create a website

Nudging: An Experiment on Transparency, Controlling for Reactance and Decision Time. (2023). Wichardt, Philipp Christoph ; Spitzer, Carsten ; Schutze, Tobias.
In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10599.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 28

References cited by this document

Cocites: 30

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Arad, A., & Rubinstein, A. (2018). The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies. The Journal of Law and Economics, 61(2), pp. 311-333.

  2. Bang, H., Shu, S., & Weber, E. (2020). The role of perceived effectiveness on the acceptability of choice architecture. Behavioural Public Policy, 4(1), pp. 50-70.

  3. Beshears, J., & Kosowsky, H. (2020). Nudging: Progress to date and future directions. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 161, pp. 3-19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bovens, L. (2009). The ethics of nudge. In Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, Economics and Psychology, pp. 207-219. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Brehm, Jack. 1966. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Jonsson, M. L., & Rahali, B. (2018). Can nudges be transparent and yet effective?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 65, pp. 41-59.

  7. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Halladay, B., 2016. Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, pp. 141-150.

  8. Guala, F., & Mittone, L. (2015). A political justification of nudging. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, pp. 385-395.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), pp. 3-28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), pp. 123-136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Infante, G., Lecouteux, G., & Sugden, R. (2016). Preference purification and the inner rational agent: a critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23, pp. 1-25.

  12. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Kemper, F., & Wichardt, P. (2022). Welfare Justifications and Responsibility in Political Decision Making – The Case of Nudging. mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Kroese, F. M., Marchiori, D. R., & De Ridder, D. T. (2016). Nudging healthy food choices: a field experiment at the train station. Journal of Public Health, 38(2), pp. e133-e137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Leiner, D. J. (2019). SoSci Survey (Version 3.1.06) [Computer software]. Available at https://www.soscisurvey.de Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D., & Rajpal, S. (2015). Warning: You are about to be nudged. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1), pp. 35-42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Melnikoff, D. E., Bargh, J. A. (2018). The mythical number two. Trends in cognitive sciences, 22(4), pp. 280-293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Merz, J. (1983). Fragebogen zur Messung der psychologischen Reaktanz. Diagnostica, 29, pp. 75–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Paunov, Y., Wänke, M., & Vogel, T. (2019). Transparency effects on policy compliance: Disclosing how defaults work can enhance their effectiveness. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), pp. 187-208.

  19. Rizzo, M.J., & D.G. Whitman. (2009). The knowledge problem of new paternalism. Brigham Young University Law Review 9(4), pp. 905–968.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Rubinstein, A. (2013). Response time and decision making: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5), pp. 540-551.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Steffel, M., Williams, E. F., & Pogacar, R. (2016). Ethically deployed defaults: Transparency and consumer protection through disclosure and preference articulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), pp. 865-880.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Sugden, R. (2008). Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constitutional Political Economy 19(3), pp. 226-248.

  23. Sugden, R. (2017). Do people really want to be nudged towards healthy lifestyles?. International Review of Economics 64(2), pp. 113-123.

  24. Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioral science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Sunstein, C. R. (2018). “Better off, as judged by themselves”: a comment on evaluating nudges. International Review of Economics, 65(1), pp. 1-8.

  26. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. van Gestel, L. C., Adriaanse, M. A., & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2021). Do nudges make use of automatic processing? Unraveling the effects of a default nudge under type 1 and type 2 processing. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 5(1-3), pp. 4-24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Whitman, D. G., & Rizzo, M.J. (2015). The Problematic Welfare Standards of Behavioral Paternalism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, pp. 409–425.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Eliciting Paternalistic Preferences: An Incentivised Experiment. (2024). Witschel, Helena ; Carlhoff, Henrik ; Schutze, Tobias.
    In: Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory.
    RePEc:zbw:roswps:169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Nudging citizens co-production: Assessing multiple behavioral strategies. (2024). Dvir, Rotem.
    In: Policy Sciences.
    RePEc:kap:policy:v:57:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11077-024-09546-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The intrinsic value of decision rights: Field evidence from electricity contract choice automation. (2024). Löschel, Andreas ; Lingens, Jorg ; Zunker, Gerald ; Feldhaus, Christoph ; Loschel, Andreas.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0928765524000162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Encouraging sustainable food consumption through nudges: An experiment with menu labels. (2024). Lotti, Lorenzo ; Buratto, Arianna.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:216:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923002872.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Free to fail? Paternalistic preferences in the United States. (2023). Skivenes, Marit ; Hermes, Henning ; Cappelen, Alexander W ; Bartling, Bjorn ; Tungodden, Bertil.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:436.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Support for behavioral nudges versus alternative policy instruments and their perceived fairness and efficacy. (2023). Mikoajczak, Gosia ; Martin, Aaron ; John, Peter.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:363-371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Free to Fail? Paternalistic Preferences in the United States. (2023). Skivenes, Marit ; Hermes, Henning ; Cappelen, Alexander W ; Bartling, Bjorn ; Tungodden, Bertil.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Free to Fail? Paternalistic Preferences in the United States. (2023). Skivenes, Marit ; Hermes, Henning ; Cappelen, Alexander W ; Bartling, Bjorn ; Tungodden, Bertil.
    In: Discussion Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:nhheco:2023_009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Intrinsic Preferences for Autonomy. (2023). Kopp, Leander ; Herz, Holger ; Freundt, Jana.
    In: FSES Working Papers.
    RePEc:fri:fribow:fribow00530.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The role of autonomy and reactance for nudging — Experimentally comparing defaults to recommendations and mandates. (2023). Perino, Grischa ; Bruns, Hendrik.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:106:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323000733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Is only one of my selves authentic? An empirical approach. (2023). Uhl, Matthias ; Krugel, Sebastian.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:102:y:2023:i:c:s2214804322001410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Nudging: An Experiment on Transparency, Controlling for Reactance and Decision Time. (2023). Wichardt, Philipp Christoph ; Spitzer, Carsten ; Schutze, Tobias.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Intrinsic Preferences for Autonomy. (2023). Kopp, Leander ; Herz, Holger ; Freundt, Jana.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Procedural fairness and equality of opportunity. (2023). Trautmann, Stefan T.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:37:y:2023:i:5:p:1697-1714.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Self-nudging is more ethical, but less efficient than social nudging. (2023). Waichman, Israel ; Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0726.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Self?nudging contracts and the positive effects of autonomy—Analyzing the prospect of behavioral self?management. (2022). Sprigman, Christopher Jon ; Tontrup, Stephan.
    In: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.
    RePEc:wly:empleg:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:594-676.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The impact on nudge acceptability judgements of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2022). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03747844.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The impact on nudge acceptability judgements of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2022). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-03747844.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Against the mainstream: Field evidence on a positive link between media consumption and the demand for sports among children. (2022). Breuer, Christoph ; Weimar, Daniel.
    In: Kyklos.
    RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:75:y:2022:i:2:p:317-336.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Self-Nudging vs. Social Nudging in Social Dilemmas: An Experiment. (2022). Waichman, Israel ; Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The impact on nudge acceptability judgments of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2021). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03228638.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The impact on nudge acceptability judgments of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2021). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-03228638.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Impact on Acceptability Judgments about Nudges of Framing and Consultation with the Targeted Population. (2021). Rafaï, Ismaël ; Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2021-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Public Acceptability of Policy Interventions to Reduce Sugary Drink Consumption in Urban Vietnam. (2021). de Steur, Hans ; Nguyen, Lan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13422-:d:694688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Point at, nudge, or push private provision of a public good?. (2021). Perino, Grischa ; Bruns, Hendrik.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:59:y:2021:i:3:p:996-1007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. On the Transparency of Nudges: An Experiment. (2019). Mittone, Luigi ; Casal, Sandro ; Guala, Francesco.
    In: CEEL Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpce:1902.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Costly switching from a status quo. (2018). Guney, Begum ; Richter, Michael.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:156:y:2018:i:c:p:55-70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Paternalism Preferences: Differences Across Genders. (). Villalba, Carmen Sainz.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:mpi:wpaper:tax-mpg-rps-2023-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-26 13:39:22 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy