Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Jury Form: Student Name: - Date: Composition1: - Composition 2: - Category 1 2 3 4

    Uploaded by

    amy.dunker7402
    This document appears to be a jury form for evaluating student compositions. It contains categories for assessing musical skills like orchestration, melodic interest, contrapuntal interest, form, rhythmic interest, and originality. Each category includes descriptors to evaluate elements in two student compositions on a scale from 1 to 4 or by checking boxes, with 1 being the lowest score and 4 being the highest.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Jury Form: Student Name: - Date: Composition1: - Composition 2: - Category 1 2 3 4

    Uploaded by

    amy.dunker7402
    17 views2 pages
    This document appears to be a jury form for evaluating student compositions. It contains categories for assessing musical skills like orchestration, melodic interest, contrapuntal interest, form, rhythmic interest, and originality. Each category includes descriptors to evaluate elements in two student compositions on a scale from 1 to 4 or by checking boxes, with 1 being the lowest score and 4 being the highest.

    Original Title

    Compositionl Rubric Form

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document appears to be a jury form for evaluating student compositions. It contains categories for assessing musical skills like orchestration, melodic interest, contrapuntal interest, form, rhythmic interest, and originality. Each category includes descriptors to evaluate elements in two student compositions on a scale from 1 to 4 or by checking boxes, with 1 being the lowest score and 4 being the highest.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    17 views2 pages

    Jury Form: Student Name: - Date: Composition1: - Composition 2: - Category 1 2 3 4

    Uploaded by

    amy.dunker7402
    This document appears to be a jury form for evaluating student compositions. It contains categories for assessing musical skills like orchestration, melodic interest, contrapuntal interest, form, rhythmic interest, and originality. Each category includes descriptors to evaluate elements in two student compositions on a scale from 1 to 4 or by checking boxes, with 1 being the lowest score and 4 being the highest.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Student Name: Composition1: Composition 2:

    __________________________________________ _

    Composition Performance

    Jury Form
    _____________________________________________ _______________________ ___________________________________________ _______
    1
    Orchestration often impractical or has problems.

    Date:

    CATEGORY A. Musical Learning and Skills: Orchestration

    2
    Occasional impractical instrumentation or problems

    3
    Instrumentation is correct, but uninteresting. Piece 1_______ ________ Piece 2

    4
    Instrumentation is correct and result is interesting and satisfying Piece 1_______ Piece 2 _____ Melody is compelling and shape is excellent. .

    Melodic Interest

    Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Melody has little interest, no clear and compelling shape

    Piece 1_______

    Piece 2________

    Melody has interest, but shape is weak

    Melody has interest and strong shape

    Piece 1_______ ________

    Piece 2 Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Limited use of contrapuntal elements Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Contrapuntal elements are clear, but distracting or awkward . Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Form is clear and interesting, transitional elements apparent

    Piece 1_______ ______

    Piece 2

    Contrapuntal Interest

    There are no contrapuntal elements. Piece is largely homophonic.

    Contrapuntal elements are clear and well integrated into the work

    Form

    Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Form is unclear or highly repetitive, lack of genuine transitional elements

    Piece 1_______

    Piece 2 ________

    Basic approach to form evident, but transitional elements unclear

    Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ______ Form is clear and interesting, transitional elements are interesting and compelling Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ______ Excellent use of rhythmic variation throughout Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ______ Work exhibits originality of ideas Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ______

    Rhythmic Interest

    Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Some attempts at altering ryhthms but with limited effect Piece 1_______ ________ Piece 2

    Piece 1_______

    Piece 2 ________

    Some successful attempts at basic rhythmic variation though limited in scope & range. Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Work exhibits derivative elements as well as original ideas Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________

    Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Good use of rhythmic variation throughout. Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________ Work exhibits derivative elements, but are used in new ways Piece 1_______ Piece 2 ________

    Originality

    Piece is derivative of works by other composers Piece 1_______ ________ Piece 2

    Comments:

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy