Organizational Behaviour Case Study

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Organizational behaviour

Case 2 US Meltdown
1. Is it fine to privatize profits and nationalize losses, is it right for organisational
development?
As the United States Of America had to suffer sub-prime crisis during 2007-2008. Many
home-owners defaulted in their payments causing Freddie and Fannie to suffer multi-billion
dollar losses. The share prices tumbled by more than 90% and the investors around the
world felt that these two firms might not be able to live upto the guarantees which they
have to provide to the public. It is somehow justified to Privatize profits and nationalize
losses as the major companies(Freddie and Fannie) which required bailouts were US federal
government entities and their guarantee was backed up by the federal government and in
case of crisis the US government backed it with a gurarantee. Therefore the mortgage was a
very safe option for the public. It is somehow argued that to privatize profits and nationalize
losses is not good for the Organisational Development of the companies as this might set up
a bad example for the future. It encourages weak leadership and poor management. The
organisations should access the risk associated with their functioning and should adopt a
proactive approach to counter such problems. The assured government bailout would affect
the organisational working which would otherwise have been different.
2. Was this a result of failure of leadership of these firms ?
The downfall of such huge companies is not just a failure of the financial system, but also a
huge leadership failure. Excessive interest in personal financial goals as against the larger
interest of the organization is one of the root cause of this meltdown. These days some
managers are not that efficient and rely on reward and incentives. They believe that if they
hire smart people, give huge incentives for personal results, the management of the firm
would take care of itself. Under such circumstances, taking risks to achieve personal goals
even if that puts others or organization in danger seems acceptable. These particular
leadership failures have been a major cause of this full-scale meltdown of US financial
sector.
Based on the above discussion, it can be judged that the scenario of financial sector is grim.
Such crisis situations do require some desperate measures as has been taken by the federal
government. It also provides us a retrospective view to analyze what went wrong and avoid
such failures in the future. So though the melt-down is surely for real, it's by tackling it
properly that the financial sector can come up with greater strengths in the future

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy