Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 176 views

    Eportfolio Criteria 2015-16

    Uploaded by

    Teresa MacKinnon
    Annually updated to reflect any changes in interface or criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Eportfolio Criteria 2015-16

    Uploaded by

    Teresa MacKinnon
    176 views1 page
    Annually updated to reflect any changes in interface or criteria.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Annually updated to reflect any changes in interface or criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    176 views1 page

    Eportfolio Criteria 2015-16

    Uploaded by

    Teresa MacKinnon
    Annually updated to reflect any changes in interface or criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    E-portfolio assessment criteria 2014-15.

    Audience awareness, focus


    Appropriateness to task

    Use of media/technology to
    enhance readers engagement
    Effective use of e-portfolio page for
    conveying the learning process

    Analysis & Reflection


    (Why?, So what? Now what?)

    student has clearly selected relevant


    materials for the purpose of
    assessment, shows understanding
    of criteria. Page has a suitable tone,
    student has articulated and
    evidenced their language learning
    persona. Assessment view presents
    a coherent narrative of the learners
    journey.
    good use of mahara, some
    creativity, enhanced with good use
    of range of media. Highly authentic,
    personal, engaging and thought
    provoking, gives the right amount of
    detail, assessor can see students
    personal engagement with language
    learning process and efforts made
    to address difficulties.

    1 2.1 2.2 3 F
    (81/74 65 55 45 30)

    extensive reflection and critical


    analysis, develops a clear personal
    narrative, shows understanding of
    experiences and gives plans for
    future language learning.

    1 2.1 2.2 3 F
    (81/74 65 55 45 30)

    1 2.1 2.2 3 F
    (81/74 65 55 45 30)

    Little/no evidence of selection, poor


    understanding of the purpose of
    page created for assessment, page
    does not have suitable tone for task,
    no real insights into students
    language learning persona.
    Assessment view does not present a
    coherent narrative of the learners
    journey.
    Minimal use of technical
    possibilities, evidence and
    presentation do not enhance the
    narrative, difficult for assessor to
    follow, seems contrived/ superficial.
    Not very interesting and has little
    impact, story rambles and seems
    too long/too short or disjointed. No
    evidence of the application of
    learning strategies
    Little analysis and reflection, mostly
    descriptive, lacks explicit personal
    awareness to apply to future
    language learning.

    The fail mark of 30 ensures that a student would have to fail in more than one of the criteria in order to fail the e-portfolio. (45+45+30 = average
    40)
    Next year we will review the possibility of formally penalising late submission.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy