create a website

A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Confi dence in Science With An Application to the Public Goods Game. (2022). Villeval, Marie Claire ; List, John ; grossman, philip ; Houser, Daniel ; Butera, Luigi.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03725592.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 82

References cited by this document

Cocites: 46

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. ——— (1990): “Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving,” The Economic Journal, 100, 464–477.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. ——— (1995): “Cooperation in public goods experiments: Kindness or confusion?” American Economic Review, 85, 891–904.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. ——— (2008): “Naturally Occurring Markets and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of the Winner’s Curse,” The Economic Journal, 118, 822–843.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. ——— (2015): How to make experimental economics research more reproducible: lessons from other disciplines and a new proposal, vol. 18, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. ——— (2017): “Replication in Labor Economics: Evidence from Data, and What It Suggests, ” American Economic Review, 107, 37–40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. ——— (2017): “To Replicate or Not To Replicate? Exploring Reproducibility in Economics through the Lens of a Model and a Pilot Study,” The Economic Journal, 127, F209–F235.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. ——— (2019): “Identification of and correction for publication bias,” American Economic Review, 109, 2766–94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Abadie, A. (2020): “Statistical Nonsignificance in Empirical Economics,” American Economic Review: Insights, 2, 193–208.

  9. Abdulkadiroglu, A., J. Angrist, and P. Pathak (2014): “The Elite Illusion: Achievement Effects at Boston and New York Exam Schools,” Econometrica, 82, 137– 196.

  10. Abeler, J., D. Nosenzo, and C. Raymond (2019): “Preferences for truth-telling,” Econometrica, 87, 1115–1153.

  11. Ambrus, A. and P. Pathak (2011): “Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments,” Journal of Public Economics, 95, 500–512.

  12. Anderson, S. and C. A. Goere, Jacob K.and Holt (1998): “A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error in Public Goods Games,” Journal of Public Economics, 70, 297–323.

  13. Andreoni, J. (1988): “Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments, ” Journal of Public Economics, 37, 291–304.

  14. Andrews, I. and M. Kasy (2017): “Identification of and correction for publication bias,” Working paper.

  15. Berry, J., L. C. Coffman, D. Hanley, R. Gihleb, and A. J. Wilson (2017): “Assessing the rate of replication in economics,” American Economic Review, 107, 27– 31.

  16. Bjork, L., M. Kocher, P. Martinsson, and P. Nam Khanh (2016): “Cooperation under risk and ambiguity,” Working Paper in Economics, University of Gothenburg, 683.

  17. Bochet, O. and L. Putterman (2009): “Not just babble: Opening the black box of communication in a voluntary contribution experiment,” European Economic Review, 53, 309–326.

  18. Bochet, O., T. Page, and L. Putterman (2006): “Communication and Punishment in Voluntary Contribution Experiments,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 11–26.

  19. Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels (2000): “ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition,” American Economic Review, 90, 166–193.

  20. Brandts, J. and A. Schram (2001): “Cooperation and Noise in Public Goods Experiments: Applying the Contribution Function Approach,” Journal of Public Economics, 79, 399–427.

  21. Butera, L. and J. A. List (2017): “An Economic Approach to Alleviate the Crisis of Confidence in Science: With an Application to the Public Goods Game,” NBER Working Papers, 23335.

  22. Camerer, C. F., A. Dreber, E. Forsell, T.-H. Ho, J. Huber, M. Johannesson, M. Kirchler, J. Almenberg, A. Altmejd, T. Chan, et al. (2016): “Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics,” Science, 351, 1433–1436.

  23. Cameron, A., J. Gelbach, and D. Miller (2008): “Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 414–427.

  24. Cesarini, D., E. Lindqvist, R. Ostling, and B. Wallace (2016): “Wealth, Health, and Child Development: Evidence from Administrative Data on Swedish Lottery Players, ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 687–738.

  25. Charness, G. and M. Rabin (2002): “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817–869.

  26. Chaudhuri, A. (2011): “Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature,” Experimental Economics, 14, 47–83.

  27. Chen, D. L., M. Schonger, and C. Wickens (2016): “oTreeAn open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97.

  28. Coffman, L. C. and M. Niederle (2015): “Pre-analysis plans have limited upside, especially where replications are feasible,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 81–97.

  29. Coffman, L. C., M. Niederle, and A. J. Wilson (2017): “A Proposal to Organize and Promote Replications,” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 107, 41–45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Correia, S. (2017): “Linear models with high-dimensional fixed effects: An efficient and feasible estimator,” Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Cox, J. C., D. Friedman, and S. Gjerstad (2007): “A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness,” Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 17–45.

  32. de Ree, J., K. Muralidharan, M. Pradhan, and H. Rogers (2018): “Double for Nothing? Experimental Evidence on an Unconditional Teacher Salary Increase in Indonesia, ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 993–1039.

  33. DellaVigna, S. and E. Linos (2022): “RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units,” Econometrica, 90, 81–116.

  34. DellaVigna, S. and M. D. Paserman (2005): “Job search and impatience,” Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 527–588.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Drazen, A. and E. Y. Ozbay (2019): “Does being chosen to lead induce non-selfish behavior? Experimental evidence on reciprocity,” Journal of Public Economics, 174, 13–21.

  36. Drazen, A., A. D. Almenberg, E. Y. Ozbay, and E. Snowberg (2019): “A JournalBased Replication of Being Chosen to Lead,” NBER Working Papers, No. w26444.

  37. Dreber, A., d. A. J. Pfeiffer, Thomas a, S. Isaksson, B. Wilson, Y. Chen, B. A. Nosek, and M. Johannesson (2015): “Using Prediction Markets to Estimate the Reproducibility of Scientific Research,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 15343–15347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Dufwenberg, M. and G. Kirchsteiger (2004): “A theory of sequential reciprocity,” Games and Economic Behavior, 47, 268–298.

  39. Eckel, C. C. and P. J. Grossman (2008): “Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 1–17.

  40. Falkinger, J., E. Fehr, S. Gaechter, and R. Winter-Ebmer (2000): “A Simple Mechanism for the Efficient Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence,” American Economic Review, 90, 247–264.

  41. Fehr, E. and S. Gaechter (2000): “Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments,” American Economic Review, 90, 980–994.

  42. Fischbacher, U. and F. Föllmi-Heusi (2013): “Lies in disguisean experimental study on cheating,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 525–547.

  43. Fischbacher, U. and S. Gaechter (2010): “Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free-riding in public good experiments,” American Economic Review, 100, 541–556.

  44. Fischbacher, U., S. Gaechter, and E. Fehr (2001): “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment,” Economics Letters, 71, 397– 404.

  45. Fischbacher, U., S. Schudy, and S. Teyssier (2014): “Heterogeneous reactions to heterogeneity in returns from public goods,” Social Choice and Welfare, 43, 195–217.

  46. Fischer, R. (1935): The Design of Experiments, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Fisher, J., R. Isaac, J. Schatzberg, and J. Walker (1995): “Heterogenous Demand for Public Goods: Behavior in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism,” Public Choice, 85, 249–266.

  48. Franco, A., N. Malhotra, and G. Simonovits (2014): “Social science. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer,” Science, 345, 1502–1505.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Fréchette, G. R., K. Sarnoff, and L. Yariv (2021): “Experimental Economics: Past and Future,” .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Frey, B. S. and S. Meier (2004): “Pro-social behavior in a natural setting,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 65–88.

  51. Gaechter, S., E. Renner, and M. Sefton (2008): “The long run benefits of punishment, ” Science, 322, 1510.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Gangadharan, L. and V. Nemes (2009): “Experimental analysis of risk and uncertainty in provisioning private and public goods,” Economic Inquiry, 47, 146–164.

  53. Hamermesh, D. S. (2007): “Viewpoint: Replication in economics,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 40, 715–733.

  54. Harrison, G. W. and J. A. List (2004): “Field Experiments,” Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009–1055.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Houser, D. and D. Kurzban (2002): “Revisiting Kindness and Confusion in Public Goods Experiments,” American Economic Review, 92, 1062–1069.

  56. Ioannidis, J. (2005): “Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 218–228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Kessler, J. B. and S. Meier (2014): “Learning from (failed) replications: Cognitive load manipulations and charitable giving,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102, 10–13.

  58. Kesternich, M., A. Lange, and B. Sturm (2014): “The Impact of Burden Sharing Rules on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 105, 107–123.

  59. Kosfeld, M., A. Okada, and A. Riedl (2009): “Institution Formation in Public Goods Games,” American Economic Review, 99, 1335–1355.

  60. Landy, J., M. Jia, I. Ding, D. Viganola, W. Tierney, A. Dreber, M. Johanneson, T. Pfeiffer, C. Ebersole, Q. Gronau, et al. (2020): “Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results,” Psychological Bulletin, 146, 451–479.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Ledyard, J. (1995): “Public goods: A survey of experimental research,” in The Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. by J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Levati, M. V., A. Morone, and A. Fiore (2009): “Voluntary contributions with imperfect information: An experimental study,” Public Choice, 138, 199–216.

  63. List, J. A. (2020): “Non est disputandum de generalizability? A glimpse into the external validity trial,” Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

  64. List, J. A., A. M. Shaikh, and Y. Xu (2019): “Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics,” Experimental Economics, 22, 773–793.

  65. Maniadis, Z., F. Tufano, and J. A. List (2014): “One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects,” American Economic Review, 104, 277–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Masclet, D., C. Noussair, S. Tucker, and M. C. Villeval (2003): “Monetary and Non-Monetary Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism,” American Economic Review, 93, 366–380.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. McEvoy, D. M., J. J. Murphy, J. M. Spraggon, and J. K. Stranlund (2011): “The problem of maintaining compliance within stable coalitions: experimental evidence,” Oxford Economic Papers, 63, 475–498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Meghir, C., M. Palme, and E. Simeonova (2018): “Education and Mortality: Evidence from a Social Experiment,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10, 234–256.

  69. Moonesinghe, R., M. J. Khoury, and A. C. J. Janssens (2007): “Most Published Research Findings Are False – But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way,” PLOS Medicine, 4, e28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Nikiforakis, N. (2010): “Feedback, punishment and cooperation in public good experiments, ” Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 689–702.

  71. Nikiforakis, N. and R. Slonim (2019): “Editors Preface: Trends in experimental economics (1975–2018),” Journal of the Economic Science Association, 5, 143–148.

  72. Palfrey, T. and J. Prisbrey (1997): “Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why?” American Economic Review, 87, 829–846.

  73. Putterman, L., J.-R. Tyran, and K. Kamei (2011): “Public goods and voting on formal sanction schemes,” Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1213–1222.

  74. Rabin, M. (1993): “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,” American Economic Review, 83, 1281–1302.

  75. Reuben, E. and J.-R. Tyran (2010): “Everyone is a winner: promoting cooperation through all-can-win intergroup competition,” European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 25–35.

  76. Sefton, M., R. Shupp, and J. Walker (2007): “The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in the Provision of Public Goods,” Economic Inquiry, 45, 671–690.

  77. Smith, V. (2018): Learning from Experiments that Fail to Confirm Beliefs: Three Cases, Doctorate Honoris Causa lecture – GATE, Lyon.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Smith, V. L., G. Suchanek, and A. Williams (1988): “Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets,” Econometrica, 56, 1119–1151.

  79. Theroude, V. and A. Zylbersztejn (2020): “Cooperation in a risky world,” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 22, 388–407.

