russian Wikipedia, as you already are, you are going to stop that genocide denial. Edit war was started by you since you have started and continued to restore your biased edits to the page after they were reverted. ‘Not good’. stjn[ru] 01:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I don't know how to respond to this wild mixture of repeated misrepresentations, personal attacks and propaganda slogans. I will only note that the Ru-Wiki admin who blocked me was subsequently banned by the WMF [3] and soon organized the propaganda site Runiversalis, designed to "replace Wikipedia in Russia". Perhaps, in time, the WMF will also be concerned about the situation with the pro-Hamas lobby in the English Wikipedia. And these are not "conspiracy theories", but well-founded research, and it is not the only one, see for example Wikipedia has it out for Israel, and we’ve got the data to prove it Nicoljaus (talk) 08:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What matters is for what you were banned, not by whom you were banned. And in both instances, you were banned for confrontational approach. Unless your conspiracy theory is that English Arbitration Committee is all ‘Khamas’, your block is still justified there. As well as in Russian Wikipedia, since no one overturned it (and judging by how you behave, no one will ever overturn it without significant restrictions). stjn[ru] 14:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, as we found out, you started this edit war just to push your POV as the only one that exists, even though there are two different elements here. Well, and also because of your personal hostility towards me, since you are so focused on my person. No other reasons are shown. Nicoljaus (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by 137.101.8.11 / RainbowMebarak123

[edit]

137.101.8.11 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)); RainbowMebarak123 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: This user adds random unsourced information from obvious baloney (like the Grand Theft Auto games being inspired by Harry Potter) to very subtle changes (like falsifying birth dates). I believe I reverted most of their changes, but a block seems in order. IceWelder (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Blocked IP for six months. The user indef Estopedist1 (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:86.120.159.11

[edit]

86.120.159.11 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalizing a bunch of name items by changing the en description to the wrong kind of name male name to female name, family name to given name, etc. XReport ―William Graham (talk) 20:02, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warned and (mostly) reverted. It looks like some of their edits were correct. Bovlb (talk) 20:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion, Q131469010

[edit]

Q131469010, I have gone through the Wikidata tours and am now ready to add more statements to the item. Porotoman99 (talk) 17:48, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Undeleted I deleted this item as empty, so undeleted. Please add some claims soon, and be aware that it might yet get deleted again if notability is not established. Bovlb (talk) 22:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Nibemben

[edit]

Nibemben (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Probably one another Matlin reincarnation. -- 31.29.202.126 18:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no fan of block evasion, but I'd much rather hear some details about how this user's edits are problematic than just get a claim that they resemble those of a blocked editor. Can you identify any bad edits here? Bovlb (talk) 23:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for protection, Q131411648

[edit]

To stop people from adding copyvio photos to the item. --Trade (talk) 00:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like a problem for Commons to sort out, as there is currently an open deletion discussion. I don't think it's up to us to anticipate the result of that discussion. Bovlb (talk) 00:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You might wanna read the actual deletion request before declaring the copyright of the photo to be an "open question". We have plenty of spam items being nominated for deletion all the times, that doesn't automatically make their status an open question As for adding copyright violations to items simply because Commons haven't gotten around to delete theme (yet), that would fall under WP:COMMON Trade (talk) 01:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can find the deletion discussion here. It seems to be heading for a deletion decision.
I'm reluctant to protect the item at this time. Several of the problematic edits appear to be from confirmed editors, so only full protection would be possible. Bovlb (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:51.36.101.40

[edit]

51.36.101.40 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: This IP, which is the same guy as 51.39.95.169 (Already blocked for vandalism), has been changing everything he can from cities to foods as being a part of saudi arabia and he has been doing it for months now. Please block that IP and its range as I've got tired of reverting him. In fact, he has been stalking me outside of Wikipedia on pages like YouTube and sent me threats there ―Abo Yemen (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I second this block request. كريم رائد (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already globally locked. I don't see any other activity on the /24. Bovlb (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He is back Special:Contributions/51.39.95.197 Abo Yemen (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He edits the exact same pages every time, can we get them protected? Abo Yemen (talk) 16:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bovlb. I think the solution is to protect those pages. Isn't it? كريم رائد (talk) 17:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's not a small set of pages affected, but I have blocked the /24 and semi-protected many of the pages affected for three months. This should give us some respite. Bovlb (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130279288

[edit]

For more than two months, the description of the property has been repeatedly vandalized by IP. A semi-protection seems appropriate to me. Stepro (talk) 22:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Semi-protected for three months. It doesn't seem worth blocking any of the IPs, but someone may want to review the other edits by Special:Contributions/2003:EE:EF1D:4000:46B:FB60:DA95:B5B8/64. Bovlb (talk) 22:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User Giorgi Akhlouri

