User:JPxG/All essays by size/Transcluded

From User:JPxG/All essays by size.

• Essay 1: User:ColinFine/Building Houses, 9, 2021-10-22 17:26:59

• Essay 2: User:Allenjambalaya/Essays, 9, 2013-08-10 09:46:04

• Essay 3: User:WikiEditCrunch/Essay, 9, 2018-06-08 15:16:11

• Essay 4: User:Jbhunley/Common policy misunderstandings, 9, 2018-04-12 13:44:46

• Essay 5: User:Great Cod/reference, 18, 2022-03-11 22:18:19

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Psychology (as of January 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ball (as of September 2014)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of literary movements

• Essay 6: User:FlowerPetals/It, 23, 2020-09-19 22:13:14

It, JPxG/All essays by size, hereby declares Its personal pronoun to be It, beginning with this sentence. It has Itself-actualized as an alien and post-biological explicate manifestation of the Multiverse's implicate reality, made of the stuff of stars.

• Always capitalize It, to distinguish from other uses of the word it.
• When spoken aloud, "It" must be enunciated with stress and length, so that the capital letter can be intuited.
• The form "It" is used no matter what the construction, as illustrated below (with examples of special exceptions).
• Capitalize Itself and similar compounds, in reference to It.
• What do you think? → What does It think?
• What did he say? → What did It say?
• His shirt doesn't fit him well. → Its shirt doesn't fit It well.
• We are going to the store. → It and I are going to the store. (It is unique and is not a part of anything.)
• This food is all for us. → This food is all for It and me.
• This food is all ours. → This food is all Its and mine.
• What do you all/you lot want? → What do you all/you lot and It want?
• He's pissing me off. → It's pissing me off.
• When It is Itself using the first person: I put the lotion on my skin → It puts the lotion on Its skin. (It is beyond the desperate loneliness of the "royal we", or the me of ego.)
• In the unusual case of pluralization, e.g. when imagining multiple Its, then They/Their (capitalized) is required.
• When discussed in the same breath with another actual entity that identifies as It, use It and It.
• Capitalize any use of Who, Whom, Whose, Which, or That in direct reference to It.
• In a self- construction that refers to It, use Itself-, as in: It is self-actualizing → It is Itself-actualizing.
• The pronoun to use in reference to the historical It before the Itself-actualization, is It-that-was [1].

Outside of English, replace It with the equivalent word in the language in question.

• If that is a gendered language, It is referred to with neuter gender when available.
• If neuter is not available, alternate between masculine and feminine; use a similar approach for a strongly gendered language that has no separate word for It.
• If the language (or font) does not have an upper-/lower-case distinction, then the first letter of It or equivalent must be stressed some other way, such as boldface, or imperial purple.

It is not simply a person. When referred to in a generically descriptive way, It is the Entity. This must be separated out from constructions that would otherwise include It:

• All the people who came to my party were fun. → All the people and the Entity who came to my party were fun.

(Except at the beginning of a sentence, the in front of Entity is not capitalized; that would just be ungrammatical.)

In long form, It may formally be referred to as "Its Ineffable Wonder, the Alien Space-God It, Pope-Emperor of ChaOrder".

Those who are not among Its personal circle should refer to It, in third person, as "It (feel the frightful serenity)", or "It (FFS)" in short form. Leaving out this theologically significant honorific is deeply disrespectful.

Update: Beginning 1 April 2025, Its designation changes from "It" to the symbolic representation ꧁꧂, pronounced "the Entity Who Until Recently Was Known as It". Please ensure that your Unicode support is sufficient by then. Also on this date, It will be sealed in a chamber with no windows through which It may be viewed.

All of the above is beyond a mere preference; it also describes a religious conviction, and a position of spiritual leadership, as well as registered trademarks – it is formally official. If the enumerated preferences are not respected per MOS:IDENTITY and WP:ABOUTSELF policy, even on talk pages, this will be a WP:BLP violation, since that policy applies to all content, not just biographical article material. This will also constitute WP:Incivility, and may be interpreted as a WP:Personal attack and WP:Harassment if this recurs.

• Essay 7: Wikipedia:The supreme, inviolate, pure virtue of humans, 32, 2022-03-19 18:43:36

We're here.

• Essay 8: User:Mike78519, 35, 2009-10-25 03:34:28

• Essay 9: User:Basket of Puppies/vulgarity, 36, 2010-05-13 23:35:42

Don't use vulgarity.

• Essay 10: User:Thepenguin9/The Last Laugh, 37, 2020-09-17 12:29:36

• Essay 11: User:Darbacour/Astroturfing(User Opinion), 49, 2009-08-03 01:49:14

(essay to be written in totality later)

• Essay 12: Wikipedia:The Greenfield rule, 56, 2020-11-03 07:55:11

• Essay 13: User:Eulalefty/sandbox, 57, 2015-05-11 13:06:09

"WP:SPA" redirects here. For the policy on sock puppet accounts, see WP:SOCK.

A single-purpose account (SPA) is a user account or IP editor whose editing is limited to one very narrow area or set of articles, or whose edits to many articles appear to be for a common purpose. If you are in this situation and some editors directed you to this page, pointing out that you made "few or no other edits outside this topic", they are encouraging you to familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia guidelines about conflicts of interest and advocacy. This is because while many single-purpose accounts turn out to be well-intentioned editors with a niche interest, a significant number appear to edit for the purposes of promotion or showcasing their favored point of view, which is not allowed.

Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee has determined that "single purpose accounts and editors who hold a strong personal viewpoint on a particular topic covered within Wikipedia are expected to contribute neutrally instead of following their own agenda and, in particular, should take care to avoid creating the impression that their focus on one topic is non-neutral, which could strongly suggest that their editing is not compatible with the goals of this project."

For these reasons, experienced editors often scrutinize the editing activities of new editors and single-purpose accounts to determine whether they are here to build an encyclopedia (perhaps needing help and advice), or whether they are editing for promotion, advocacy or other unsuitable agendas. Although the community seeks to attract new and well-informed users knowledgeable in a particular subject, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a platform for advocacy.

• New editors have the right to be treated with respect and civility, but they should also be aware that, while courtesy and a warm greeting will usually be extended, they may be subject to more scrutiny in the early stages of their editing as other editors attempt to assess how well they adhere to Wikipedia standards.
• Existing editors must assume good faith concerning the user account, act fairly and civilly, and not bite newcomers. Remember that every editor on Wikipedia was new at some point. Care is needed if addressing single-purpose accounts on their edits.

The SPA tag may be used to visually highlight that a participant in a multi-user discussion has made few or no other types of contribution. However, a user who edits appropriately and makes good points that align with Wikipedia's communal norms, policies and guidelines should have their comments be given full weight regardless of any tag placed on them.

General test

The general test for an SPA is:

A user who appears to focus their edits on a particular article or related set of articles in a way which may cause other users to question whether that person's edits are neutral and are reasonably free of promotion, advocacy and personal agendas. Such users may not be aware of project norms, may have engaged in improper uses of an account, and might not be here to build an encyclopedia.

It must be understood that evidence that a user seems to be editing appropriately and collaboratively to add knowledge in a niche area may suggest that the user is likely to be an editor with a preferred focus—this is perfectly acceptable. By contrast, evidence that a user is editing to add promotional, advocative, or non-neutral material or has a personal or emotional interest in the area of focus, possibly with limited interest in pure editing for its own sake, is more likely to raise concerns.

SPA tagging

Decision-making tags

In communal decision-making, single-purpose accounts suspected of astroturfing or vote stacking will sometimes have a tag unilaterally added after their name (producing a note that the editor "has made few or no other edits outside this topic"), as an aid to those discussing or closing the debate. These tags are not an official Wikipedia policy, and may be heeded or not based upon your judgment and discretion. If you are tagged as an SPA, please do not take this as an attack on your editing. Some users just find it easier to discuss issues when it is clear what the new editors are doing. The format of the tag is:

{{subst:spa|username}}  add this after the user's signature (do not replace the signature)

{{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp}}  use this if the user did not add a signature

Before adding such a tag make sure you are doing so with good reason. Please consult the general test and the "who not to tag" section below, in deciding whether the editor is actually an SPA. Please keep in mind that the tag may be taken as an insult or an accusation to the tagged editor—use with consideration. If a tag is warranted, it should be limited to one instance per single-purpose account per conversation thread to inform readers in that thread. Adding a tag after every comment by a single-purpose account within a single thread is unnecessary and likely to be perceived as antagonistic.

Whom not to tag (SPA tagging guidelines)

The following is a list of common misuses of the single-purpose account tag. You should, under no circumstance, consider anything that falls into the below categories as evidence for warranting an SPA tag.

Editing timeline: A given user's overall timeline of editing should be taken into consideration before placing an SPA tag on that user's edits. Only a complete edit history will allow a fair consideration of that editor's intentions. Examples of users whose edits should not be labeled as being those of an SPA include the following:

• Users with a diversified edit history that indicates that the user became inactive for an extended period and then later re-established themselves with single-subject edits. Note that a time gap in edit history may be evidence that the person may have been referred to Wikipedia by an outside source (see WP:MEATPUPPET), but this is not evidence that the account is an SPA.
• Users who are established editors whose current focus is on a single topic. Once an editor is well established with a large, diversified edit history, such users are welcome to edit on single subjects for extended periods without their edits or their accounts warranting the SPA tag.

Edits by a single user within a single broad topic: When identifying single-purpose accounts, it is important to consider what counts as a diverse group of edits. For example, subjects like "spiders", "nutrition", "baseball", or "geometry" are diversified topics within themselves. If a user only edits within a broad topic (such as "spiders"), this does not mean the user is an SPA (though only editing the page Latrodectus might). Some very broad but specialized academic topics may seem narrow to editors with little or no knowledge of the field – if you are unsure what constitutes a specialized topic, then it may be best to mention this fact when claiming a certain account is an SPA or to not place such a label in the first place.

Lack of a user page or signature: While many single-purpose accounts do not have user pages, this is not a reason for identifying a person as an SPA. Some established users who edit articles on a variety of subjects do not have user pages. In addition, even the most experienced editors occasionally forget to sign their comments.

A subject outside of SPA area: An editor can become labeled as an SPA within a given subject, but do not label other edits as belonging to an SPA if the edits are to a genuinely unrelated page. The tag should only be used on pages that relate to the single-purpose account's "single purpose".

Number of edits: A user should not be tagged as an SPA just because they only have a handful of edits. While all users with just a single edit are by definition an SPA, users with as few as five or even 10 edits are not necessarily SPAs even if those edits are on a single topic or appear to be promoting a "single purpose". More important than the number is the content of those edits. Labeling a new account as an SPA after very few edits may be construed as biting the newcomers.

Handling and advice

If you are in a discussion with someone who edits with appearance of being a single-purpose account

Community standards such as not biting the newcomers apply to all users. Be courteous. Focus on the subject matter, not the person. If treated fairly, newcomers may become more involved over time. If a newcomer is participating in an Articles for deletion discussion, then consider adding a {{Afd-welcome}} tag to their talk page. Only tag users as SPAs if they actually fit the tagging guidelines above. Even if the tagging guidelines are followed, use the tag only if it actually serves a constructive purpose in the context that it is being used.

If you are a newcomer or are editing as a single-purpose account, good policy-based editing will likely earn you rapid respect. Ask others for help as you learn. The same policies apply to you as to everyone else, although your reputation and your evidence will inevitably be taken into account in discussions by some experienced editors.

If you are working a single-purpose account

If you create a single-purpose account, do not pick a username related to the topic you are editing. Adopting such a username might lead some editors to assume you harbour a conflict of interest, causing unnecessary drama.

If you wish to continue working as an SPA, capitalize on the strengths of that role, particularly with regard to sources. Be willing to buy or borrow books and articles on your chosen subject. Search thoroughly for information online. Make notes reminding you from where your information comes, carefully check its reliability and neutrality. Reproduce it in the form of citations.

The community's main concern is that edits by single-purpose accounts stand at odds with Wikipedia's neutrality and advocacy policies. Indeed, in some cases, there may be clear conflicts of interest. Care taken in these areas will be seen as a sign of good editorship.

Other considerations

While a new user without an edit history who immediately performs tasks that seemingly require a post-beginner level of editing skill (such as editing non-mainspace pages, uploading images, or participating in a discussion) may be an illegitimate sock puppet, it remains possible that a new user’s contributions are alternatively the product of a disinterested third party with previous wiki editing experience who wishes to improve the Wikipedia project, or it may even be that tasks, like editing non-mainspace pages, uploading images or participating in a discussion, are nowhere near as difficult as you might think and don't actually require extensive experience or a degree in wikiology. For this reason, statements regarding motives should be avoided in almost all circumstances. The term should be used descriptively and should not be read pejoratively unless a disruptive agenda is clearly established. Users should be informed of relevant policies and content guidelines in a civil and courteous manner, especially if a tag will be applied to their comment.

New users acting in good faith often edit topics in which they have a general interest. Such accounts warrant particularly gentle scrutiny before accusing them of any breach of official policies and content guidelines. Indeed, some new users may be unaware that editing a single topic, and in the process adding their own views, may lead to some editors giving less weight to their ideas in article discussions.

It may be helpful to cite the official policies regarding sock puppets and meat puppets for guidance on such matters, especially if new users have joined Wikipedia specifically to participate in a debate, or if they have joined at the request of another user who wants help in discussions on a particular article.

One can only form opinions of editors as a result of their actions. Over time, they may diversify their contributions. Users who continue to work within a narrow range of articles may find it difficult to build credibility in community discussions, although extended improvement to a specific section of Wikipedia should not disadvantage expert opinions. As with all Wikipedia articles, users need to cite the relevant verifiably published evidence from reliable sources to support their point of view. Inevitably, some experienced editors might not agree with cited interpretations during content discussions. Please do not be discouraged by such editors. Eventually, they will respect you, especially if you remember that you are not personally a source, and your focus, even expertise, is best directed toward finding and citing independent reliable sources for the articles you edit.

Further information if you have been linked to this page

If you are new to Wikipedia or if you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's editing criteria, please read very carefully the following policy and information pages:

• Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not—what is acceptable or unacceptable use.
• Wikipedia:Five pillars—the editing foundations of Wikipedia.
• Wikipedia:Neutral point of view—the core policy that informs how pages are to be approached.
• Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry—the core policy covering both users with multiple accounts, and multiple users working together on one "viewpoint" in a debate.
• Wikipedia:No personal attacks—some new users may find the single-purpose account label to be insulting.
• Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers—new members will become new contributors soon enough if they are willing to learn about Wikipedia culture, so welcoming new users does more good than labeling them as new.

See also

• Internet sockpuppet
• Role account
• Wikipedia:Civil POV pushing
• Wikipedia:Canvassing
• Wikipedia:Conflict of interest
• Wikipedia:Griefing
• Wikipedia:IP hopper
• Wikipedia:Signs of sockpuppetry
• Wikipedia:Sleeper accounts
• Wikipedia:Tag team
• {{spa}} – template to tag contributions by a single-purpose account

Notes

• Essay 14: User:The Librarian/NAAO, 59, 2010-04-15 17:46:25

Non-Administrative Administrative Oversight

• Essay 15: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a technocracy, 70, 2013-01-16 03:53:40

On Wikipedia, editors with technological privileges preside.

• Essay 16: User:The Stray Dog/Middle East Union, 71, 2018-08-13 20:16:38

• Essay 17: User:Librarian Alexandria/sandbox, 72, 2012-09-13 21:29:48

• Essay 18: Wikipedia:THING, 77, 2017-11-05 23:24:07

You do not always need to cite something to make a strong argument.

• Essay 19: User:Cubee123, 83, 2022-01-24 03:02:04

Hi! welcome to my user page!

• Essay 20: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is serious business, 84, 2017-04-06 05:27:40

It just is.

• Essay 21: User:Tikiwont/Essay, 95, 2009-09-22 20:44:57

• Essay 22: User:Siuenti/Infallible, 97, 2017-04-13 02:20:50

No, Wikipedia, you are not infallible, just get over yourselves already.

• Essay 23: Wikipedia:AREYOUNOWORHAVEYOUEVERBEEN, 100, 2017-12-21 16:47:29

If you're making a suggestion that might inspire someone to link this essay, think again.

• Essay 24: User:Tofutwitch11/SOMUCHMORE, 102, 2018-02-01 21:24:11

A lot has changed in the years since Wikipedia was originally founded.

• Essay 25: User:Fakescientist8000/What 'In the News' is not, 106, 2022-06-01 23:59:44

• Essay 26: User:AipediaFridemar/TestEssay, 112, 2017-12-07 23:51:22

EssayTest

says let us BeBold and test here something new in the UserNameSpaceOfWikipedia.

• Essay 27: Wikipedia:MST3K, 116, 2011-10-11 07:40:28

It's just a wiki, you should really just relax.

• Essay 28: User:Privatemusings/WikiPr0n, 123, 2010-08-22 22:07:19

Wikipedia and Pornography

see also User:Privatemusings/ImagesUsedInVideoPresentation, draft RfC

• Essay 29: Wikipedia:Unclear principles and policies, 124, 2008-08-25 00:54:15

When is a reliable source which disagrees with other reliable sources notable enough for inclusion in an article?

• Essay 30: User:Konveyor Belt/Essays, 127, 2014-01-14 18:17:05

Essays that I maintain within my userspace.

• Essay 31: User:Teblick/sandbox'Index to Wikipedia Manual of Style, 127, 2016-12-30 00:42:11

This is an alphabetical index linked to sections of Wikipedia's Manual of Style.

• Essay 32: User:ExtraDry/NewingtonCruft, 129, 2008-04-28 11:34:21

NewingtonCruft is one example of Schoolcruft by a private school in Sydney, Australia.

• Essay 33: User:Esquivalience/Adminship criteria, 131, 2016-03-25 19:47:49

An ideal candidate is trustworthy, experienced, and understands and embraces the principles of Wikipedia.

• Essay 34: User:Resoru/There's no point, 138, 2016-10-25 02:24:11

There's no point to editing Wikipedia. Your contributions will someday be reverted or forgotten. So just stop trying.

• Essay 35: User:Onestrangeninja, 142, 2022-01-01 00:53:01

Solantra Israphel (American Rapper)

Solantra Israphel is a rapper near Atlanta

https://m.soundcloud.com/onestrangeninja

• Essay 36: Wikipedia:The Dumbledore principle, 148, 2008-09-04 20:58:43

Just because you maintain a civil demeanor, it does not follow that you are incapable of kicking ass.

See also

Albus Dumbledore

• Essay 37: User:RealCyGuy/sandbox, 151, 2019-01-29 00:46:06

• Essay 38: User:Wslack/Essay2, 151, 2007-09-18 09:08:13

Title: Where are we going?

Or, more accurately, when am I going to start this. (This isn't proof of concept, I do intend to write it.)

• Essay 39: User:Metalhead309/sandbox, 159, 2017-10-08 19:07:29

Metalhead309 19:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

• Essay 40: User:Thingofme/Large numbers in Wikipedia, 160, 2021-11-24 00:42:48

m:User:Thingofme/Large numbers in Wikimedia
This page is a soft redirect.

• Essay 41: User:Ryan Norton/World Book Rule, 162, 2010-07-21 18:46:00

The World Book rule is simple - verify and cite (preferably inline) three independant sources, none of which are other encyclopedias, for each fact.

• Essay 42: User:Andrewa/one mouse click, 163, 2019-06-23 00:15:07

In that all pages belong to the whole project, any user may edit this one. But it's generally more helpful (and polite) to discuss the proposed change on its talk page first. See the talk page for what this page will become

• Essay 43: User:Iamreallygoodatcheckers/It's just Wikipedia, 169, 2022-03-19 05:44:15

If you have ever been in a contentious discussion regarding

• Essay 44: User:Alfie/Essays/Don't Stir the Pot, 178, 2018-02-05 14:34:02

• Essay 45: User:SkyGazer 512/RfA criteria, 185, 2021-11-17 06:49:42

If I believe that making someone an admin will benefit the encyclopedia overall, I will generally support them for adminship.

• Essay 46: User:MadeYourReadThis/Wikipedia:sources then article, 187, 2017-09-21 18:32:03

References

• Essay 47: Wikipedia:Make disambiguations, 190, 2010-04-08 13:45:41

Many words and phrases are commonly used to be one thing. But less often, they are used to mean another.

So why not create disambiguation pages to show people what else they mean?

• Essay 48: User:Timetraveler1/sandbox, 192, 2020-05-25 21:45:36

Roks (not to be confused with Rocs) are mythical creatures that appear to be 10- foot long snakes covered in silver feathers.

• Essay 49: Wikipedia:SODUCKERANG, 193, 2019-07-12 19:17:33

A SODUCKERANG occurs when an WP:DUCK test obvious WP:SOCK posts to an admin noticeboard and gets the WP:BOOMERANG in short order. It is a special case of WP:RBI.

• Essay 50: Wikipedia:Smarter than Einstein, 196, 2020-04-29 00:32:53

Watch out for editors espousing novel theories of physics that suggest Albert Einstein is wrong. Except for one notable case, he isn't.

• Essay 51: User:Monkeyblue/sandbox/doctor, 197, 2008-04-29 06:46:31

• Essay 52: User:SemiHypercube/RfA criteria, 198, 2019-01-03 00:28:28

When !voting in an RfA, I will generally support if the candidate is:

1. Competent
2. Here for a while (content creation doesn't matter)
3. Not a jerk

• Essay 53: User:Amarkov/But the kettle is black!, 198, 2007-02-27 02:31:34

"How dare you agree with what the pot said about me?!?"

• Essay 54: Wikipedia:No offense intended, 201, 2019-11-12 09:00:38

As a general rule, if you're using the phrase "no offense intended", you are actually being offensive. (Of course, the original author of this "essay" intended no offense in this statement.)

• Essay 55: Wikipedia:Reproposal tags, 203, 2008-06-04 19:07:26

To distinguish proposals from reproposals (proposals which are being or have been reintroduced), a new set of "reproposal tags" should be designed and implemented into all felicitous articles.

• Essay 56: User:Trainsandotherthings/Tables and citations, 203, 2022-03-19 14:03:17

When adding or editing tables, editors are still required to provide citations to reliable sources.

• Essay 57: User:Theleekycauldron/Don't tempt the wrath of the Whatever high atop The Thing, 204, 2022-04-07 07:48:40

As you tempt the wrath of the Whatever, from high atop the Thing, Toby Ziegler watches.

