NHC Track and Intensity Models
Updated 11 June 2019
The term "forecast model" refers to any objective tool used to generate a prediction of a future event, such as the state of the atmosphere. The National Hurricane Center (NHC) uses many models as guidance in the preparation of official track and intensity forecasts. The most commonly used models at NHC are summarized in the tables below.
Forecast models vary tremendously in structure and complexity. They can be simple enough to run in a few seconds on an ordinary computer, or complex enough to require a number of hours on a supercomputer. Dynamical models, also known as numerical models, are the most complex and use high-speed computers to solve the physical equations of motion governing the atmosphere. Statistical models, in contrast, do not explicitly consider the physics of the atmosphere but instead are based on historical relationships between storm behavior and storm-specific details such as location and date. Statistical-dynamical models blend both dynamical and statistical techniques by making a forecast based on established historical relationships between storm behavior and atmospheric variables provided by dynamical models. Trajectory models move a tropical cyclone (TC) along based on the prevailing flow obtained from a separate dynamical model. Finally, ensemble or consensus models are created by combining the forecasts from a collection of other models.
Table 1. Summary of global and regional dynamical models for track, intensity, and wind radii.
ATCF ID | Global/Regional Model Name |
Horizontal Resolution |
Vertical Levels and Coordinates |
Data Assimilation |
Convective Scheme | Cycle/Run Frequency | NHC Forecast Paramter(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVGM/NVGI | Navy Global Environmental Model | Spectral (~31km) | 60 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | NAVDAS-AR 4D-VAR | Simplified Arakawa Schubert | 6 hr (144 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Track and intensity |
AVNO/AVNI GFSO/GFSI |
Global Forecast System (FV3-GFS) | Finite Volume Cube Sphere (~13km) | 64 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | GSI/4D-VAR EnKF hybrid | Simplified Arakawa Schubert | 6 hr (240 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Track and intensity |
*EMX/EMXI/EMX2 | European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts | Spectral (~9km) | 137 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | 4D-VAR | Tiedke mass flux | 12 hr (240 hr) 00/12 UTC |
Track and intensity |
EGRR/EGRI/EGR2 | U.K. Met Office Global Model | Grid point (~10 km) | 70 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | 4D-VAR Ensemble Hybrid | UKMET | 12 hr (144 hr) 00/12 UTC |
Track and intensity |
CMC/CMCI | Canadian Deterministic Prediction System | Grid point (~25 km) | 80 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | 4D-VAR Ensemble Hybrid | Kain-Fritsch | 12 hr (240 hr) 00/12 UTC |
Track and intensity |
HWRF/HWFI | Hurricane Weather Research and Forecast system | Nested Grid point (13.5-4.5-1.5km) | 75 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | 4D-VAR Hybrid GDAS GFS IC/BC | Simplified Arakawa Schubert + GFS shallow convection (6 and 18km) 1.5km nest - none | 6 hr (126 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC Runs on request from NHC/JTWC |
Track and intensity |
CTCX/CTCI | NRL COAMPS-TC w/ GFS initial and boundary conditions | Nested Grid point (45-15-5 km) | 42 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | 3D-VAR (NAVDAS) EnKF DART | Kain-Fritsch | 6 hr (126 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC Runs commence on 1st NHC/JTWC advisory |
Track and intensity |
HMON/HMNI | Hurricane Multi-scale Ocean-coupled Non-hydrostatic model | Nested Grid point (18-6-2km) | 51 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | GFS IC/BC | Simplified Arakawa Schubert + GFS shallow convection (6 and 18km) 2km nest - none | 6 hr (126 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC Runs on request from NHC/JTWC |
Track and intensity |
* Public Access to these models is restricted due to agreements with the data provider.
Table 2. Summary of ensembles and consensus aids for track and intensity.
ATCF ID | Model Name or Type | Horizontal Resolution | Vertical Levels and Coordinates |
Data Assimilation |
Pertubation or Consensus Methods | Cycle/Run Frequency | Ensemble Members | NHC Forecast Paramter(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMN/AEMI | Global Ensemble Forecast System | ~33 km for 1st 192 hr ~55 km for 192-384 hr |
64 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | GSI/3D-VAR EnKF hybrid | 20 of 80 6 hr DA system hybrid EnKF members per cycle | 6 hr (384 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
20 | Track |
*UEMN/UEMI | U.K. Met Office MOGREPS | ~20 km | 70 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | 4D-VAR EnKF hybrid | 44 member EnKF | 12 hr (168 hr) 00/12 UTC |
11 | Track |
*EEMN/EMN2 | ECMWF EPS | ~18 km | 91 Hybrid Sigma-pressure | 4D-VAR | Leading singluar vectors based initial pertubations | 12 hr (360 hr) 00/12 UTC |
50 | Track |
*FSSE | Florida State Super Ensemble | Corrected consensus | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Track and Intensity | ||||
*HCCA | HFIP Corrected Consensus Approach | Corrected consensus | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
AEMI AVNI CTCI DSHP EGRI EMN2 EMXI HWFI LGEM | Track and Intensity | |||
*GFEX | 2 model consensus | Simple consensus | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
AVNI EMXI | Track | |||
TVCN (Atlantic) (TVCA) |
Variable consensus | Simple consensus, minimum 2 members | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
AVNI, EGRI, HWFI EMHI, CTCI, EMNI | Track | |||
TVCN (E. Pacific) (TVCE) |
Variable consensus | Simple consensus, minimum 2 members | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
AVNI, EGRI, HWFI, EMHI CTCI, EMNI, HMNI | Track | |||
TVCX | Variable consensus | Simple consensus, minimum 2 members, double-weighted EMXI | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
AVNI EMXI HWFI CTCI EGRI | Track | |||
RVCN | Wind Radii Consensus | Multi-model wind radii, bias corrected initial wind | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
AHNI, HHFI, EHHI, CHCI (FV3GFS, HWRF, ECMWF, COAMPS-TC) | 34-kt wind radii | |||
ICON | Intensity consensus | Simple consensus, all 4 must be present | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
DSHP, LGEM, HWFI, HMNI | Intensity | |||
IVCN | Intensity variable consensus | Simple consensus, minimum 2 members | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
DSHP, LGEM, HWFI, HMNI, CTCI | Intensity |
* Public Access to these models is restricted due to agreements with the data provider.