[edit]

This Giorgi Akhlouri ( talk  · contribs  · logs ) has highjacked Q94704254 article from its original purpose of representing Jock Alves, It seems to me vandalism. Pierre cb (talk) 05:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Reverted, merged, warned. Bovlb (talk) 06:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spammer

[edit]

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/204.40.194.131 Vicarage (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not much here, but /24 blocked for 2 weeks. Bovlb (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q106078330

[edit]

Central Cee (Q106078330) gets lots of vandalism, protection is needed. Samoasambia ✎ 17:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for six months. I didn't block any of the IPs, although I'm a little concerned about the description churn coming from Special:Contributions/2A01:CB1D:441:6200:C74:9FE6:45AE:F4B1/64. Bovlb (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request related to a deleted Italian Wikipedia article

[edit]

There was an Italian Wikipedia article on Yogorino (a frozen yogurt chain that operates in over 20 countries) but was deleted and create protected on January 29, 2016 due to it being unencyclopedic/promotional per the deleting admin. Despite my best efforts, I cannot figure which Wikidata entry was connected to that article.

In any case, I request that the relevant entry be undeleted so that it can be connected to the Name Suggestion Index database and add relevant links to the said entry such as but not limited to websites and social media presence (this assumes that the Wikidata entry in question previously existed before it was deleted). -Ianlopez1115 (talk) 17:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find it. If you believe it meets notability criteria, I suggest that you go ahead and recreate it. It won't show in a "recreated item" report. Bovlb (talk) 18:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's possible there was no Wikidata item created. Peter James (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Oversight

[edit]

As required by Wikidata:Oversight, I am notifying the community that a new request for oversight has been filed. Please see the request at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Ameisenigel. Thanks, --Ameisenigel (talk) 22:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private proxies

[edit]

Did you notice 185.177.126.102 and 89.39.107.172 ? Same guy operating private proxies on the provider Worldstream in the Netherlands. Don't we globally blacklist editing from these ranges? Is it server technicians who handle these cases or stewards? Infrastruktur (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stewards can globally block the IP's. --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I just read the global blocking policy says "open proxies" may be blocked and only when there is abuse. *facepalm* No point in local action, so I guess this is ✓ Done now. Infrastruktur (talk) 09:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Odysseyseocomp

[edit]

Odysseyseocomp (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 04:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, but user is warned Estopedist1 (talk) 07:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Nasrumikailethiopia

[edit]

Nasrumikailethiopia (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 04:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Blocked indef Estopedist1 (talk) 07:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning 50.29.112.22

[edit]

50.29.112.22 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Strange edits consisting of adding a single character as an alias and then removing it (see 1, 2, 3, 4, etc), similar to previous edits of 50.29.112.150 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (see 5, 6), 50.29.112.25 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (see 7, 8). All of these IPs are currently blocked on enwiki. --Ovruni (talk) 09:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is bizarre, but so far as I can see, most of their contributions are good edits, and the strange one-letter aliases are always self-reverted. I left them a note asking for an explanation. Bovlb (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:36.81.198.27

[edit]

36.81.198.27 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. ―Kokage si (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 11:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:240F:7A:DECC:1:0:0:0:0/64

[edit]

240F:7A:DECC:1:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Controversial editing. ―Kokage si (talk) 11:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Range-blocked for 3 days.--S8321414 (talk) 12:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

174.240.250.236 & 69.40.117.55

[edit]

LTA vandalism by 174.240.250.236 (talk • contribs • logs) and 69.40.117.55 (talk • contribs • logs). Samoasambia ✎ 21:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LTA 197. I've blocked the /24 and deleted the items. Bovlb (talk) 23:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed user QaFQqK56bnsHrz

[edit]

Account vanished; please remove rollback (?). Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 08:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Jobeyub

[edit]

Jobeyub (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: mostly vandalism (besides some probably legit image additions) ―Mykhal (talk) 08:08, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Wüstenspringmaus talk 09:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:2001:448A:50E0:0:0:0:0:0/48

[edit]

2001:448A:50E0:0:0:0:0:0/48 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long term abuse. ―Kokage si (talk) 10:16, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Wüstenspringmaus talk 10:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Kamalacharya.edu

[edit]

Kamalacharya.edu (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:03, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User is warmed and talk page deleted. Madamebiblio (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for protection, Q775989

[edit]

Hello all, Since few days, the description of the "occupation" property has been repeatedly vandalized by different IP. Vandalisms have been shared on Twitter.

A semi-protection seems appropriate. Thanks for your help ! Pronoia (talk) 19:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done for 2 weeks. Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=2291319005"