The Alaska Satellite Facility

NEWS & NOTES Spring 2004, Volume 1:2

GhostNet — Searching the Oceans for Dangerous Debris

Last summer a collaboration of Ghost- Radiometer (MODIS), NOAA Coast- every six hours from the National
Net researchers from government, Watch Advanced Very High Resolu- Centers for Environmental Prediction
academia, and private industry con- tion Radiometer (AVHRR), and and the NOAA Data Buoy Center.
ducted an aerial survey that reached NOAA Geostationary Operational En- Staff at the Alaska Satellite Facility
from Astoria, OR, to Cold Bay, AK. vironmental Satellite (GOES), provide support through acquisition
The survey aircraft was instrumented • NASA MODIS chlorophyll imagery, planning, image processing and con-
with a collection of visible, IR and • Canadian Space Agency Radarsat-1 sulting for SAR image interpretation.
LIDAR sensors used to locate actual synthetic aperture radar (SAR) im- Last summer’s GhostNet participants
debris in the ocean. agery and derived ship positions and identified likely areas of debris accu-
GhostNet is a three-year, NASA- high-resolution SAR wind images, mulation by searching for convergent
funded research project designed to • NASA SeaWinds QuikSCAT scat- processes in the ocean using circulation
demonstrate the feasibility of identify- terometer wind data and derived models and analyses of scatterometer
ing derelict fishing nets and other an- wind stress curl, wind data.
thropogenic marine debris using data • NASA TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter Next they observed likely regions
from satellite remote sensing, airborne data processed into sea surface with multi-platform satellite imagery to
and in situ buoy measurements. height anomaly information, pinpoint convergence zones.
The GhostNet project arose from a • data from a MicroSas Optical Finally, the group made the aerial
need to locate lost or abandoned fish- Sensor – OCR-507, survey to verify the location of conver-
ing gear, especially high-seas drift nets, • images from a green-laser (352 nm) gence zones and locate actual debris.
which pose a threat to all fish species LIDAR with a gated camera, The researchers discovered logs, fish-
inhabiting near-surface waters. Sea • video from a visible RGB camera, ing debris, and other foreign materials,
birds, sea turtles and marine mammals • images from an infrared imager, which had become preferentially con-
also risk entanglement in derelict nets. • sea surface temperatures from an centrated in the areas of convergence in-
When these nets drift into coral reef infrared radiometer, and dicated by analysis of the data. ◆
environments, they cause physical • moored and drifting buoy reports by Jeremy Nicoll and Bill Pichel
damage to the reefs and continue to en-
tangle and kill animals inhabiting the
reef’s ecosystem.
Collaborators designed the GhostNet
project to locate derelict nets and other
hazardous debris in the open ocean
before they encounter reefs or wash
ashore and do further damage. Regions
of interest for GhostNet include the
southeastern Bering Sea; the Gulf of
Alaska; and the Subtropical Conver-
gence Zone (STCZ) associated with the
North Pacific subtropical high.
GhostNet researchers use a geo-
graphic information system to integrate
a collection of satellite, aircraft, buoy, and
static (i.e., bathymetry and coastline)
data to identify potential sites where
hazardous debris may be concentrated.
A combined suite of datasets used © CSA 2003
in the GhostNet project includes:
• SST images from NASA Moderate This Radarsat-1 SAR image, acquired July 18, was used in conjuction with MODIS Chlorophyll and NOAA-16
Resolution Imaging Spectro- AVHRR imagery to pinpoint the eddy (circled in the image above) in the ocean northwest of Vancouver Island.
The Reflector Array Maintained in Delta Junction, Alaska
ASF has maintained an array of tri-hedral reflectors in
the fields at Delta Junction since 1991 to aid in calibration
and ground truth evaluation of several international
environmental satellites. These reflectors provide a known
radiometric return to measure the strength of the satellite
signal.
Reflector positions are well known, so they are useful
for measuring geographical accuracy and geometric
distortions. When used this way, the reflectors help tie the
satellite images from space to earth.
Many of the reflectors are mounted on ring bases, which
allows easy and accurate orientation toward the origin of
any satellite signal.
The trihedral shape of the reflectors causes a triple
bounce of the incident rays of the radar beam, which makes
them all appear to reflect from the apex no matter where
they impinge upon the reflector panel. A third generation corner reflector, deployed in Delta
Junction, is shown above.
In other words, the distance between the satellite and all
points on the reflector appear to be the same.
A corner reflector returns forward scatter rather than the
typical backscatter; it actually turns the incident beams back
on a parallel path to the satellite.
This allows for a brighter return because it simu-
lates a longer illumination time than the single point
would normally have.
This brighter return allows calibration engi-
neers to easily identify the reflector in an image
and perform impulse response measurements,
such as resolution, peak-to-side-lobe ratio, and
radar cross section, which would usually be lost in
the clutter of a normal target.
These measurements help determine the
optimal processing options for a given application. ➞
ASF calibration engineers used the Delta
reflector array to assist with calibrating two
European Remote Sensing satellites (ERS-1 and
ERS-2), the Japanese Earth Resource Satellite
(JERS-1), and multiple beam modes of the
Canadian Radarsat-1 (R-1) satellite.
The reflectors are useful to monitor long-term
stability of the satellites and provide ground
control points for producing Alaska digital
elevation maps.
ASF is exploring the idea of allowing its users
to utilize this array of corner reflectors for
optimizing their own geolocation or image focus-
ing algorithms. © CSA 1996
Interested parties should contact ASF User
Services to discuss possible collaboration with One of the corner reflectors is pointed out in the SAR image above, with an
ASF’s calibration team on using the corner impulse response of a typical corner reflector super imposed in the upper right.
reflectors. ◆

by Phil Utley and Wade Albright

Software Tool Suite Updated
The Alaska Satellite Facility is updating its download- applied to all SAR tools yet; it will be done incremen-
able suite of software tools used for SAR data manipula- tally over the next two software releases.
tion. New versions of the tools can be accessed using a • Software documentation: ASF now provides up to five
standard internet browser through an http download. software documentation outlets for the SAR tools. A
Executable binaries for Sun SOLARIS and Silicon UNIX man(ual) page is available at the command line
Graph-ics IRIX operating system environments are now after tool installation, and a more verbose version is
available. Source code (ANSI C) is also available, de- published at ASF’s website in HTML/XML and Adobe
pendent upon tool-specific distribution guidelines im- PDF formats.
posed by ASF’s parent institution, the University of Alaska Executable versions of most SAR tools offer brief
Fairbanks, and various U.S. federal agencies. usage guidance from the UNIX command line by typing
To access source code or U.S. Department of Com- the tool name followed by no arguments. In select cases,
merce export-restricted tools, users must submit online such as with sarview, documentation is provided through
forms or print and fax forms, and use a download pass- a GUI pull-down menu.
word. Users with an approval form already on file at ASF In addition, the ASF SAR Tools Software Manual
User Services are asked to update their contact and insti- 2003 is available in Adobe PDF format from the website.
tutional affiliation information. The manual contains usage, algorithm (equation), and
• Departure from binary-encoded metadata: Within the dependency information for every tool. Contact informa-
SAR tools domain, ASF has eliminated the Data Descrip- tion for each tool has been replaced with the ASF User
tor Record (.ddr) file. Services email address (uso@asf.alaska.edu; or see
Instead, ASF’s proprietary metadata file definition http://www.asf.alaska.edu/).
has been expanded. This affects every tool and the asso- • Intellectual property considerations: Source code de-
ciated metadata generating/parsing functionality has been veloped by ASF will be distributed either by the Berke-
encoded into the updated ASF metadata ANSI C library. ley Standard Distribution (BSD) model or by collabora-
The expanded .meta file is ASCII encoded, which enables tive agreement. Previous references to GPL (GNU Pub-
metadata keyword value viewing or editing with any text lic License) have been removed from all source code.
editor—an improvement over the binary-encoded ap-
proach associated with the .ddr file. Complementary con- • Internet bulletin board support forum: Loosely
version utilities meta2ddr and ddr2meta are now associated with the February 2004 release is the intro-
available in the event files manipulated using previous duction of a newly created electronic bulletin board
versions of SAR tools need to be utilized by any of the resource for SAR tools software support (see
newly released software. https://forum.asf.alaska.edu/). Following a test drive by
the ASF User Working Group, the forum is open to the
• Byte addressing standards: Transferring data files be-
user community. (See the story in this newsletter.)
tween computing environments can introduce compatibil-
ity problems due to byte addressing standards. • SAR tools problem reports: Since the 2002 SAR tools
‘Big-endian’ refers to computing environments in release, a number of known/reported coding errors have
which multi-byte quantities (e.g., long, float, or double data been repaired in a number of tools. Where such fixes have
types) are addressed by pointing to their most significant successfully graduated from testing, the repaired version of
byte. This applies to data stored in computer memory and the tool has been included in the February 2004 release.
in files. The remaining repairs (i.e., the backlog) are being
For example, a generic binary image data file cre- performed in priority order based upon customer demand
ated on your UNIX system may not be directly imported and resource availability.
into a PC-based version of ArcGIS without considering Let ASF know what’s critical to your SAR-
the byte order. The dependency is understood to be dependent projects.
CPU-based and not operating system dependent. • Future software tool development: The professional
ASF SAR tools and the data they manipulate ad- staff at ASF are committed to making SAR data more
here to the IEEE ‘big-endian’ standard. Because the .ddr accessible. Efforts are underway to bring the entire suite
metadata file has been eliminated, the ‘endian-ness’ check- of tools to the LINUX computing platform. In addition,
ing function has been relocated. When an executable ver- we are in the process of bundling multiple tools that are
sion of a SAR tool is created from source code, the config commonly used in succession into user-friendly versions.
tool determines the architecture of the host computer. This The Alaska Satellite Facility values guidance from
system value (representing ‘endian’ order) gets stored in its customers, so please take a moment to provide input
the metadata file. the next time you see us at a NASA Earth Sciences booth
The byte order swapping function, when required, or when a survey comes across your desk. ◆
is now added to each tool via the ioline.c function of by Rory O’Neill
the asf.a ANSI C library. Byte swapping has not been
 their ASF data products. Users can sections addressing the most
ASF Opens New post and answer questions relat- common issues encountered by
ing to such topics as software tool users.
Forum Online installation, software tool use, and
data product specifications; as
ASF invites everyone to take
advantage of this new service,
ASF has unveiled a new open fo- well as feedback about integrat- hoping you will contribute gener-
rum service. The user community ing ASF data and non-ASF soft- ously of your knowledge and expe-
and ASF staff can now interact ware. rience from incorporating SAR data
with each other online about tech- In the Discussion forum, users into your research and operations.
nical topics related to ASF data, are encouraged to submit more Registration is required prior to
ASF software tools, SAR applica- generalized topics associated with posting information to the forum,
tions and other issues. The forum ASF and remote sensing, e.g., SAR and instructions are found under
features two posting areas—Sup- theory, SAR applications, future the registration icon on the main
port and Discussion. missions, or even Alaska trivia! As page. The URL for the site is
The Support forum brings to- the knowledge base held in the fo- https://forum.asf.alaska.edu/. ◆
gether questions and answers, rum grows, the frequently asked
questions (FAQ) area will include by Chris Wyatt
helping users get the most out of

News & Notes The ASF User Working Group Radarsat-1

Subscription Information 2004 Cycle Reminders
ASF is one of NASA’s eight Distributed Ac-
The Alaska Satellite Facility News & tive Archive Centers (DAACs). Each DAAC Cycle 127: March 15 - April 8
Notes newsletter was created for ASF has an advisory group consisting of data users
data users to contain detailed informa- who meet regularly to assess the products and Cycle 128: April 8 - May 2
tion about special projects and notewor- services offered by that DAAC.
The ASF User Working Group (UWG) Cycle 129: May 2 - May 26
thy developments at ASF, as well as sci-
ence articles that highlight the utiliza- met at ASF in Fairbanks on Nov. 19-20, 2003, Cycle 130: May 26 - June 19
tion of ASF data. where the management team presented a
Principle investigators of approved review of ASF activities over the past year, Cycle 131: June 19 - July 13
ASF projects will automatically be as well as plans for the future.
mailed a copy of this newsletter. Any- The UWG assessment resulting from this Plan ahead!
one else interested in receiving the News meeting was very positive, and the group
& Notes can contact ASF User Services made several recommendations for improv- New data acquisition requests (DARs)
via email (uso@asf.alaska.edu) to sub- ing ASF’s products and services. for Radarsat-1 should be submitted nine
scribe. Be sure to include your name and Comments from data users on any to ten weeks in advance of the acquisi-
mailing address in the request. aspect of ASF operations are welcome. tion start date. Meeting this deadline im-
On occasion, articles submitted by Notes from UWG meetings and contact in- proves the scheduling success rate at
ASF data users will be published in this formation are posted on their website: CSA.
newsletter. If you are interested in con- psc.apl.washington.edu/ASFUWG.
New ERS-2 DARs should be submit-
tributing materials for the News & * * * ted a minimum of six to seven weeks
Notes, please contact User Services at ASF encourages everyone to contact the User prior to the desired start date.
the email address listed above. Services Office with questions and comments
about our products and services.