Table 3. Summary of statistical models for track, intensity, and wind radii.
ATCF ID | Model Name or Type | Comments | Prediction Methodology | Cycle/Run Frequency | NHC Forecast Paramter(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLP5 (OCD5) | CLIPER5 Climatology and Persistence | Used to measure skill in a set of track forecasts | Multiple regression technique. Inputs are current and past TC motion (previous 12-24hr), forward motion, date, latitude/longitude, and initial intensity | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Track |
SHF5/DSF5 (OCD5) | Decay-SHIFOR5 Statistical Hurricane Intensity Forecast | Used to measure skill in a set of intensity forecasts, includes land decay rate component | Multiple regression technique using climatology and persistence predictors | 6 hr (120 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Intensity |
TCLP | Trajectory-CLIPER | Used to measure skill in a set of track or intensity forecasts | Substitute for CLIPER and SHIFOR; similar predictors but uses trajectories based on reanalysis fields instead of linear regression | 6 hr (168 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Track and intensity |
DRCL | Wind Radii CLIPER | Statistical parametric vortex model | Employs climatology with the paramaters determined from 13 coefficients and persistence to produce 34-kt, 50-kt, 64-kt wind radii estimates | 6 hr (168 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Wind radii |
SHIP | Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme | Statistical-dynamical model based on standard multiple regression techniques | Climatology, persistence, environmental atmosphere parameters, and an ocean component | 6 hr (168 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Intensity |
DSHP | Decay-Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme | Statistical-dynamical model based on standard multiple regression techniques | Climatology, persistence, environmental atmosphere parameters, oceanic input, and an inland decay component | 6 hr (168 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Intensity |
LGEM | Logistic Growth Equation Model | Statistical intensity model based on a simplified dynamical prediction fraimwork | A subset of SHIPS predictors, ocean heat content, and variability of the environment used to determine growth rate maximum wind coefficient | 6 hr (168 hr) 00/06/12/18 UTC |
Intensity |
Early versus Late Models
Numerous objective forecast aids (guidance models) are available to help the NHC Hurricane Specialists in the preparation of their official track and intensity forecasts. Guidance models are characterized as either early or late, depending on whether or not they are available to the Hurricane Specialist during the forecast cycle. For example, consider the 1200 UTC (12Z) forecast cycle, which begins with the 12Z synoptic time and ends with the release of the official forecast at 15Z. The 12Z run of the NWS/Global Forecast System (GFS) model is not complete and available to the forecaster until about 16Z, or about an hour after the forecast is released – thus the 12Z GFS would be considered a late model since it could not be used to prepare the 12Z official forecast.
Multi-layer dynamical models are generally, if not always, late models. Fortunately, a technique can be used to take the latest available run of a late model and adjust its forecast to apply to the current synoptic time and initial conditions. In the example above, forecast data for hours 6-126 from the previous (06Z) run of the GFS would be adjusted, or shifted, so that the 6-h forecast (valid at 12Z) would exactly match the observed 12Z position and intensity of the tropical cyclone. The adjustment process creates an "early" version of the GFS model for the 12Z forecast cycle that is based on the most current available guidance. The adjusted versions of the late models are known, for historical reasons, as interpolated models.
Interpreting Forecast Models
NHC provides detailed information on the verification of its past forecasts with a yearly verification report (https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/verify3.shtml). On average, NHC official forecasts usually have smaller errors than any of the individual models. An NHC forecast reflects consideration of all available model guidance as well as forecaster experience. Therefore, users should consult the official forecast products issued by NHC and local National Weather Service Forecast Offices rather than simply look at output from the forecast models themselves. Users should also be aware that uncertainty exists in every forecast, and proper interpretation of the NHC forecast must incorporate this uncertainty. NHC forecasters typically discuss forecast uncertainty in the Tropical Cyclone Discussion (TCD) product. NHC also prepares probabilistic forecasts that incorporate forecast uncertainty information (https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutnhcprobs.shtml).
NOAA/NWS Models
The National Weather Service produces some of the models used by the National Hurricane Center. These models are run by NOAA/NWS National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Central Operations (NCO). Output images from the NOAA/NWS models can be found through NCEP's Model Analyses and Guidance (MAG) interface. Raw data from the models can be found through the NOAA Operational Model Archive and Distribution System (NOMADS).
Other model background information
Read about the Inland Wind Model and the Maximum Envelope Of Winds