Treaty Interpretation
27 Followers
Recent papers in Treaty Interpretation
This book addresses current developments concerning the interpretation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the part of international courts and tribunals. It does so from different perspectives, by focusing... more
This chapter examines the domestic origins of the canons of construction used in treaty interpretation. It shows that these canons typically draw on domestic principles for statutory and contractual interpretation. Section I surveys... more
This book deepens the study of the law of treaties by offering specific solutions to current legal problems. It provides a high-level theoretical and practical approach, touching upon all major current issues of the law of treaties. It is... more
The chapter explores the historical background to plurilingual treaty-making as well as the practice of the PCIJ and ICJ to the interpretation of plurilingual treaties. The chapter includes a detailed examination of Article 33 of the... more
The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention) was adopted by the General Assembly sixty-five years ago. Following the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust, the Genocide Convention’s primary... more
Spacefaring activities are currently undertaken by more actors than before, including private companies, and projects have become oriented towards long-time presence not only in outer space, but including on the surface of celestial... more
The proliferation of International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and treaty-based investment arbitration has raised concerns over the extent to which IIAs are actually fair and are able to balance the interests of foreign investors and... more
In the current legal landscape, it is possible to craft policy that combats drug abuse and drug harms, protects human rights, and complies with international drug control law in good faith, by regulating the recreational uses of cannabis... more
In the context of the current negotiations of the ‘asylum package’ and considering the existing regulation on the administrative detention of asylum seekers in EU law, this contribution aims to identify the legal difficulties that would... more
This chapter explores the relationship between international human rights law and international humanitarian law in the targeting of members of armed groups in non-international armed conflicts. It attempts to flesh out points of... more
This paper seeks to clarify the confusions regarding the relationships between international human rights law and international humanitarian law, the principle of equality of belligerents, and the use of the term “should” in treaties.... more
International cultural heritage-related disputes rarely entail uniquely cultural issues. These disputes — just like any other international dispute — may involve questions relating to other branches of the law. The case of the Crimean art... more
The purpose of the present Thesis is to examine the principle of evolutionary interpretation and its connection to the option of a "special meaning" introduced in Article 31.4 VCLT. The analysis initiates with some general remarks on the... more
Arguably, sovereignty, as understood in the Lotus Case, does not foreclose the possibility of international trade law’s renovation through a constitutional interpretation. The article identifies this possibility through the epithet of... more
If law is a social construct, the product of interactions between individuals and other legal persons, then it is not surprising that we are drawn to describing law or specific legal instruments in the same way we do those legal persons.... more
Il saggio intende mettere in luce la complessità degli organi di controllo nel diritto internazionale e le loro funzioni, al fine di chiarire il valore delle pronunce del Comitato europeo dei diritti sociali (Comitato europeo o CEDS) per... more
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has consistently adopted a universalist approach to treaty interpretation, reflected in its evolutive interpretation of the American Convention on Human Rights. An overview of the most important... more
Academic analysis of pronouncements of human rights treaty monitoring bodies has tended to focus on their contribution to the promotion of human rights in domestic jurisdictions, particularly to convey the desire of scholars to see more... more
The principle of contemporaneous interpretation provides that the terms of a treaty shall be interpreted as they were understood at the time of the conclusion of the treaty. The principle of evolutionary interpretation, on the other hand,... more
While treaties can be notoriously difficult to amend by formal means, they must nevertheless be adapted over time in order to remain useful. Herein lies the role of subsequent practice as a key tool for treaty change. Subsequent practice... more
The adoption of the 2008 Rotterdam Rules in six equally authentic language versions has presented the maritime community with an issue that it has not (knowingly) previously encountered, namely the issue of the interpretation of... more
Intertemporal Linguistics in International Law examines and offers an overdue solution to a specific problem central to the resolution of an ever increasing number of international legal disputes: how to interpret a treaty with terms that... more
International intellectual property regime is one of the most problematic legal regimes in international economic law. Although its establishment goes back to more than one hundred years ago, it can not be argued that it is stable and... more
The role of regional organisations in dispute settlement for states is very instrumental to the resolution of inter-state disputes and human-rights related disputes. This paper will highlight the interaction between state sovereignty and... more
International investment cases show the frequent use of good faith arguments by both investors and respondent states. These cases also illustrate how parties and tribunals tend to conceptualize the good faith principle which has become an... more
The object and purpose is usually perceived as referring to one notion, the purpose that a norm is aimed to serve. This paper, however, argues that for interpretation in light of the object and purpose, first, the purpose that can be... more
The cornerstone of international law in providing stability in international relations is the sovereign equality of States, and both the Responsiblity to Protect and the Landlocked States clash with this bedrock of international law. The... more
This post analyses the doctrinal contributions of the “Norstar” Judgement to both freedom of navigation (Article 87(1)(a) of UNCLOS) and exclusive flag state jurisdiction (Article 92(1) of UNCLOS). The post concludes with a brief... more
While the topic of this chapter may appear out of place in an edited volume on 'evolutionary interpretation', intertemporal linguistics in fact drills down directly into the epicentre of the evolutionary interpretation debate. In this... more
International lawyers and courts consider the principle of systemic integration to be a potential answer to difficulties arising from the fragmentation of public international law. This article questions the application of this approach... more
My dissenting opinion of the Interim Award on Jurisdiction in the PCA Case No. 2013-34 Venezuela US SRL v Venezuela. It relates to the applicability of the MFN Clause to establish jurisdiction
Le mur – à la fois « mur-objet » et « mur-mot » –, et plus précisément le mur-frontière, étant le « signe de » quelque chose, les outils de la sémiotique et de la sémantique peuvent être sollicités. Toute édification d'un mur-frontière... more
Az Európa Tanácsnak (ET) az emberi lény emberi jogainak és méltóságának a biológia és az orvostudomány alkalmazására tekintettel történő védelméről szóló, Oviedóban, 1997. április 4-én kelt egyezménye a bioetika nemzetközi jogi... more
International lawyers and courts consider the principle of systemic integration to be a potential answer to difficulties arising from the fragmentation of public international law. This article questions the application of this approach... more
Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties calls for consideration of the ordinary meaning as the starting point in the process of interpretation. Although the linguistic concept of ordinary meaning is founded on the idea... more
Older men and women have been identified as facing many human rights violations, yet provisions protecting this category are scattered over a large number of highly diverse instruments. Notwithstanding increased calls for a global binding... more
International investment cases show the frequent use of good faith arguments by both investors and respondent states. These cases also illustrate how parties and tribunals tend to conceptualize the good faith principle which has become an... more
Measures in the System of Central State Organs). Notably the Czech Constitution provides that the Constitutional Court has to decide on the measures necessary to implement binding decisions of international courts if it cannot be... more
Different interpretations of the terms under the dispute settlement clause in Turkey-Turkic state BITs have recently caused conflicting decisions rendered by investment tribunals. To be more precise, the tribunal in Kılıç regarded this... more
This article presents a methodological critique of the interpretation, increasingly popular after Hassan v UK, that Article 5(1) ECHR allows the internment of prisoners of war or civilians in international armed conflicts according to... more