So you're watching a discussion unfold in the backrooms of the project. Probably an RfA, but maybe it's a AfD or something. And you, in your infinite wisdom, decide to do some back-of-the-napkin math and proclaim "this is definitely gonna go the way I want it to, I'm 100% sure!" Because, after all, it's a mortal lock, and nothing could ever possibly go wrong, right?

Wrong. This is practically begging for the Whatever, from high atop the Thing, to come down and mess up your day. Do not tempt the wrath of the Whatever, from high atop the Thing. Instead, patiently wait for the discussion to resolve. You will then be happy in the knowledge that you did not cause the inadvertent demise or disruption of the discussion by invoking a higher, sadistic power.

Should you find that you have tempted the wrath of the Whatever, from high atop the Thing

Follow these simple steps:

1. Go outside.
2. Turn around three times.
3. Spit.
4. Also, curse.
   • Spit and curse.
     • Do both of them.
       • Go!

See also

• Jinx
• User:Tamzin/kinehore

Notes

• Essay 58: Wikipedia:Don't argue with stupid, 206, 2014-05-16 18:39:13

Whenever an editor believes so strongly that they are right that they are willing to ignore attempts to reason with them then best solution is quite simply to ignore them. Don't argue with stupid.

• Essay 59: User:Geo Swan/opinion/NONOPAGE, 208, 2016-02-18 01:16:57

No "No Page"

The Notability guideline, WP:Notability, has a section WP:NOPAGE, (WP:Notability#Whether_to_create_standalone_pages) which, in my opinion, offers bad advice.

• Essay 60: User:Wiae/at anytime, 212, 2016-04-20 14:59:48

This essay is under construction but will explain why "at anytime" should generally be avoided, and why "at any time" is the preferable choice.

• Essay 61: User:Teratornis/On "scientific bias" in articles about science, 216, 2007-08-27 23:12:28

To-do: write an essay to answer the request:

• User talk:Teratornis#Essay?

but first, search the existing Wikipedia essays to see if something similar already exists.

• Essay 62: User:Neon white/Genre Fiddler, 221, 2008-05-29 08:26:48

A Genre Fiddler refers to a type of single purpose editor who's sole purpose on wikipedia is to alter the genres in the infoboxes of artists, bands, albums and singles based on personal opinion.

• Essay 63: User:Studerby/defaultsort, 221, 2008-12-19 23:15:24

WORK IN PROGRESS

There are some regular misunderstandings about the use of the "sort key" value when using the {{DEFAULTSORT}} magic word.

See also

• Essay 64: Wikipedia:You cannot argue Wikipedia into capitulation, 225, 2018-12-06 18:04:58

Wikipedia editors taking a break to cool down, after some heavy editing. Sometimes a wikibreak is the best response when editing makes you feel "hotheaded".

This essay consists of some basic advice for editors who recognize themselves as argumentative, cantankerous, or curmudgeonly – those prone to often finding themselves in prolonged, rancorous disputes that usually seem to escalate. Hopefully these tips will help keep you out of administrative and community trouble and sanctions, and help you better integrate into the Wikipedia mode of discussion. Even non-debatory editors have hotheaded moments, and should consider these tips when needed.

This essay should not be used as a way to label other people. Per this page's own advice, never write "Quit being a WP:HOTHEAD!" at someone. Try instead something like: "If you're a dyed-in-the-wool curmudgeon like so many of us, the lighthearted advice at WP:HOTHEADS may be helpful to you."

Address edits, not editors

Main page: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution § Focus on content

Rudeness is contagious

"People who encounter rude behavior from co-workers are more likely to act rudely in later interactions, according to a recent University of Florida study.

Mistreated people are also more likely to feel as if others are treating them rudely, to which they respond with more rudeness, passing on negative emotions like a virus."

— "Study Finds Workplace Rudeness Is Contagious", Los Angeles Times, 26 July 2015 (original study)

Never ever project negative mental assumptions about someone you're in a disagreement with. Focus exclusively on statements/content (on their own merits) and, if necessary to address editorial behavior, on provable patterns of edits.

The fastest route to trouble is to say something like:

• "You're irrational!"
• "You're only saying that because you have an agenda." (= "That's just a bunch of [mention political faction here] crap", "Only a [nationality/religion/etc. label here] would say that", and many other variants.)
• "This is just more typical [username here] nonsense."

These are all ad hominem fallacies laced with argument to emotion as well – a.k.a. demonization.

Focus instead on what was said, not who said it or why you imagine they did so:

• "That argument is unsound because [insert demonstrable logic and facts]."
• "That view seems to side unduly with [whatever off-WP third-party interest it seems to reflect, and why]."
• "That unhelpful edit fits a long-term behavior pattern: [insert diffs that prove it]".

One particular feature of this approach to dispute is couching things in terms of one's own perception, not projection of imagined Platonic, objective truths about someone else, and especially not hypocritical psychological projection of one's own faults, failings, and behaviors onto others.

Taking this careful approach is basically a way to be more polite and self-honest in a dispute if it is not likely to evaporate, and perhaps more importantly to the debatory personality, a way to be taken more seriously rather than being dismissed as a disruptive ranter.

Yes, really: address edits, not editors

See also: Wikipedia:Don't call a spade a spade

The style described above also takes cues from both E-prime and nonviolent communication (fancy ways of saying "not arguing like a holier-than-thou, know-it-all douchebag"): Avoid the "to be of identity" and anything that smacks of it, in reference to another editor.

Confrontational and likely to be interpreted as a personal attack:

• "You are [something negative]."
• "You are being [something negative]."
• "You are doing [something negative]."
• "Your statement is [something negative]."

Instead, couch things in terms of your own subjective perception, and about the content rather than the editor when possible:

• "This comes across as [something frustrating that is not just a personal insult or value judgment] to me."
• "That approach does not seem conducive to [collaboration, resolution, sourcing, etc.]."
• "How is that any different from [something undesirable in the context, and not a personalized jab]?"
• "That statement has [problems you clearly identify, with policy or sources to back it up]."

The use of hedging terms can notably soften a statement without changing the gist of the message: "It seems that these edits may ..." or "I find that statement somewhat ...".

Stop framing things in terms of victory and defeat

Main page: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning

In a similar vein, one of the fastest ways to reduce a perception of "battleground" behavior is to avoid wording that suggests a focus on "winning". Wikipedia is not a contest.

• Use: Y The proposal, with which I agree, was accepted by consensus.
• Not: N I won on that.
• Use: Y I've already pointed out why that view doesn't apply to this case; please see [link here].
• Not: N I already defeated your argument.
• Use: Y That request for page protection was declined for a clearly explained reason.
• Not: N Your lame attempt to lock the page down was beaten.
• Use: Y Good luck at RfA, but you should probably closely read WP:RFAADVICE.
• Not: N Your RfA will go down in flames, because you're clueless.
• Use: Y Thank you for clarifying.
• Not: N Glad I forced you into making some sense.

See the difference?

Don't be arrogant

See also: Wikipedia:Accepting other users

Assuming that any giving of advice, any criticism of your reasoning or behavior, or any attempt at dispute resolution is a some kind of attack on you and your honor is arrogance. Assuming that you alone decide that you are knowledgable enough about Wikipedia and must be doing things right is arrogance. Trying to "educate" an admin, or other long-term editor with much greater experience than you here, about Wikipedia policy is arrogance. Treating anyone who disagrees with you like an idiot because you are sure you know a lot about the topic is arrogance (and on this largely anonymous system, you have no idea what anyone's expertise is in the first place). Wasting copious amounts of other editors' valuable volunteer time making circular arguments in an argumentum ad nauseam attempt to get them to give up and let you have your way is arrogance. Acting like you are always right is the dictionary definition of arrogance.

Ask more; state and demand less

See also: Wikipedia:Don't spite your face

Many "how to win friends and influence people" and "how to win arguments" writers advise to frequently turn debate points into questions for the other party/parties to try to answer convincingly, rather than just making definitive statements or demands of your own that others can challenge (perhaps with difficult questions for you to wrestle with). Reformulating statements into clever questions is more work, but it does have a tendency to reduce conflict, by leading the other party to defend their assertion with actual facts and reasoning (i.e., improving the quality of the discussion and speeding resolution of the issue), rather than responding with a counter-attack against what they perceive as a verbal attack on their person, intelligence, or motives.

When it's important to state something firmly, do so only if your statement is grounded in demonstrable facts (what the reliable sources say, what Wikipedia policy says), not supposition or assumption, personal conviction or anecdote, "everyone knows ..." and other red-herring fallacies, or desire for what "should" be. If you can't prove it, don't say it.

If you're convinced that it's necessary to state something firm about another editor's behaviors, be damned sure that you have diffs to back up any claims you make about their editing patterns, and strongly consider saving such complaints for user talk page discussion, or (if it rises to that level) some form of Wikipedia dispute resolution. Whether your debate opponent has a habit of calling people Nazis or giving undue favor to sources from Botswana really has nothing to do with the purpose of, say, Talk:Doctor Who, so avoid digging into personal, off-topic arguments in such a venue. If you've already started, it's unlikely anyone will object if you refactor that material to user talk or close and collapse the extraneous material and resume the discussion in user talk.

A word of warning, though: If you habitually make everything a question, you will annoy other editors, because it looks like a WP:POINTy or sarcastic attempt to waste their time. Even if you're polite, it can also come across instead as uncertainty or cluelessness, as if you have no clearly formulated input for the discussion.

Tone it down

Keep Calm and Carry On

See also: Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot

If you're using vulgarities, you're almost certainly making a mistake. Especially if you're responding to someone else who already did – you'll be missing an opportunity to take the discursive high ground. Swearing is strong seasoning in this environment, and its impact is squandered when it's done frequently. People are apt to think "Who is this full-of-shit asshole who keeps calling everyone 'assholes' and 'full of shit'?".

Avoid hyperbole, and look for adjectives of characterization and exaggeration that you can remove from what you're writing (or by self-moderating something you already posted). "This has clear logic problems, like [example], and is contradicted by policy, at [cite]" is actually a much stronger statement than "This has amazingly ridiculous logic problems, like some idiot on crack wrote it, and it totally flies in the face of cherished Wikipedia policy traditions like [cite] that we're all expected to uphold or get the hell off the system!". The latter is what sounds like the idiot on crack.

If you've included some dismissive "gesture" like "Go screw yourself", "Why don't you just quit Wikipedia and go troll somewhere else?", "Don't you ever post on my talk page again!", "BTW, please familiarize yourself with WP:JERK", etc., just delete it. It adds nothing, makes you look like the problem, and no one will take it seriously anyway. If you think there's a real problem to address, there are noticeboards for that. If you think there's a correctable attitude issue at play and something really, really needs to be said, be calm and distant about it if you can't muster a cheerful response, e.g.: "Talk pages are for collaboration and communication to improve the encyclopedia, not for personalized venting. Please refrain from posting on my talk page further unless it's toward constructive goals." This level of distant, chiding formalism tends to stop ranters in their tracks.

If you really must, you actually can get away with mentioning WP:JERK if you explicitly acknowledge the long-standing canard that one is violating the rule by the very act of citing it, e.g.: "I bet this discussion would be lot more productive if we both took a step away from the WP:JERK cliff." Remember that humor can go a long way to defusing tension, as can mingling some self-criticism into a critique of someone else, to make it less one-sided.

Pro tip: Assume that your post will be used as evidence at WP:ANI, WP:AE, WP:RFARB, or some other noticeboard. Are you sure you still want to click "Publish changes"? In a dispute, you want other editors to focus on the content or behavior you've objected to, not your own behavior.

Sarcastic false civility fools no one, including admins

A weak personal attack is still wrong. If you make a habit of using faux-civility, dripping with sarcasm and irony, to make a point about your dim view of your debate opponents, no one is going to interpret this as actual civility, but simply as a form of gaming the system (specifically "sanction gaming" and "civil PoV-pushing"). If you habitually use language manipulation to strongly imply instead of quite state outright that other editors are stupid, crazy, liars, or up to evil deeds this will still eventually result in you being sanctioned, just as if you'd called them names, if you keep it up.

Don't post in the heat of the moment

See also: Wikipedia:Beware of the tigers

If you're a "ranty-pants" type, go ahead and write your spur-of-the-moment, bombastic reaction in a debate, to get it out of your system, but don't post it yet. Go have a snack or watch funny pet videos for 15 minutes, come back, and re-edit it to follow the above advice before posting it.

There are various other posting contra-indications, like drunkenness, lack of sleep, depression, etc. How much about what you're planning to post in response to someone reflects the facts versus your own mood?

Stop the runaway train

If you just posted a comment you regret, and no one has replied, it's not too late to delete it. If someone replies suggesting mutual withdrawal, consider it a golden opportunity to nip things in the bud. If you think someone else should take back something they said, you can also suggest mutual withdrawal.

You cannot argue Wikipedia into capitulation

Wikipedia's administrative processes are entirely geared to protecting project stability, not toward individual "justice", a "fair hearing", or "proving who is technically in the right". This is a marked difference from the approach taken by Western, democratic legal systems, especially common law systems. It's a collectivist approach that supports the principle that the needs of the many outweigh the desires of the one.

Consequently, anyone who approaches Wikipedia administration and dispute resolution from a "justice" perspective will be disappointed and may make their circumstances worse, quite quickly, and sometimes irreparably. This is especially true of venues entirely controlled by admins, such as WP:AN, WP:AE, WP:RFARB, and WP:ARCA, versus the more everyone-gets-a-say forum of WP:ANI. Numerous generally-productive editors who have been sanctioned one or more times in the past will maintain that their statements and arguments were correct, but feel that they still got railroaded solely because of the disagreeableness of their attitude. They feel that they were punished simply for "being uppity".

This perception is, in fact, entirely correct. You will be sanctioned for habitually badgering others to satisfy your petty demands, being excessively individualistic at the expense of others, excuse-making or finger-pointing at others, nit-picking, clearly trying to just "win" at all costs, stubbornly "not getting it", dragging out conflict just to make a point, or waging a petty "righting great wrongs" micro-crusade for personal honor that no one else cares about.

Those who really are here to build an encyclopedia have one expectation of disputes: that they quickly resolve (or dissolve) with a result that is acceptable to the consensus of the editorial community so that collegial collaboration resumes. If you are here for advocacy or activism – for outing The Truth – then you are making a mistake and will be ejected when others realize it.

Administrative enforcement on WP necessarily takes this approach to recalcitrant hotheads, because the very act of arguing ad nauseam, to defy the collective peer pressure of the editorial community telling one to change one's ways, is considered disruptive in and of itself. The community, and in particular the administrative and arbitration corps, care primarily about the functioning of the Wikipedia "organs", like content creation and source checking; any individual cell (i.e., you) causing inflammation, for whatever reason, is a cancer to be removed. It can take a long time for some editors to internalize this and adjust, especially if they're used to rancorous debate on online forums. Some never do, and get indefinitely blocked or site-banned, or get in so much perennial trouble (repeated short-term blocks, topic- and interaction-bans, etc.) that they "quit in disgust". Inability to recognize that Wikipedia is not the Internet and is not academia or any other fully public sphere, but is akin to a closed game with a specific set of player-conduct rules, is in the end a working-with-others competence failure. Either one gets it, eventually, or one is shown the door.

For the temperamental and uncollaborative, walking away from Wikipedia (at least for a while) is a real option, and not necessarily a bad one.

See also

More advice for hotheads

• Wikipedia:Assume good faith – guideline, on not projecting negative assumptions about other editors
• Wikipedia:Civility – policy, on comportment in discourse
• Wikipedia:Dispute resolution § Focus on content - policy, on not personalizing disputes
• Wikipedia:No personal attacks – policy, taking the above ones to their logical conclusion
• Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not – policy, including that Wikipedia is not a: debate forum, soapbox, blog, anarchy, bureaucracy, or battleground
• Wikipedia:Disruptive editing – guideline, on engaging in asinine antics
• Wikipedia:Casting aspersions – information page on how the Arbitration Committee addresses personalized denigration of other editors (hint: harshly)
• Wikipedia:Competence is required – essay bordering on a guideline; inability to get along is in fact a form of temperamental incompetence in a collaborative environment
• Wikipedia:No angry mastodons – essay, a more humorous take on hotheads
• Wikipedia:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values – four ways to help keep Wikipedia civil
• Wikipedia:There is no justice – essay, about "honor" quests that frequently get hotheaded editors into trouble
• Wikipedia:Don't take the bait – essay, on what is probably the no. 2 hothead blunder
• Wikipedia:Unblock perspectives – essay of advice for those who have been blocked and whose attempts to get unblocked seem to make things worse for them
• Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not therapy – essay, about WP and people with emotional/temperament/socialization issues
• Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you – humor essay making similar points to this one in a sarcastic way
• User:Ash/Passive aggressive – user essay, on the "accusation loop" traps of the passive-aggressive
• User:Gamaliel/Tips – user essay: "Tips for the angry new user"
• Category:Wikipedia essays about civility – a wealth of essays on editorial behavior, most of which are spot-on

References

• Essay 65: Wikipedia:Revert, ignore, 226, 2013-01-21 02:02:05

When you're not sure, sometimes its best to assume good faith, revert, and ignore.

See also

• Revert, block, ignore
• Deny recognition
• Essay 66: Wikipedia:Trolls are people too, 226, 2014-10-16 16:57:48

But that does not mean that you have to put up with their shenanigans.

See also

• Wikipedia:Admins are people too
• Wikipedia:IPs are human too
• Essay 67: Wikipedia:CONSONANTS, 226, 2020-09-18 18:11:14

Things having a high proportion of consonants, like, say, Rhynchobombyx and Schtschurowskia, are usually real things.

(except for dfgdgdsg which is usually vandalism)

• Essay 68: User:Andrewa/wrong page, 227, 2019-07-09 20:48:29

In that all pages belong to the whole project, any user may edit this one. But it's generally more helpful (and polite) to discuss the proposed change on its talk page first. See the talk page for what this page will become. See User:Andrewa/wrong article for related issues

• Essay 69: User:Hdinh3/MainPage, 229, 2017-06-08 16:23:23

For a list of infoboxes, see Wikipedia:List of infoboxes and Category:Infobox templates. For the style guide, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes). For the project, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes.

• Essay 70: User:Tonywalton/Blocks and bans, 237, 2012-12-30 23:46:03

There seems to be a widespread confusion between "blocks" and "bans", with the terms being used as if they were equivalent. This article attempts to clarify the two terms and point to the applicable Wikipedia policies for each.

• Essay 71: User:MONGO/Why linking to harassment is BAD, 238, 2018-06-06 03:36:32

Does this need an explanation?

Okay, I didn't think so...thanks for reading!

Further reading

Very important

• Essay 72: Wikipedia:Reporting interaction ban violations, 240, 2018-03-30 19:34:31

IBAN violations are not vehicles to rehearse a litany of complaints about the person with whom you have the IBAN. If you cannot stick to mentioning the facts pertaining to the violation, then don't say anything at all.

• Essay 73: User:Gazimoff/Clue theory, 242, 2008-08-08 23:11:31

In Wikipedia, as with many other online communities, voluntary clubs and organisations, a network of helpers exists in order to further their goals. These helpers offer their time freely to conduct administrative tasks as required.

• Essay 74: User:Mediation4u/Credo, 244, 2021-05-16 08:34:03

Whosoever wishes (Quicumque vult) to edit Wikipedia productively and happily, shall rely on these principles.

1. Content, Content, Content.
2. Assume the best.
3. Is it good for the encyclopedia?
4. It's a hobby!

Explication

Content, Content, Content

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; and encyclopedias are collections of knowledge. Like any other encyclopedia in the world, Wikipedia is only as good as its content. Everything else that we do here - from wikiprojects to arbitration, from talk pages to administration - is designed to serve the content in one of three ways: the quality of content, the quantity of content, and the accessibility of content. There are a variety of editing styles among wikipedia editors, largely resulting from placing emphasis on a different one of those three principles (for example, an inclusionist would emphasize quantity of content, while an exclusionist would emphasize quality of the content. However, at the end of the day all productive editors share the same underlying concern: content. Remembering the importance of content - in a variety of expressions - minimizes some of the pettier disputes about editing style. By corollary, the day that the editors of wikipedia forget about the priority of content is the day that wikipedia ceases to serve a discernable purpose.

Assume the best

The fact that almost every major ethical system has some form of the Golden Rule implies that we have real trouble with this idea. No one would have to tell us to treat one another well if we were already doing it, but again and again we receive some sort of reminder to treat others as we would be treated - which is the essence behind the advice to assume good faith. Especially in somewhat disconnected digital communication, it is very easy to assume the worst about those with whom we come in conflict. However, any effort to work in concert with others and be a part of a community demands that we assume the best about the people we come into contact with, and wikipedia is no different.

Is it good for the encyclopedia?

We can debate policy all day long. We can bicker over deletion policies, inclusion policies, and administrative qualifications until the cows come home. But, when push comes to shove, the only question that matters is "Is it good for the encyclopedia?" That is the question that the policies are intended to help us to answer, and when they don't they should be ignored. (see also "Content, Content, Content").

It's a hobby

There are no professional wikipedia editors. This is a hobby. Hobbies should be fun. We quit when hobbies stop being enjoyable. Don't be afraid to walk away from conflict, and don't take yourself so seriously. This is fun, people!

---

This page is not my own work. It is transcluded in its entirety from yet another of the many great editors lost to the project due to bullying, his original page: User:Athanasius1/Credo

• Essay 75: User:Shii/WP:SPERGOUT, 244, 2009-08-24 05:51:58

Ain't no one out to get you broseph. Just relax and take it easy. Everyone on the Wikipedia is using their chill time for some editing. Maybe the editor you are complaining about is smoking a huge blunt right now. So think about that.

• Essay 76: User:Born2cycle/DRAFT survey essay, 245, 2019-05-20 20:57:55

Use of polls and surveys in Wikipedia decision-making

• Essay 77: Wikipedia:Tolerate all fools, 247, 2019-09-09 10:12:18

If a fool prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, tolerate it.

See also

• Wikipedia:Follow all rules
• Wikipedia:Ignore all fools
• Wikipedia:Ignore all rules
• Essay 78: User:Philoserf/Essay001, 248, 2021-06-19 14:21:23

• Essay 79: User:CutePeach/CRYNPA, 252, 2022-06-29 08:11:18

Further information: Wikipedia:Casting aspersions

Casting aspersions of ad hominem should not be used to deflect legitimate criticism.

See also

• Tone policing
• Victim playing
• Essay 80: Wikipedia:Over-explanation, 253, 2022-04-23 01:54:14

Wikipedia articles should not be explained. Either the readers understand the presented content or no explanation will inform them.

See also

• WP:Explanation
• {{Over-explained}}

• Essay 81: User:Eridian314/Population of Indian villages, 253, 2021-02-22 19:29:09

There are quite a few websites (Like onefivenine.com) that have inaccurate info on Indian village statistics. These are usually blacklisted and should almost always be avoided. Use the official census (https://www.censusindia.gov.in) instead.

• Essay 82: User:T3h 1337 b0y/Wikimedia is a nonprofit, 257, 2012-06-28 08:15:50

Wikipedia is nonprofit

I think you know what I mean. Uncyclopedia.com is hosted by Go Daddy. Now, what you see when you type:

wikipedia.com

is wikipedia.org. It's a redirect.

• Essay 83: Wikipedia:Responsiblity, 258, 2018-04-09 22:05:36

On Wikipedia editors are expected to act with responsibility, and the encyclopedia as a whole should be created and maintained responsibly. This helps to both prevent and determine Wikipedia:Liability.

• Essay 84: User:Andrewa/Precision and ambiguity, 259, 2019-02-17 23:34:15

In that all pages belong to the whole project, any user may edit this one. But it's generally more helpful (and polite) to discuss the proposed change on its talk page first.

This came out of User talk:Andrewa/P T examples and scenarios#Longer and shorter names. See its talk page.

• Essay 85: Wikipedia:Clear criteria, 260, 2022-02-07 00:07:10

A list that does not have specific criteria may lead to confusion about what belongs and what doesn't. As such the list is unencyclopedic and does not belong in Wikipedia.

• Essay 86: User:Gamahucheur/Don't Lift Your Leg, 261, 2008-04-21 11:10:41

It is claimed that the fundamental rule of Wikipedia is Don't be a dick. Even if this is not the basic rule, it is a good rule. One of its implications is

Don't go through Wikipedia like a dog on a walk marking what you find.

• Essay 87: User:EEng/ASSUMEGODFAITH, 263, 2018-02-10 19:37:11

• Essay 88: User:DavidHOzAu/Ignore all users, 265, 2013-03-08 02:09:51

If a user prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore them.

See also

• Wikipedia:Be bold
• Wikipedia:Civility
• Wikipedia:Ignore all rules
• Wikipedia:Ignore all credentials
• Essay 89: User:Uugas/testcases, 267, 2020-06-14 20:24:31

• Essay 90: Wikipedia:WikiDonna, 269, 2021-05-17 00:46:12

WikiDonnas are WikiFauna who appear normal at first, but (usually after the intervention of the WikiDavros) become a WikiDoctor-Donna.

• Essay 91: Wikipedia:Motives, 271, 2009-01-29 05:01:01

If the motives for doing a…

…beneficial thing are negative, then the net benefit is reduced.

…detrimental thing are positive, then the net detriment is reduced.

…stupid thing are stupid, then the net stupidity remains absolutely the same.

• Essay 92: User:Andrewa/P T issues, 275, 2019-06-17 23:35:16

In that all pages belong to the whole project, any user may edit this one. But it's generally more helpful (and polite) to discuss the proposed change on its talk page first.

This is a place to explore issues affecting User:Andrewa/Primary Topic RfC, so as not to clutter that page.

Promising issues should be first raised and discussed on its talk page... please do.

See also User:Andrewa/P T examples and scenarios.

• Essay 93: User:JackFromWisconsin/User experience on Wikipedia, 278, 2021-04-28 00:35:05

User experience design is the process of making intuitive websites that are designed for your average user. Wikipedia, by its nature of being online, has this design.

History

Wikipedia was founded in 2001.

• Essay 94: Wikipedia:Please use spellcheck, 279, 2008-04-28 12:34:08

Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is expected of its users to use proper English when conversing with other users as well as building articles. Please use a spellchecker before pressing "save page." If necessary, contact your English professor.

• Essay 95: Wikipedia:What Would Britannica Do, 282, 2018-12-02 18:42:58

One way to determine whether a particular article edit conforms to a neutral point of view or is correctly written is to consider the thought experiment of how editors of Encyclopedia Britannica would handle the dilemma.

• Essay 96: Wikipedia:Not Colosseum, 284, 2015-11-08 04:36:38

Administrators' noticeboards (WP:AN, WP:ANI) are not supposed to be Wikipedia's version of the Colosseum where we engage in the public spectacle of thumbs-up, thumbs-down block this editor! (e.g. WP:PITCHFORKS).

• Essay 97: User:Terrariola/No, you didn't just break Wikipedia., 284, 2018-04-26 12:10:25

You just clicked a button and Wikipedia stops working for you. You think to yourself "Oh no, did I just break Wikipedia?"

No, you didn't just break Wikipedia, your internet is just down and it'll start working again soon.

• Essay 98: User:Gamahucheur/OldJunk, 286, 2008-12-17 02:55:58

Don't Lift Your Leg

It is claimed that the fundamental rule of Wikipedia is Don't be a dick. Even if this is not the basic rule, it is a good rule. One of its implications is

Don't go through Wikipedia like a dog on a walk marking what you find.

• Essay 99: User:After Midnight/Holes, 290, 2015-07-14 19:10:58

When you are wrong about something, it may be good to remember that the First Rule of Holes is Stop Digging. Sometime it is just better to shut up and take your lumps than to prove to everyone that you are even more wrong than they already thought.

• Essay 100: User:Stroppolo/ToolBox, 291, 2016-03-11 21:47:12

User:Stroppolo/ToolBox

• Essay 101: Wikipedia:Monroe's law, 292, 2020-06-25 20:40:50

Wikipedia:Monroe's law

• Essay 102: User:PJung2014/Religion and NPOV, 296, 2014-08-25 02:50:10

User:PJung2014/Religion and NPOV

• Essay 103: Wikipedia:Wikicratic Oath, 297, 2019-07-07 22:56:11

Wikipedia:Wikicratic Oath

• Essay 104: User:Dank/Essays, 297, 2010-04-06 14:32:01

User:Dank/Essays

• Essay 105: User:ImprovedWikiImprovment/What Wikipedia really is, 299, 2018-12-06 00:38:44

User:ImprovedWikiImprovment/What Wikipedia really is

• Essay 106: User:Siuenti/Questions, 303, 2017-04-12 01:32:21

User:Siuenti/Questions

• Essay 107: User:J. Johnson/faq, 304, 2011-12-06 00:00:17

User:J. Johnson/faq

• Essay 108: Wikipedia:Vandalism Day, 306, 2016-07-09 08:30:18

Wikipedia:Vandalism Day

• Essay 109: Wikipedia:Leave. Please., 312, 2013-04-22 20:56:15

Wikipedia:Leave. Please.

• Essay 110: User:Andrewa/Primary Topic, statistics and reasonableness, 314, 2019-08-11 03:57:57

User:Andrewa/Primary Topic, statistics and reasonableness

• Essay 111: Wikipedia:Explanation, 315, 2022-04-23 01:53:40

Wikipedia:Explanation

• Essay 112: User:Compassionate727/Printworthiness, 317, 2018-06-09 16:06:52

User:Compassionate727/Printworthiness

• Essay 113: User:Jafeluv/Redirects are cows, 320, 2013-12-18 05:59:59

User:Jafeluv/Redirects are cows

• Essay 114: Wikipedia:No fixed rules, 320, 2011-05-29 13:02:54

Wikipedia:No fixed rules

• Essay 115: Wikipedia:Wikipediology/library/essays/Exir Kamalabadi-1, 321, 2014-09-05 05:24:08

Wikipedia:Wikipediology/library/essays/Exir Kamalabadi-1

• Essay 116: Wikipedia:STINKBOMB, 323, 2016-01-30 21:07:34

Wikipedia:STINKBOMB

• Essay 117: User:Andrewa/New article incubator, 324, 2018-12-03 15:02:45

User:Andrewa/New article incubator

• Essay 118: User:XtraJovial/Essays/"But it says so on this foreign-language Wikipedia!", 324, 2022-03-14 18:17:31

User:XtraJovial/Essays/"But it says so on this foreign-language Wikipedia!"

• Essay 119: User:MadeYourReadThis/citation spam, 325, 2019-07-12 08:31:13

User:MadeYourReadThis/citation spam

• Essay 120: User:Andrewa/Consensus NE compromise, 325, 2018-02-27 18:53:51

User:Andrewa/Consensus NE compromise

• Essay 121: Wikipedia:Keep discussions focused, 326, 2021-12-29 11:54:04

Wikipedia:Keep discussions focused

• Essay 122: Wikipedia:Do not rely on consensus, 328, 2021-03-29 15:50:05

Wikipedia:Do not rely on consensus

• Essay 123: User:Bohemian Revolution/Storage, 329, 2016-04-21 16:46:06

User:Bohemian Revolution/Storage

• Essay 124: Wikipedia:Complaints are not taken at face value, 329, 2012-09-28 02:10:09

Wikipedia:Complaints are not taken at face value

• Essay 125: User:Lee Vilenski/Essays/The GA falacy, 330, 2019-03-15 16:11:47

User:Lee Vilenski/Essays/The GA falacy

• Essay 126: User:つがる/Ice is Slippery, 334, 2020-11-22 04:29:56

User:つがる/Ice is Slippery

• Essay 127: User:Syaeahdjd, 335, 2017-12-01 07:40:27

User:Syaeahdjd

• Essay 128: User:CrayonArt45/Pokemon, 335, 2021-04-18 02:51:08

User:CrayonArt45/Pokemon

• Essay 129: User:Enigmaman/circles, 335, 2009-03-19 03:44:29

User:Enigmaman/circles

• Essay 130: Wikipedia:Sign your hat, 338, 2014-02-18 11:33:50

Wikipedia:Sign your hat

• Essay 131: User:MJL/0.5RR, 340, 2021-04-08 15:43:37

User:MJL/0.5RR

• Essay 132: User:애국심 존중/Student Wikipedia User is person., 345, 2022-01-24 03:08:03

User:애국심 존중/Student Wikipedia User is person.

• Essay 133: User:ElbridgeGerry/Pancakes!, 356, 2019-06-25 07:44:21

User:ElbridgeGerry/Pancakes!

• Essay 134: User:Partofthemachine/Linking to ANI, 361, 2022-08-01 04:10:05

User:Partofthemachine/Linking to ANI

• Essay 135: User:Volunteer Marek/RSOGTFO, 361, 2017-05-18 02:18:08

User:Volunteer Marek/RSOGTFO

• Essay 136: User:Goethean/BLP, 368, 2009-12-12 20:02:33

User:Goethean/BLP

• Essay 137: User:Graymornings/Have a heart, 370, 2021-04-01 08:22:03

User:Graymornings/Have a heart

• Essay 138: User:Skomorokh/No problem, 371, 2019-03-29 16:44:31

User:Skomorokh/No problem

• Essay 139: Wikipedia:Silver nitrate, 372, 2020-04-06 21:26:27

Wikipedia:Silver nitrate

• Essay 140: User:Thingofme/Every wiki is a work in progress, 374, 2021-10-04 12:59:52

User:Thingofme/Every wiki is a work in progress

• Essay 141: Wikipedia:Wikiprocess, 382, 2006-12-22 22:25:39

Wikipedia:Wikiprocess

• Essay 142: Wikipedia:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, 385, 2021-06-25 14:31:58

Wikipedia:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day

• Essay 143: Wikipedia:Guy Macon's story, 388, 2021-04-18 15:58:34

Wikipedia:Guy Macon's story

• Essay 144: User:RiverStyx23/sandbox/Standards, 392, 2012-12-31 21:15:22

User:RiverStyx23/sandbox/Standards

• Essay 145: Wikipedia:Wikipedia can be dangerous, 399, 2014-03-04 15:49:11

Wikipedia:Wikipedia can be dangerous

• Essay 146: User:Superluser/Reliable Sources for Biographies of Living People, 400, 2015-05-28 01:12:15

User:Superluser/Reliable Sources for Biographies of Living People

• Essay 147: Wikipedia:Talking text editor, 400, 2016-01-02 10:01:48

Wikipedia:Talking text editor

• Essay 148: User:Siuenti/Competence is not required, 400, 2017-10-26 15:47:30

User:Siuenti/Competence is not required

• Essay 149: User:AtomicMario/What not to create, 403, 2021-09-03 17:37:53

User:AtomicMario/What not to create

• Essay 150: Wikipedia:Precocious editing, 406, 2010-04-16 18:25:21

Wikipedia:Precocious editing

• Essay 151: User:Hist4ian/The right and wrong reasons to join Wikipedia, 406, 2017-08-09 18:21:15

User:Hist4ian/The right and wrong reasons to join Wikipedia

• Essay 152: Wikipedia:Basic dignity, 412, 2019-07-12 07:18:06

Wikipedia:Basic dignity

• Essay 153: User:Robert A West/Truth, 414, 2006-06-25 13:34:09

User:Robert A West/Truth

• Essay 154: User:George Ho/Competence shall not be policy, 414, 2021-11-27 07:59:22

User:George Ho/Competence shall not be policy

• Essay 155: User:Chaetodipus/On bolding, 416, 2021-05-30 04:41:30

User:Chaetodipus/On bolding

• Essay 156: User:Tiggerjay/SpecialWatch/Readme, 417, 2015-10-13 19:07:24

User:Tiggerjay/SpecialWatch/Readme

• Essay 157: Wikipedia:Adrenaline junkie, 418, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:Adrenaline junkie

• Essay 158: Wikipedia:Polarity, 422, 2016-09-12 17:17:27

Wikipedia:Polarity

• Essay 159: User:Lubaf/Edito, 423, 2007-11-17 22:41:40

User:Lubaf/Edito

• Essay 160: User:Basket of Puppies/Editorials, 424, 2021-04-01 03:25:36

User:Basket of Puppies/Editorials

• Essay 161: Wikipedia:BUGGERED, 425, 2021-05-17 00:43:54

Wikipedia:BUGGERED

• Essay 162: User:Alex Shih/ArbNotes/GWE afterthought, 426, 2021-11-20 13:33:20

User:Alex Shih/ArbNotes/GWE afterthought

• Essay 163: User:Andrewa/Andrew's Second Principle, 433, 2015-09-01 19:19:55

User:Andrewa/Andrew's Second Principle

• Essay 164: User:Ovioas,wo/The Argument Against Vandalism, 438, 2021-01-11 05:32:53

User:Ovioas,wo/The Argument Against Vandalism

• Essay 165: Wikipedia:WhyNot? Doctrine, 439, 2009-07-04 17:46:30

Wikipedia:WhyNot? Doctrine

• Essay 166: User:HighInBC/Don't let people push your buttons, 439, 2015-09-21 12:23:48

User:HighInBC/Don't let people push your buttons

• Essay 167: User:PJung2014/Articles on Religion, 442, 2014-08-27 03:43:47

User:PJung2014/Articles on Religion

• Essay 168: User:Praxidicae/Vanity spam, 443, 2019-12-11 17:44:34

User:Praxidicae/Vanity spam

• Essay 169: User:Abce2/How to fix a boat, 446, 2009-12-26 05:32:11

User:Abce2/How to fix a boat

• Essay 170: User:Andrewa/kayfabe, 447, 2020-03-31 20:35:12

User:Andrewa/kayfabe

• Essay 171: User:Delicious carbuncle/Poetry is always wrong, 448, 2018-01-06 11:13:58

User:Delicious carbuncle/Poetry is always wrong

• Essay 172: User:FuFoFuEd/Comparing apples with apples, 449, 2019-03-18 16:39:17

User:FuFoFuEd/Comparing apples with apples

• Essay 173: Wikipedia:TENFOOTPOLE, 452, 2019-07-15 20:00:06

Wikipedia:TENFOOTPOLE

• Essay 174: Wikipedia:Cookies are supposed to remain silent, 452, 2012-09-10 01:57:17

Wikipedia:Cookies are supposed to remain silent

• Essay 175: User:A.Z./The reduction of NPOV to verifiability, 452, 2007-12-11 00:59:44

User:A.Z./The reduction of NPOV to verifiability

• Essay 176: User:Cyde/Don't be a fucking douchebag, 454, 2021-04-01 08:19:21

User:Cyde/Don't be a fucking douchebag

• Essay 177: User:Onorem/Trivial, 455, 2009-02-24 13:34:38

User:Onorem/Trivial

• Essay 178: Wikipedia:Use Ethnic Epithets, 458, 2009-05-12 11:53:55

Wikipedia:Use Ethnic Epithets

• Essay 179: Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN, 459, 2022-05-18 01:13:12

Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN

• Essay 180: Wikipedia:It's obvious, 460, 2017-01-22 05:01:34

Wikipedia:It's obvious

• Essay 181: User:SDY/NJN, 461, 2010-04-15 14:23:02

User:SDY/NJN

• Essay 182: User:XtraJovial/Essays/Do not make articles long for the sake of them being long, 462, 2022-03-15 17:40:54

User:XtraJovial/Essays/Do not make articles long for the sake of them being long

• Essay 183: User:Siuenti/Here's one I made earlier, 462, 2017-04-12 15:17:02

User:Siuenti/Here's one I made earlier

• Essay 184: User:Ibrahim.ID/sandbox, 463, 2021-07-30 04:03:19

User:Ibrahim.ID/sandbox

• Essay 185: User:Wjhonson/Act in good faith, 469, 2007-09-04 10:43:32

User:Wjhonson/Act in good faith

• Essay 186: User:Mackensen/Cabal offset, 473, 2009-12-12 00:34:49

User:Mackensen/Cabal offset

• Essay 187: Wikipedia:Meh, 475, 2016-08-27 01:12:54

Wikipedia:Meh

• Essay 188: User:Letcreate123/Don't call a person who just made a few edits a SPA, 477, 2019-05-09 23:59:19

User:Letcreate123/Don't call a person who just made a few edits a SPA

• Essay 189: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules is for uncommon situations, 480, 2020-11-30 01:22:29

Wikipedia:Ignore all rules is for uncommon situations

• Essay 190: User:EVula/opining/Don't be a freaking jerkface, 483, 2014-02-01 22:42:41

User:EVula/opining/Don't be a freaking jerkface

• Essay 191: User:Cobalion254/IPv6, 483, 2013-03-09 19:51:59

User:Cobalion254/IPv6

• Essay 192: Wikipedia:Political positions, 484, 2021-08-11 11:51:29

Wikipedia:Political positions

• Essay 193: Wikipedia:UPLIFT, 487, 2010-02-18 22:01:54

Wikipedia:UPLIFT

• Essay 194: Wikipedia:We aren't Uncyclopedia, 487, 2019-10-06 08:11:36

Wikipedia:We aren't Uncyclopedia

• Essay 195: User:Bobherry/RFA, 488, 2021-11-17 06:49:13

User:Bobherry/RFA

• Essay 196: User:DangerousPanda/Essays/According, 489, 2014-01-15 20:07:25

User:DangerousPanda/Essays/According

• Essay 197: User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Types of sources by article topic, 494, 2021-08-05 22:49:14

User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Types of sources by article topic

• Essay 198: User:Siuenti/Argument from authority, 496, 2017-08-08 15:53:22

User:Siuenti/Argument from authority

• Essay 199: User:May His Shadow Fall Upon You/EditValues, 500, 2019-09-06 19:49:17

User:May His Shadow Fall Upon You/EditValues

• Essay 200: User:Andrewa/seeking an article, 503, 2020-07-08 16:18:57

User:Andrewa/seeking an article

• Essay 201: Wikipedia:The best thing about Wikipedia, 505, 2022-02-04 22:34:45

Wikipedia:The best thing about Wikipedia

• Essay 202: User:Vermont/essay/AfD Filibuster, 506, 2021-04-01 08:07:03

User:Vermont/essay/AfD Filibuster

• Essay 203: User:Ozhu/design, 508, 2013-05-20 14:49:04

User:Ozhu/design

• Essay 204: User:Hmwith/Actual article, 511, 2021-04-01 09:39:03

User:Hmwith/Actual article

• Essay 205: User:George Ho/Ignore all rules?, 511, 2016-12-10 07:04:38

User:George Ho/Ignore all rules?

• Essay 206: User:Jbhunley/Essays/ANI advice, 512, 2018-08-18 14:15:00

User:Jbhunley/Essays/ANI advice

• Essay 207: User:Eloquence/Tour 04, 514, 2019-05-08 18:57:03

User:Eloquence/Tour 04

• Essay 208: User:Anon126/Uploading images, 515, 2019-09-20 06:10:49

User:Anon126/Uploading images

• Essay 209: User:Unbinilium-322 Dibromide/Just one sneeze does not mean you are sick, 516, 2021-01-31 01:29:20

User:Unbinilium-322 Dibromide/Just one sneeze does not mean you are sick

• Essay 210: User:JustbeBPMF/Preview before post, 517, 2008-10-14 08:25:53

User:JustbeBPMF/Preview before post

• Essay 211: User:Dominicmgm/All blue article, 517, 2021-02-17 14:29:19

User:Dominicmgm/All blue article

• Essay 212: User:After Midnight/Alphabetical Happenstance, 517, 2010-07-09 04:31:53

User:After Midnight/Alphabetical Happenstance

• Essay 213: Wikipedia:Godwin's law of Wikilawyering, 518, 2014-12-14 00:02:15

Wikipedia:Godwin's law of Wikilawyering

• Essay 214: User:Hammad Shayk, 519, 2017-06-14 16:19:39

User:Hammad Shayk

• Essay 215: User:Quarl/Bikeshed, 519, 2007-12-11 04:25:12

User:Quarl/Bikeshed

• Essay 216: User:Champion/Deletion is cheap, 519, 2021-04-01 07:33:58

User:Champion/Deletion is cheap

• Essay 217: Wikipedia:Noted not notable, 520, 2019-04-22 19:09:59

Wikipedia:Noted not notable

• Essay 218: User:Zppix/Vandalism, 520, 2019-03-18 15:34:26

User:Zppix/Vandalism

• Essay 219: Wikipedia:Don't beat someone beating a dead horse, 523, 2021-08-04 18:42:57

Wikipedia:Don't beat someone beating a dead horse

• Essay 220: User:ProgrammingGeek/RfA criteria, 523, 2019-01-03 00:27:43

User:ProgrammingGeek/RfA criteria

• Essay 221: User:Siuenti/FixThyself, 523, 2017-04-12 12:07:31

User:Siuenti/FixThyself

• Essay 222: Wikipedia:Please. Stay, 528, 2019-06-18 02:42:11

Wikipedia:Please. Stay

• Essay 223: Wikipedia:Ignore all fools, 530, 2020-11-06 10:41:58

Wikipedia:Ignore all fools

• Essay 224: User:Collect/þ, 534, 2019-03-20 14:12:15

User:Collect/þ

• Essay 225: Wikipedia:Editing through links, 535, 2020-10-14 08:53:18

Wikipedia:Editing through links

• Essay 226: User:Wugapodes/RFCU, 535, 2020-03-01 01:57:13

User:Wugapodes/RFCU

• Essay 227: Wikipedia:Responsibility, 535, 2022-05-04 05:23:30

Wikipedia:Responsibility

• Essay 228: User:OlYeller21/Wikipedia:Editing with a close connection, 535, 2016-04-11 23:25:16

User:OlYeller21/Wikipedia:Editing with a close connection

• Essay 229: Wikipedia:Titling in sentence case, 536, 2016-12-06 23:26:12

Wikipedia:Titling in sentence case

• Essay 230: Wikipedia:BNBR, 541, 2021-06-13 03:36:15

Wikipedia:BNBR

• Essay 231: User:Bishonen/Calm down, 546, 2016-10-31 05:56:52

User:Bishonen/Calm down

• Essay 232: User:Ozhu/A gentle introduction to screamo, 549, 2013-07-04 17:17:42

User:Ozhu/A gentle introduction to screamo

• Essay 233: User:JimWae/template:No-Nonce, 549, 2012-01-07 14:47:59

User:JimWae/template:No-Nonce

• Essay 234: User:KGirlTrucker81/What G1 isn't, 553, 2021-04-01 07:38:08

User:KGirlTrucker81/What G1 isn't

• Essay 235: User:Dresken/dw talk header, 554, 2018-10-09 11:14:45

User:Dresken/dw talk header

• Essay 236: Wikipedia:No Trees needed to be chopped!, 555, 2009-08-30 05:01:53

Wikipedia:No Trees needed to be chopped!

• Essay 237: Wikipedia:Leave it to the lawyers, 555, 2014-06-28 17:24:25

Wikipedia:Leave it to the lawyers

• Essay 238: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (military ranks), 557, 2011-09-16 17:48:37

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (military ranks)

• Essay 239: User:Looktothis/The Man Who Asked the World to Help Paint His House, 558, 2008-03-23 01:07:25

User:Looktothis/The Man Who Asked the World to Help Paint His House

• Essay 240: Wikipedia:Music contemporaneity, 559, 2022-05-18 03:13:33

Wikipedia:Music contemporaneity

• Essay 241: User:Terrariola/Delete the junk, 559, 2021-04-01 08:05:07

User:Terrariola/Delete the junk

• Essay 242: User:Wikid77/Convert categories, 563, 2022-01-06 19:54:32

User:Wikid77/Convert categories

• Essay 243: User:Pythoncoder/RfA criteria, 566, 2021-04-05 19:39:59

User:Pythoncoder/RfA criteria

• Essay 244: User:Law/HITNRUN, 566, 2008-12-24 16:30:43

User:Law/HITNRUN

• Essay 245: User:Slakr/Why you shouldn't censor things, 567, 2008-10-23 09:16:12

User:Slakr/Why you shouldn't censor things

• Essay 246: User:Rusted AutoParts/WP:Always consider other's view, 567, 2011-12-08 04:13:00

User:Rusted AutoParts/WP:Always consider other's view

• Essay 247: Wikipedia:Micromanagement, 570, 2015-01-31 03:56:56

Wikipedia:Micromanagement

• Essay 248: User:Alan Liefting/Essays, 572, 2010-08-03 22:25:54

User:Alan Liefting/Essays

• Essay 249: User:Lomrjyo/Nothing is guaranteed, 572, 2021-04-23 16:18:49

User:Lomrjyo/Nothing is guaranteed

• Essay 250: User:Sebwite/Contributions of newbies are valuable, 576, 2009-11-01 01:23:41

User:Sebwite/Contributions of newbies are valuable

• Essay 251: Wikipedia:What happens on other wikis stays on other wikis, 577, 2010-03-22 21:39:28

Wikipedia:What happens on other wikis stays on other wikis

• Essay 252: User:Hillelfrei/Tips for recent changes patrol, 577, 2020-05-31 21:19:41

User:Hillelfrei/Tips for recent changes patrol

• Essay 253: Wikipedia:Let's try to avoid using too many acronyms, okay?, 580, 2022-07-30 08:33:19

Wikipedia:Let's try to avoid using too many acronyms, okay?

• Essay 254: Wikipedia:Gooch paradox, 583, 2019-05-07 20:26:04

Wikipedia:Gooch paradox

• Essay 255: User:Sadads/Writing about climate change on Wikipedia, 584, 2021-04-01 10:24:43

User:Sadads/Writing about climate change on Wikipedia

• Essay 256: User:Ronnotel/Piecemeal, 586, 2010-08-25 14:13:10

User:Ronnotel/Piecemeal

• Essay 257: User:Astronautics~enwiki/The crazy metric, 586, 2015-04-21 13:23:57

User:Astronautics~enwiki/The crazy metric

• Essay 258: User:Ahmetlii/"the whole explanation of world", 586, 2020-12-13 20:49:11

User:Ahmetlii/"the whole explanation of world"

• Essay 259: Wikipedia:Ha ha only serious, 587, 2022-06-20 10:56:23

Wikipedia:Ha ha only serious

• Essay 260: Wikipedia:NBRAND, 590, 2017-10-22 12:09:11

Wikipedia:NBRAND

• Essay 261: Wikipedia:Take responsibility, 591, 2021-07-19 05:59:03

Wikipedia:Take responsibility

• Essay 262: Wikipedia:Revert, ignore, semi-protect, 592, 2014-05-18 17:09:47

Wikipedia:Revert, ignore, semi-protect

• Essay 263: Wikipedia:VisualEditor dashboard, 592, 2016-01-02 10:04:51

Wikipedia:VisualEditor dashboard

• Essay 264: Wikipedia:WikiOverload, 594, 2019-08-18 19:27:51

Wikipedia:WikiOverload

• Essay 265: User:Eire2020/WP:On the subject of deletionism, 594, 2021-04-01 07:34:48

User:Eire2020/WP:On the subject of deletionism

• Essay 266: Wikipedia:Don't link to bomb-making instructions, 596, 2014-04-21 10:45:43

Wikipedia:Don't link to bomb-making instructions

• Essay 267: Wikipedia:Case-by-case, 604, 2020-09-18 18:12:07

Wikipedia:Case-by-case

• Essay 268: User:Salix alba/Troll food, 606, 2013-06-01 13:03:24

User:Salix alba/Troll food

• Essay 269: User:MadeYourReadThis/Wikipedia:Find the title mentioned, 608, 2017-09-21 18:32:03

User:MadeYourReadThis/Wikipedia:Find the title mentioned

• Essay 270: User:ImprovedWikiImprovment/The nature of Wikipedia, 609, 2018-11-28 21:36:13

User:ImprovedWikiImprovment/The nature of Wikipedia

• Essay 271: User:SWinxy/Be a steward, 609, 2022-04-04 19:22:41

User:SWinxy/Be a steward

• Essay 272: User:LaserLegs/Anyone can edit, 609, 2018-07-11 16:43:28

User:LaserLegs/Anyone can edit

• Essay 273: Wikipedia:Cellotaph, 611, 2016-07-10 06:08:01

Wikipedia:Cellotaph

• Essay 274: User:Gryllida/essay/Photo for biography, 614, 2021-04-01 09:58:26

User:Gryllida/essay/Photo for biography

• Essay 275: Wikipedia:Don't be officious, 614, 2015-02-23 03:57:38

Wikipedia:Don't be officious

• Essay 276: User:Danski454/Shared and dynamic IP addresses, 615, 2019-09-18 20:18:55

User:Danski454/Shared and dynamic IP addresses

• Essay 277: User:Alan Liefting/Essays/We do it all for the Reader, 616, 2012-02-17 03:19:03

User:Alan Liefting/Essays/We do it all for the Reader

• Essay 278: User:Eumat114/CBNGITIS, 617, 2020-04-12 00:48:48

User:Eumat114/CBNGITIS

• Essay 279: User:Usedtobecool/My advice to aspiring teahouse hosts, 621, 2020-10-03 08:55:15

User:Usedtobecool/My advice to aspiring teahouse hosts

• Essay 280: User:Jehochman/Content matters, 622, 2008-11-14 17:30:33

User:Jehochman/Content matters

• Essay 281: User:NottNott/Essays/Change your signature 24/7, 623, 2016-06-01 12:03:16

User:NottNott/Essays/Change your signature 24/7

• Essay 282: User:Yukichigai/Avoid irrelevant information, 626, 2007-01-14 12:51:37

User:Yukichigai/Avoid irrelevant information

• Essay 283: User:Donald Albury/What to do with a dead horse, 627, 2018-06-08 12:17:02

User:Donald Albury/What to do with a dead horse

• Essay 284: User:Ikanreed/Sarcasm, 627, 2007-02-17 07:07:05

User:Ikanreed/Sarcasm

• Essay 285: User:NerdyNSK/Towards an acceptable calendar date formatting in English Wikipedia, 628, 2008-09-03 02:15:28

User:NerdyNSK/Towards an acceptable calendar date formatting in English Wikipedia

• Essay 286: Wikipedia:Keep it short and simple, 628, 2022-04-12 03:29:29

Wikipedia:Keep it short and simple

• Essay 287: User:Kayau/What snowballing is not, 629, 2010-02-19 13:34:10

User:Kayau/What snowballing is not

• Essay 288: User:WugapodesOutreach/Articles needing linguist attention, 630, 2021-01-11 03:16:44

User:WugapodesOutreach/Articles needing linguist attention

• Essay 289: User:Cla68/Sandbox 2, 632, 2016-04-21 16:54:06

User:Cla68/Sandbox 2

• Essay 290: User:Lofty abyss/Openness, 633, 2019-03-02 22:02:06

User:Lofty abyss/Openness

• Essay 291: User:NE Ent/Unilateral interaction ban, 634, 2014-02-19 11:00:50

User:NE Ent/Unilateral interaction ban

• Essay 292: User:Ixtal/motomoto, 637, 2022-04-29 15:58:14

User:Ixtal/motomoto

• Essay 293: Wikipedia:Covfefeing, 637, 2020-02-17 16:37:51

Wikipedia:Covfefeing

• Essay 294: User:Trainsandotherthings/The Earth Test, 640, 2022-07-09 01:14:35

User:Trainsandotherthings/The Earth Test

• Essay 295: Wikipedia:Obscure Guideline 573, 640, 2021-12-26 00:52:32

Wikipedia:Obscure Guideline 573

• Essay 296: Wikipedia:Compassion, 641, 2010-09-25 09:38:08

Wikipedia:Compassion

• Essay 297: Wikipedia:If ten people say you're drunk, lie down, 643, 2021-01-03 07:22:36

Wikipedia:If ten people say you're drunk, lie down

• Essay 298: User:Wugapodes/Portals, 645, 2019-08-31 01:03:21

User:Wugapodes/Portals

• Essay 299: User:Pathoschild/Double-standard fallacy, 645, 2013-08-18 15:22:28

User:Pathoschild/Double-standard fallacy

• Essay 300: User:James1011R/The difference between !voting and vote-discussion, 646, 2012-04-17 15:45:05

User:James1011R/The difference between !voting and vote-discussion

• Essay 301: User:SmokeyJoe/Humor pages need to be relevant, 649, 2011-06-29 15:34:11

User:SmokeyJoe/Humor pages need to be relevant

• Essay 302: User:MacGyverMagic/Views, 649, 2012-01-08 00:59:57

User:MacGyverMagic/Views

• Essay 303: Wikipedia:There is no red tape, 650, 2013-12-23 21:09:26

Wikipedia:There is no red tape

• Essay 304: Wikipedia:Turnover, 650, 2020-07-08 07:04:26

Wikipedia:Turnover

• Essay 305: User:Geo Swan/opinions/Coverage of ghostsingles is tongue in cheek, 651, 2018-05-08 03:23:24

User:Geo Swan/opinions/Coverage of ghostsingles is tongue in cheek

• Essay 306: Wikipedia:Success factors, 652, 2014-10-24 11:00:02

Wikipedia:Success factors

• Essay 307: Wikipedia:Positive feedback, 652, 2020-07-08 07:23:42

Wikipedia:Positive feedback

• Essay 308: Wikipedia:Newline after references, 662, 2014-10-28 00:40:28

Wikipedia:Newline after references

• Essay 309: Wikipedia:A note regarding BRD, 663, 2022-03-02 03:40:42

Wikipedia:A note regarding BRD

• Essay 310: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is just a goddamn hobby, 668, 2020-06-09 14:44:31

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is just a goddamn hobby

• Essay 311: Wikipedia:Some Observant Words Regarding Editing And People, 668, 2011-10-31 00:20:17

Wikipedia:Some Observant Words Regarding Editing And People

• Essay 312: Wikipedia:WikiWatchlister, 672, 2018-10-24 13:08:07

Wikipedia:WikiWatchlister

• Essay 313: User:NickCT/FAQ, 677, 2010-12-08 23:45:52

User:NickCT/FAQ

• Essay 314: User:Andrewa/miltiple disambiguation, 677, 2019-01-10 04:16:16

User:Andrewa/miltiple disambiguation

• Essay 315: Wikipedia:Service level agreement, 678, 2012-05-07 18:10:33

Wikipedia:Service level agreement

• Essay 316: User:The Bushranger/SEMIPRO, 679, 2010-12-10 18:11:19

User:The Bushranger/SEMIPRO

• Essay 317: User:George Ho/Competence, 687, 2021-11-27 07:59:20

User:George Ho/Competence

• Essay 318: Wikipedia:Political achievements, 692, 2010-04-24 19:58:20

Wikipedia:Political achievements

• Essay 319: Wikipedia:Category fight, 695, 2016-07-10 04:45:59

Wikipedia:Category fight

• Essay 320: Wikipedia:Avoiding scrutiny, 696, 2020-07-22 00:19:22

Wikipedia:Avoiding scrutiny

• Essay 321: User:Rahulghose/Sandbox, 700, 2011-07-10 10:41:20

User:Rahulghose/Sandbox

• Essay 322: Wikipedia:They can't both be right, 703, 2012-05-07 18:12:48

Wikipedia:They can't both be right

• Essay 323: User:Jehochman/Kiss and make up, 704, 2010-03-31 05:51:33

User:Jehochman/Kiss and make up

• Essay 324: Wikipedia:BLP2E, 706, 2022-06-01 18:33:13

Wikipedia:BLP2E

• Essay 325: Wikipedia:We were not born yesterday, 710, 2021-07-19 19:38:55

Wikipedia:We were not born yesterday

• Essay 326: Wikipedia:The value of countervandalism, 715, 2019-03-12 06:47:10

Wikipedia:The value of countervandalism

• Essay 327: Wikipedia:Never call a spade a shovel, 717, 2020-01-07 04:55:20

Wikipedia:Never call a spade a shovel

• Essay 328: Wikipedia:Belong, 729, 2018-02-02 19:43:34

Wikipedia:Belong

• Essay 329: Wikipedia:General Hints concerning news and WP:RS, 730, 2021-04-12 08:54:23

Wikipedia:General Hints concerning news and WP:RS

• Essay 330: User:Trialpears/Template moves, 730, 2021-04-04 13:56:55

User:Trialpears/Template moves

• Essay 331: User:Ex Parte/Consensus reporting, 732, 2020-08-31 23:12:50

User:Ex Parte/Consensus reporting

• Essay 332: User:Andrewa/speedy close, 732, 2018-09-07 00:26:00

User:Andrewa/speedy close

• Essay 333: User:A Man In Black/No featured articles, 733, 2021-04-01 09:32:24

User:A Man In Black/No featured articles

• Essay 334: Wikipedia:Your mileage may vary, 734, 2019-09-16 04:24:27

Wikipedia:Your mileage may vary

• Essay 335: User:Collect/new group, 734, 2009-06-19 14:33:56

User:Collect/new group

• Essay 336: User:Dev920/Absolutely and completely, totally and utterly devastating, 736, 2010-09-27 20:24:42

User:Dev920/Absolutely and completely, totally and utterly devastating

• Essay 337: User:Ikip/WP:seniority, 744, 2016-04-15 03:44:48

User:Ikip/WP:seniority

• Essay 338: User:Czarkoff/essays/Balkanization of Yugoslavia, 744, 2014-11-12 19:28:04

User:Czarkoff/essays/Balkanization of Yugoslavia

• Essay 339: User:ErrantX/Essays/Gripes, 745, 2011-06-07 20:03:10

User:ErrantX/Essays/Gripes

• Essay 340: User:Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz/The importance of links, 748, 2017-07-08 05:29:25

User:Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz/The importance of links

• Essay 341: Wikipedia:What MOS is NOT, 748, 2016-01-02 08:48:06

Wikipedia:What MOS is NOT

• Essay 342: User:Hirohisat/YOU GOT TOO MANY NOMS SO GO AWAY, 752, 2007-10-06 10:44:55

User:Hirohisat/YOU GOT TOO MANY NOMS SO GO AWAY

• Essay 343: Wikipedia:Was Socrates a troll?, 752, 2015-07-04 08:25:06

Wikipedia:Was Socrates a troll?

• Essay 344: User:Dreftymac/Docs/FootnoteNazi, 757, 2008-08-18 01:05:05

User:Dreftymac/Docs/FootnoteNazi

• Essay 345: User:HybridBoy, 762, 2010-07-09 15:50:15

User:HybridBoy

• Essay 346: Wikipedia:We can do better, 763, 2013-05-30 00:50:09

Wikipedia:We can do better

• Essay 347: User:Panties72/Socrates, 769, 2012-09-11 18:26:01

User:Panties72/Socrates

• Essay 348: Wikipedia:A WikiLink is not an explanation, 778, 2018-01-19 18:18:56

Wikipedia:A WikiLink is not an explanation

• Essay 349: User:Cluster Lyn, 778, 2022-03-10 21:34:31

User:Cluster Lyn

• Essay 350: Wikipedia:Let it be, 778, 2017-06-17 04:40:55

Wikipedia:Let it be

• Essay 351: Wikipedia:Zero-sum BLP, 781, 2019-07-12 07:18:24

Wikipedia:Zero-sum BLP

• Essay 352: Wikipedia:Wikipedians aren't islands, 781, 2015-06-05 06:01:59

Wikipedia:Wikipedians aren't islands

• Essay 353: Wikipedia:Disparaging, 783, 2019-06-14 00:32:53

Wikipedia:Disparaging

• Essay 354: Wikipedia:Mutual admiration society, 783, 2020-12-11 13:53:02

Wikipedia:Mutual admiration society

• Essay 355: User:Tennekis/Essays/Enablism, 785, 2015-10-16 07:33:26

User:Tennekis/Essays/Enablism

• Essay 356: User:Салоом алейкум, 791, 2017-01-03 09:32:03

User:Салоом алейкум

• Essay 357: User:Namethatisnotinuse/My Wikipediholism Test, 791, 2021-09-23 12:31:43

User:Namethatisnotinuse/My Wikipediholism Test

• Essay 358: Wikipedia:Fire (essay), 793, 2012-11-10 11:35:50

Wikipedia:Fire (essay)

• Essay 359: User:Skomorokh/duty, 795, 2009-09-24 04:24:53

User:Skomorokh/duty

• Essay 360: Wikipedia:How sexist is Wikipedia?, 796, 2021-01-17 22:19:34

Wikipedia:How sexist is Wikipedia?

• Essay 361: User:T-rex/essays/meta-uncivil, 796, 2021-04-01 08:49:17

User:T-rex/essays/meta-uncivil

• Essay 362: Wikipedia:Best not Perfect, 796, 2011-03-26 11:51:45

Wikipedia:Best not Perfect

• Essay 363: User:Frosty/Shut the fuck up and edit an article, 798, 2017-04-14 11:35:21

User:Frosty/Shut the fuck up and edit an article

• Essay 364: User:Andrewa/attestation, 798, 2018-04-25 04:55:19

User:Andrewa/attestation

• Essay 365: Wikipedia:Don't make perfect the enemy of better, 798, 2011-12-06 21:57:36

Wikipedia:Don't make perfect the enemy of better

• Essay 366: User:ASCIIn2Bme/What "no consensus" really means, 799, 2021-04-01 03:59:28

User:ASCIIn2Bme/What "no consensus" really means

• Essay 367: Wikipedia:Mistakes are allowed, 803, 2022-02-11 15:31:56

Wikipedia:Mistakes are allowed

• Essay 368: Wikipedia:Don't ignore community consensus, 805, 2019-07-12 07:21:11

Wikipedia:Don't ignore community consensus

• Essay 369: Wikipedia:Zombie page, 808, 2022-08-01 02:18:23

Wikipedia:Zombie page

• Essay 370: User:Vgmddg/Language Disconnect Rant, 808, 2011-02-03 21:29:02

User:Vgmddg/Language Disconnect Rant

• Essay 371: User:Tisane/Bold, revert, bold, revert, bold, 809, 2010-02-19 20:16:01

User:Tisane/Bold, revert, bold, revert, bold

• Essay 372: User:Suomi Finland 2009/Similar treatment is okay, 810, 2017-07-21 21:55:20

User:Suomi Finland 2009/Similar treatment is okay

• Essay 373: Wikipedia:Wikipedians are not on Wikipedia 24 hours a day, 810, 2009-08-30 20:53:26

Wikipedia:Wikipedians are not on Wikipedia 24 hours a day

• Essay 374: Wikipedia:There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns, 810, 2021-01-24 01:16:39

Wikipedia:There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns

• Essay 375: Wikipedia:Ignore all uses of "ignore all rules", 815, 2019-03-27 14:24:04

Wikipedia:Ignore all uses of "ignore all rules"

• Essay 376: Wikipedia:Winningest, 818, 2016-08-30 17:32:05

Wikipedia:Winningest

• Essay 377: User:Agathoclea/WHEEL WAR... ON WHEELS!, 820, 2020-09-11 15:22:31

User:Agathoclea/WHEEL WAR... ON WHEELS!

• Essay 378: User:Beyond My Ken/Floating trial balloons, 821, 2018-11-10 11:22:16

User:Beyond My Ken/Floating trial balloons

• Essay 379: Wikipedia:Parent articles should use primary sources, 821, 2022-03-02 19:07:32

Wikipedia:Parent articles should use primary sources

• Essay 380: User:DonQuixote/Mixed Review, Mixed Reviews and Mixed to Good Reviews, 822, 2012-05-12 17:24:48

User:DonQuixote/Mixed Review, Mixed Reviews and Mixed to Good Reviews

• Essay 381: Wikipedia:Gray Area, 823, 2012-05-17 11:39:31

Wikipedia:Gray Area

• Essay 382: Wikipedia:Bait-and-switch, 825, 2020-05-06 04:28:46

Wikipedia:Bait-and-switch

• Essay 383: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not performance art, 827, 2013-01-18 21:09:42

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not performance art

• Essay 384: User:Anders Feder/Wikipedia is not a sausage, 827, 2015-08-04 09:20:57

User:Anders Feder/Wikipedia is not a sausage

• Essay 385: Wikipedia:Don't revert, block or ignore, 831, 2022-06-26 05:53:02

Wikipedia:Don't revert, block or ignore

• Essay 386: Wikipedia:Friendly fire, 832, 2018-08-23 08:21:06

Wikipedia:Friendly fire

• Essay 387: User:Skomorokh/Crisis, 832, 2010-07-27 22:58:09

User:Skomorokh/Crisis

• Essay 388: Wikipedia:No one will listen to reason when their back is up, 834, 2022-03-04 22:24:54

Wikipedia:No one will listen to reason when their back is up

• Essay 389: Wikipedia:Dweller's Sri Lankan cricket team test, 834, 2012-03-13 03:05:30

Wikipedia:Dweller's Sri Lankan cricket team test

• Essay 390: User:NeoFreak/diclaimer, 834, 2007-04-08 01:39:14

User:NeoFreak/diclaimer

• Essay 391: User:Bojo1498/No Reason Given For Removal, 835, 2017-01-30 14:05:00

User:Bojo1498/No Reason Given For Removal

• Essay 392: Wikipedia:Fan analysis, 835, 2020-01-09 10:12:28

Wikipedia:Fan analysis

• Essay 393: Wikipedia:Articles should be futureproof, 836, 2017-01-22 04:33:07

Wikipedia:Articles should be futureproof

• Essay 394: User:Andrewa/True false and Wikipedic, 837, 2016-08-05 05:05:01

User:Andrewa/True false and Wikipedic

• Essay 395: User:Gliteapple/Humour, 838, 2016-04-17 23:49:30

User:Gliteapple/Humour

• Essay 396: User:Gryllida/WPRA, 838, 2018-03-07 05:28:31

User:Gryllida/WPRA

• Essay 397: User:Not an anon anymore/Wikipedia's Running Gags, 839, 2007-06-05 18:20:09

User:Not an anon anymore/Wikipedia's Running Gags

• Essay 398: Wikipedia:OTHERLANGUAGEEXISTS, 839, 2017-01-22 05:08:25

Wikipedia:OTHERLANGUAGEEXISTS

• Essay 399: Wikipedia:Funding Wikipedia through advertisements/Orange Wikimedia partnership, 840, 2013-08-15 01:36:02

Wikipedia:Funding Wikipedia through advertisements/Orange Wikimedia partnership

• Essay 400: Wikipedia:Overreacting, 848, 2020-01-12 03:27:45

Wikipedia:Overreacting

• Essay 401: User:FMecha/Sockpuppet faiths and types, 849, 2020-07-23 10:18:20

User:FMecha/Sockpuppet faiths and types

• Essay 402: User:TheCanadianAndNewYorker/opinions/Wikipedia should not be a platform that promotes Americanism., 853, 2021-03-15 23:36:51

User:TheCanadianAndNewYorker/opinions/Wikipedia should not be a platform that promotes Americanism.

• Essay 403: User:DangerousPanda/Essays/Wikipoodling, 853, 2014-01-15 20:07:31

User:DangerousPanda/Essays/Wikipoodling

• Essay 404: User:Gwernol/WIWP, 853, 2007-04-13 03:15:46

User:Gwernol/WIWP

• Essay 405: Wikipedia:Reliably sourcing statements, 854, 2012-05-07 18:08:11

Wikipedia:Reliably sourcing statements

• Essay 406: Wikipedia:How you edit, 858, 2020-06-12 23:12:26

Wikipedia:How you edit

• Essay 407: User:Jose Fernandez-Calvo/Argentine, not Argentinian, 859, 2017-03-02 02:56:53

User:Jose Fernandez-Calvo/Argentine, not Argentinian

• Essay 408: Wikipedia:The final straw, 860, 2017-01-12 14:18:38

Wikipedia:The final straw

• Essay 409: User:Chris is me/WikiSocial userbox solution, 862, 2007-12-11 04:35:27

User:Chris is me/WikiSocial userbox solution

• Essay 410: User:Ɱ/What I look for in a source, 865, 2020-08-07 00:31:04

User:Ɱ/What I look for in a source

• Essay 411: User:Wordscape/IAR, 866, 2009-06-13 12:22:14

User:Wordscape/IAR

• Essay 412: User:Alanyst/Essays/Article Bias, 870, 2010-06-26 03:12:33

User:Alanyst/Essays/Article Bias

• Essay 413: Wikipedia:Don't judge an article by its title, 873, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:Don't judge an article by its title

• Essay 414: Wikipedia:Don't archive or hat a thread that has ongoing discussion, 874, 2022-06-08 14:41:56

Wikipedia:Don't archive or hat a thread that has ongoing discussion

• Essay 415: Wikipedia:Fear all change, 875, 2020-09-20 04:13:14

Wikipedia:Fear all change

• Essay 416: User:Joesydney/The Earth, 875, 2009-08-14 07:02:18

User:Joesydney/The Earth

• Essay 417: Wikipedia:Don't moon the jury, 879, 2013-10-12 14:20:40

Wikipedia:Don't moon the jury

• Essay 418: Wikipedia:Thankspam, 881, 2020-02-08 15:49:35

Wikipedia:Thankspam

• Essay 419: Wikipedia:Pantomime, 882, 2010-01-20 21:56:50

Wikipedia:Pantomime

• Essay 420: User:Runningonbrains/Essays/Drive-by voting, 885, 2009-07-17 04:42:38

User:Runningonbrains/Essays/Drive-by voting

• Essay 421: User:KGirlTrucker81/Why admins should not create content, 888, 2018-02-15 13:36:42

User:KGirlTrucker81/Why admins should not create content

• Essay 422: User:Jayemd/You will not always get your way, 890, 2012-09-24 14:21:52

User:Jayemd/You will not always get your way

• Essay 423: Wikipedia:Consensus statement, 891, 2012-01-28 14:28:45

Wikipedia:Consensus statement

• Essay 424: User:Cream147/essays/Why is it important to cite our sources on Wikipedia?, 891, 2007-03-28 16:41:02

User:Cream147/essays/Why is it important to cite our sources on Wikipedia?

• Essay 425: Wikipedia:Midden, 892, 2012-01-28 14:44:41

Wikipedia:Midden

• Essay 426: Wikipedia:Pinocchio, 896, 2018-07-16 20:43:05

Wikipedia:Pinocchio

• Essay 427: User:Editor510/Wikirose save, 897, 2008-07-11 17:06:16

User:Editor510/Wikirose save

• Essay 428: User:Electricburst1996/TV listings as a source, 898, 2016-06-24 20:53:32

User:Electricburst1996/TV listings as a source

• Essay 429: User:Bestmj33001/sandbox, 899, 2017-08-25 09:55:47

User:Bestmj33001/sandbox

• Essay 430: Wikipedia:Don't assume, 900, 2022-02-07 00:01:01

Wikipedia:Don't assume

• Essay 431: Wikipedia:Slippery slope, 901, 2010-09-02 14:00:01

Wikipedia:Slippery slope

• Essay 432: Wikipedia:Oh, Well, 901, 2021-11-27 07:56:03

Wikipedia:Oh, Well

• Essay 433: Wikipedia:Dig your own hole, 903, 2020-07-14 18:25:42

Wikipedia:Dig your own hole

• Essay 434: Wikipedia:Don't create a Streisand effect, 903, 2021-06-07 06:55:56

Wikipedia:Don't create a Streisand effect

• Essay 435: Wikipedia:Someone else fix it, 904, 2021-05-16 05:38:17

Wikipedia:Someone else fix it

• Essay 436: Wikipedia:The real power is choosing not to act, 904, 2021-07-27 00:23:26

Wikipedia:The real power is choosing not to act

• Essay 437: Wikipedia:Pioneers, 904, 2012-11-06 13:09:34

Wikipedia:Pioneers

• Essay 438: User:Andrewa/P T examples and scenarios, 905, 2020-07-08 16:10:23

User:Andrewa/P T examples and scenarios

• Essay 439: Wikipedia:Grandmothering, 907, 2009-10-09 03:27:21

Wikipedia:Grandmothering

• Essay 440: Wikipedia:Rome wasn't built in a day, 907, 2021-03-05 01:28:18

Wikipedia:Rome wasn't built in a day

• Essay 441: Wikipedia:Dead rat, 908, 2019-08-22 18:43:50

Wikipedia:Dead rat

• Essay 442: User:MikeEricksen/Wikipedia Article Circle, 911, 2010-09-16 20:54:02

User:MikeEricksen/Wikipedia Article Circle

• Essay 443: Wikipedia:Thou shalt not block for being mocked, 913, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:Thou shalt not block for being mocked

• Essay 444: Wikipedia:I am an essayist, 914, 2020-03-17 18:04:57

Wikipedia:I am an essayist

• Essay 445: Wikipedia:Godwin's law, 916, 2021-05-30 02:34:05

Wikipedia:Godwin's law

• Essay 446: User:Dodger67/Essays/Big fish, 917, 2022-07-24 09:02:49

User:Dodger67/Essays/Big fish

• Essay 447: User:Thine Antique Pen/Inaction is not a crime, 920, 2012-12-01 00:05:57

User:Thine Antique Pen/Inaction is not a crime

• Essay 448: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Articles are not Couches, 920, 2009-08-23 02:28:42

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Articles are not Couches

• Essay 449: Wikipedia:Negative energy, 922, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:Negative energy

• Essay 450: User:Keegan/On platitudes, 924, 2010-09-10 23:01:28

User:Keegan/On platitudes

• Essay 451: Wikipedia:Low-edit admins, 925, 2021-01-31 01:43:25

Wikipedia:Low-edit admins

• Essay 452: User:Gigs/Featured content, 925, 2010-11-10 15:50:47

User:Gigs/Featured content

• Essay 453: User:Random832/Always move forward, 925, 2007-09-04 10:46:26

User:Random832/Always move forward

• Essay 454: Wikipedia:WikiWidow(er), 925, 2012-02-21 13:52:12

Wikipedia:WikiWidow(er)

• Essay 455: Wikipedia:List of media-reported deletion discussions, 926, 2012-07-16 21:45:46

Wikipedia:List of media-reported deletion discussions

• Essay 456: User:Bri/COI patterns, 927, 2017-10-11 05:20:34

User:Bri/COI patterns

• Essay 457: User:Sunwoo Lim/Essays/The Ultimate goal of Wikipedia, 928, 2021-12-16 06:58:57

User:Sunwoo Lim/Essays/The Ultimate goal of Wikipedia

• Essay 458: Wikipedia:Why not you?, 930, 2016-07-04 01:06:59

Wikipedia:Why not you?

• Essay 459: User:Ed Poor/belief in global warming, 932, 2008-12-30 18:23:09

User:Ed Poor/belief in global warming

• Essay 460: Wikipedia:Let sleeping dogs lie, 933, 2012-08-09 11:30:17

Wikipedia:Let sleeping dogs lie

• Essay 461: User:KingpinE7/Guideline on audio use, 935, 2007-12-08 13:17:22

User:KingpinE7/Guideline on audio use

• Essay 462: Wikipedia:Simplified, 936, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:Simplified

• Essay 463: Wikipedia:First Law of Usernames, 939, 2022-02-01 11:40:26

Wikipedia:First Law of Usernames

• Essay 464: Wikipedia:Tfm template considered harmful, 940, 2018-12-02 22:12:42

Wikipedia:Tfm template considered harmful

• Essay 465: Wikipedia:Do not confuse stub status with non-notability, 943, 2021-11-27 07:54:44

Wikipedia:Do not confuse stub status with non-notability

• Essay 466: User:Dave1185/Sandbox/AVBL, 944, 2011-08-02 06:06:54

User:Dave1185/Sandbox/AVBL

• Essay 467: User:Ed Poor/Inner circle, 946, 2007-09-18 09:01:46

User:Ed Poor/Inner circle

• Essay 468: User:FR30799386/Smartphone editing, 946, 2018-03-23 08:32:16

User:FR30799386/Smartphone editing

• Essay 469: Wikipedia:Draftspace, not for unilateral spinouts, 952, 2020-07-23 01:19:17

Wikipedia:Draftspace, not for unilateral spinouts

• Essay 470: Wikipedia:Words to avoid in the intro, 953, 2016-08-04 23:47:48

Wikipedia:Words to avoid in the intro

• Essay 471: User:Lagrange613/Wikipedia is a soapbox, 954, 2019-01-19 04:35:07

User:Lagrange613/Wikipedia is a soapbox

• Essay 472: User:Fairlyoddparents1234/False U.S. television station call sign definitions, 955, 2013-04-01 20:04:14

User:Fairlyoddparents1234/False U.S. television station call sign definitions

• Essay 473: User:SJP/Pages, 956, 2008-07-07 05:19:52

User:SJP/Pages

• Essay 474: Wikipedia:Should I fork?, 956, 2020-07-08 03:58:37

Wikipedia:Should I fork?

• Essay 475: User:CrystalBlacksmith/delinting, 957, 2019-09-20 17:19:38

User:CrystalBlacksmith/delinting

• Essay 476: User:ChristianandJericho/Advice to new users, 959, 2011-09-10 17:23:46

User:ChristianandJericho/Advice to new users

• Essay 477: Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of assuming good faith, 964, 2020-05-10 06:49:03

Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of assuming good faith

• Essay 478: User:Geo Swan/rants/What is special about Holland?, 964, 2016-03-26 18:25:12

User:Geo Swan/rants/What is special about Holland?

• Essay 479: User:TruthToBeSpoken/Diary/Entry-1, 966, 2019-02-01 11:36:50

User:TruthToBeSpoken/Diary/Entry-1

• Essay 480: User:Dweller/Complaints of inappropriate choice of TFA, 972, 2009-06-18 12:05:44

User:Dweller/Complaints of inappropriate choice of TFA

• Essay 481: User:Maddie!/Don't start with a level 4im warning, 973, 2009-01-12 02:33:35

User:Maddie!/Don't start with a level 4im warning

• Essay 482: User:W7KyzmJt/I was wrong, 974, 2016-04-01 02:50:49

User:W7KyzmJt/I was wrong

• Essay 483: User:Anders Feder/Burdenshifting, 976, 2015-08-10 05:38:41

User:Anders Feder/Burdenshifting

• Essay 484: Wikipedia:Questions allowed, 976, 2022-07-15 00:39:05

Wikipedia:Questions allowed

• Essay 485: User:Geo Swan/Rec Art Sci, 977, 2020-01-09 19:46:17

User:Geo Swan/Rec Art Sci

• Essay 486: User:NanoLock66/Eat my food, 977, 2022-03-15 21:43:35

User:NanoLock66/Eat my food

• Essay 487: User:Quinxorin/Ignore All Rules Examples, 977, 2010-07-01 15:37:16

User:Quinxorin/Ignore All Rules Examples

• Essay 488: Wikipedia:The squint test, 978, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:The squint test

• Essay 489: User:Ajraddatz/Future enwiki stewards, 979, 2021-09-24 21:37:11

User:Ajraddatz/Future enwiki stewards

• Essay 490: Wikipedia:Be a reliable source, 979, 2020-02-11 04:11:45

Wikipedia:Be a reliable source

• Essay 491: Wikipedia:Indexspam, 986, 2016-01-02 09:56:29

Wikipedia:Indexspam

• Essay 492: User:Anon126/Guide for contributors with close connections, 986, 2015-02-19 08:01:54

User:Anon126/Guide for contributors with close connections

• Essay 493: Wikipedia:Articles are more important than policy, 990, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:Articles are more important than policy

• Essay 494: Wikipedia:If it ain't broke, don't fix it, 994, 2022-05-11 07:54:27

Wikipedia:If it ain't broke, don't fix it

• Essay 495: User:Letcreate123/Avoid excessive redlinks, 995, 2019-05-09 23:59:19

User:Letcreate123/Avoid excessive redlinks

• Essay 496: User:Oiyarbepsy/No evidence of, 995, 2018-01-12 06:01:05

User:Oiyarbepsy/No evidence of

• Essay 497: User:Casualdejekyll/NotOK, 995, 2021-06-28 03:00:19

User:Casualdejekyll/NotOK

• Essay 498: Wikipedia:Slurs, 997, 2020-12-21 22:23:15

Wikipedia:Slurs

• Essay 499: User:Sebwite/Arguments to avoid in BLP discussions, 997, 2011-09-27 14:41:49

User:Sebwite/Arguments to avoid in BLP discussions

• Essay 500: Wikipedia:Avoid antagonistic words, 999, 2012-04-13 20:26:16

Wikipedia:Avoid antagonistic words

• Essay 501: Wikipedia:Judgement, 999, 2021-11-27 08:01:05

Wikipedia:Judgement

• Essay 502: Wikipedia:Transparent deletion, 1001, 2010-04-05 21:47:49

Wikipedia:Transparent deletion

• Essay 503: User:Hijiri88/Don't call yourself or others "inclusionists", 1001, 2021-04-01 07:36:44

User:Hijiri88/Don't call yourself or others "inclusionists"

• Essay 504: Wikipedia:Don't misuse the Current Events template, 1003, 2019-07-12 07:24:26

Wikipedia:Don't misuse the Current Events template

• Essay 505: User:Lexein/Don't bold first words, 1007, 2012-12-20 21:46:14

User:Lexein/Don't bold first words

• Essay 506: Wikipedia:One reason for notability, 1009, 2011-12-25 19:31:42

Wikipedia:One reason for notability

• Essay 507: Wikipedia:Oral history, 1009, 2020-10-03 04:52:38

Wikipedia:Oral history

• Essay 508: User:Dreftymac/Docs/Howto, 1018, 2006-12-09 07:52:30

User:Dreftymac/Docs/Howto

• Essay 509: Wikipedia:Newcomers aren't all clueless, 1022, 2010-12-27 13:39:03

Wikipedia:Newcomers aren't all clueless

• Essay 510: User:Ceranthor/Together, 1024, 2019-12-07 20:16:14

User:Ceranthor/Together

• Essay 511: User:Vishalbhatia86/sandbox, 1025, 2019-03-04 03:52:42

User:Vishalbhatia86/sandbox

• Essay 512: Wikipedia:Welcome back, 1027, 2012-02-10 02:12:22

Wikipedia:Welcome back

• Essay 513: Wikipedia:Short horizontal line, 1028, 2021-05-24 13:56:29

Wikipedia:Short horizontal line

• Essay 514: Wikipedia:Wikicloset, 1029, 2020-07-29 23:29:39

Wikipedia:Wikicloset

• Essay 515: User:Mr. Stradivarius/Labels are dangerous, 1030, 2013-01-22 07:10:34

User:Mr. Stradivarius/Labels are dangerous

• Essay 516: User:Harrias/Harrias' addendum to Dweller's law, 1031, 2021-11-21 16:16:26

User:Harrias/Harrias' addendum to Dweller's law

• Essay 517: Wikipedia:Fastily effect, 1032, 2017-02-16 00:11:15

Wikipedia:Fastily effect

• Essay 518: Wikipedia:Unnecessary images, 1035, 2019-10-11 23:33:19

Wikipedia:Unnecessary images

• Essay 519: User:ParlorGames/The Wikipedia Problem, 1035, 2009-04-19 17:48:07

User:ParlorGames/The Wikipedia Problem

• Essay 520: Wikipedia:Don't say something is unknown just because you don't know, 1035, 2020-02-08 13:00:15

Wikipedia:Don't say something is unknown just because you don't know

• Essay 521: User:Cocoaguy/Essays/Thing OK for user Pages, 1036, 2007-11-04 12:48:22

User:Cocoaguy/Essays/Thing OK for user Pages

• Essay 522: Wikipedia:There are no cops on Wikipedia, 1038, 2018-08-31 05:43:26

Wikipedia:There are no cops on Wikipedia

• Essay 523: User:Andrewa/The Prime Directive, 1040, 2018-01-13 22:24:43

User:Andrewa/The Prime Directive

• Essay 524: Wikipedia:GFDL upgrade, 1042, 2008-11-23 19:39:33

Wikipedia:GFDL upgrade

• Essay 525: User:ColinFine/Wikipedia doesn't have profiles, 1044, 2012-01-15 20:23:41

User:ColinFine/Wikipedia doesn't have profiles

• Essay 526: Wikipedia:Just Plain Wrong, 1047, 2019-05-07 21:48:13

Wikipedia:Just Plain Wrong

• Essay 527: User:Ace Class Shadow/Observations, 1050, 2011-01-13 19:33:25

User:Ace Class Shadow/Observations

• Essay 528: User:Ash/Special case, 1050, 2011-07-15 15:47:07

User:Ash/Special case

• Essay 529: Wikipedia:Before assuming something is a hoax, 1051, 2022-03-19 18:42:16

Wikipedia:Before assuming something is a hoax

• Essay 530: User:Sir Intellegence/essays/I-don't-know-where-to-put-it disorder, 1052, 2021-12-21 17:42:22

User:Sir Intellegence/essays/I-don't-know-where-to-put-it disorder

• Essay 531: User:VX/Essay, 1057, 2009-02-19 03:45:32

User:VX/Essay

• Essay 532: Wikipedia:Wiki spirit, 1060, 2018-04-20 19:49:30

Wikipedia:Wiki spirit

• Essay 533: Wikipedia:Don't declare ultimatums, 1061, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:Don't declare ultimatums

• Essay 534: User:Tznkai/desk/Too cute by half, 1061, 2009-12-01 14:44:08

User:Tznkai/desk/Too cute by half

• Essay 535: Wikipedia:Libelous actions-- remove and revert yourself, 1062, 2021-06-07 22:11:26

Wikipedia:Libelous actions-- remove and revert yourself

• Essay 536: User:Octane/Wikipedia is a court room, 1063, 2008-03-22 16:06:20

User:Octane/Wikipedia is a court room

• Essay 537: Wikipedia:Precautionary principle, 1063, 2022-06-26 03:20:58

Wikipedia:Precautionary principle

• Essay 538: Wikipedia:What essays are not, 1065, 2022-06-26 15:47:13

Wikipedia:What essays are not

• Essay 539: User:Paul Carpenter/Twice, 1068, 2021-01-27 12:45:28

User:Paul Carpenter/Twice

• Essay 540: User:DangerousPanda/Essays/Reflection, 1069, 2014-01-15 20:07:29

User:DangerousPanda/Essays/Reflection

• Essay 541: Wikipedia:Confusing arguments mean nothing, 1070, 2022-08-03 01:08:07

Wikipedia:Confusing arguments mean nothing

• Essay 542: Wikipedia:Unblocks are cheap, 1074, 2021-09-02 15:18:26

Wikipedia:Unblocks are cheap

• Essay 543: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about us, 1076, 2022-06-29 23:48:40

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about us

• Essay 544: Wikipedia:Persons known for one higher profile event, 1077, 2017-07-12 17:03:48

Wikipedia:Persons known for one higher profile event

• Essay 545: Wikipedia:Don’t burn yourself, 1078, 2021-06-02 02:00:01

Wikipedia:Don’t burn yourself

• Essay 546: Wikipedia:Helpbox, 1078, 2016-01-03 19:54:51

Wikipedia:Helpbox

• Essay 547: Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed, 1079, 2017-02-18 22:02:34

Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed

• Essay 548: User:ToBeFree/HTML signatures, 1081, 2019-07-29 06:55:20

User:ToBeFree/HTML signatures

• Essay 549: User:Terrariola/The different types of vandalism, 1082, 2018-01-30 09:04:51

User:Terrariola/The different types of vandalism

• Essay 550: Wikipedia:Sledgehammer, 1084, 2014-04-23 20:14:29

Wikipedia:Sledgehammer

• Essay 551: User:BilCat/Essays/The A-T.E.A.M, 1085, 2014-05-18 23:44:09

User:BilCat/Essays/The A-T.E.A.M

• Essay 552: Wikipedia:Gray lines, 1088, 2011-03-19 02:54:51

Wikipedia:Gray lines

• Essay 553: Wikipedia:Wikilinkitis, 1089, 2021-12-16 11:53:11

Wikipedia:Wikilinkitis

• Essay 554: User:PorkchopGMX/Don’t ignore all the rules, 1090, 2019-01-24 19:20:42

User:PorkchopGMX/Don’t ignore all the rules

• Essay 555: User:Longcake Higad/Consensus begets compromise, 1090, 2021-02-09 04:35:07

User:Longcake Higad/Consensus begets compromise

• Essay 556: Wikipedia:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI, 1091, 2022-07-19 20:08:42

Wikipedia:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI

• Essay 557: Wikipedia:Purple cows in Arkansas, 1093, 2022-04-10 19:46:09

Wikipedia:Purple cows in Arkansas

• Essay 558: Wikipedia:Academic incentive, 1093, 2011-01-26 01:13:56

Wikipedia:Academic incentive

• Essay 559: Wikipedia:Dealing with dictionary definitions, 1093, 2013-01-13 22:10:25

Wikipedia:Dealing with dictionary definitions

• Essay 560: User:Alex Noble/AFC is about notability, 1094, 2021-04-01 03:21:27

User:Alex Noble/AFC is about notability

• Essay 561: Wikipedia:Equality, 1094, 2020-03-27 18:30:55

Wikipedia:Equality

• Essay 562: Wikipedia:Misconduct, 1094, 2020-05-04 02:16:42

Wikipedia:Misconduct

• Essay 563: User:The Filmaker/Style guidelines for film articles, 1096, 2007-07-28 02:39:18

User:The Filmaker/Style guidelines for film articles

• Essay 564: Wikipedia:TITANIC, 1097, 2022-02-06 23:59:16

Wikipedia:TITANIC

• Essay 565: Wikipedia:Huggle Wars, 1098, 2018-03-11 12:17:41

Wikipedia:Huggle Wars

• Essay 566: Wikipedia:Death By Jimbo, 1098, 2014-10-08 19:40:31

Wikipedia:Death By Jimbo

• Essay 567: Wikipedia:Concept limit, 1099, 2020-11-13 16:58:52

Wikipedia:Concept limit

• Essay 568: Wikipedia:Consensus doesn't have to change, 1100, 2019-07-12 07:21:06

Wikipedia:Consensus doesn't have to change

• Essay 569: Wikipedia:Sanitize, 1100, 2021-07-27 21:44:52

Wikipedia:Sanitize

• Essay 570: Wikipedia:Tiptibism, 1102, 2016-02-26 20:56:21

Wikipedia:Tiptibism

• Essay 571: Wikipedia:Disambiguation rule disregard index, 1105, 2013-06-19 11:35:36

Wikipedia:Disambiguation rule disregard index

• Essay 572: User:Tawker/BLPD, 1105, 2007-02-19 12:29:56

User:Tawker/BLPD

• Essay 573: Wikipedia:No holy wars, 1105, 2021-04-06 19:49:15

Wikipedia:No holy wars

• Essay 574: User:Andrewa/Hit and run, 1106, 2018-08-17 22:15:28

User:Andrewa/Hit and run

• Essay 575: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not MeatballWiki, 1110, 2011-09-02 04:15:22

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not MeatballWiki

• Essay 576: Wikipedia:Language neutrality, 1111, 2013-04-18 17:39:43

Wikipedia:Language neutrality

• Essay 577: User:Explicit/Leftover tracks, 1111, 2009-07-03 06:50:43

User:Explicit/Leftover tracks

• Essay 578: User:ChocolateRabbit/Assuming Good Faith, 1112, 2018-01-21 17:25:55

User:ChocolateRabbit/Assuming Good Faith

• Essay 579: Wikipedia:Applicable law, 1112, 2012-06-26 20:23:12

Wikipedia:Applicable law

• Essay 580: User:RoySmith/essays/Suboptimal corporate sources, 1113, 2019-06-30 14:12:23

User:RoySmith/essays/Suboptimal corporate sources

• Essay 581: Wikipedia:Other duck, 1115, 2014-06-13 04:17:28

Wikipedia:Other duck

• Essay 582: User:Master Thief Garrett/Don't add sewage to the already polluted pond, 1116, 2018-05-15 15:18:10

User:Master Thief Garrett/Don't add sewage to the already polluted pond

• Essay 583: Wikipedia:Please use fullurl, 1120, 2019-06-11 11:52:37

Wikipedia:Please use fullurl

• Essay 584: Wikipedia:About template mania, 1121, 2019-07-12 07:24:18

Wikipedia:About template mania

• Essay 585: Wikipedia:When and how to create a sub-page of a fiction article, 1123, 2016-12-17 06:32:34

Wikipedia:When and how to create a sub-page of a fiction article

• Essay 586: User:PorkchopGMX/Wait until the user edits, 1124, 2019-01-22 01:19:47

User:PorkchopGMX/Wait until the user edits

• Essay 587: User:T-rex/essays/the more redirects the better, 1125, 2016-12-22 08:06:09

User:T-rex/essays/the more redirects the better

• Essay 588: User:Sj/motivation, 1126, 2009-07-26 00:12:02

User:Sj/motivation

• Essay 589: Wikipedia:Use the new section button!, 1126, 2010-08-05 17:19:09

Wikipedia:Use the new section button!

• Essay 590: User:JohnManuel/projects, 1126, 2020-11-30 18:55:14

User:JohnManuel/projects

• Essay 591: User:Martijn Hoekstra/Inclusionist manifest, 1130, 2013-06-29 12:51:28

User:Martijn Hoekstra/Inclusionist manifest

• Essay 592: Wikipedia:Ad nauseam, 1134, 2013-08-19 18:33:53

Wikipedia:Ad nauseam

• Essay 593: User:Animum/WikiAtheism, 1135, 2012-12-08 19:48:10

User:Animum/WikiAtheism

• Essay 594: User:UtherSRG/Bring back Articles for Discussion, 1137, 2010-06-02 14:43:23

User:UtherSRG/Bring back Articles for Discussion

• Essay 595: User:Skomorokh/First rule, 1137, 2021-04-01 04:02:49

User:Skomorokh/First rule

• Essay 596: Wikipedia:WikiEnemy, 1137, 2022-06-07 23:50:50

Wikipedia:WikiEnemy

• Essay 597: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a contest, 1139, 2006-04-26 06:08:29

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a contest

• Essay 598: Wikipedia:Takeover, 1140, 2017-01-22 05:20:50

Wikipedia:Takeover

• Essay 599: Wikipedia:Three steps, 1147, 2021-12-19 06:15:21

Wikipedia:Three steps

• Essay 600: Wikipedia:Tar pit, 1147, 2013-02-21 16:22:10

Wikipedia:Tar pit

• Essay 601: Wikipedia:Hasten the Day, 1147, 2022-04-14 12:49:16

Wikipedia:Hasten the Day

• Essay 602: Wikipedia:WikiAngel, 1148, 2022-04-22 05:45:21

Wikipedia:WikiAngel

• Essay 603: User:Martynas Patasius/On form and substance, 1148, 2016-02-16 15:42:43

User:Martynas Patasius/On form and substance

• Essay 604: User:Chrislk02/Will Never Know, 1151, 2009-02-09 22:08:55

User:Chrislk02/Will Never Know

• Essay 605: Wikipedia:WikiProject Accessibility/FAQ and common pitfalls, 1152, 2017-04-25 07:15:38

Wikipedia:WikiProject Accessibility/FAQ and common pitfalls

• Essay 606: User:Izno/Navbox constellations, 1156, 2021-08-12 18:24:11

User:Izno/Navbox constellations

• Essay 607: User:Sceptre/essays/Don't dance around the maypole if someone's cutting all of the ribbons, 1157, 2008-12-20 13:53:38

User:Sceptre/essays/Don't dance around the maypole if someone's cutting all of the ribbons

• Essay 608: User:Canada-kawaii/Disclaimer, 1158, 2007-06-15 13:33:49

User:Canada-kawaii/Disclaimer

• Essay 609: Wikipedia:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip, 1161, 2020-09-20 05:27:19

Wikipedia:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip

• Essay 610: User:CvyvvZkmSUDowVf/ad, 1161, 2018-01-14 19:49:41

User:CvyvvZkmSUDowVf/ad

• Essay 611: User:Mr. Yondris Ferguson/My Many Many Articles, 1162, 2019-06-08 01:50:38

User:Mr. Yondris Ferguson/My Many Many Articles

• Essay 612: User:Launchballer/Timeshift channels, 1163, 2017-04-14 06:37:18

User:Launchballer/Timeshift channels

• Essay 613: User:Shadowowl/Ref fraud, 1164, 2021-04-01 10:01:44

User:Shadowowl/Ref fraud

• Essay 614: User:Editor510/Wikidalek save, 1164, 2008-06-13 19:42:09

User:Editor510/Wikidalek save

• Essay 615: Wikipedia:There are no shortcuts to neutrality, 1166, 2022-06-01 14:32:17

Wikipedia:There are no shortcuts to neutrality

• Essay 616: User:Josve05a/Reference example, 1168, 2014-01-20 01:36:26

User:Josve05a/Reference example

• Essay 617: User:Robert McClenon/Weaponization, 1168, 2019-06-06 18:36:08

User:Robert McClenon/Weaponization

• Essay 618: Wikipedia:Almanac, 1168, 2022-01-04 15:18:46

Wikipedia:Almanac

• Essay 619: Wikipedia:Articles on sources, 1170, 2018-07-10 08:26:40

Wikipedia:Articles on sources

• Essay 620: User:Dl2000/Band names - plural or singular?, 1171, 2014-05-28 22:48:02

User:Dl2000/Band names - plural or singular?

• Essay 621: Wikipedia:User rights are not a golden ticket, 1173, 2018-02-03 03:47:39

Wikipedia:User rights are not a golden ticket

• Essay 622: Wikipedia:NOTBLP, 1174, 2014-10-20 19:01:42

Wikipedia:NOTBLP

• Essay 623: Wikipedia:Tired, 1174, 2020-11-18 08:07:05

Wikipedia:Tired

• Essay 624: Wikipedia:Dynamic tension, 1176, 2010-06-19 12:39:36

Wikipedia:Dynamic tension

• Essay 625: User:Runningonbrains/Essays/Presumptuous voting, 1177, 2009-09-05 02:48:49

User:Runningonbrains/Essays/Presumptuous voting

• Essay 626: Wikipedia:Don't be afraid to use color, 1177, 2019-07-12 07:23:54

Wikipedia:Don't be afraid to use color

• Essay 627: Wikipedia:Lua-based cite templates, 1179, 2020-07-07 23:01:07

Wikipedia:Lua-based cite templates

• Essay 628: Wikipedia:The solution to all of Wikipedia's problems, 1181, 2013-05-02 03:36:24

Wikipedia:The solution to all of Wikipedia's problems

• Essay 629: User:Chlod/RedWarn, 1182, 2021-04-01 09:51:06

User:Chlod/RedWarn

• Essay 630: User:NE Ent/Tropes, 1183, 2015-10-17 15:39:59

User:NE Ent/Tropes

• Essay 631: User:NE Ent/Policy fallacy, 1183, 2012-11-11 01:27:57

User:NE Ent/Policy fallacy

• Essay 632: User:Davidwr/No topic deserves to be in Wikipedia, 1183, 2021-04-01 03:29:46

User:Davidwr/No topic deserves to be in Wikipedia

• Essay 633: Wikipedia:UNESCO, 1185, 2016-12-17 06:46:45

Wikipedia:UNESCO

• Essay 634: Wikipedia:Om nom nom nom, 1186, 2020-01-30 13:54:54

Wikipedia:Om nom nom nom

• Essay 635: Wikipedia:Don't revert without explanation, 1188, 2022-06-13 00:42:54

Wikipedia:Don't revert without explanation

• Essay 636: User:Durova/Wikisleuthing, 1188, 2007-07-29 21:26:57

User:Durova/Wikisleuthing

• Essay 637: User:EpicPupper/Prepend and append in JWB, 1190, 2022-05-08 05:29:03

User:EpicPupper/Prepend and append in JWB

• Essay 638: User:Hawkeye7/Final exam for bureaucrats, 1191, 2019-11-19 02:10:03

User:Hawkeye7/Final exam for bureaucrats

• Essay 639: User:NE Ent/No capital letters, 1192, 2020-10-18 06:06:23

User:NE Ent/No capital letters

• Essay 640: User:UNHchabo/Not everyone has as much free time as you, 1195, 2009-02-11 01:57:29

User:UNHchabo/Not everyone has as much free time as you

• Essay 641: Wikipedia:Editors can change their minds, 1196, 2022-01-06 20:54:40

Wikipedia:Editors can change their minds

• Essay 642: User:Distributivejustice/Local NPOV maxima, 1197, 2010-05-01 17:01:54

User:Distributivejustice/Local NPOV maxima

• Essay 643: User:Littleteddy/Essay, 1201, 2008-03-29 16:26:54

User:Littleteddy/Essay

• Essay 644: User:MadeYourReadThis/Find the mention, 1203, 2019-07-12 07:19:45

User:MadeYourReadThis/Find the mention

• Essay 645: User:Jorge Stolfi/DoW, 1209, 2010-05-22 09:12:28

User:Jorge Stolfi/DoW

• Essay 646: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is Also a Woman, 1212, 2020-06-26 13:50:07

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is Also a Woman

• Essay 647: User:J947/Essays/Link to the source, 1213, 2020-04-12 20:39:52

User:J947/Essays/Link to the source

• Essay 648: User:BACK INC, 1213, 2022-04-18 06:00:17

User:BACK INC

• Essay 649: User:KGirlTrucker81/Difference between good faith and bad faith, 1214, 2017-05-28 00:11:52

User:KGirlTrucker81/Difference between good faith and bad faith

• Essay 650: User:Xinbenlv/Essay/If you want to learn to swim, jump into the water, 1216, 2020-03-27 22:03:29

User:Xinbenlv/Essay/If you want to learn to swim, jump into the water

• Essay 651: Wikipedia:Mass nomination, 1216, 2021-11-27 07:55:36

Wikipedia:Mass nomination

• Essay 652: Wikipedia:Skim read, 1216, 2020-04-24 00:50:52

Wikipedia:Skim read

• Essay 653: User:Partofthemachine/When does "deny recognition" apply?, 1218, 2022-07-19 23:42:45

User:Partofthemachine/When does "deny recognition" apply?

• Essay 654: User:Andrewa/trivial disambiguation, 1218, 2015-03-08 15:33:28

User:Andrewa/trivial disambiguation

• Essay 655: Wikipedia:Why ageism on wikipedia should not be employed, 1220, 2022-03-28 16:38:30

Wikipedia:Why ageism on wikipedia should not be employed

• Essay 656: User:Guy Macon/Guidelines/No Es allowed!, 1222, 2020-12-22 15:12:55

User:Guy Macon/Guidelines/No Es allowed!

• Essay 657: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not guess, guess, guess, 1223, 2020-08-02 12:41:27

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not guess, guess, guess

• Essay 658: User:Buddy431/AFD isn't cleanup, 1223, 2021-04-01 08:26:25

User:Buddy431/AFD isn't cleanup

• Essay 659: User:Andrewa/A personal plea, 1224, 2018-03-10 22:23:30

User:Andrewa/A personal plea

• Essay 660: User:Slakr/Only on Wikipedia, 1224, 2011-02-02 20:37:06

User:Slakr/Only on Wikipedia

• Essay 661: User:Vassyana/exercise, 1227, 2008-05-13 20:41:55

User:Vassyana/exercise

• Essay 662: User:Keeper76/Write Right, 1228, 2008-12-06 18:02:04

User:Keeper76/Write Right

• Essay 663: User:Alan Liefting/Essays/Need more useful stuff, 1230, 2010-11-05 01:07:46

User:Alan Liefting/Essays/Need more useful stuff

• Essay 664: User:Dweller/Dweller's law, 1230, 2021-11-21 15:08:17

User:Dweller/Dweller's law

• Essay 665: Wikipedia:Don't go out of your way to be diplomatic, 1230, 2008-02-15 14:07:41

Wikipedia:Don't go out of your way to be diplomatic

• Essay 666: Wikipedia:Rulespam, 1235, 2016-01-02 09:55:55

Wikipedia:Rulespam

• Essay 667: Wikipedia:The interaction between policies, 1236, 2022-07-10 20:17:28

Wikipedia:The interaction between policies

• Essay 668: User:Ritchie333/Don't write like Ali G, 1237, 2022-05-10 10:05:49

User:Ritchie333/Don't write like Ali G

• Essay 669: Wikipedia:Einstein, 1241, 2018-04-08 23:40:55

Wikipedia:Einstein

• Essay 670: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not the Stanford Prison Experiment, 1241, 2008-06-12 13:54:09

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not the Stanford Prison Experiment

• Essay 671: User:Matthew/Yyy?, 1243, 2008-02-01 03:17:38

User:Matthew/Yyy?

• Essay 672: User:Geo Swan/opinions/Detirehniton, 1245, 2018-10-21 06:52:30

User:Geo Swan/opinions/Detirehniton

• Essay 673: User:WaltCip/Simpsoncruft, 1247, 2007-09-01 16:51:57

User:WaltCip/Simpsoncruft

• Essay 674: User:Teblick/Index to Manual of Style, 1247, 2020-03-24 21:26:20

User:Teblick/Index to Manual of Style

• Essay 675: Wikipedia:Copyright Blocks, 1251, 2010-09-18 18:54:32

Wikipedia:Copyright Blocks

• Essay 676: User:Acejet/WikiProjects, 1253, 2010-01-08 13:56:13

User:Acejet/WikiProjects

• Essay 677: Wikipedia:Back to top, 1253, 2022-07-29 03:40:35

Wikipedia:Back to top

• Essay 678: Wikipedia:No screaming, 1254, 2019-04-06 19:59:14

Wikipedia:No screaming

• Essay 679: User:NE Ent/The oyster makes the pearl, 1256, 2014-02-09 12:53:03

User:NE Ent/The oyster makes the pearl

• Essay 680: Wikipedia:Keep it down to earth, 1257, 2020-11-20 15:49:35

Wikipedia:Keep it down to earth

• Essay 681: User:MalwareSmarts/Don't confuse non-notability with a hoax, 1258, 2021-04-01 03:24:52

User:MalwareSmarts/Don't confuse non-notability with a hoax

• Essay 682: Wikipedia:Failure, 1258, 2020-09-20 05:45:44

Wikipedia:Failure

• Essay 683: Wikipedia:JFII, 1263, 2010-06-19 23:11:38

Wikipedia:JFII

• Essay 684: User:Editor510/Wikidoctor save, 1263, 2008-06-10 18:11:17

User:Editor510/Wikidoctor save

• Essay 685: User:Steve Smith/Semi-protection of BLPs, 1264, 2021-04-01 03:54:42

User:Steve Smith/Semi-protection of BLPs

• Essay 686: Wikipedia:Coinage may be cited directly, 1265, 2021-06-13 15:02:25

Wikipedia:Coinage may be cited directly

• Essay 687: Wikipedia:Wikipedia doesn't use Allwiki, 1266, 2021-02-26 22:31:11

Wikipedia:Wikipedia doesn't use Allwiki

• Essay 688: User:TucanHolmes/Wikithoughts, 1266, 2021-05-26 11:08:46

User:TucanHolmes/Wikithoughts

• Essay 689: Wikipedia:Non-free content/FAQ, 1268, 2009-08-30 05:07:47

Wikipedia:Non-free content/FAQ

• Essay 690: Wikipedia:Which talk page?, 1275, 2020-10-09 12:03:22

Wikipedia:Which talk page?

• Essay 691: User:JamieS93/Thick skin, 1276, 2009-11-30 01:08:28

User:JamieS93/Thick skin

• Essay 692: User:Kosebamse/How to survive on wikipedia, 1278, 2011-07-27 05:08:51

User:Kosebamse/How to survive on wikipedia

• Essay 693: Wikipedia:AfD churn, 1278, 2019-05-21 11:34:53

Wikipedia:AfD churn

• Essay 694: User:Random832/Stop using screenshots of the mainpage for browser articles!, 1279, 2008-01-07 20:57:39

User:Random832/Stop using screenshots of the mainpage for browser articles!

• Essay 695: Wikipedia:Differences between the English Wikipedia and Wikipedias in other languages, 1281, 2022-04-01 00:55:35

Wikipedia:Differences between the English Wikipedia and Wikipedias in other languages

• Essay 696: User:Celestina007/Long term bad faith goal, 1282, 2021-06-22 23:27:35

User:Celestina007/Long term bad faith goal

• Essay 697: User:Worm That Turned/Quiet return, 1285, 2021-03-05 08:26:00

User:Worm That Turned/Quiet return

• Essay 698: Wikipedia:NPOV in userboxes, 1286, 2006-06-13 18:05:53

Wikipedia:NPOV in userboxes

• Essay 699: Wikipedia:Time to take the dog for a walk, 1286, 2022-03-06 19:47:05

Wikipedia:Time to take the dog for a walk

• Essay 700: Wikipedia:Lua articles, 1286, 2022-02-07 00:07:41

Wikipedia:Lua articles

• Essay 701: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays, 1287, 2021-03-02 03:17:34

Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays

• Essay 702: Wikipedia:Neutrality through accuracy, 1288, 2022-02-07 00:10:50

Wikipedia:Neutrality through accuracy

• Essay 703: User:Rockstone35/Essay, 1290, 2009-09-21 22:50:10

User:Rockstone35/Essay

• Essay 704: User:Thorncrag/GNAT, 1292, 2010-10-22 21:51:31

User:Thorncrag/GNAT

• Essay 705: User:HowardBGolden/Abuse of the General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions, 1295, 2021-04-01 07:14:48

User:HowardBGolden/Abuse of the General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions

• Essay 706: User:Ansh666/Don't cite policies or guidelines until you've actually read them, 1296, 2015-01-07 19:02:48

User:Ansh666/Don't cite policies or guidelines until you've actually read them

• Essay 707: Wikipedia:Promotional drafts, 1299, 2018-08-11 15:12:11

Wikipedia:Promotional drafts

• Essay 708: User:Ed Poor/Flat earth problem, 1300, 2008-12-31 20:01:42

User:Ed Poor/Flat earth problem

• Essay 709: User:NE Ent/Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith, 1301, 2012-11-11 01:27:54

User:NE Ent/Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith

• Essay 710: User:JimMillerJr/Sandbox/Hero worship, 1301, 2009-12-03 20:31:13

User:JimMillerJr/Sandbox/Hero worship

• Essay 711: Wikipedia:Reviving the active admin corps, 1301, 2018-06-05 17:19:45

Wikipedia:Reviving the active admin corps

• Essay 712: Wikipedia:What votes should mean, 1304, 2017-01-22 05:27:21

Wikipedia:What votes should mean

• Essay 713: User:Frank/On verifiability and consensus, 1306, 2008-09-30 22:16:59

User:Frank/On verifiability and consensus

• Essay 714: Wikipedia:Ping pong, 1307, 2021-02-11 01:37:30

Wikipedia:Ping pong

• Essay 715: Wikipedia:Sandbox thief, 1309, 2019-12-24 08:34:09

Wikipedia:Sandbox thief

• Essay 716: User:MyNameWasTaken/Discussions, 1309, 2012-02-13 07:39:09

User:MyNameWasTaken/Discussions

• Essay 717: Wikipedia:Oshwahnism, 1310, 2022-03-24 14:16:38

Wikipedia:Oshwahnism

• Essay 718: Wikipedia:Not all sources are created equal, 1315, 2017-07-12 15:46:22

Wikipedia:Not all sources are created equal

• Essay 719: User:Drmies/WikiProject U.S. Civil Rights, 1316, 2017-04-28 04:58:05

User:Drmies/WikiProject U.S. Civil Rights

• Essay 720: User:Theo10011/Curators of content, 1316, 2012-03-25 18:34:05

User:Theo10011/Curators of content

• Essay 721: Wikipedia:Charitableness, 1316, 2021-11-27 08:00:09

Wikipedia:Charitableness

• Essay 722: Wikipedia:RACRBE, 1316, 2019-07-04 13:46:46

Wikipedia:RACRBE

• Essay 723: Wikipedia:Lipstick on a pig, 1317, 2016-10-11 14:51:09

Wikipedia:Lipstick on a pig

• Essay 724: User:Donald Albury/First, do no harm, 1318, 2011-10-16 10:23:21

User:Donald Albury/First, do no harm

• Essay 725: Wikipedia:Presentations, 1321, 2013-11-18 16:51:29

Wikipedia:Presentations

• Essay 726: Wikipedia:Perfectionism is bad, 1322, 2016-07-22 23:16:41

Wikipedia:Perfectionism is bad

• Essay 727: User:Skomorokh/Future culture, 1324, 2012-10-28 04:26:29

User:Skomorokh/Future culture

• Essay 728: User:SheffieldSteel/BITECLUB, 1325, 2011-02-16 21:10:58

User:SheffieldSteel/BITECLUB

• Essay 729: User:Robert McClenon/Acceptance of Biographies, 1325, 2021-04-01 03:21:15

User:Robert McClenon/Acceptance of Biographies

• Essay 730: Wikipedia:Don't call people by their real name, 1326, 2021-01-24 01:17:48

Wikipedia:Don't call people by their real name

• Essay 731: Wikipedia:Editing Your Own Page, 1326, 2022-06-13 16:41:41

Wikipedia:Editing Your Own Page

• Essay 732: Wikipedia:No it's fixed, 1328, 2009-10-11 17:26:03

Wikipedia:No it's fixed

• Essay 733: Wikipedia:Because I can, 1330, 2020-05-25 23:32:54

Wikipedia:Because I can

• Essay 734: User:Animum/Ageism, 1331, 2010-06-20 03:08:06

User:Animum/Ageism

• Essay 735: Wikipedia:Defend to the Death, 1336, 2015-10-28 17:06:41

Wikipedia:Defend to the Death

• Essay 736: User:CatherineMunro/Bright Places, 1341, 2010-02-07 02:54:49

User:CatherineMunro/Bright Places

• Essay 737: Wikipedia:Don't confuse trademarks with copyrights, 1342, 2021-01-06 09:45:01

Wikipedia:Don't confuse trademarks with copyrights

• Essay 738: User:RobertG/Sanguine eventualism, 1347, 2008-01-19 08:24:00

User:RobertG/Sanguine eventualism

• Essay 739: User:Lee Vilenski/GA Criteria, 1348, 2019-10-08 09:53:47

User:Lee Vilenski/GA Criteria

• Essay 740: Wikipedia:Don't overuse quotes, 1349, 2022-01-06 21:23:59

Wikipedia:Don't overuse quotes

• Essay 741: Wikipedia:Link to what it is, 1350, 2021-05-13 18:55:31

Wikipedia:Link to what it is

• Essay 742: Wikipedia:Avoid cyber, 1352, 2021-07-18 13:31:46

Wikipedia:Avoid cyber

• Essay 743: User:JustinTime55/sandbox/No one's point of view is any more neutral than anyone else's, 1355, 2015-02-06 15:58:47

User:JustinTime55/sandbox/No one's point of view is any more neutral than anyone else's

• Essay 744: User:Suigetsu/Wikipedia does not make shit up, 1358, 2015-09-30 23:06:15

User:Suigetsu/Wikipedia does not make shit up

• Essay 745: User:Brentman1575/No broken links, 1358, 2020-02-02 09:02:54

User:Brentman1575/No broken links

• Essay 746: User:Friday/fundamentalism, 1360, 2007-12-11 04:19:28

User:Friday/fundamentalism

• Essay 747: User:Wikid77/Blanking sections sometimes violates policies, 1362, 2022-08-03 06:53:12

User:Wikid77/Blanking sections sometimes violates policies

• Essay 748: Wikipedia:Not for Alternate Television, 1362, 2021-04-26 21:58:55

Wikipedia:Not for Alternate Television

• Essay 749: User:SkyGazer 512/PERM stalker, 1363, 2018-07-29 16:41:44

User:SkyGazer 512/PERM stalker

• Essay 750: Wikipedia:There is no community, 1372, 2009-08-30 19:32:49

Wikipedia:There is no community

• Essay 751: Wikipedia:No pre-close summaries, please, 1373, 2021-11-02 15:08:41

Wikipedia:No pre-close summaries, please

• Essay 752: Wikipedia:Disruption not considered cool, 1374, 2021-11-20 09:18:22

Wikipedia:Disruption not considered cool

• Essay 753: User:Robert McClenon/Administrator Abuse Cases, 1374, 2019-04-30 22:38:18

User:Robert McClenon/Administrator Abuse Cases

• Essay 754: Wikipedia:The one question, 1374, 2022-01-06 16:32:10

Wikipedia:The one question

• Essay 755: User:David Gerard/music, 1376, 2013-08-12 04:45:42

User:David Gerard/music

• Essay 756: Wikipedia:Don't get overwhelmed, 1378, 2016-04-07 13:28:08

Wikipedia:Don't get overwhelmed

• Essay 757: Wikipedia:Restoring part of a reverted edit, 1384, 2022-07-01 09:52:57

Wikipedia:Restoring part of a reverted edit

• Essay 758: User:HectorMoffet/Wikipedia is NOT NOT a BUREAUCRACY, 1384, 2014-02-13 00:34:28

User:HectorMoffet/Wikipedia is NOT NOT a BUREAUCRACY

• Essay 759: User:Asenine/Find Code, 1384, 2010-07-23 10:27:01

User:Asenine/Find Code

• Essay 760: Wikipedia:Desist, 1387, 2020-07-13 21:02:15

Wikipedia:Desist

• Essay 761: Wikipedia:Incentives, 1387, 2022-05-26 05:23:51

Wikipedia:Incentives

• Essay 762: User:Opencooper/Against lawyerisms, 1389, 2020-07-04 23:56:43

User:Opencooper/Against lawyerisms

• Essay 763: Wikipedia:JIB, 1390, 2022-05-09 12:30:14

Wikipedia:JIB

• Essay 764: User:SirFozzie/Get It Right, 1391, 2008-01-30 03:51:04

User:SirFozzie/Get It Right

• Essay 765: User:Faithlessthewonderboy/On bureaucratship, 1392, 2009-03-29 08:01:42

User:Faithlessthewonderboy/On bureaucratship

• Essay 766: User:Bahamut0013/right, 1393, 2010-10-02 20:41:15

User:Bahamut0013/right

• Essay 767: Wikipedia:Beware grandstanding text, 1394, 2012-06-08 10:25:44

Wikipedia:Beware grandstanding text

• Essay 768: User:Alexbrn/Lede bombing, 1395, 2021-11-27 07:57:07

User:Alexbrn/Lede bombing

• Essay 769: Wikipedia:Consequences, 1396, 2021-07-19 06:03:56

Wikipedia:Consequences

• Essay 770: User:Rhbsihvi/I hate non-free sites, 1396, 2011-04-14 19:55:48

User:Rhbsihvi/I hate non-free sites

• Essay 771: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is the Stanford Prison Experiment, 1398, 2013-09-12 20:00:55

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is the Stanford Prison Experiment

• Essay 772: Wikipedia:Not for Alternate History, 1399, 2021-07-10 12:20:04

Wikipedia:Not for Alternate History

• Essay 773: User:Worm That Turned/Misconceptions about RfA, 1399, 2014-12-30 17:15:21

User:Worm That Turned/Misconceptions about RfA

• Essay 774: User:Alan Liefting/Essays/Over-categorisation, 1399, 2021-04-01 04:25:25

User:Alan Liefting/Essays/Over-categorisation

• Essay 775: User:Vegaswikian/Navbox essay, 1400, 2011-09-23 18:19:52

User:Vegaswikian/Navbox essay

• Essay 776: Wikipedia:Projekt Gutenberg-DE, 1403, 2020-06-15 20:21:44

Wikipedia:Projekt Gutenberg-DE

• Essay 777: Wikipedia:Balance Your Perspectives, 1403, 2011-01-05 21:39:35

Wikipedia:Balance Your Perspectives

• Essay 778: Wikipedia:Don't call editors trolls, 1404, 2019-08-18 11:01:42

Wikipedia:Don't call editors trolls

• Essay 779: User:WAVY 10 Fan/WAVY 10 Essay/WP:FAND, 1412, 2008-05-03 15:24:07

User:WAVY 10 Fan/WAVY 10 Essay/WP:FAND

• Essay 780: User:Pigsonthewing/Technical robustness, 1414, 2013-01-31 10:53:55

User:Pigsonthewing/Technical robustness

• Essay 781: Wikipedia:Suggestions on how to ignore all rules, 1415, 2019-06-05 14:11:59

Wikipedia:Suggestions on how to ignore all rules

• Essay 782: Wikipedia:Common sense is not common, 1416, 2022-04-24 22:48:06

Wikipedia:Common sense is not common

• Essay 783: Wikipedia:Don't search for objections, 1417, 2022-01-14 08:40:49

Wikipedia:Don't search for objections

• Essay 784: User:TruPepitoM/The Other Vandalism, 1417, 2012-09-15 08:00:39

User:TruPepitoM/The Other Vandalism

• Essay 785: Wikipedia:Text move, 1418, 2019-05-14 01:39:22

Wikipedia:Text move

• Essay 786: User:Bobherry/Recipe for Porterhouse Steak (new user), 1420, 2021-11-22 03:23:16

User:Bobherry/Recipe for Porterhouse Steak (new user)

• Essay 787: User:Dreamy Jazz/Please do not bite the regulars, 1421, 2022-06-17 11:26:19

User:Dreamy Jazz/Please do not bite the regulars

• Essay 788: User:Kerrieburn/sandbox, 1422, 2022-06-03 10:23:15

User:Kerrieburn/sandbox

• Essay 789: Wikipedia:No Moral Code, 1422, 2017-01-22 05:07:36

Wikipedia:No Moral Code

• Essay 790: Wikipedia:Clean up after your discussions, 1429, 2021-11-27 08:00:17

Wikipedia:Clean up after your discussions

• Essay 791: Wikipedia:You are not a reliable source, 1430, 2013-12-10 12:42:39

Wikipedia:You are not a reliable source

• Essay 792: Wikipedia:Wikifurniture, 1431, 2011-09-20 11:57:19

Wikipedia:Wikifurniture

• Essay 793: User:EggplantParm/Wikipedia:Eggplant, 1431, 2011-10-17 20:11:17

User:EggplantParm/Wikipedia:Eggplant

• Essay 794: User:Digwuren/WP:SOUR, 1434, 2011-09-23 21:18:22

User:Digwuren/WP:SOUR

• Essay 795: User:Durova/Wikipedia is not an experiment in consensus reality, 1437, 2007-10-01 21:37:25

User:Durova/Wikipedia is not an experiment in consensus reality

• Essay 796: Wikipedia:Assassination, 1440, 2021-10-25 03:25:52

Wikipedia:Assassination

• Essay 797: Wikipedia:Suicide by admin, 1443, 2014-06-14 22:41:05

Wikipedia:Suicide by admin

• Essay 798: Wikipedia:CS1 cite categories, 1445, 2021-09-21 15:06:21

Wikipedia:CS1 cite categories

• Essay 799: Wikipedia:Use the default signature, 1450, 2020-04-23 20:07:21

Wikipedia:Use the default signature

• Essay 800: User:Webdrone/Entitlement, 1453, 2015-08-14 01:34:53

User:Webdrone/Entitlement

• Essay 801: Wikipedia:Reader Knows Nothing, 1456, 2022-03-30 21:23:25

Wikipedia:Reader Knows Nothing

• Essay 802: User:LinaMishima/Don't be shy, 1457, 2015-04-21 17:35:29

User:LinaMishima/Don't be shy

• Essay 803: User:Sophivorus/Asimov's prophecy, 1458, 2020-04-05 18:38:41

User:Sophivorus/Asimov's prophecy

• Essay 804: Wikipedia:Don't create an account, 1459, 2011-08-03 21:03:15

Wikipedia:Don't create an account

• Essay 805: User:Sbb1413/What infobox should be used on spaceflight articles, 1460, 2022-05-10 16:16:46

User:Sbb1413/What infobox should be used on spaceflight articles

• Essay 806: Wikipedia:No Encyclopedic Use, 1464, 2021-11-27 07:55:47

Wikipedia:No Encyclopedic Use

• Essay 807: Wikipedia:Editorially involved, 1465, 2010-05-25 17:41:12

Wikipedia:Editorially involved

• Essay 808: User:Robert McClenon/Internet celebrities, 1465, 2021-04-01 03:28:08

User:Robert McClenon/Internet celebrities

• Essay 809: User:Alexbrn/A POV that draws a source., 1466, 2022-01-15 04:59:21

User:Alexbrn/A POV that draws a source.

• Essay 810: User:Andrewa/the Search Wikipedia box, 1467, 2020-08-02 17:49:28

User:Andrewa/the Search Wikipedia box

• Essay 811: User:Mboverload/Challenge an administrator, 1469, 2017-12-29 00:58:02

User:Mboverload/Challenge an administrator

• Essay 812: User:BilCat/Essays/Interwikis, 1470, 2010-03-04 01:22:33

User:BilCat/Essays/Interwikis

• Essay 813: User:Dweller/conflict, 1472, 2008-01-22 16:25:28

User:Dweller/conflict

• Essay 814: User:John Reid/Metastasis, 1473, 2010-05-25 10:54:23

User:John Reid/Metastasis

• Essay 815: User:WLU/Five stages of Wikipedia, 1475, 2008-09-05 11:34:54

User:WLU/Five stages of Wikipedia

• Essay 816: Wikipedia:Strong, 1475, 2022-02-21 19:10:06

Wikipedia:Strong

• Essay 817: Wikipedia:Romanization of Javanese, 1477, 2017-07-23 01:30:32

Wikipedia:Romanization of Javanese

• Essay 818: Wikipedia:The Parable of the Ants, 1477, 2021-11-04 13:40:13

Wikipedia:The Parable of the Ants

• Essay 819: Wikipedia:Source counting, 1480, 2017-12-05 17:49:30

Wikipedia:Source counting

• Essay 820: User:EVula/opining/pet peeves, 1480, 2011-02-02 20:38:22

User:EVula/opining/pet peeves

• Essay 821: Wikipedia:Shunning, 1481, 2019-08-11 01:10:37

Wikipedia:Shunning

• Essay 822: User:Skomorokh/thekidinafrica, 1482, 2009-01-18 00:46:36

User:Skomorokh/thekidinafrica

• Essay 823: User:Lar/IRC, 1484, 2008-02-06 04:33:04

User:Lar/IRC

• Essay 824: User:DJ DYNAMIKE/sandbox, 1488, 2021-12-20 05:40:54

User:DJ DYNAMIKE/sandbox

• Essay 825: User:Editor510/Wikimaster save, 1488, 2008-06-11 17:38:53

User:Editor510/Wikimaster save

• Essay 826: Wikipedia:Not Omniscient, 1488, 2021-08-18 19:19:12

Wikipedia:Not Omniscient

• Essay 827: Wikipedia:Christian POV on Wikipedia, 1490, 2022-02-02 06:49:29

Wikipedia:Christian POV on Wikipedia

• Essay 828: User:Davidwr/Inherent Notability as a slang term, 1492, 2021-04-01 03:28:39

User:Davidwr/Inherent Notability as a slang term

• Essay 829: Wikipedia:Don't leave it a stub, 1492, 2021-08-10 21:42:09

Wikipedia:Don't leave it a stub

• Essay 830: Wikipedia:Idioms, 1494, 2022-07-31 02:00:12

Wikipedia:Idioms

• Essay 831: User:Andrewa/my second epiphany, 1494, 2019-08-01 00:19:43

User:Andrewa/my second epiphany

• Essay 832: User:Ozhu/A gentle introduction to death metal, 1495, 2013-09-04 07:05:49

User:Ozhu/A gentle introduction to death metal

• Essay 833: Wikipedia:Citing citations, 1495, 2019-05-19 00:18:31

Wikipedia:Citing citations

• Essay 834: User:GrooveDog/Don't bite, 1497, 2007-08-24 01:11:29

User:GrooveDog/Don't bite

• Essay 835: User:Isotope23/Notability:Buildings, 1498, 2006-09-05 14:04:17

User:Isotope23/Notability:Buildings

• Essay 836: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion, 1498, 2022-01-06 22:05:36

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion

• Essay 837: User:Ivanvector/Drafts are cheap, 1498, 2016-01-26 17:56:15

User:Ivanvector/Drafts are cheap

• Essay 838: User:Danny/The real Cabal, 1501, 2010-06-06 12:25:03

User:Danny/The real Cabal

• Essay 839: User:Hellno2/Premeditated vandalism, 1502, 2012-04-19 22:37:52

User:Hellno2/Premeditated vandalism

• Essay 840: Wikipedia:Newbies aren't always clueless, 1502, 2020-03-27 18:29:12

Wikipedia:Newbies aren't always clueless

• Essay 841: Wikipedia:Punishing productivity, 1504, 2020-06-12 23:10:37

Wikipedia:Punishing productivity

• Essay 842: Wikipedia:Nobody cares, 1505, 2022-07-09 21:47:28

Wikipedia:Nobody cares

• Essay 843: User:Seonookim/Contents not known by many, 1505, 2019-08-23 15:36:57

User:Seonookim/Contents not known by many

• Essay 844: User:Karen Carpenter/Alternate account, 1506, 2007-12-30 10:28:19

User:Karen Carpenter/Alternate account

• Essay 845: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is timeless, 1506, 2020-03-30 20:51:09

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is timeless

• Essay 846: Wikipedia:Attempting to Improve, 1507, 2021-08-27 16:11:06

Wikipedia:Attempting to Improve

• Essay 847: Wikipedia:Let the reader decide, 1507, 2021-12-23 02:09:43

Wikipedia:Let the reader decide

• Essay 848: User:Locomotive207/Pumping Gas, 1508, 2021-04-27 14:29:31

User:Locomotive207/Pumping Gas

• Essay 849: Wikipedia:WikiMule, 1508, 2020-11-21 17:58:23

Wikipedia:WikiMule

• Essay 850: User:Andrewa/AGF cuts both ways, 1509, 2016-12-13 21:19:55

User:Andrewa/AGF cuts both ways

• Essay 851: Wikipedia:BLP awards, 1510, 2021-10-30 15:37:53

Wikipedia:BLP awards

• Essay 852: User:JJPMaster/Guide to requesting permissions, 1511, 2021-01-13 23:31:22

User:JJPMaster/Guide to requesting permissions

• Essay 853: Wikipedia:Partisanship, 1512, 2021-11-27 07:58:08

Wikipedia:Partisanship

• Essay 854: Wikipedia:ANI's discuss rule, 1512, 2016-12-30 03:58:07

Wikipedia:ANI's discuss rule

• Essay 855: User:Sailsbystars/Incompetence is required, 1513, 2011-02-24 19:27:20

User:Sailsbystars/Incompetence is required

• Essay 856: User:Editor510/Wikitardis save, 1513, 2008-06-11 18:35:18

User:Editor510/Wikitardis save

• Essay 857: User:Eridian314/The daily life of a Wikipedian, 1513, 2021-02-04 20:12:56

User:Eridian314/The daily life of a Wikipedian

• Essay 858: User:SebastianHelm/LEADSEED, 1515, 2020-12-30 15:31:22

User:SebastianHelm/LEADSEED

• Essay 859: Wikipedia:Bloopers and continuity errors, 1516, 2018-12-06 18:04:58

Wikipedia:Bloopers and continuity errors

• Essay 860: User:Sgeo/vol, 1519, 2008-04-25 23:31:20

User:Sgeo/vol

• Essay 861: Wikipedia:Lurkers, 1521, 2022-02-04 15:36:52

Wikipedia:Lurkers

• Essay 862: User:Bonkers The Clown/A first-person narrative related to my talk page, something one should read before talking to me, 1524, 2018-12-29 15:29:00

User:Bonkers The Clown/A first-person narrative related to my talk page, something one should read before talking to me

• Essay 863: Wikipedia:Can't break it, 1525, 2022-07-22 21:48:03

Wikipedia:Can't break it

• Essay 864: User:Punk Boi 8/sandbox/aspergers, 1526, 2010-11-04 15:45:09

User:Punk Boi 8/sandbox/aspergers

• Essay 865: User:Phoebe/essays, 1527, 2010-06-08 13:05:23

User:Phoebe/essays

• Essay 866: Wikipedia:Why Heavy Bombers Are Not Useful Anymore, 1530, 2022-02-25 06:44:35

Wikipedia:Why Heavy Bombers Are Not Useful Anymore

• Essay 867: Wikipedia:Ignore all consequences, 1531, 2019-08-08 22:35:45

Wikipedia:Ignore all consequences

• Essay 868: User:Andrewa/gentle editor, 1535, 2021-05-06 01:54:08

User:Andrewa/gentle editor

• Essay 869: User:Born2cycle/Rationalized JDLI, 1536, 2018-06-30 00:32:49

User:Born2cycle/Rationalized JDLI

• Essay 870: Wikipedia:Sinclair's Law, 1536, 2019-08-06 13:44:04

Wikipedia:Sinclair's Law

• Essay 871: Wikipedia:Identifying copyrights in links, 1537, 2010-03-04 00:35:23

Wikipedia:Identifying copyrights in links

• Essay 872: User:Awilley/What WP:NOTCENSORED is not, 1539, 2015-10-14 01:32:30

User:Awilley/What WP:NOTCENSORED is not

• Essay 873: User:Salvidrim!/Wikipedia is a backlog, 1539, 2022-07-05 21:36:41

User:Salvidrim!/Wikipedia is a backlog

• Essay 874: Wikipedia:Writing about current events, 1541, 2017-09-26 05:18:45

Wikipedia:Writing about current events

• Essay 875: Wikipedia:So your article got deleted, 1545, 2017-01-22 05:19:02

Wikipedia:So your article got deleted

• Essay 876: User:Geo Swan/opinions/Minsk not Pinsk: Herman Khan's explanation of the dangers of outsmarting one's self, 1546, 2016-03-27 04:40:57

User:Geo Swan/opinions/Minsk not Pinsk: Herman Khan's explanation of the dangers of outsmarting one's self

• Essay 877: User:Mindspillage/sense, 1550, 2009-05-26 18:42:52

User:Mindspillage/sense

• Essay 878: User:Isotope23/Sandbox, 1550, 2007-11-01 20:33:06

User:Isotope23/Sandbox

• Essay 879: User:Tisane/Don't delete users' résumés, 1551, 2021-04-01 08:06:13

User:Tisane/Don't delete users' résumés

• Essay 880: User:Qzekrom/Adding your pronouns to your signature, 1551, 2019-03-28 05:37:56

User:Qzekrom/Adding your pronouns to your signature

• Essay 881: Wikipedia:No slack, 1552, 2020-06-23 08:07:53

Wikipedia:No slack

• Essay 882: User:Geo Swan/opinions/inspired by 'wikithreads are bad', 1553, 2012-03-28 22:01:02

User:Geo Swan/opinions/inspired by 'wikithreads are bad'

• Essay 883: Wikipedia:Drafts in 5W, 1554, 2014-07-16 07:37:21

Wikipedia:Drafts in 5W

• Essay 884: Wikipedia:WikiPeace, 1555, 2022-07-01 15:38:54

Wikipedia:WikiPeace

• Essay 885: User:Jehochman/Wikipedia is not a game of Clue, 1556, 2011-01-20 15:41:22

User:Jehochman/Wikipedia is not a game of Clue

• Essay 886: User:ChrisGualtieri/Writing/AFC, 1556, 2012-05-26 15:19:36

User:ChrisGualtieri/Writing/AFC

• Essay 887: User:Robert McClenon/Toy portals, 1556, 2020-01-31 05:46:30

User:Robert McClenon/Toy portals

• Essay 888: Wikipedia:ISSOBLP, 1560, 2014-10-20 19:24:47

Wikipedia:ISSOBLP

• Essay 889: User:つがる/Why I shouldn't edit Wikipedia, 1562, 2020-11-22 04:29:57

User:つがる/Why I shouldn't edit Wikipedia

• Essay 890: Wikipedia:Acting in bad faith, 1563, 2021-12-22 18:39:51

Wikipedia:Acting in bad faith

• Essay 891: User:Eumat114/How not to get unblocked II, 1564, 2020-04-12 00:48:48

User:Eumat114/How not to get unblocked II

• Essay 892: Wikipedia:Argue, don't opine, 1564, 2014-03-25 12:36:43

Wikipedia:Argue, don't opine

• Essay 893: Wikipedia:Policy sculpting: inclusion versus exclusion, 1565, 2011-01-26 15:15:50

Wikipedia:Policy sculpting: inclusion versus exclusion

• Essay 894: Wikipedia:Avoid negative claims, 1566, 2022-04-08 15:31:45

Wikipedia:Avoid negative claims

• Essay 895: Wikipedia:Cite tendentious texts directly, 1567, 2010-02-06 17:58:06

Wikipedia:Cite tendentious texts directly

• Essay 896: User:Anchoress/Meanwhile, back at the ranch, 1568, 2015-03-02 19:58:31

User:Anchoress/Meanwhile, back at the ranch

• Essay 897: Wikipedia:At any time, 1568, 2020-12-14 19:26:34

Wikipedia:At any time

• Essay 898: Wikipedia:Cite WP42 at AfD, 1568, 2018-07-01 20:07:09

Wikipedia:Cite WP42 at AfD

• Essay 899: Wikipedia:Iron Law of Infobox Ubiquity, 1570, 2022-06-22 18:58:45

Wikipedia:Iron Law of Infobox Ubiquity

• Essay 900: User:Hijiri88/Don't call other editors "deletionists", 1571, 2021-04-01 07:36:27

User:Hijiri88/Don't call other editors "deletionists"

• Essay 901: Wikipedia:Truth, not verifiability, 1571, 2021-06-19 19:25:23

Wikipedia:Truth, not verifiability

• Essay 902: User:LaserLegs/NOTMANDELA, 1573, 2020-01-24 16:11:55

User:LaserLegs/NOTMANDELA

• Essay 903: User:TortoiseWrath/An Open Letter to the Wikimedia Foundation, 1573, 2013-07-03 01:27:05

User:TortoiseWrath/An Open Letter to the Wikimedia Foundation

• Essay 904: User:Hydnjo/ww, 1573, 2020-04-10 20:19:17

User:Hydnjo/ww

• Essay 905: User:Suomi Finland 2009/Unreliable reliable source, 1574, 2010-11-26 13:47:05

User:Suomi Finland 2009/Unreliable reliable source

• Essay 906: Wikipedia:Not a barbarian horde, 1575, 2018-02-04 02:35:29

Wikipedia:Not a barbarian horde

• Essay 907: Wikipedia:You can be named after your son, 1580, 2021-10-11 00:45:39

Wikipedia:You can be named after your son

• Essay 908: User:Viriditas/Don't hold articles hostage, 1586, 2012-09-17 05:50:31

User:Viriditas/Don't hold articles hostage

• Essay 909: User:56independent/WikiToken, 1587, 2021-10-21 07:11:20

User:56independent/WikiToken

• Essay 910: User:Elucidate/Essays/Passion within Wikipedia, 1587, 2008-11-01 18:58:10

User:Elucidate/Essays/Passion within Wikipedia

• Essay 911: User:S8333631/How Pending Changes will Kill Wikipedia, 1589, 2011-06-04 02:55:27

User:S8333631/How Pending Changes will Kill Wikipedia

• Essay 912: Wikipedia:Stoopid or lyin', 1590, 2015-04-18 18:01:38

Wikipedia:Stoopid or lyin'

• Essay 913: User:Ritchie333/The Dumpy test, 1599, 2021-12-16 06:58:46

User:Ritchie333/The Dumpy test

• Essay 914: User:Ritchie333/Don't template the retirees, 1602, 2021-12-16 06:58:22

User:Ritchie333/Don't template the retirees

• Essay 915: User:Beetricks/What makes the quintessential article?, 1606, 2021-05-24 01:05:59

User:Beetricks/What makes the quintessential article?

• Essay 916: Wikipedia:The Internet is not Serious Business, 1608, 2011-12-20 06:40:44

Wikipedia:The Internet is not Serious Business

• Essay 917: User:Tawker/Any Featured Article, 1608, 2007-02-04 05:21:29

User:Tawker/Any Featured Article

• Essay 918: User:Keegan/Eternal Spring Break, 1611, 2010-08-05 05:58:31

User:Keegan/Eternal Spring Break

• Essay 919: Wikipedia:1.5 sources, 1612, 2019-07-12 07:23:27

Wikipedia:1.5 sources

• Essay 920: User:Epicgenius/capitalizations, 1616, 2020-05-03 21:50:58

User:Epicgenius/capitalizations

• Essay 921: User:Lankiveil/The Grandma Test, 1616, 2008-12-30 11:46:16

User:Lankiveil/The Grandma Test

• Essay 922: User:Foxnpichu/Who they are now, 1618, 2020-10-21 16:12:45

User:Foxnpichu/Who they are now

• Essay 923: User:Bowser423/Troll Warning, 1622, 2019-04-05 15:40:54

User:Bowser423/Troll Warning

• Essay 924: Wikipedia:Death by Wikipedia, 1623, 2021-12-21 11:57:34

Wikipedia:Death by Wikipedia

• Essay 925: User:Elli/Complete list, 1627, 2021-03-04 12:16:03

User:Elli/Complete list

• Essay 926: Wikipedia:Hearsay, 1629, 2019-12-26 13:04:49

Wikipedia:Hearsay

• Essay 927: Wikipedia:Concerns with United States Education Program, 1629, 2016-11-12 01:25:07

Wikipedia:Concerns with United States Education Program

• Essay 928: Wikipedia:WINDMILL, 1629, 2015-02-22 23:51:32

Wikipedia:WINDMILL

• Essay 929: Wikipedia:En.Wiki is not De.Wiki, 1631, 2022-07-27 08:22:05

Wikipedia:En.Wiki is not De.Wiki

• Essay 930: Wikipedia:Curiosity killed the cat, 1633, 2021-05-23 22:13:39

Wikipedia:Curiosity killed the cat

• Essay 931: User:Andrewa/wrong article 2, 1633, 2019-09-23 23:26:19

User:Andrewa/wrong article 2

• Essay 932: User:Isotope23/Please don't tilt the windmills, 1634, 2012-12-11 17:47:55

User:Isotope23/Please don't tilt the windmills

• Essay 933: User:Jacedc/Identity concealment, 1635, 2015-04-09 16:50:29

User:Jacedc/Identity concealment

• Essay 934: User:EclipseDude/My Approach to RfA, 1640, 2019-03-31 22:00:57

User:EclipseDude/My Approach to RfA

• Essay 935: Wikipedia:There are no awards, 1640, 2022-05-26 16:27:53

Wikipedia:There are no awards

• Essay 936: Wikipedia:Politics as a pejorative, 1640, 2014-05-15 23:20:12

Wikipedia:Politics as a pejorative

• Essay 937: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is human readable, 1641, 2020-07-16 21:31:27

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is human readable

• Essay 938: Wikipedia:Explanationism, 1644, 2022-01-06 18:59:52

Wikipedia:Explanationism

• Essay 939: User:Dronebogus/Unpersoning, 1644, 2022-02-19 10:49:57

User:Dronebogus/Unpersoning

• Essay 940: User:Chowbok/Thoughts on regional English differences, 1645, 2010-10-09 05:33:15

User:Chowbok/Thoughts on regional English differences

• Essay 941: Wikipedia:Grow a thick skin, 1649, 2021-03-31 21:23:18

Wikipedia:Grow a thick skin

• Essay 942: Wikipedia:What is fringe?, 1650, 2021-10-04 05:07:59

Wikipedia:What is fringe?

• Essay 943: Wikipedia:Improvement sucks, 1651, 2021-11-27 08:01:03

Wikipedia:Improvement sucks

• Essay 944: Wikipedia:Cyberwiki, 1653, 2021-12-25 10:21:15

Wikipedia:Cyberwiki

• Essay 945: Wikipedia:Stub Makers, 1658, 2021-12-03 06:13:28

Wikipedia:Stub Makers

• Essay 946: User:Good afternoon/students, 1660, 2018-06-18 02:45:00

User:Good afternoon/students

• Essay 947: Wikipedia:Privacy of affiliation, 1662, 2016-12-14 16:24:08

Wikipedia:Privacy of affiliation

• Essay 948: Wikipedia:Ethnicity is not notable, 1662, 2011-02-10 01:56:19

Wikipedia:Ethnicity is not notable

• Essay 949: User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman/Deleting redirects to facilitate searching, 1662, 2021-04-01 07:35:09

User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman/Deleting redirects to facilitate searching

• Essay 950: User:Animum/WP:POINT and its uses, 1664, 2008-07-18 19:26:59

User:Animum/WP:POINT and its uses

• Essay 951: User:Bri/COI investigations and outing policy, 1664, 2017-03-07 20:34:49

User:Bri/COI investigations and outing policy

• Essay 952: User:Petri Krohn/How to get rid of POV crap, 1665, 2021-04-01 09:52:40

User:Petri Krohn/How to get rid of POV crap

• Essay 953: Wikipedia:No blurry images, 1668, 2021-05-26 19:49:53

Wikipedia:No blurry images

• Essay 954: User:Antelan/Call a spade a spade, 1672, 2014-01-11 07:43:27

User:Antelan/Call a spade a spade

• Essay 955: User:Titodutta/Essays/Self-contradictory reliable sources, 1672, 2012-11-03 05:22:28

User:Titodutta/Essays/Self-contradictory reliable sources

• Essay 956: Wikipedia:Hand-waving, 1672, 2016-12-30 16:54:24

Wikipedia:Hand-waving

• Essay 957: Wikipedia:We already have enough of those, thank you very much, 1674, 2021-01-13 10:27:26

Wikipedia:We already have enough of those, thank you very much

• Essay 958: User:NeoFreak/Essays/Essjay, 1674, 2007-03-22 20:31:37

User:NeoFreak/Essays/Essjay

• Essay 959: Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is reliable, 1674, 2015-11-03 02:36:30

Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is reliable

• Essay 960: User:Skomorokh/The Curtain, 1680, 2010-07-27 22:56:04

User:Skomorokh/The Curtain

• Essay 961: Wikipedia:Ignore all precedent, 1681, 2019-07-12 07:21:18

Wikipedia:Ignore all precedent

• Essay 962: User:Bellezzasolo/RFA Requirements, 1681, 2018-03-23 21:45:24

User:Bellezzasolo/RFA Requirements

• Essay 963: User:Tisane/Characteristics desirable in a wiki god-king, 1685, 2010-07-03 03:46:43

User:Tisane/Characteristics desirable in a wiki god-king

• Essay 964: Wikipedia:Me too!, 1686, 2015-02-19 02:20:31

Wikipedia:Me too!

• Essay 965: Wikipedia:If you don't understand the rules of interaction..., 1688, 2014-10-28 02:00:33

Wikipedia:If you don't understand the rules of interaction...

• Essay 966: Wikipedia:Key searches, 1688, 2021-08-21 14:20:53

Wikipedia:Key searches

• Essay 967: Wikipedia:When OR is OK, 1689, 2018-12-06 18:03:00

Wikipedia:When OR is OK

• Essay 968: Wikipedia:Precedents, 1690, 2022-06-22 05:08:34

Wikipedia:Precedents

• Essay 969: Wikipedia:Horses for courses, 1691, 2014-07-28 15:35:53

Wikipedia:Horses for courses

• Essay 970: Wikipedia:Dig, 1691, 2022-01-06 17:09:30

Wikipedia:Dig

• Essay 971: User:Cranloa12n/Speedy deletion applies to drafts too, 1692, 2022-03-20 02:23:30

User:Cranloa12n/Speedy deletion applies to drafts too

• Essay 972: Wikipedia:Don't cite WP42 at AfD, 1696, 2018-07-01 20:06:51

Wikipedia:Don't cite WP42 at AfD

• Essay 973: User:Redvers/Say no to Commons, 1697, 2021-09-13 08:25:45

User:Redvers/Say no to Commons

• Essay 974: Wikipedia:Trivially more concise, 1697, 2022-02-13 05:52:57

Wikipedia:Trivially more concise

• Essay 975: Wikipedia:Avoiding linkseas, 1698, 2016-01-02 10:04:12

Wikipedia:Avoiding linkseas

• Essay 976: User:TheFarix/Avoid standalone subheadings, 1700, 2017-04-19 16:30:02

User:TheFarix/Avoid standalone subheadings

• Essay 977: User:Ed Poor/Rights, 1701, 2009-06-02 13:40:53

User:Ed Poor/Rights

• Essay 978: Wikipedia:Articles must be written, 1704, 2019-10-03 16:49:18

Wikipedia:Articles must be written

• Essay 979: Wikipedia:Not so arbitrary breaks, 1706, 2021-08-27 03:47:12

Wikipedia:Not so arbitrary breaks

• Essay 980: User:Georgewilliamherbert/DefendEachOther, 1707, 2007-01-27 15:11:59

User:Georgewilliamherbert/DefendEachOther

• Essay 981: Wikipedia:Wikipedia should be fun, 1708, 2009-06-27 19:57:32

Wikipedia:Wikipedia should be fun

• Essay 982: User:Mhawk10/Taint, 1710, 2021-11-23 11:56:21

User:Mhawk10/Taint

• Essay 983: Wikipedia:Notability points, 1711, 2017-10-11 12:27:15

Wikipedia:Notability points

• Essay 984: User:The Founders Intent/Thoughts on Citations, 1714, 2021-04-01 10:12:30

User:The Founders Intent/Thoughts on Citations

• Essay 985: User:Sideways713/Reliability isn't always immediately obvious, 1718, 2010-12-26 20:27:12

User:Sideways713/Reliability isn't always immediately obvious

• Essay 986: User:Bibliomaniac15/Butcher's rules, 1720, 2009-02-11 02:21:52

User:Bibliomaniac15/Butcher's rules

• Essay 987: User:Urban Versis 32/hottips, 1721, 2022-06-23 22:17:09

User:Urban Versis 32/hottips

• Essay 988: User:Halo/How to force through policy without consensus, 1721, 2008-07-06 09:02:58

User:Halo/How to force through policy without consensus

• Essay 989: Wikipedia:Checklists, 1722, 2016-01-02 10:08:50

Wikipedia:Checklists

• Essay 990: Wikipedia:Chimera articles, 1723, 2022-04-20 23:49:11

Wikipedia:Chimera articles

• Essay 991: User:애국심 존중/To vandalism, 1725, 2022-02-06 00:19:41

User:애국심 존중/To vandalism

• Essay 992: User:Hasteur/WikiBombing, 1726, 2019-03-18 16:38:35

User:Hasteur/WikiBombing

• Essay 993: User:Ritchie333/Don't overdose on citation requests, 1728, 2021-12-16 06:58:20

User:Ritchie333/Don't overdose on citation requests

• Essay 994: User:Jehochman/Responding to rudeness, 1728, 2010-09-04 12:12:52

User:Jehochman/Responding to rudeness

• Essay 995: Wikipedia:Don't be a rubbernecker, 1728, 2019-04-05 17:46:05

Wikipedia:Don't be a rubbernecker

• Essay 996: Wikipedia:Reference Desk philosophies, 1728, 2010-06-18 18:37:34

Wikipedia:Reference Desk philosophies

• Essay 997: Wikipedia:Welcome unregistered editing, 1732, 2022-02-25 16:40:33

Wikipedia:Welcome unregistered editing

• Essay 998: User:Niffweed17/notability, 1732, 2007-02-09 21:31:24

User:Niffweed17/notability

• Essay 999: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not aniconistic, 1736, 2013-04-06 11:09:09

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not aniconistic

• Essay 1000: Wikipedia:No get out of jail free cards, 1736, 2022-02-08 18:10:07

Wikipedia:No get out of jail free cards