  80. Villeval, M. C. (2020): “Public goods, norms and cooperation,” in Handbook of Experimental Game Theory, ed. by M. Capra, R. Croson, M. Rigdon, and T. Rosenblat, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. Chapter 7, 184–212.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Wacholder, S., S. Chanock, M. Garcia-Closas, L. El Ghormli, and N. Rothman (2004): “Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report is False: An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology Studies,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 434– 442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Ziliak, S. and D. McCloskey (2008): The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Economics, Cognition, And Society, University of Michigan Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. What Is the False Discovery Rate in Empirical Research?. (2024). Engsted, Tom.
    In: Econ Journal Watch.
    RePEc:ejw:journl:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:92-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Social mobility perceptions and inequality acceptance. (2024). Preuss, Marcel ; Muller, Daniel ; Fehr, Dietmar.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:221:y:2024:i:c:p:366-384.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Estimating the merit-order effect using coarsened exact matching: Reconciling theory with the empirical results to improve policy implications. (2024). Rinne, Sonja.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Is temperature adversely related to economic development? Evidence on the short-run and the long-run links from sub-national data. (2024). Stadelmann, David ; Meierrieks, Daniel.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004663.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Classical p-values and the Bayesian posterior probability that the hypothesis is approximately true. (2024). Kline, Brendan.
    In: Journal of Econometrics.
    RePEc:eee:econom:v:240:y:2024:i:1:s030440762400023x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Ethnic spatial dispersion and immigrant identity. (2023). Constant, Amelie ; Zimmermann, Klaus F ; Schuller, Simone.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:1282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Replications in agricultural economics. (2023). Henningsen, Arne ; Grebitus, Carola ; Finger, Robert.
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:45:y:2023:i:3:p:1258-1274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias. (2023). Brodeur, Abel ; Lusher, Lester ; Figlio, David N ; Carrell, Scott E.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16369.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Does Losing Lead to Winning? An Empirical Analysis for Four Sports. (2023). van Dolder, Dennie ; van den Assem, Martijn J ; Teeselink, Bouke Klein.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:1:p:513-532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Does Organic Farming Jeopardize Food and Nutrition Security?. (2023). Henningsen, Arne.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2023_02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Does the ECBs monetary policy affect personal finances and economic inequality? A household perspective from Germany. (2023). Hayo, Bernd.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:129:y:2023:i:c:s0264999323003681.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Ethnic Spatial Dispersion and Immigrant Identity. (2023). Zimmermann, Klaus F ; Schuller, Simone ; Constant, Amelie F.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Bridging the gap: Applying analytics to address gender pay inequity. (2023). Ross, David Gaddis ; Bjarnadottir, Margret Vilborg ; Anderson, David.
    In: Production and Operations Management.
    RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:1846-1864.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Unpacking P-hacking and Publication Bias. (2023). Lusher, Lester ; Carrell, Scott ; Brodeur, Abel ; Figlio, David.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:113:y:2023:i:11:p:2974-3002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Early Education, Preferences, and Decision-Making Abilities. (2022). Carvalho, Leandro S ; Amaro, Pedro Manuel ; Azevedo, Joana.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Moving to a world beyond p-value. (2022). Kim, Jae H.
    In: Review of Managerial Science.
    RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:16:y:2022:i:8:d:10.1007_s11846-021-00504-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Vocational training for unemployed youth in Latvia. (2022). Havari, Enkelejda ; Ghirelli, Corinna ; Bratti, Massimiliano ; Santangelo, Giulia.
    In: Journal of Population Economics.
    RePEc:spr:jopoec:v:35:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s00148-021-00877-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Reconsidering macroeconomic policy prescriptions with meta-analysis. (2022). Gechert, Sebastian.
    In: Industrial and Corporate Change.
