SCR 974
SCR 974
(Table 1, Figure 1). Both the layers of gel 7. Chauhan, S., M Sc thesis, Indian Agri-
prepared in Sisco agar showed poorly cultural Research Institute, New Delhi,
visible halo zones, while with Qualigens, 1984, p. 148.
8. Chauhan, S. and Gaur, Y. D., in Current
the halo zone was of moderate intensity.
Status of Biological Nitrogen Fixation
Similar type of results were observed
(eds Singh, R., Nanawatee H. S. and
when different media varying in compo- Sawhney S. K.), HAU, Hissar, 1986,
sition, particularly in carbon sources pp. 136–137.
were used. A well-like halo zone under 9. Gaur, Y. D., in Nitrogen: Soil, Physiology,
the spot, which was clearer after Biochemistry, Microbiology, Genetics
removing the growth with cotton swab, (eds Abrol, Y. P., Tilak, K. V. B. R.,
was considered as positive antagonism. Kumar, S. and Katyal, J. C.), INSA, New
The examination of 38 strains as test Delhi,1993, pp. 173–198.
strains against 15 non-bacteriocin pro- 10. Nirmala, J., Ph D thesis, Indian Agricul-
tural Research Institute, New Delhi, 1999,
ducing sensitive strains on YEDXA, made
p. 262.
with a mixture of Qualigens and Difco 11. Bergersen, F. J., Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 1961,
agars, showed 23 strains producing clearly 14, 349–360.
visible inhibitory halo zones. These 23 12. Vincent, J. M., in A Manual for the
strains showed an inhibitory spectrum Practical Study of Root Nodule Bacteria,
identical to that obtained with deferred Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford,
antagonism procedure. 1970, p. 164.
Based on this modified simple method, 13. Subba Rao, N. S., in Interaction of
8648 transconjugants could successfully Nitrogen-Fixing Microorganism (ed. Subba
Rao, N. S.), Oxford & IBH, New Delhi,
be screened to identify three bacteriocin-
1984, pp. 37–64.
defective mutants10.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. N.J. thanks Indian
1. Mayr-Harting, A., Hedges, A. J. and Council of Agricultural Research for the
Berkelay, R. C. W., in Methods in Micro- senior fellowship.
biology (eds Norris, J. R. and Ribbons,
Figure 1. Production of inhibition zone by D. W.), Academic Press Inc, New York, Received 10 November 1999; revised accep-
the antagonistic strains of Cicer–Rhizobium 1972, pp. 315–472. ted 20 June 2000
against the sensitive strain PR2005b (center: 2. Tagg, J. R., Dajani, A. and Wannamaker,
2005b, from ↑ clockwise: PR2303, PR2042c, L. W., Bacteriol. Rev., 1976, 40, 722–
PR2015b and PR2109a). a, Growth; b, Halo 756.
zone seen after removal of growth. J. NIRMALA
3. Schwinghamer, E. A. and Brockwell, J., Y. D. GAUR*
Soil Biol. Biochem., 1978, 10, 383–387.
4. Lotz, W. and Mayer, F., J. Virol., 1972,
observed. It was found that when the Division of Microbiology,
9, 160–173.
bottom layer of YEDXA contained 0.5% 5. Gissman, L. and Lotz, W., J. Gen. Virol., Indian Agricultural Research Institute,
Qualigens and 1.5% Difco agar, and the 1975, 27, 379–383. New Delhi 110 012, India
top layer contained 0.5% of each of these 6. Kekessy, D. A. and Piguet, J. D., Appl. *For correspondence.
two agars, the halo zone was most sharp Microbiol., 1970, 20, 282–283. e–mail: ydg_mbio@iari.ernet.in