Jerusalem in Bible
Jerusalem in Bible
Jerusalem in Bible
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Biblical World.
http://www.jstor.org
328
2. The pre-exllicprophetsfrequently
speakof Zionas in a peculiar
sensethe abodeof Yahweh. This showsthat it was the hill upon
which the Temple stood. Thus, Amos I:2? "Yahwehshall roar
fromZion;"Isa 2:3, "Manypeopleshallcomeup to themouxltain
of Yahweh,to thewhouse
of the Godof Jacob. . . o for out of Zion
shallgo forthinstruction;"
Isa. 4:5J"Andthe Lordwill createolrer
thewholehabitationof MountZion,andoverherassemblies,
a cloud
andsmokeby day;"8: I8," Yahwehof hostsdwellethin MountZion;2'
s
s
-
*|6
SOUTHWEST HILTHE
TRADIT10NAL ZION
329
offerings;" 7:
33o
32,
Andtherefell onNicanor's
side aboutfive hundred
33I
disposeof thesestatements
is to assertthatFirstMaccabeesis in error
in its identification.Thus,Mommert(Vol.I, p. I79) remarks:"In
the secondcenturybeforeChristin MaccabeesZionappearsfor a
shorttimeas a designationof the sanctuary."As a matterof fact,
Zionhas neverappearedas anythingelse thana designation
of the
sanctuaryfromthe earliesttimesonward. This identification
is not
peculiarto Maccabeesamongthe books of the Apocrypha,
but is
found also in Ecclus. 24:Io, "In the holytabernacleI ministered
beforehim; and so was I establishedin Zion;"I Esdr.8:8I, "He
glorifiedthe templeof ourLord,andraisedup the desolateZion."
8. Josephus
neverusesthenameZion,butin Ant.i, I3: 2; Vii. 4 : 2;
I3:4, he statesthat David'stentfor the arkwaspitchedon the same
mountainonwhichSolomon'sTemplewasafterward
built. Dand's
tentfor the ark,accordingto II Sam.6: I2, wasplacedin the Cityof
David on MountZion; consequently
Josephusalso seemsto have
held that Zion was the Templehill. We find thus an unbroken
traditionidentifyingZionwiththe easternhill fromthe earliesttimes
downto aboutIOO A. D.
The only objectiorlto this view is that in manypassagesof the
OldTestamentZionis putintoparallelism
withJerusalem. This, it
is claimed,showsthatZionwasa nameforthewholecity,andthereforeforbidsourbasinganyconclusions
uponits connection
withthe
Temple. This parallelismof Zion and Jerusalemis foundin the
pre-exilicprophets(cf. AmosI :2; Mic. 4: 2L=Isa.2:3j; Isa. 4:3 f.;
o:32; 3I :4 f.,9; 33:20;37:22,32[ =II KingsIg:2I,3I]; Mic.3:Io!
I2 [ =Jer.26:I8]; 4:8; Zeph.3:I4, I6). It is foundmorefrequently
in
the exilicandpost-exilicliterature(cf. Jer.5I:35; Lam.I: I7; 2:IO,
I3; 4:II f.; Isa.40:9; 4I:27; 52:I f.; 62:I; 64:Io; Zech.I:I7; 8:3;
9:9; Joel 3:I6 f.; Ps. 5I:I8; 76:2; Io2:I6, 2I; I28:5; I47:I2;
I35:2I; Ecclus.24:IO f.). In a numberof passagesZionanddaughter Zionareusedas namesfor the wholeof Jerusalem(cf. Isa. I: 27;
Io:24; 29:8; 33:5, I4; Mic. I:I3; 4:Io f; 4:I3; Jer 3:I4; 4:6,
3I; 6:2, 23; 9:I9; 30:I7; Lam.I:6, I7; 2:I, 4, 8, I8; 4:22; 5:II,
I8; Isa. I2:6; 49:I4; 5I:3, II, I6; 6I:3; 62:II; 66:8; Zech.2:7;
Joel 2:23; Isa 35:Io; Ps. 9 I4; 87:5; Io2:I3, I6; I26:I; I29:5).
It shouldbe notedthatall thesepassagesin whichZionis putinto
parallelismwith Jerusalem,or in whichit is describedas if it were
332
the whole city, are poetical. There is not one instance in prose in
which Zion is identifiedwith Jerusalem. Zion is E>arallel
to Judahor
Israel in a numberof passages (cf. Jer. I4:I9;
Lam. 5:II; Isa. 46:
I3; ZeCh,9:I3;
PST48
II,I2;69:35;78:68;97:8;I49:2).
It would
not be safe to infer from these that Zion is literallysynonymouswith
all of Judah or Israel. It is equally unsafe to infer from poetic
parallelismthat Zion is literallysynonymouswith Jerusalem. When
we considerthat in the great majorityof passages Zion is connected
with the Temple or with somethingon the eastem hill, and that in
not one passageis it connectedwith the westernhill, the easiest way
to explain the Old Testament usage is to assume that Zion was
originallya name for the eastem hill, but that its associationwith the
Temple made it suitable as a poetic designation of Jerusalem or
Judah viewed as a religious community. When, therefore, it is
placed in parallelismwith Jerusalemor Judah, it does not indicate
that it had an actualgeographicalextensionto the westemhill. This
is a more naturalhvpothesisthan the one which assumes that Zion
was originallythe name of the western hill, was then extended to
the whole citv, and was finallylimited again to the Temple mount.
II. OpheZ. The hill of Ophel is first mentioned in Mic. 4:8,
where it is describedas " Ophel of daughterZion." Since Zion has
been found to lie on the eastem hill, this implies that Ophel was on
the same ridge. Neh. 3:26 states that " the Nethinimdweltin Ophel
unto the place over against the Water Gate towardthe east." The
Water Gate opened upon the path which led down from the eastem
hill to the spring of Gihon; consequentlyOphel was situatedin the
middle of the easternhill. The same locationis assignedto it by the
statements of Neh. 3:27 and II:2I.
II Chron. 27:3 mentions the
wall of Ophel in connectionwith the upper gate of the house of the
Lord. II Chron.33:I4 connectsthe compassingaboutof Ophelw]th
the buildingof an outer wall to the City of David on the west side of
Gihon. Josephus,in Wars, v, 4:2, says that the eastem wall of the
city ran from Siloam to the Temple and joined the easterncloisterat
a place called Ophel. Wars,v, 6: I, connectsOphelwith the Temple
and the Valley of Kidron(cf. n, 6: 3). Fromthesepassagesit is clear
that Ophel must have lain on the eastem hill immediatelysouthof the
Temple.
333