    RePEc:oup:indcch:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:576-590..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. P-Hacking, Data Type and Data-Sharing Policy. (2022). Neisser, Carina ; Cook, Nikolai ; Brodeur, Abel.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15586.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Confi dence in Science With An Application to the Public Goods Game. (2022). Villeval, Marie Claire ; List, John ; grossman, philip ; Houser, Daniel ; Butera, Luigi.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03725592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. On index investing. (2022). Ringgenberg, Matthew C ; Heath, Davidson ; Coles, Jeffrey L.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:145:y:2022:i:3:p:665-683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Null Result Penalty. (2022). Stegmann, Andreas ; Roth, Christopher ; Haaland, Ingar K ; Chopra, Felix.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9776.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Shallow Meritocracy. (2022). Andre, Peter.
    In: CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2022_318v3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Can the Replication Rate Tell Us About Publication Bias?. (2022). Vu, Patrick.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2206.15023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. P-Hacking, Data Type and Data-Sharing Policy. (2022). Brodeur, Abel ; Cook, Nikolai ; Neisser, Carina.
    In: ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:200.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Null Result Penalty. (2022). Stegmann, Andreas ; Roth, Christopher ; Haaland, Ingar ; Chopra, Felix.
    In: ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Which Findings Should Be Published?. (2022). Kasy, Maximilian ; Frankel, Alexander.
    In: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.
    RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:1-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Why Are Pollution Damages Lower in Developed Countries? Insights from High-Income, High-Particulate Matter Hong Kong. (2021). Shimshack, Jay ; Colmer, Jonathan ; Liu, Siying ; Lin, Dajun.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Innovation Performance and the Signal Effect: Evidence from a European Program. (2021). Quignon, Aurelien ; Levratto, Nadine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03466903.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Political budget cycles revisited: Testing the signalling process. (2021). Hayo, Bernd ; Garcia, Israel.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:69:y:2021:i:c:s0176268021000318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Why are pollution damages lower in developed countries? Insights from high-Income, high-particulate matter Hong Kong. (2021). Shimshack, Jay ; Liu, Siying ; Lin, Dajun ; Colmer, Jonathan.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:79:y:2021:i:c:s0167629621000965.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Kinship structure, stress, and the gender gap in competition. (2021). Lowes, Sara.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:192:y:2021:i:c:p:36-57.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Innovation Performance and the Signal Effect: Evidence from a European Program. (2021). Levratto, Nadine ; Quignon, Aurelien.
    In: EconomiX Working Papers.
    RePEc:drm:wpaper:2021-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Why Are Pollution Damages Lower in Developed Countries? Insights from High-Income, High-Particulate Matter Hong Kong. (2021). Shimshack, Jay ; Colmer, Jonathan ; Liu, Siying ; Lin, Dajun.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Shallow Meritocracy: An Experiment on Fairness Views. (2021). Andre, Peter.
    In: ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The long?run effects of noncommunicable disease shocks. (2020). Palmer, Michael ; Mahal, Ajay ; Pan, Tianxin ; McPake, Barbara ; Annear, Peter .
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:29:y:2020:i:12:p:1549-1565.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Does Losing Lead to Winning? An Empirical Analysis for Four Different Sports. (2020). van Dolder, Dennie ; van den Assem, Martijn J ; Teeselink, Bouke Klein.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20200049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Investor Tax Credits and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from U.S. States. (2020). Mezzanotti, Filippo ; Xu, Ting ; Wang, Xinxin ; Howell, Sabrina T ; Denes, Matthew R.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The power of experiments: How big is your n?. (2020). Zacharodimou, Panagiota ; Buehren, Christoph ; Asanov, Igor.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202032.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Between Fear Mongers and Samaritans: Does Information Provision Affect Attitudes towards the Right of Asylum in Germany?. (2020). Neumeier, Florian ; Hayo, Bernd.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202031.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Teaching Graduate (and Undergraduate) Econometrics: Some Sensible Shifts to Improve Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Usefulness. (2020). Arkes, Jeremy.
    In: Econometrics.
    RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:36-:d:409801.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Between Fear Mongers and Samaritans: Does Information Provision Affect Attitudes towards the Right of Asylum in Germany?. (2020). Neumeier, Florian ; Hayo, Bernd.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8420.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Methods Matter: p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal Analysis in Economics. (2020). Brodeur, Abel ; Heyes, Anthony ; Cook, Nikolai.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:110:y:2020:i:11:p:3634-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-28 07:46:23 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy