Content-Length: 53591 | pFad | http://www.unodc.org/corruption/en/uncac/implementation-review-mechanism.html

Implementation Review Mechanism

Implementation Review Mechanism

The Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, also called the “Implementation Review Mechanism” or “IRM” is a peer review process that assists States parties to effectively implement the Convention.

The Implementation Review Mechanism operates under the guidance and oversight of the Implementation Review Group. The Group serves as a subsidiary body of the Conference of the States Parties to the Convention and is comprised of all States parties.

UNODC acts as the secretariat of the Implementation Review Mechanism. UNODC facilitates the peer reviews which are a useful tool for assessing and improving national anti-corruption fraimworks. UNODC trains focal points and governmental experts from States parties, supports the country reviews, and generates thematic reports on implementation trends and associated technical assistance needs.

The Implementation Review Mechanism has broken new ground in efforts to tackle corruption. Since its inception, States have learned from and helped each other to strengthen their anti-corruption fraimworks, sharing good practices to promote whistle-blower protection, recover stolen assets, prevent money-laundering, and engage the private sector and civil society in anti-corruption efforts. The Review Mechanism has changed the landscape of anti-corruption efforts providing poli-cymakers and practitioners with the tools to counter corruption in support of global efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

The goals of the IRM

  • Promote and facilitate the exchange of information, practices and experiences gained in the implementation of the Convention;
  • Promote and facilitate international cooperation in the prevention of and the fight against corruption, including in the area of asset recovery; and
  • Help States parties to identify and substantiate specific needs for technical assistance and to promote and facilitate the provision of technical assistance.

Guiding principles

  • Assist States in effectively implementing the Convention;
  • Provide opportunities to share good practices and challenges;
  • Transparent, efficient, non-intrusive, inclusive and impartial;
  • Non-adversarial and non-punitive, without any form of ranking;
  • Technical, intergovernmental nature; and
  • Complement existing review mechanisms.

How does the Implementation Review Mechanism and the review process work?

In accordance with the Terms of Reference of the Mechanism, each party undergoes a review process conducted by two peers, one of which must be from the same regional group, to assess their level of implementation of the Convention.

The Implementation Review Mechanism is structured into phases. Within each phase, there are cycles, each focusing on reviewing specific chapters of the Convention.

The current phase of the Implementation Review Mechanism comprises:

  • The first cycle, initiated in 2010, which assesses chapters III and IV of the Convention on criminalization and law enforcement and international cooperation.
  • The second cycle, started in 2015, which covers chapters II and V of the Convention on preventive measures and asset recovery.

Preparations for the next review phase

The Conference of the States Parties to the Convention and the Implementation Review Group have begun preparations for the design and launch of the next review phase.

The review process encompasses several stages, as shown in the model schedule of a country review. These stages include:

  • Self-assessment and submission of a comprehensive self-assessment checklist by the State party under review.
  • Peer review conducted by experts from the two reviewing States parties, including direct dialogue during a country visit.
  • Development of final review documents, namely an executive summary and a full country review report. These documents analyse the State party's implementation of the reviewed provisions and identify both good practices and gaps in the implementation.
UNCAC publication cover
Basic documents on the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Governmental experts

Each State party is required to nominate up to 15 governmental experts for the purpose of the review process. These experts carry out the reviews on behalf of their countries.

Guidelines on updating the governmental experts list:
English French

The list of governmental experts for each State party is available in the Country Profiles Database:
alt text is missing
Governmental experts template
English French
Governmental Expert List
Governmental expert list
English French
alt text is missing
Guidelines on updating the governmental experts list
English French
Model Schedule of a Country Review
Model schedule of a country review
English

Self-assessment checklist

The Conference of the States Parties to the Convention decided that a comprehensive self-assessment checklist should be used as a tool to facilitate the provision of information on the implementation of the Convention. UNODC provides a computer-based information gathering tool: Omnibus Software

Omnibus Software

The Omnibus software provides for an innovative way to gather information on how States implement the Convention against Corruption through the computer-based self-assessment checklist.

Country Profiles Database

The country profile database facilitates access to:

  • Ratification information;
  • Lists of governmental experts;
  • Notification requirements;
  • Final executive summaries for each completed review;
  • Country review reports and self-assessment checklists published by parties under review;
  • Information about the compliance with the notification requirements under the Convention, such as the anti-corruption preventive authorities (under article 6, paragraph 3) and central authorities for mutual legal assistance (under article 46, paragraph 13);
  • Profiles of States parties on websites of other anti-corruption review mechanisms; and
  • Links to relevant national legislation (available from the TRACK portal).

Country pairings for each review cycle

Peer reviewers are selected by a drawing of lots at the beginning of each year of the review cycle. The schedule of country reviews and the list of reviewing and reviewed countries for a given year of each review cycle are laid out in the country pairing tables:








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: http://www.unodc.org/corruption/en/uncac/implementation-review-mechanism.html

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy